The Impact of Raters' Cognition on Judgment Accuracy: An Extension to the Job Analysis Domain
Eighty-six incumbents of three different jobs produced job-analytic ratings using either a decomposed (task-based) or a holistic (job-based) rating strategy. Approximately half of them received rater training in making inferential decisions. When tasks were less complex than the job as a whole, rati...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of business and psychology 1994-09, Vol.9 (1), p.47-57 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 57 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 47 |
| container_title | Journal of business and psychology |
| container_volume | 9 |
| creator | Sanchez, Juan I. Levine, Edward L. |
| description | Eighty-six incumbents of three different jobs produced job-analytic ratings using either a decomposed (task-based) or a holistic (job-based) rating strategy. Approximately half of them received rater training in making inferential decisions. When tasks were less complex than the job as a whole, rating decomposition generally had positive effects on ratings' quality. Similarly, when the number of tasks rated was low to moderate, rater training was effective. A contingency approach, where limitations concerning the use of rating decomposition and inferential training were outlined, should serve to inform future uses and theories of rating aids in job analysis. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF02230986 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1308779639</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25092451</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25092451</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-dafa58b237baf793be7f8286c1c64353ded01fe7202d51d0bc92f37d9cb281383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEFLAzEQhYMoWKsX70LAgyCsTpLuJvFWa6stBUEqeJElm03qlnZTkyzYf2-kojDwYPjm8eYhdE7ghgDw2_sJUMpAiuIA9UjOWcZy9naIeiCEzBgtxDE6CWEFADkpoIfeFx8GTzdbpSN2Fr-oaHy4wiO3bJvYuBanmXX1cmPaiIdad17p3R0etnj8FU0bfpDocEwuM1elvVrvQhPwg9uopj1FR1atgzn71T56nYwXo6ds_vw4HQ3nmaaCxKxWVuWiooxXynLJKsOtoKLQRBeD9EBtaiDWcAq0zkkNlZbUMl5LXaV7JlgfXe59t959dibEcuU6n7KEkjAQnMuCyURd7yntXQje2HLrm43yu5JA-VNf-V9fgi_28CpE5_9ImoOkg5ywb_JsamM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1308779639</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Impact of Raters' Cognition on Judgment Accuracy: An Extension to the Job Analysis Domain</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Sanchez, Juan I. ; Levine, Edward L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sanchez, Juan I. ; Levine, Edward L.</creatorcontrib><description>Eighty-six incumbents of three different jobs produced job-analytic ratings using either a decomposed (task-based) or a holistic (job-based) rating strategy. Approximately half of them received rater training in making inferential decisions. When tasks were less complex than the job as a whole, rating decomposition generally had positive effects on ratings' quality. Similarly, when the number of tasks rated was low to moderate, rater training was effective. A contingency approach, where limitations concerning the use of rating decomposition and inferential training were outlined, should serve to inform future uses and theories of rating aids in job analysis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0889-3268</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-353X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF02230986</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, N.Y: Human Sciences Press, Inc</publisher><subject>Cognition ; Fire fighting ; Heuristics ; Incumbents ; Job analysis ; Job training ; Judgment ; Police ; Police training ; Training</subject><ispartof>Journal of business and psychology, 1994-09, Vol.9 (1), p.47-57</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1994 Human Sciences Press, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-dafa58b237baf793be7f8286c1c64353ded01fe7202d51d0bc92f37d9cb281383</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-dafa58b237baf793be7f8286c1c64353ded01fe7202d51d0bc92f37d9cb281383</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25092451$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25092451$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27868,27923,27924,58016,58249</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sanchez, Juan I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levine, Edward L.</creatorcontrib><title>The Impact of Raters' Cognition on Judgment Accuracy: An Extension to the Job Analysis Domain</title><title>Journal of business and psychology</title><description>Eighty-six incumbents of three different jobs produced job-analytic ratings using either a decomposed (task-based) or a holistic (job-based) rating strategy. Approximately half of them received rater training in making inferential decisions. When tasks were less complex than the job as a whole, rating decomposition generally had positive effects on ratings' quality. Similarly, when the number of tasks rated was low to moderate, rater training was effective. A contingency approach, where limitations concerning the use of rating decomposition and inferential training were outlined, should serve to inform future uses and theories of rating aids in job analysis.</description><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Fire fighting</subject><subject>Heuristics</subject><subject>Incumbents</subject><subject>Job analysis</subject><subject>Job training</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Police</subject><subject>Police training</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>0889-3268</issn><issn>1573-353X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkEFLAzEQhYMoWKsX70LAgyCsTpLuJvFWa6stBUEqeJElm03qlnZTkyzYf2-kojDwYPjm8eYhdE7ghgDw2_sJUMpAiuIA9UjOWcZy9naIeiCEzBgtxDE6CWEFADkpoIfeFx8GTzdbpSN2Fr-oaHy4wiO3bJvYuBanmXX1cmPaiIdad17p3R0etnj8FU0bfpDocEwuM1elvVrvQhPwg9uopj1FR1atgzn71T56nYwXo6ds_vw4HQ3nmaaCxKxWVuWiooxXynLJKsOtoKLQRBeD9EBtaiDWcAq0zkkNlZbUMl5LXaV7JlgfXe59t959dibEcuU6n7KEkjAQnMuCyURd7yntXQje2HLrm43yu5JA-VNf-V9fgi_28CpE5_9ImoOkg5ywb_JsamM</recordid><startdate>19940901</startdate><enddate>19940901</enddate><creator>Sanchez, Juan I.</creator><creator>Levine, Edward L.</creator><general>Human Sciences Press, Inc</general><general>Human Sciences Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JWXEY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19940901</creationdate><title>The Impact of Raters' Cognition on Judgment Accuracy: An Extension to the Job Analysis Domain</title><author>Sanchez, Juan I. ; Levine, Edward L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-dafa58b237baf793be7f8286c1c64353ded01fe7202d51d0bc92f37d9cb281383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Fire fighting</topic><topic>Heuristics</topic><topic>Incumbents</topic><topic>Job analysis</topic><topic>Job training</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Police</topic><topic>Police training</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sanchez, Juan I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levine, Edward L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 39</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Journal of business and psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sanchez, Juan I.</au><au>Levine, Edward L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Impact of Raters' Cognition on Judgment Accuracy: An Extension to the Job Analysis Domain</atitle><jtitle>Journal of business and psychology</jtitle><date>1994-09-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>47</spage><epage>57</epage><pages>47-57</pages><issn>0889-3268</issn><eissn>1573-353X</eissn><abstract>Eighty-six incumbents of three different jobs produced job-analytic ratings using either a decomposed (task-based) or a holistic (job-based) rating strategy. Approximately half of them received rater training in making inferential decisions. When tasks were less complex than the job as a whole, rating decomposition generally had positive effects on ratings' quality. Similarly, when the number of tasks rated was low to moderate, rater training was effective. A contingency approach, where limitations concerning the use of rating decomposition and inferential training were outlined, should serve to inform future uses and theories of rating aids in job analysis.</abstract><cop>New York, N.Y</cop><pub>Human Sciences Press, Inc</pub><doi>10.1007/BF02230986</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0889-3268 |
| ispartof | Journal of business and psychology, 1994-09, Vol.9 (1), p.47-57 |
| issn | 0889-3268 1573-353X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1308779639 |
| source | Business Source Complete; Periodicals Index Online; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Cognition Fire fighting Heuristics Incumbents Job analysis Job training Judgment Police Police training Training |
| title | The Impact of Raters' Cognition on Judgment Accuracy: An Extension to the Job Analysis Domain |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T01%3A11%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Impact%20of%20Raters'%20Cognition%20on%20Judgment%20Accuracy:%20An%20Extension%20to%20the%20Job%20Analysis%20Domain&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20business%20and%20psychology&rft.au=Sanchez,%20Juan%20I.&rft.date=1994-09-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=47&rft.epage=57&rft.pages=47-57&rft.issn=0889-3268&rft.eissn=1573-353X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF02230986&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E25092451%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1308779639&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=25092451&rfr_iscdi=true |