Divergent selection for geotactic response and evolution of reproductive isolation in sympatric and allopatric populations of houseflies

Experimental populations of houseflies subjected to 95% selective pressure for geotactic preference under conditions of 50% potential gene flow and of allopatry evolved reproductive isolation after only 16 generations. No significant difference was found between sympatric and allopatric populations....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American naturalist 1975-05, Vol.109 (967), p.353-358
Hauptverfasser: Hurd, L.E, Eisenberg, R.M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 358
container_issue 967
container_start_page 353
container_title The American naturalist
container_volume 109
creator Hurd, L.E
Eisenberg, R.M
description Experimental populations of houseflies subjected to 95% selective pressure for geotactic preference under conditions of 50% potential gene flow and of allopatry evolved reproductive isolation after only 16 generations. No significant difference was found between sympatric and allopatric populations. Our study does not support the hypothesis that incipient reproductive isolation occurs more rapidly under conditions of sympatry than allopatry.
doi_str_mv 10.1086/283002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1308335703</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2459699</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2459699</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-ea0d71088fdf6d9f776eba9f2fe2e6910f5dbdedb5ecd4cc69c8d1d2c347b9af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kN1KAzEQhYMoWKs-gWBA8G41P7ubzaX4DwUvtNchTSZ1y3azJruFvoGPbdotXg2H882cmUHokpI7SqrynlWcEHaEJrTgIis448doQgjhGaG5OEVnMa6SlLksJuj3qd5AWELb4wgNmL72LXY-4CX4XidpcIDY-TYC1q3FsPHNsIe8S04XvB0StQFcR9_ovVO3OG7Xne5D6t416abxB9n5bhixuJvw7YcIrqkhnqMTp5sIF4c6RfOX56_Ht2z28fr--DDLDGNln4EmVqQzK2ddaaUTooSFlo45YFBKSlxhFxbsogBjc2NKaSpLLTM8FwupHZ-im3FuWv1ngNirlR9CmyIV5aTivBCEJ-p2pEzwMQZwqgv1WoetokTtvqzGLyfwagRXsffhn2J5IUspk3092k57pZehjmr-yUhKYiKXMuX9AWnshlc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1308335703</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Divergent selection for geotactic response and evolution of reproductive isolation in sympatric and allopatric populations of houseflies</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Hurd, L.E ; Eisenberg, R.M</creator><creatorcontrib>Hurd, L.E ; Eisenberg, R.M</creatorcontrib><description>Experimental populations of houseflies subjected to 95% selective pressure for geotactic preference under conditions of 50% potential gene flow and of allopatry evolved reproductive isolation after only 16 generations. No significant difference was found between sympatric and allopatric populations. Our study does not support the hypothesis that incipient reproductive isolation occurs more rapidly under conditions of sympatry than allopatry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-0147</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/283002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Salem, Mass: University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Divergent evolution ; Evolution ; Flies ; Gene flow ; Geotaxis ; Habitat selection ; Hybridity ; Musca domestica ; Reproductive isolation ; Speciation ; Sympatric species</subject><ispartof>The American naturalist, 1975-05, Vol.109 (967), p.353-358</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1975 The University of Chicago</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-ea0d71088fdf6d9f776eba9f2fe2e6910f5dbdedb5ecd4cc69c8d1d2c347b9af3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2459699$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2459699$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27846,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hurd, L.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisenberg, R.M</creatorcontrib><title>Divergent selection for geotactic response and evolution of reproductive isolation in sympatric and allopatric populations of houseflies</title><title>The American naturalist</title><description>Experimental populations of houseflies subjected to 95% selective pressure for geotactic preference under conditions of 50% potential gene flow and of allopatry evolved reproductive isolation after only 16 generations. No significant difference was found between sympatric and allopatric populations. Our study does not support the hypothesis that incipient reproductive isolation occurs more rapidly under conditions of sympatry than allopatry.</description><subject>Divergent evolution</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Flies</subject><subject>Gene flow</subject><subject>Geotaxis</subject><subject>Habitat selection</subject><subject>Hybridity</subject><subject>Musca domestica</subject><subject>Reproductive isolation</subject><subject>Speciation</subject><subject>Sympatric species</subject><issn>0003-0147</issn><issn>1537-5323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1975</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kN1KAzEQhYMoWKs-gWBA8G41P7ubzaX4DwUvtNchTSZ1y3azJruFvoGPbdotXg2H882cmUHokpI7SqrynlWcEHaEJrTgIis448doQgjhGaG5OEVnMa6SlLksJuj3qd5AWELb4wgNmL72LXY-4CX4XidpcIDY-TYC1q3FsPHNsIe8S04XvB0StQFcR9_ovVO3OG7Xne5D6t416abxB9n5bhixuJvw7YcIrqkhnqMTp5sIF4c6RfOX56_Ht2z28fr--DDLDGNln4EmVqQzK2ddaaUTooSFlo45YFBKSlxhFxbsogBjc2NKaSpLLTM8FwupHZ-im3FuWv1ngNirlR9CmyIV5aTivBCEJ-p2pEzwMQZwqgv1WoetokTtvqzGLyfwagRXsffhn2J5IUspk3092k57pZehjmr-yUhKYiKXMuX9AWnshlc</recordid><startdate>19750501</startdate><enddate>19750501</enddate><creator>Hurd, L.E</creator><creator>Eisenberg, R.M</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ICWRT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19750501</creationdate><title>Divergent selection for geotactic response and evolution of reproductive isolation in sympatric and allopatric populations of houseflies</title><author>Hurd, L.E ; Eisenberg, R.M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-ea0d71088fdf6d9f776eba9f2fe2e6910f5dbdedb5ecd4cc69c8d1d2c347b9af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1975</creationdate><topic>Divergent evolution</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Flies</topic><topic>Gene flow</topic><topic>Geotaxis</topic><topic>Habitat selection</topic><topic>Hybridity</topic><topic>Musca domestica</topic><topic>Reproductive isolation</topic><topic>Speciation</topic><topic>Sympatric species</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hurd, L.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisenberg, R.M</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 28</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>The American naturalist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hurd, L.E</au><au>Eisenberg, R.M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Divergent selection for geotactic response and evolution of reproductive isolation in sympatric and allopatric populations of houseflies</atitle><jtitle>The American naturalist</jtitle><date>1975-05-01</date><risdate>1975</risdate><volume>109</volume><issue>967</issue><spage>353</spage><epage>358</epage><pages>353-358</pages><issn>0003-0147</issn><eissn>1537-5323</eissn><abstract>Experimental populations of houseflies subjected to 95% selective pressure for geotactic preference under conditions of 50% potential gene flow and of allopatry evolved reproductive isolation after only 16 generations. No significant difference was found between sympatric and allopatric populations. Our study does not support the hypothesis that incipient reproductive isolation occurs more rapidly under conditions of sympatry than allopatry.</abstract><cop>Salem, Mass</cop><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/283002</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-0147
ispartof The American naturalist, 1975-05, Vol.109 (967), p.353-358
issn 0003-0147
1537-5323
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1308335703
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Divergent evolution
Evolution
Flies
Gene flow
Geotaxis
Habitat selection
Hybridity
Musca domestica
Reproductive isolation
Speciation
Sympatric species
title Divergent selection for geotactic response and evolution of reproductive isolation in sympatric and allopatric populations of houseflies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T10%3A10%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Divergent%20selection%20for%20geotactic%20response%20and%20evolution%20of%20reproductive%20isolation%20in%20sympatric%20and%20allopatric%20populations%20of%20houseflies&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20naturalist&rft.au=Hurd,%20L.E&rft.date=1975-05-01&rft.volume=109&rft.issue=967&rft.spage=353&rft.epage=358&rft.pages=353-358&rft.issn=0003-0147&rft.eissn=1537-5323&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/283002&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2459699%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1308335703&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2459699&rfr_iscdi=true