The Possibility of a Prison Sentence Is a Necessity

A policy which would prohibit sentencing of nondangerous offenders to prison is based on the unacceptable premise that prisons are and must continue to be destructive. The Policy would make ineffectual the less punitive sentences such as fines and probation, for the removal of the possible sanction...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Crime and delinquency 1975-10, Vol.21 (4), p.356-359
1. Verfasser: Connolly, Paul K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 359
container_issue 4
container_start_page 356
container_title Crime and delinquency
container_volume 21
creator Connolly, Paul K.
description A policy which would prohibit sentencing of nondangerous offenders to prison is based on the unacceptable premise that prisons are and must continue to be destructive. The Policy would make ineffectual the less punitive sentences such as fines and probation, for the removal of the possible sanction of a prison sentence would also remove, in many instances, the strongest motive to pay the fine or keep the conditions of probation. The policy would polarize the now general attitude of the public that the courts are too lenient. The legislatures in response to the public outcry would enact more mandatory sentencing legislation. Thus the movement to encourage the use of probation and fines would be set back sharply. A prison sentence should be the last alternative considered by the trial judge. But it must be available for use and the defendant must be aware of this availability and the possibility of its use for the protection of society.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/001112877502100407
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1308277611</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_001112877502100407</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1308277611</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-cb3888690308e873832630731f7ea82ae1d782b9a3ed8b6e871cff06495252693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9Lw0AQxRdRMFa_gKeA59iZ3WZ3c5Tin0LRghW8LZt0VlNqUnfTQ759N8SDIM5lYPi9N7zH2DXCLaJSUwBE5FqpHDgCzECdsATznGdCq_dTlgxANhDn7CKELcQRBSZMrD8pXbUh1GW9q7s-bV1q05WvQ9ukr9R01FSULkI8PlNFkev6S3bm7C7Q1c-esLeH-_X8KVu-PC7md8us4lJ2WVUKrbUsQIAmrYQWXApQAp0iq7kl3CjNy8IK2uhSRgQr50DOipznXBZiwm5G371vvw8UOrNtD76JLw1GT66URIwUH6nKxxienNn7-sv63iCYoRzzt5womo6iYD_ol-3_iiO1AmDO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1308277611</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Possibility of a Prison Sentence Is a Necessity</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Connolly, Paul K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Connolly, Paul K.</creatorcontrib><description>A policy which would prohibit sentencing of nondangerous offenders to prison is based on the unacceptable premise that prisons are and must continue to be destructive. The Policy would make ineffectual the less punitive sentences such as fines and probation, for the removal of the possible sanction of a prison sentence would also remove, in many instances, the strongest motive to pay the fine or keep the conditions of probation. The policy would polarize the now general attitude of the public that the courts are too lenient. The legislatures in response to the public outcry would enact more mandatory sentencing legislation. Thus the movement to encourage the use of probation and fines would be set back sharply. A prison sentence should be the last alternative considered by the trial judge. But it must be available for use and the defendant must be aware of this availability and the possibility of its use for the protection of society.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-1287</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-387X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/001112877502100407</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Crime and delinquency, 1975-10, Vol.21 (4), p.356-359</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/001112877502100407$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/001112877502100407$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,21800,27850,27905,27906,43602,43603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Connolly, Paul K.</creatorcontrib><title>The Possibility of a Prison Sentence Is a Necessity</title><title>Crime and delinquency</title><description>A policy which would prohibit sentencing of nondangerous offenders to prison is based on the unacceptable premise that prisons are and must continue to be destructive. The Policy would make ineffectual the less punitive sentences such as fines and probation, for the removal of the possible sanction of a prison sentence would also remove, in many instances, the strongest motive to pay the fine or keep the conditions of probation. The policy would polarize the now general attitude of the public that the courts are too lenient. The legislatures in response to the public outcry would enact more mandatory sentencing legislation. Thus the movement to encourage the use of probation and fines would be set back sharply. A prison sentence should be the last alternative considered by the trial judge. But it must be available for use and the defendant must be aware of this availability and the possibility of its use for the protection of society.</description><issn>0011-1287</issn><issn>1552-387X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1975</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9Lw0AQxRdRMFa_gKeA59iZ3WZ3c5Tin0LRghW8LZt0VlNqUnfTQ759N8SDIM5lYPi9N7zH2DXCLaJSUwBE5FqpHDgCzECdsATznGdCq_dTlgxANhDn7CKELcQRBSZMrD8pXbUh1GW9q7s-bV1q05WvQ9ukr9R01FSULkI8PlNFkev6S3bm7C7Q1c-esLeH-_X8KVu-PC7md8us4lJ2WVUKrbUsQIAmrYQWXApQAp0iq7kl3CjNy8IK2uhSRgQr50DOipznXBZiwm5G371vvw8UOrNtD76JLw1GT66URIwUH6nKxxienNn7-sv63iCYoRzzt5womo6iYD_ol-3_iiO1AmDO</recordid><startdate>197510</startdate><enddate>197510</enddate><creator>Connolly, Paul K.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>National Council on Crime and Delinquency</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197510</creationdate><title>The Possibility of a Prison Sentence Is a Necessity</title><author>Connolly, Paul K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-cb3888690308e873832630731f7ea82ae1d782b9a3ed8b6e871cff06495252693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1975</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Connolly, Paul K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Crime and delinquency</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Connolly, Paul K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Possibility of a Prison Sentence Is a Necessity</atitle><jtitle>Crime and delinquency</jtitle><date>1975-10</date><risdate>1975</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>356</spage><epage>359</epage><pages>356-359</pages><issn>0011-1287</issn><eissn>1552-387X</eissn><abstract>A policy which would prohibit sentencing of nondangerous offenders to prison is based on the unacceptable premise that prisons are and must continue to be destructive. The Policy would make ineffectual the less punitive sentences such as fines and probation, for the removal of the possible sanction of a prison sentence would also remove, in many instances, the strongest motive to pay the fine or keep the conditions of probation. The policy would polarize the now general attitude of the public that the courts are too lenient. The legislatures in response to the public outcry would enact more mandatory sentencing legislation. Thus the movement to encourage the use of probation and fines would be set back sharply. A prison sentence should be the last alternative considered by the trial judge. But it must be available for use and the defendant must be aware of this availability and the possibility of its use for the protection of society.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/001112877502100407</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0011-1287
ispartof Crime and delinquency, 1975-10, Vol.21 (4), p.356-359
issn 0011-1287
1552-387X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1308277611
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Periodicals Index Online; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title The Possibility of a Prison Sentence Is a Necessity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T20%3A39%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Possibility%20of%20a%20Prison%20Sentence%20Is%20a%20Necessity&rft.jtitle=Crime%20and%20delinquency&rft.au=Connolly,%20Paul%20K.&rft.date=1975-10&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=356&rft.epage=359&rft.pages=356-359&rft.issn=0011-1287&rft.eissn=1552-387X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/001112877502100407&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1308277611%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1308277611&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_001112877502100407&rfr_iscdi=true