Learning effects of CAI on college students

The purpose of this study was to determine if college students learn better when using lecture/CAI than by using the conventional lecture method, when the material presented is very visually oriented. The subjects consisted of 28 students enrolled in a freshman level computer science course that is...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Computers and education 1995-05, Vol.24 (4), p.271-277
Hauptverfasser: Tjaden, Bunny J., Dianne Martin, C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 277
container_issue 4
container_start_page 271
container_title Computers and education
container_volume 24
creator Tjaden, Bunny J.
Dianne Martin, C.
description The purpose of this study was to determine if college students learn better when using lecture/CAI than by using the conventional lecture method, when the material presented is very visually oriented. The subjects consisted of 28 students enrolled in a freshman level computer science course that is required for their major. Students were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Both groups received the same lecture. The control group was presented examples in class by the professor aided by transparencies. The treatment group was presented the same examples using a computer tutorial, without teacher intervention. As was indicated on the pre-test, the two groups demonstrated remarkably similar results in the amount of prior knowledge of the subject area. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the amount of learning that took place, as shown by the results of the post-test. There was, however, a considerable difference in time spent on the task. The examples took much longer for theprofessor to present to the control group than it took the treatment group to absorb the interactive examples on individual computers. The majority of the students who were in the treatment group (lecture and computer examples) indicated that they preferred the computer tutorial to having examples presented by the instructor.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0360-1315(95)00031-G
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1307440356</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ512195</ericid><els_id>036013159500031G</els_id><sourcerecordid>1307440356</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-96aff79501b97c8f46d302609a1b95ed37b92a071dce44bbcef3ac66491abae13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKvfoIcFL4qsZjZ_trkIpdRaKXhR8Bay2UnZUjc12RX89qa29OhpYOb33vAeISOg90BBPlAmaQ4MxI0St5RSBvn8hAxgXLK8HBcfp2RwRM7JRYzrBHHJxYDcLdGEtmlXGTqHtouZd9l0ssh8m1m_2eAKs9j1NbZdvCRnzmwiXh3mkLw_zd6mz_nydb6YTpa5ZYJ1uZLGuVIJCpUq7dhxWTNaSKpMWgisWVmpwtASaoucV5VFx4yVkiswlUFgQ3K9990G_9Vj7PTa96FNLzUwWnJOmZCJ4nvKBh9jQKe3ofk04UcD1bta9C6z3mXWSui_WvQ8yUZ7GYbGHiWzFwEFKJHOj4dzCvjdYNDRNtharJuQ6tG1b_73_wWgwnCJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1307440356</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Learning effects of CAI on college students</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Tjaden, Bunny J. ; Dianne Martin, C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tjaden, Bunny J. ; Dianne Martin, C.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to determine if college students learn better when using lecture/CAI than by using the conventional lecture method, when the material presented is very visually oriented. The subjects consisted of 28 students enrolled in a freshman level computer science course that is required for their major. Students were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Both groups received the same lecture. The control group was presented examples in class by the professor aided by transparencies. The treatment group was presented the same examples using a computer tutorial, without teacher intervention. As was indicated on the pre-test, the two groups demonstrated remarkably similar results in the amount of prior knowledge of the subject area. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the amount of learning that took place, as shown by the results of the post-test. There was, however, a considerable difference in time spent on the task. The examples took much longer for theprofessor to present to the control group than it took the treatment group to absorb the interactive examples on individual computers. The majority of the students who were in the treatment group (lecture and computer examples) indicated that they preferred the computer tutorial to having examples presented by the instructor.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-1315</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-782X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0360-1315(95)00031-G</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, N.Y: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>College Students ; Comparative Analysis ; Computer Assisted Instruction ; Conventional Instruction ; Educational Experiments ; Educational Technology ; Examples ; Higher Education ; Learning ; Lecture Method</subject><ispartof>Computers and education, 1995-05, Vol.24 (4), p.271-277</ispartof><rights>1995</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-96aff79501b97c8f46d302609a1b95ed37b92a071dce44bbcef3ac66491abae13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-96aff79501b97c8f46d302609a1b95ed37b92a071dce44bbcef3ac66491abae13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/036013159500031G$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27846,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ512195$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tjaden, Bunny J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dianne Martin, C.</creatorcontrib><title>Learning effects of CAI on college students</title><title>Computers and education</title><description>The purpose of this study was to determine if college students learn better when using lecture/CAI than by using the conventional lecture method, when the material presented is very visually oriented. The subjects consisted of 28 students enrolled in a freshman level computer science course that is required for their major. Students were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Both groups received the same lecture. The control group was presented examples in class by the professor aided by transparencies. The treatment group was presented the same examples using a computer tutorial, without teacher intervention. As was indicated on the pre-test, the two groups demonstrated remarkably similar results in the amount of prior knowledge of the subject area. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the amount of learning that took place, as shown by the results of the post-test. There was, however, a considerable difference in time spent on the task. The examples took much longer for theprofessor to present to the control group than it took the treatment group to absorb the interactive examples on individual computers. The majority of the students who were in the treatment group (lecture and computer examples) indicated that they preferred the computer tutorial to having examples presented by the instructor.</description><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Computer Assisted Instruction</subject><subject>Conventional Instruction</subject><subject>Educational Experiments</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Examples</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Lecture Method</subject><issn>0360-1315</issn><issn>1873-782X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKvfoIcFL4qsZjZ_trkIpdRaKXhR8Bay2UnZUjc12RX89qa29OhpYOb33vAeISOg90BBPlAmaQ4MxI0St5RSBvn8hAxgXLK8HBcfp2RwRM7JRYzrBHHJxYDcLdGEtmlXGTqHtouZd9l0ssh8m1m_2eAKs9j1NbZdvCRnzmwiXh3mkLw_zd6mz_nydb6YTpa5ZYJ1uZLGuVIJCpUq7dhxWTNaSKpMWgisWVmpwtASaoucV5VFx4yVkiswlUFgQ3K9990G_9Vj7PTa96FNLzUwWnJOmZCJ4nvKBh9jQKe3ofk04UcD1bta9C6z3mXWSui_WvQ8yUZ7GYbGHiWzFwEFKJHOj4dzCvjdYNDRNtharJuQ6tG1b_73_wWgwnCJ</recordid><startdate>19950501</startdate><enddate>19950501</enddate><creator>Tjaden, Bunny J.</creator><creator>Dianne Martin, C.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Pergamon Press</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HWXIY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950501</creationdate><title>Learning effects of CAI on college students</title><author>Tjaden, Bunny J. ; Dianne Martin, C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-96aff79501b97c8f46d302609a1b95ed37b92a071dce44bbcef3ac66491abae13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Computer Assisted Instruction</topic><topic>Conventional Instruction</topic><topic>Educational Experiments</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Examples</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Lecture Method</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tjaden, Bunny J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dianne Martin, C.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 25</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Computers and education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tjaden, Bunny J.</au><au>Dianne Martin, C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ512195</ericid><atitle>Learning effects of CAI on college students</atitle><jtitle>Computers and education</jtitle><date>1995-05-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>271</spage><epage>277</epage><pages>271-277</pages><issn>0360-1315</issn><eissn>1873-782X</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to determine if college students learn better when using lecture/CAI than by using the conventional lecture method, when the material presented is very visually oriented. The subjects consisted of 28 students enrolled in a freshman level computer science course that is required for their major. Students were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Both groups received the same lecture. The control group was presented examples in class by the professor aided by transparencies. The treatment group was presented the same examples using a computer tutorial, without teacher intervention. As was indicated on the pre-test, the two groups demonstrated remarkably similar results in the amount of prior knowledge of the subject area. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the amount of learning that took place, as shown by the results of the post-test. There was, however, a considerable difference in time spent on the task. The examples took much longer for theprofessor to present to the control group than it took the treatment group to absorb the interactive examples on individual computers. The majority of the students who were in the treatment group (lecture and computer examples) indicated that they preferred the computer tutorial to having examples presented by the instructor.</abstract><cop>New York, N.Y</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/0360-1315(95)00031-G</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0360-1315
ispartof Computers and education, 1995-05, Vol.24 (4), p.271-277
issn 0360-1315
1873-782X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1307440356
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); Periodicals Index Online
subjects College Students
Comparative Analysis
Computer Assisted Instruction
Conventional Instruction
Educational Experiments
Educational Technology
Examples
Higher Education
Learning
Lecture Method
title Learning effects of CAI on college students
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T18%3A59%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Learning%20effects%20of%20CAI%20on%20college%20students&rft.jtitle=Computers%20and%20education&rft.au=Tjaden,%20Bunny%20J.&rft.date=1995-05-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=271&rft.epage=277&rft.pages=271-277&rft.issn=0360-1315&rft.eissn=1873-782X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0360-1315(95)00031-G&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1307440356%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1307440356&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ512195&rft_els_id=036013159500031G&rfr_iscdi=true