comparison of formic acid and an acid-salt type additive on the performance of dairy cows in early lactation

Perennial ryegrass, harvested as second‐cut material on 10 and 11 July 1990, was treated with either formic acid at 31 t‐1 or an acid‐salt type additive at 61 t‐1 and ensiled in roofed 150 t bunker silos. Subsequently both silages underwent a predominantly lactic fermentation. Nevertheless the acid‐...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Grass and forage science 1993-03, Vol.48 (1), p.64-69
Hauptverfasser: Davies, O.D, Haigh, P.M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 69
container_issue 1
container_start_page 64
container_title Grass and forage science
container_volume 48
creator Davies, O.D
Haigh, P.M
description Perennial ryegrass, harvested as second‐cut material on 10 and 11 July 1990, was treated with either formic acid at 31 t‐1 or an acid‐salt type additive at 61 t‐1 and ensiled in roofed 150 t bunker silos. Subsequently both silages underwent a predominantly lactic fermentation. Nevertheless the acid‐salt‐treated silage had a significantly higher quantity of formic acid (19 vs 12 g kg DM‐1) and significantly lower levels of lactic (98 vs 118 g kg DM‐1) and acetic acid (11 vs 17 g kg DM‐1) compared with formic acid‐treated silage. In‐silo losses and effluent production were similar. Each silage was individually fed to 10 October‐calving Friesian dairy cows (average weight 565 kg) from weeks 2 to 15 of lactation, together with 3 kg d‐1 of a compound feed containing 190 g kg DM‐1 crude protein and with an estimated metabolizable energy content of 12·6 MJ kg DM‐1. The acid‐salt additive had no significant effect on silage DM intake, daily milk yield, milk protein or cow liveweight change, but significantly increased milk butterfat content compared with formic acid‐treated silage. It is concluded that the acid‐salt type additive produced little difference in terms of either silage fermentation or animal performance compared with formic add treatment.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1993.tb01837.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1306635197</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1306635197</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-39a7cabb3cdc0760f107399d45aad47a7db97314c10418e29b9f159de1c0156f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkWFv1CAYx4lxiefNzyDR161QaDlMfGEWd1syXbLbou_IU6DK2SsVmLt--1G77L0kBBKe3_-BHwi9o6SkeXzYl5Q1dVFxyUsqJStTS-iGifL4Aq2ej16iFaG8KuqKV6_Q6xj3hBAhGVuhXvvDCMFFP2Df4c6Hg9MYtDMYhnn-2xcR-oTTNFoMxrjk_lqcgfTL4tGGGYJB2znAgAsT1v4hYjdgC6GfcA86QXJ-OEUnHfTRvnla1-ju_Mvt2UVxdb29PPt8VWhOBC-YBKGhbZk2moiGdJQIJqXhNYDhAoRppWCUa0o43dhKtrKjtTSWakLrpmNr9H7JHYP_c29jUnt_H4bcUlFGmobVNAes0celSgcfY7CdGoM7QJgUJWq2q_ZqVqhmhWq2q57sqmOGPy3wg-vt9B-k2p7vGp75YuFdTPb4zEP4rRrBRK2-f9sqcXvz9aLZ_VDzZd8u9R14BT_zh6m7XUXycyiXm-yHPQJHfZqB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1306635197</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>comparison of formic acid and an acid-salt type additive on the performance of dairy cows in early lactation</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Davies, O.D ; Haigh, P.M</creator><creatorcontrib>Davies, O.D ; Haigh, P.M</creatorcontrib><description>Perennial ryegrass, harvested as second‐cut material on 10 and 11 July 1990, was treated with either formic acid at 31 t‐1 or an acid‐salt type additive at 61 t‐1 and ensiled in roofed 150 t bunker silos. Subsequently both silages underwent a predominantly lactic fermentation. Nevertheless the acid‐salt‐treated silage had a significantly higher quantity of formic acid (19 vs 12 g kg DM‐1) and significantly lower levels of lactic (98 vs 118 g kg DM‐1) and acetic acid (11 vs 17 g kg DM‐1) compared with formic acid‐treated silage. In‐silo losses and effluent production were similar. Each silage was individually fed to 10 October‐calving Friesian dairy cows (average weight 565 kg) from weeks 2 to 15 of lactation, together with 3 kg d‐1 of a compound feed containing 190 g kg DM‐1 crude protein and with an estimated metabolizable energy content of 12·6 MJ kg DM‐1. The acid‐salt additive had no significant effect on silage DM intake, daily milk yield, milk protein or cow liveweight change, but significantly increased milk butterfat content compared with formic acid‐treated silage. It is concluded that the acid‐salt type additive produced little difference in terms of either silage fermentation or animal performance compared with formic add treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0142-5242</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2494</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1993.tb01837.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>acetic acid ; dairy cows ; dairy performance ; feed intake ; formic acid ; grass silage ; lactation stage ; lactic acid ; liveweight gain ; nutritive value ; salts ; silage additives ; silage making ; silage quality</subject><ispartof>Grass and forage science, 1993-03, Vol.48 (1), p.64-69</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-39a7cabb3cdc0760f107399d45aad47a7db97314c10418e29b9f159de1c0156f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-39a7cabb3cdc0760f107399d45aad47a7db97314c10418e29b9f159de1c0156f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2494.1993.tb01837.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2494.1993.tb01837.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27869,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davies, O.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haigh, P.M</creatorcontrib><title>comparison of formic acid and an acid-salt type additive on the performance of dairy cows in early lactation</title><title>Grass and forage science</title><description>Perennial ryegrass, harvested as second‐cut material on 10 and 11 July 1990, was treated with either formic acid at 31 t‐1 or an acid‐salt type additive at 61 t‐1 and ensiled in roofed 150 t bunker silos. Subsequently both silages underwent a predominantly lactic fermentation. Nevertheless the acid‐salt‐treated silage had a significantly higher quantity of formic acid (19 vs 12 g kg DM‐1) and significantly lower levels of lactic (98 vs 118 g kg DM‐1) and acetic acid (11 vs 17 g kg DM‐1) compared with formic acid‐treated silage. In‐silo losses and effluent production were similar. Each silage was individually fed to 10 October‐calving Friesian dairy cows (average weight 565 kg) from weeks 2 to 15 of lactation, together with 3 kg d‐1 of a compound feed containing 190 g kg DM‐1 crude protein and with an estimated metabolizable energy content of 12·6 MJ kg DM‐1. The acid‐salt additive had no significant effect on silage DM intake, daily milk yield, milk protein or cow liveweight change, but significantly increased milk butterfat content compared with formic acid‐treated silage. It is concluded that the acid‐salt type additive produced little difference in terms of either silage fermentation or animal performance compared with formic add treatment.</description><subject>acetic acid</subject><subject>dairy cows</subject><subject>dairy performance</subject><subject>feed intake</subject><subject>formic acid</subject><subject>grass silage</subject><subject>lactation stage</subject><subject>lactic acid</subject><subject>liveweight gain</subject><subject>nutritive value</subject><subject>salts</subject><subject>silage additives</subject><subject>silage making</subject><subject>silage quality</subject><issn>0142-5242</issn><issn>1365-2494</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkWFv1CAYx4lxiefNzyDR161QaDlMfGEWd1syXbLbou_IU6DK2SsVmLt--1G77L0kBBKe3_-BHwi9o6SkeXzYl5Q1dVFxyUsqJStTS-iGifL4Aq2ej16iFaG8KuqKV6_Q6xj3hBAhGVuhXvvDCMFFP2Df4c6Hg9MYtDMYhnn-2xcR-oTTNFoMxrjk_lqcgfTL4tGGGYJB2znAgAsT1v4hYjdgC6GfcA86QXJ-OEUnHfTRvnla1-ju_Mvt2UVxdb29PPt8VWhOBC-YBKGhbZk2moiGdJQIJqXhNYDhAoRppWCUa0o43dhKtrKjtTSWakLrpmNr9H7JHYP_c29jUnt_H4bcUlFGmobVNAes0celSgcfY7CdGoM7QJgUJWq2q_ZqVqhmhWq2q57sqmOGPy3wg-vt9B-k2p7vGp75YuFdTPb4zEP4rRrBRK2-f9sqcXvz9aLZ_VDzZd8u9R14BT_zh6m7XUXycyiXm-yHPQJHfZqB</recordid><startdate>199303</startdate><enddate>199303</enddate><creator>Davies, O.D</creator><creator>Haigh, P.M</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Scientific Publications</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HVZBN</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199303</creationdate><title>comparison of formic acid and an acid-salt type additive on the performance of dairy cows in early lactation</title><author>Davies, O.D ; Haigh, P.M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-39a7cabb3cdc0760f107399d45aad47a7db97314c10418e29b9f159de1c0156f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>acetic acid</topic><topic>dairy cows</topic><topic>dairy performance</topic><topic>feed intake</topic><topic>formic acid</topic><topic>grass silage</topic><topic>lactation stage</topic><topic>lactic acid</topic><topic>liveweight gain</topic><topic>nutritive value</topic><topic>salts</topic><topic>silage additives</topic><topic>silage making</topic><topic>silage quality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davies, O.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haigh, P.M</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 24</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Grass and forage science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davies, O.D</au><au>Haigh, P.M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>comparison of formic acid and an acid-salt type additive on the performance of dairy cows in early lactation</atitle><jtitle>Grass and forage science</jtitle><date>1993-03</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>64</spage><epage>69</epage><pages>64-69</pages><issn>0142-5242</issn><eissn>1365-2494</eissn><abstract>Perennial ryegrass, harvested as second‐cut material on 10 and 11 July 1990, was treated with either formic acid at 31 t‐1 or an acid‐salt type additive at 61 t‐1 and ensiled in roofed 150 t bunker silos. Subsequently both silages underwent a predominantly lactic fermentation. Nevertheless the acid‐salt‐treated silage had a significantly higher quantity of formic acid (19 vs 12 g kg DM‐1) and significantly lower levels of lactic (98 vs 118 g kg DM‐1) and acetic acid (11 vs 17 g kg DM‐1) compared with formic acid‐treated silage. In‐silo losses and effluent production were similar. Each silage was individually fed to 10 October‐calving Friesian dairy cows (average weight 565 kg) from weeks 2 to 15 of lactation, together with 3 kg d‐1 of a compound feed containing 190 g kg DM‐1 crude protein and with an estimated metabolizable energy content of 12·6 MJ kg DM‐1. The acid‐salt additive had no significant effect on silage DM intake, daily milk yield, milk protein or cow liveweight change, but significantly increased milk butterfat content compared with formic acid‐treated silage. It is concluded that the acid‐salt type additive produced little difference in terms of either silage fermentation or animal performance compared with formic add treatment.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2494.1993.tb01837.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0142-5242
ispartof Grass and forage science, 1993-03, Vol.48 (1), p.64-69
issn 0142-5242
1365-2494
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1306635197
source Wiley Journals; Periodicals Index Online
subjects acetic acid
dairy cows
dairy performance
feed intake
formic acid
grass silage
lactation stage
lactic acid
liveweight gain
nutritive value
salts
silage additives
silage making
silage quality
title comparison of formic acid and an acid-salt type additive on the performance of dairy cows in early lactation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T02%3A00%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=comparison%20of%20formic%20acid%20and%20an%20acid-salt%20type%20additive%20on%20the%20performance%20of%20dairy%20cows%20in%20early%20lactation&rft.jtitle=Grass%20and%20forage%20science&rft.au=Davies,%20O.D&rft.date=1993-03&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=64&rft.epage=69&rft.pages=64-69&rft.issn=0142-5242&rft.eissn=1365-2494&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1993.tb01837.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1306635197%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1306635197&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true