Divergent selection for geotactic response and evolution of reproductive isolation in sympatric and allopatric populations of houseflies
Experimental populations of houseflies subjected to 95% selective pressure for geotactic preference under conditions of 50% potential gene flow and of allopatry evolved reproductive isolation after only 16 generations. No significant difference was found between sympatric and allopatric populations....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American naturalist 1975-05, Vol.109 (967), p.353-358 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 358 |
---|---|
container_issue | 967 |
container_start_page | 353 |
container_title | The American naturalist |
container_volume | 109 |
creator | Hurd, L.E Eisenberg, R.M |
description | Experimental populations of houseflies subjected to 95% selective pressure for geotactic preference under conditions of 50% potential gene flow and of allopatry evolved reproductive isolation after only 16 generations. No significant difference was found between sympatric and allopatric populations. Our study does not support the hypothesis that incipient reproductive isolation occurs more rapidly under conditions of sympatry than allopatry. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/283002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1308335703</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2459699</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2459699</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-ea0d71088fdf6d9f776eba9f2fe2e6910f5dbdedb5ecd4cc69c8d1d2c347b9af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kN1KAzEQhYMoWKs-gWBA8G41P7ubzaX4DwUvtNchTSZ1y3azJruFvoGPbdotXg2H882cmUHokpI7SqrynlWcEHaEJrTgIis448doQgjhGaG5OEVnMa6SlLksJuj3qd5AWELb4wgNmL72LXY-4CX4XidpcIDY-TYC1q3FsPHNsIe8S04XvB0StQFcR9_ovVO3OG7Xne5D6t416abxB9n5bhixuJvw7YcIrqkhnqMTp5sIF4c6RfOX56_Ht2z28fr--DDLDGNln4EmVqQzK2ddaaUTooSFlo45YFBKSlxhFxbsogBjc2NKaSpLLTM8FwupHZ-im3FuWv1ngNirlR9CmyIV5aTivBCEJ-p2pEzwMQZwqgv1WoetokTtvqzGLyfwagRXsffhn2J5IUspk3092k57pZehjmr-yUhKYiKXMuX9AWnshlc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1308335703</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Divergent selection for geotactic response and evolution of reproductive isolation in sympatric and allopatric populations of houseflies</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Hurd, L.E ; Eisenberg, R.M</creator><creatorcontrib>Hurd, L.E ; Eisenberg, R.M</creatorcontrib><description>Experimental populations of houseflies subjected to 95% selective pressure for geotactic preference under conditions of 50% potential gene flow and of allopatry evolved reproductive isolation after only 16 generations. No significant difference was found between sympatric and allopatric populations. Our study does not support the hypothesis that incipient reproductive isolation occurs more rapidly under conditions of sympatry than allopatry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-0147</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/283002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Salem, Mass: University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Divergent evolution ; Evolution ; Flies ; Gene flow ; Geotaxis ; Habitat selection ; Hybridity ; Musca domestica ; Reproductive isolation ; Speciation ; Sympatric species</subject><ispartof>The American naturalist, 1975-05, Vol.109 (967), p.353-358</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1975 The University of Chicago</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-ea0d71088fdf6d9f776eba9f2fe2e6910f5dbdedb5ecd4cc69c8d1d2c347b9af3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2459699$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2459699$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27846,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hurd, L.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisenberg, R.M</creatorcontrib><title>Divergent selection for geotactic response and evolution of reproductive isolation in sympatric and allopatric populations of houseflies</title><title>The American naturalist</title><description>Experimental populations of houseflies subjected to 95% selective pressure for geotactic preference under conditions of 50% potential gene flow and of allopatry evolved reproductive isolation after only 16 generations. No significant difference was found between sympatric and allopatric populations. Our study does not support the hypothesis that incipient reproductive isolation occurs more rapidly under conditions of sympatry than allopatry.</description><subject>Divergent evolution</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Flies</subject><subject>Gene flow</subject><subject>Geotaxis</subject><subject>Habitat selection</subject><subject>Hybridity</subject><subject>Musca domestica</subject><subject>Reproductive isolation</subject><subject>Speciation</subject><subject>Sympatric species</subject><issn>0003-0147</issn><issn>1537-5323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1975</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kN1KAzEQhYMoWKs-gWBA8G41P7ubzaX4DwUvtNchTSZ1y3azJruFvoGPbdotXg2H882cmUHokpI7SqrynlWcEHaEJrTgIis448doQgjhGaG5OEVnMa6SlLksJuj3qd5AWELb4wgNmL72LXY-4CX4XidpcIDY-TYC1q3FsPHNsIe8S04XvB0StQFcR9_ovVO3OG7Xne5D6t416abxB9n5bhixuJvw7YcIrqkhnqMTp5sIF4c6RfOX56_Ht2z28fr--DDLDGNln4EmVqQzK2ddaaUTooSFlo45YFBKSlxhFxbsogBjc2NKaSpLLTM8FwupHZ-im3FuWv1ngNirlR9CmyIV5aTivBCEJ-p2pEzwMQZwqgv1WoetokTtvqzGLyfwagRXsffhn2J5IUspk3092k57pZehjmr-yUhKYiKXMuX9AWnshlc</recordid><startdate>19750501</startdate><enddate>19750501</enddate><creator>Hurd, L.E</creator><creator>Eisenberg, R.M</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ICWRT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19750501</creationdate><title>Divergent selection for geotactic response and evolution of reproductive isolation in sympatric and allopatric populations of houseflies</title><author>Hurd, L.E ; Eisenberg, R.M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-ea0d71088fdf6d9f776eba9f2fe2e6910f5dbdedb5ecd4cc69c8d1d2c347b9af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1975</creationdate><topic>Divergent evolution</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Flies</topic><topic>Gene flow</topic><topic>Geotaxis</topic><topic>Habitat selection</topic><topic>Hybridity</topic><topic>Musca domestica</topic><topic>Reproductive isolation</topic><topic>Speciation</topic><topic>Sympatric species</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hurd, L.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisenberg, R.M</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 28</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>The American naturalist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hurd, L.E</au><au>Eisenberg, R.M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Divergent selection for geotactic response and evolution of reproductive isolation in sympatric and allopatric populations of houseflies</atitle><jtitle>The American naturalist</jtitle><date>1975-05-01</date><risdate>1975</risdate><volume>109</volume><issue>967</issue><spage>353</spage><epage>358</epage><pages>353-358</pages><issn>0003-0147</issn><eissn>1537-5323</eissn><abstract>Experimental populations of houseflies subjected to 95% selective pressure for geotactic preference under conditions of 50% potential gene flow and of allopatry evolved reproductive isolation after only 16 generations. No significant difference was found between sympatric and allopatric populations. Our study does not support the hypothesis that incipient reproductive isolation occurs more rapidly under conditions of sympatry than allopatry.</abstract><cop>Salem, Mass</cop><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/283002</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-0147 |
ispartof | The American naturalist, 1975-05, Vol.109 (967), p.353-358 |
issn | 0003-0147 1537-5323 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1308335703 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Periodicals Index Online |
subjects | Divergent evolution Evolution Flies Gene flow Geotaxis Habitat selection Hybridity Musca domestica Reproductive isolation Speciation Sympatric species |
title | Divergent selection for geotactic response and evolution of reproductive isolation in sympatric and allopatric populations of houseflies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T10%3A10%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Divergent%20selection%20for%20geotactic%20response%20and%20evolution%20of%20reproductive%20isolation%20in%20sympatric%20and%20allopatric%20populations%20of%20houseflies&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20naturalist&rft.au=Hurd,%20L.E&rft.date=1975-05-01&rft.volume=109&rft.issue=967&rft.spage=353&rft.epage=358&rft.pages=353-358&rft.issn=0003-0147&rft.eissn=1537-5323&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/283002&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2459699%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1308335703&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2459699&rfr_iscdi=true |