Merit scholarships are no quick fix for college quality

Before college leaders undertake what may be a costly endeavor, they may wish to appraise the likely success of an academic merit scholarship program. This research presents a methodology for assessing the potential success of such a program. We first develop and estimate a model of college choice t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Economics of education review 1988, Vol.7 (3), p.345-355
Hauptverfasser: Kealy, Mary Jo, Rockel, Mark L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 355
container_issue 3
container_start_page 345
container_title Economics of education review
container_volume 7
creator Kealy, Mary Jo
Rockel, Mark L.
description Before college leaders undertake what may be a costly endeavor, they may wish to appraise the likely success of an academic merit scholarship program. This research presents a methodology for assessing the potential success of such a program. We first develop and estimate a model of college choice that specifically accounts for price/quality tradeoffs among the colleges to which an individual has applied and been admitted. The model is then used to simulate the changes in the probability of enrollment at the institute corresponding to changes in merit scholarships. Finally, the costs of a merit program are calculated.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0272-7757(88)90006-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1307029227</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0272775788900064</els_id><sourcerecordid>1307029227</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-5aa94662b462a32b474bfc1f9c1464c99b9ffed61216d100bf715ea8f734cf213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1LAzEUDKJgrf4DDwsi6GE1X5tkL4IUv0DxoueQZl9s6rZZk22x_97UlnozMAyEmffmDUKnBF8RTMQ1ppKWUlbyQqnLGmMsSr6HBkRJVkqm6D4a7CSH6CiladZUCrMBki8QfV8kOwmtiWniu1SYCMU8FF8Lbz8L578LF2JhQ9vCB-Rf0_p-dYwOnGkTnGx5iN7v795Gj-Xz68PT6Pa5tEyKvqyMqbkQdMwFNSyT5GNniast4YLbuh7XzkEjCCWiIRiPnSQVGOUk49ZRwobobDO3i-FrAanX07CI87xSE4YlpjWlMqv4RmVjSCmC0130MxNXmmC9rkiv79fr-7VS-rcizbPtaWOL0IHdeSA_G6BZ6KVmRmasMkidncz4DJbRrZlXmlWVnvSzPOt8G9Qka1oXzdz69JeDKCGpwFl3s9FBbm3pIepkPcwtND6C7XUT_P-hfwBE6pGm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1307029227</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Merit scholarships are no quick fix for college quality</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Kealy, Mary Jo ; Rockel, Mark L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kealy, Mary Jo ; Rockel, Mark L.</creatorcontrib><description>Before college leaders undertake what may be a costly endeavor, they may wish to appraise the likely success of an academic merit scholarship program. This research presents a methodology for assessing the potential success of such a program. We first develop and estimate a model of college choice that specifically accounts for price/quality tradeoffs among the colleges to which an individual has applied and been admitted. The model is then used to simulate the changes in the probability of enrollment at the institute corresponding to changes in merit scholarships. Finally, the costs of a merit program are calculated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-7757</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7382</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0272-7757(88)90006-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, MA: Elsevier India Pvt Ltd</publisher><subject>Cost and financing ; Educational sciences ; Planning and economics of education ; United States, Canada</subject><ispartof>Economics of education review, 1988, Vol.7 (3), p.345-355</ispartof><rights>1988</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-5aa94662b462a32b474bfc1f9c1464c99b9ffed61216d100bf715ea8f734cf213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-5aa94662b462a32b474bfc1f9c1464c99b9ffed61216d100bf715ea8f734cf213</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0272775788900064$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,3994,4010,27846,27900,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=11867260$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeecoedu/v_3a7_3ay_3a1988_3ai_3a3_3ap_3a345-355.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kealy, Mary Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rockel, Mark L.</creatorcontrib><title>Merit scholarships are no quick fix for college quality</title><title>Economics of education review</title><description>Before college leaders undertake what may be a costly endeavor, they may wish to appraise the likely success of an academic merit scholarship program. This research presents a methodology for assessing the potential success of such a program. We first develop and estimate a model of college choice that specifically accounts for price/quality tradeoffs among the colleges to which an individual has applied and been admitted. The model is then used to simulate the changes in the probability of enrollment at the institute corresponding to changes in merit scholarships. Finally, the costs of a merit program are calculated.</description><subject>Cost and financing</subject><subject>Educational sciences</subject><subject>Planning and economics of education</subject><subject>United States, Canada</subject><issn>0272-7757</issn><issn>1873-7382</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UE1LAzEUDKJgrf4DDwsi6GE1X5tkL4IUv0DxoueQZl9s6rZZk22x_97UlnozMAyEmffmDUKnBF8RTMQ1ppKWUlbyQqnLGmMsSr6HBkRJVkqm6D4a7CSH6CiladZUCrMBki8QfV8kOwmtiWniu1SYCMU8FF8Lbz8L578LF2JhQ9vCB-Rf0_p-dYwOnGkTnGx5iN7v795Gj-Xz68PT6Pa5tEyKvqyMqbkQdMwFNSyT5GNniast4YLbuh7XzkEjCCWiIRiPnSQVGOUk49ZRwobobDO3i-FrAanX07CI87xSE4YlpjWlMqv4RmVjSCmC0130MxNXmmC9rkiv79fr-7VS-rcizbPtaWOL0IHdeSA_G6BZ6KVmRmasMkidncz4DJbRrZlXmlWVnvSzPOt8G9Qka1oXzdz69JeDKCGpwFl3s9FBbm3pIepkPcwtND6C7XUT_P-hfwBE6pGm</recordid><startdate>1988</startdate><enddate>1988</enddate><creator>Kealy, Mary Jo</creator><creator>Rockel, Mark L.</creator><general>Elsevier India Pvt Ltd</general><general>Ballinger Pub</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Pergamon Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HNUUZ</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1988</creationdate><title>Merit scholarships are no quick fix for college quality</title><author>Kealy, Mary Jo ; Rockel, Mark L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-5aa94662b462a32b474bfc1f9c1464c99b9ffed61216d100bf715ea8f734cf213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Cost and financing</topic><topic>Educational sciences</topic><topic>Planning and economics of education</topic><topic>United States, Canada</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kealy, Mary Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rockel, Mark L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 21</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Economics of education review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kealy, Mary Jo</au><au>Rockel, Mark L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Merit scholarships are no quick fix for college quality</atitle><jtitle>Economics of education review</jtitle><date>1988</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>345</spage><epage>355</epage><pages>345-355</pages><issn>0272-7757</issn><eissn>1873-7382</eissn><abstract>Before college leaders undertake what may be a costly endeavor, they may wish to appraise the likely success of an academic merit scholarship program. This research presents a methodology for assessing the potential success of such a program. We first develop and estimate a model of college choice that specifically accounts for price/quality tradeoffs among the colleges to which an individual has applied and been admitted. The model is then used to simulate the changes in the probability of enrollment at the institute corresponding to changes in merit scholarships. Finally, the costs of a merit program are calculated.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, MA</cop><pub>Elsevier India Pvt Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/0272-7757(88)90006-4</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0272-7757
ispartof Economics of education review, 1988, Vol.7 (3), p.345-355
issn 0272-7757
1873-7382
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1307029227
source RePEc; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Cost and financing
Educational sciences
Planning and economics of education
United States, Canada
title Merit scholarships are no quick fix for college quality
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T07%3A57%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Merit%20scholarships%20are%20no%20quick%20fix%20for%20college%20quality&rft.jtitle=Economics%20of%20education%20review&rft.au=Kealy,%20Mary%20Jo&rft.date=1988&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=345&rft.epage=355&rft.pages=345-355&rft.issn=0272-7757&rft.eissn=1873-7382&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0272-7757(88)90006-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1307029227%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1307029227&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=0272775788900064&rfr_iscdi=true