Taste tests. Psychophysical issues in comparative test design
Discrimination and preference testing is performed extensively by food and beverage producers for managerial purposes and, more recently, for comparative advertising. In this paper, the authors examine several basic issues in the design of these tests. The concepts of discrimination, preference, and...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Psychology & marketing 1984-03, Vol.1 (1), p.69-91 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 91 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 69 |
| container_title | Psychology & marketing |
| container_volume | 1 |
| creator | Buchanan, Bruce S. Morrison, Donald G. |
| description | Discrimination and preference testing is performed extensively by food and beverage producers for managerial purposes and, more recently, for comparative advertising. In this paper, the authors examine several basic issues in the design of these tests. The concepts of discrimination, preference, and choice are defined and related to one another. Further, various psychophysical models of discrimination and preference are presented and compared. These psychophysical models are then related to specific product test designs. The purpose of this exercise is to provide the applied product researcher or manager with a coherent conceptual framework for designing comparative product tests. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/mar.4220010108 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1308069707</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1308069707</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2708-5dc3d1aea052a48da74b77d21292dbe8cadce89918893c9cc25d521f4e5f00923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFLAzEQRoMoWKtXzwuetyazm01y8FCLVqFWkYrHkCZZm9p212Sr7r83ZUXxJHMYBt6bGT6ETgkeEIzhfK38IAfAmMTie6hHKOC0YCLbRz3MckgLnBeH6CiE5Q7CgvbQxUyFxiaNDU0YJA-h1YuqXrTBabVKXAhbGxK3SXS1rpVXjXvv2MTY4F42x-igVKtgT757Hz1dX81GN-nkfnw7Gk5SDQzzlBqdGaKswhRUzo1i-ZwxAwQEmLnlWhltuRCEc5FpoTVQQ4GUuaVlfBOyPjrr9ta-eosvNXJZbf0mnpQkwxwXgmEWqUFHaV-F4G0pa-9iKq0kWO4iknGQvxFFQXTCh1vZ9h9a3g0f_7hp57qY3-ePq_yrLFjGqHyejiWbXo45zCYSsi9EdXi5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1308069707</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Taste tests. Psychophysical issues in comparative test design</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Buchanan, Bruce S. ; Morrison, Donald G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Buchanan, Bruce S. ; Morrison, Donald G.</creatorcontrib><description>Discrimination and preference testing is performed extensively by food and beverage producers for managerial purposes and, more recently, for comparative advertising. In this paper, the authors examine several basic issues in the design of these tests. The concepts of discrimination, preference, and choice are defined and related to one another. Further, various psychophysical models of discrimination and preference are presented and compared. These psychophysical models are then related to specific product test designs. The purpose of this exercise is to provide the applied product researcher or manager with a coherent conceptual framework for designing comparative product tests.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0742-6046</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6793</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mar.4220010108</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><ispartof>Psychology & marketing, 1984-03, Vol.1 (1), p.69-91</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1984 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., A Wiley Company</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2708-5dc3d1aea052a48da74b77d21292dbe8cadce89918893c9cc25d521f4e5f00923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2708-5dc3d1aea052a48da74b77d21292dbe8cadce89918893c9cc25d521f4e5f00923</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27846,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buchanan, Bruce S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrison, Donald G.</creatorcontrib><title>Taste tests. Psychophysical issues in comparative test design</title><title>Psychology & marketing</title><addtitle>Psychology & Marketing</addtitle><description>Discrimination and preference testing is performed extensively by food and beverage producers for managerial purposes and, more recently, for comparative advertising. In this paper, the authors examine several basic issues in the design of these tests. The concepts of discrimination, preference, and choice are defined and related to one another. Further, various psychophysical models of discrimination and preference are presented and compared. These psychophysical models are then related to specific product test designs. The purpose of this exercise is to provide the applied product researcher or manager with a coherent conceptual framework for designing comparative product tests.</description><issn>0742-6046</issn><issn>1520-6793</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1984</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ACFII</sourceid><sourceid>AKNXY</sourceid><sourceid>HYQOX</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>~P3</sourceid><sourceid>~PJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEFLAzEQRoMoWKtXzwuetyazm01y8FCLVqFWkYrHkCZZm9p212Sr7r83ZUXxJHMYBt6bGT6ETgkeEIzhfK38IAfAmMTie6hHKOC0YCLbRz3MckgLnBeH6CiE5Q7CgvbQxUyFxiaNDU0YJA-h1YuqXrTBabVKXAhbGxK3SXS1rpVXjXvv2MTY4F42x-igVKtgT757Hz1dX81GN-nkfnw7Gk5SDQzzlBqdGaKswhRUzo1i-ZwxAwQEmLnlWhltuRCEc5FpoTVQQ4GUuaVlfBOyPjrr9ta-eosvNXJZbf0mnpQkwxwXgmEWqUFHaV-F4G0pa-9iKq0kWO4iknGQvxFFQXTCh1vZ9h9a3g0f_7hp57qY3-ePq_yrLFjGqHyejiWbXo45zCYSsi9EdXi5</recordid><startdate>198403</startdate><enddate>198403</enddate><creator>Buchanan, Bruce S.</creator><creator>Morrison, Donald G.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Van Nostrand Reinhold</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ACFII</scope><scope>AKNXY</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SFNNT</scope><scope>~P2</scope><scope>~P3</scope><scope>~PJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198403</creationdate><title>Taste tests. Psychophysical issues in comparative test design</title><author>Buchanan, Bruce S. ; Morrison, Donald G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2708-5dc3d1aea052a48da74b77d21292dbe8cadce89918893c9cc25d521f4e5f00923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1984</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buchanan, Bruce S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrison, Donald G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 1 (2022)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 4 (2022)</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 44</collection><collection>PAO Collection 4</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 4</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection</collection><jtitle>Psychology & marketing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buchanan, Bruce S.</au><au>Morrison, Donald G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Taste tests. Psychophysical issues in comparative test design</atitle><jtitle>Psychology & marketing</jtitle><addtitle>Psychology & Marketing</addtitle><date>1984-03</date><risdate>1984</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>69</spage><epage>91</epage><pages>69-91</pages><issn>0742-6046</issn><eissn>1520-6793</eissn><abstract>Discrimination and preference testing is performed extensively by food and beverage producers for managerial purposes and, more recently, for comparative advertising. In this paper, the authors examine several basic issues in the design of these tests. The concepts of discrimination, preference, and choice are defined and related to one another. Further, various psychophysical models of discrimination and preference are presented and compared. These psychophysical models are then related to specific product test designs. The purpose of this exercise is to provide the applied product researcher or manager with a coherent conceptual framework for designing comparative product tests.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/mar.4220010108</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0742-6046 |
| ispartof | Psychology & marketing, 1984-03, Vol.1 (1), p.69-91 |
| issn | 0742-6046 1520-6793 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1308069707 |
| source | Business Source Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Periodicals Index Online |
| title | Taste tests. Psychophysical issues in comparative test design |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T14%3A14%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Taste%20tests.%20Psychophysical%20issues%20in%20comparative%20test%20design&rft.jtitle=Psychology%20&%20marketing&rft.au=Buchanan,%20Bruce%20S.&rft.date=1984-03&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=69&rft.epage=91&rft.pages=69-91&rft.issn=0742-6046&rft.eissn=1520-6793&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mar.4220010108&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1308069707%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1308069707&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |