Merit scholarships are no quick fix for college quality
Before college leaders undertake what may be a costly endeavor, they may wish to appraise the likely success of an academic merit scholarship program. This research presents a methodology for assessing the potential success of such a program. We first develop and estimate a model of college choice t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Economics of education review 1988, Vol.7 (3), p.345-355 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 355 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 345 |
container_title | Economics of education review |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Kealy, Mary Jo Rockel, Mark L. |
description | Before college leaders undertake what may be a costly endeavor, they may wish to appraise the likely success of an academic merit scholarship program. This research presents a methodology for assessing the potential success of such a program. We first develop and estimate a model of college choice that specifically accounts for price/quality tradeoffs among the colleges to which an individual has applied and been admitted. The model is then used to simulate the changes in the probability of enrollment at the institute corresponding to changes in merit scholarships. Finally, the costs of a merit program are calculated. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0272-7757(88)90006-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1307029227</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0272775788900064</els_id><sourcerecordid>1307029227</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-5aa94662b462a32b474bfc1f9c1464c99b9ffed61216d100bf715ea8f734cf213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1LAzEUDKJgrf4DDwsi6GE1X5tkL4IUv0DxoueQZl9s6rZZk22x_97UlnozMAyEmffmDUKnBF8RTMQ1ppKWUlbyQqnLGmMsSr6HBkRJVkqm6D4a7CSH6CiladZUCrMBki8QfV8kOwmtiWniu1SYCMU8FF8Lbz8L578LF2JhQ9vCB-Rf0_p-dYwOnGkTnGx5iN7v795Gj-Xz68PT6Pa5tEyKvqyMqbkQdMwFNSyT5GNniast4YLbuh7XzkEjCCWiIRiPnSQVGOUk49ZRwobobDO3i-FrAanX07CI87xSE4YlpjWlMqv4RmVjSCmC0130MxNXmmC9rkiv79fr-7VS-rcizbPtaWOL0IHdeSA_G6BZ6KVmRmasMkidncz4DJbRrZlXmlWVnvSzPOt8G9Qka1oXzdz69JeDKCGpwFl3s9FBbm3pIepkPcwtND6C7XUT_P-hfwBE6pGm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1307029227</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Merit scholarships are no quick fix for college quality</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Kealy, Mary Jo ; Rockel, Mark L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kealy, Mary Jo ; Rockel, Mark L.</creatorcontrib><description>Before college leaders undertake what may be a costly endeavor, they may wish to appraise the likely success of an academic merit scholarship program. This research presents a methodology for assessing the potential success of such a program. We first develop and estimate a model of college choice that specifically accounts for price/quality tradeoffs among the colleges to which an individual has applied and been admitted. The model is then used to simulate the changes in the probability of enrollment at the institute corresponding to changes in merit scholarships. Finally, the costs of a merit program are calculated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-7757</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7382</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0272-7757(88)90006-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, MA: Elsevier India Pvt Ltd</publisher><subject>Cost and financing ; Educational sciences ; Planning and economics of education ; United States, Canada</subject><ispartof>Economics of education review, 1988, Vol.7 (3), p.345-355</ispartof><rights>1988</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-5aa94662b462a32b474bfc1f9c1464c99b9ffed61216d100bf715ea8f734cf213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-5aa94662b462a32b474bfc1f9c1464c99b9ffed61216d100bf715ea8f734cf213</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0272775788900064$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,3994,4010,27846,27900,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=11867260$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeecoedu/v_3a7_3ay_3a1988_3ai_3a3_3ap_3a345-355.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kealy, Mary Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rockel, Mark L.</creatorcontrib><title>Merit scholarships are no quick fix for college quality</title><title>Economics of education review</title><description>Before college leaders undertake what may be a costly endeavor, they may wish to appraise the likely success of an academic merit scholarship program. This research presents a methodology for assessing the potential success of such a program. We first develop and estimate a model of college choice that specifically accounts for price/quality tradeoffs among the colleges to which an individual has applied and been admitted. The model is then used to simulate the changes in the probability of enrollment at the institute corresponding to changes in merit scholarships. Finally, the costs of a merit program are calculated.</description><subject>Cost and financing</subject><subject>Educational sciences</subject><subject>Planning and economics of education</subject><subject>United States, Canada</subject><issn>0272-7757</issn><issn>1873-7382</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UE1LAzEUDKJgrf4DDwsi6GE1X5tkL4IUv0DxoueQZl9s6rZZk22x_97UlnozMAyEmffmDUKnBF8RTMQ1ppKWUlbyQqnLGmMsSr6HBkRJVkqm6D4a7CSH6CiladZUCrMBki8QfV8kOwmtiWniu1SYCMU8FF8Lbz8L578LF2JhQ9vCB-Rf0_p-dYwOnGkTnGx5iN7v795Gj-Xz68PT6Pa5tEyKvqyMqbkQdMwFNSyT5GNniast4YLbuh7XzkEjCCWiIRiPnSQVGOUk49ZRwobobDO3i-FrAanX07CI87xSE4YlpjWlMqv4RmVjSCmC0130MxNXmmC9rkiv79fr-7VS-rcizbPtaWOL0IHdeSA_G6BZ6KVmRmasMkidncz4DJbRrZlXmlWVnvSzPOt8G9Qka1oXzdz69JeDKCGpwFl3s9FBbm3pIepkPcwtND6C7XUT_P-hfwBE6pGm</recordid><startdate>1988</startdate><enddate>1988</enddate><creator>Kealy, Mary Jo</creator><creator>Rockel, Mark L.</creator><general>Elsevier India Pvt Ltd</general><general>Ballinger Pub</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Pergamon Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HNUUZ</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1988</creationdate><title>Merit scholarships are no quick fix for college quality</title><author>Kealy, Mary Jo ; Rockel, Mark L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-5aa94662b462a32b474bfc1f9c1464c99b9ffed61216d100bf715ea8f734cf213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Cost and financing</topic><topic>Educational sciences</topic><topic>Planning and economics of education</topic><topic>United States, Canada</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kealy, Mary Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rockel, Mark L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 21</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Economics of education review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kealy, Mary Jo</au><au>Rockel, Mark L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Merit scholarships are no quick fix for college quality</atitle><jtitle>Economics of education review</jtitle><date>1988</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>345</spage><epage>355</epage><pages>345-355</pages><issn>0272-7757</issn><eissn>1873-7382</eissn><abstract>Before college leaders undertake what may be a costly endeavor, they may wish to appraise the likely success of an academic merit scholarship program. This research presents a methodology for assessing the potential success of such a program. We first develop and estimate a model of college choice that specifically accounts for price/quality tradeoffs among the colleges to which an individual has applied and been admitted. The model is then used to simulate the changes in the probability of enrollment at the institute corresponding to changes in merit scholarships. Finally, the costs of a merit program are calculated.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, MA</cop><pub>Elsevier India Pvt Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/0272-7757(88)90006-4</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0272-7757 |
ispartof | Economics of education review, 1988, Vol.7 (3), p.345-355 |
issn | 0272-7757 1873-7382 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1307029227 |
source | RePEc; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Periodicals Index Online |
subjects | Cost and financing Educational sciences Planning and economics of education United States, Canada |
title | Merit scholarships are no quick fix for college quality |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T07%3A57%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Merit%20scholarships%20are%20no%20quick%20fix%20for%20college%20quality&rft.jtitle=Economics%20of%20education%20review&rft.au=Kealy,%20Mary%20Jo&rft.date=1988&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=345&rft.epage=355&rft.pages=345-355&rft.issn=0272-7757&rft.eissn=1873-7382&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0272-7757(88)90006-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1307029227%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1307029227&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=0272775788900064&rfr_iscdi=true |