The Possibility of a Prison Sentence Is a Necessity
A policy which would prohibit sentencing of nondangerous offenders to prison is based on the unacceptable premise that prisons are and must continue to be destructive. The Policy would make ineffectual the less punitive sentences such as fines and probation, for the removal of the possible sanction...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Crime and delinquency 1975-10, Vol.21 (4), p.356-359 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 359 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 356 |
container_title | Crime and delinquency |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Connolly, Paul K. |
description | A policy which would prohibit sentencing of nondangerous offenders to
prison is based on the unacceptable premise that prisons are and must
continue to be destructive.
The Policy would make ineffectual the less punitive sentences such as
fines and probation, for the removal of the possible sanction of a prison
sentence would also remove, in many instances, the strongest motive to pay
the fine or keep the conditions of probation.
The policy would polarize the now general attitude of the public that the
courts are too lenient. The legislatures in response to the public outcry
would enact more mandatory sentencing legislation. Thus the movement
to encourage the use of probation and fines would be set back sharply.
A prison sentence should be the last alternative considered by the trial
judge. But it must be available for use and the defendant must be aware of
this availability and the possibility of its use for the protection of society. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/001112877502100407 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1308277611</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_001112877502100407</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1308277611</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-cb3888690308e873832630731f7ea82ae1d782b9a3ed8b6e871cff06495252693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9Lw0AQxRdRMFa_gKeA59iZ3WZ3c5Tin0LRghW8LZt0VlNqUnfTQ759N8SDIM5lYPi9N7zH2DXCLaJSUwBE5FqpHDgCzECdsATznGdCq_dTlgxANhDn7CKELcQRBSZMrD8pXbUh1GW9q7s-bV1q05WvQ9ukr9R01FSULkI8PlNFkev6S3bm7C7Q1c-esLeH-_X8KVu-PC7md8us4lJ2WVUKrbUsQIAmrYQWXApQAp0iq7kl3CjNy8IK2uhSRgQr50DOipznXBZiwm5G371vvw8UOrNtD76JLw1GT66URIwUH6nKxxienNn7-sv63iCYoRzzt5womo6iYD_ol-3_iiO1AmDO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1308277611</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Possibility of a Prison Sentence Is a Necessity</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Connolly, Paul K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Connolly, Paul K.</creatorcontrib><description>A policy which would prohibit sentencing of nondangerous offenders to
prison is based on the unacceptable premise that prisons are and must
continue to be destructive.
The Policy would make ineffectual the less punitive sentences such as
fines and probation, for the removal of the possible sanction of a prison
sentence would also remove, in many instances, the strongest motive to pay
the fine or keep the conditions of probation.
The policy would polarize the now general attitude of the public that the
courts are too lenient. The legislatures in response to the public outcry
would enact more mandatory sentencing legislation. Thus the movement
to encourage the use of probation and fines would be set back sharply.
A prison sentence should be the last alternative considered by the trial
judge. But it must be available for use and the defendant must be aware of
this availability and the possibility of its use for the protection of society.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-1287</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-387X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/001112877502100407</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Crime and delinquency, 1975-10, Vol.21 (4), p.356-359</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/001112877502100407$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/001112877502100407$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,21800,27850,27905,27906,43602,43603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Connolly, Paul K.</creatorcontrib><title>The Possibility of a Prison Sentence Is a Necessity</title><title>Crime and delinquency</title><description>A policy which would prohibit sentencing of nondangerous offenders to
prison is based on the unacceptable premise that prisons are and must
continue to be destructive.
The Policy would make ineffectual the less punitive sentences such as
fines and probation, for the removal of the possible sanction of a prison
sentence would also remove, in many instances, the strongest motive to pay
the fine or keep the conditions of probation.
The policy would polarize the now general attitude of the public that the
courts are too lenient. The legislatures in response to the public outcry
would enact more mandatory sentencing legislation. Thus the movement
to encourage the use of probation and fines would be set back sharply.
A prison sentence should be the last alternative considered by the trial
judge. But it must be available for use and the defendant must be aware of
this availability and the possibility of its use for the protection of society.</description><issn>0011-1287</issn><issn>1552-387X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1975</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9Lw0AQxRdRMFa_gKeA59iZ3WZ3c5Tin0LRghW8LZt0VlNqUnfTQ759N8SDIM5lYPi9N7zH2DXCLaJSUwBE5FqpHDgCzECdsATznGdCq_dTlgxANhDn7CKELcQRBSZMrD8pXbUh1GW9q7s-bV1q05WvQ9ukr9R01FSULkI8PlNFkev6S3bm7C7Q1c-esLeH-_X8KVu-PC7md8us4lJ2WVUKrbUsQIAmrYQWXApQAp0iq7kl3CjNy8IK2uhSRgQr50DOipznXBZiwm5G371vvw8UOrNtD76JLw1GT66URIwUH6nKxxienNn7-sv63iCYoRzzt5womo6iYD_ol-3_iiO1AmDO</recordid><startdate>197510</startdate><enddate>197510</enddate><creator>Connolly, Paul K.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>National Council on Crime and Delinquency</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197510</creationdate><title>The Possibility of a Prison Sentence Is a Necessity</title><author>Connolly, Paul K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-cb3888690308e873832630731f7ea82ae1d782b9a3ed8b6e871cff06495252693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1975</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Connolly, Paul K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Crime and delinquency</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Connolly, Paul K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Possibility of a Prison Sentence Is a Necessity</atitle><jtitle>Crime and delinquency</jtitle><date>1975-10</date><risdate>1975</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>356</spage><epage>359</epage><pages>356-359</pages><issn>0011-1287</issn><eissn>1552-387X</eissn><abstract>A policy which would prohibit sentencing of nondangerous offenders to
prison is based on the unacceptable premise that prisons are and must
continue to be destructive.
The Policy would make ineffectual the less punitive sentences such as
fines and probation, for the removal of the possible sanction of a prison
sentence would also remove, in many instances, the strongest motive to pay
the fine or keep the conditions of probation.
The policy would polarize the now general attitude of the public that the
courts are too lenient. The legislatures in response to the public outcry
would enact more mandatory sentencing legislation. Thus the movement
to encourage the use of probation and fines would be set back sharply.
A prison sentence should be the last alternative considered by the trial
judge. But it must be available for use and the defendant must be aware of
this availability and the possibility of its use for the protection of society.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/001112877502100407</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0011-1287 |
ispartof | Crime and delinquency, 1975-10, Vol.21 (4), p.356-359 |
issn | 0011-1287 1552-387X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1308277611 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Periodicals Index Online; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
title | The Possibility of a Prison Sentence Is a Necessity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T20%3A39%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Possibility%20of%20a%20Prison%20Sentence%20Is%20a%20Necessity&rft.jtitle=Crime%20and%20delinquency&rft.au=Connolly,%20Paul%20K.&rft.date=1975-10&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=356&rft.epage=359&rft.pages=356-359&rft.issn=0011-1287&rft.eissn=1552-387X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/001112877502100407&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1308277611%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1308277611&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_001112877502100407&rfr_iscdi=true |