Recent Institutional Legislation

The brief period covered by our history as an independent nation has been, for the student of political institutions, an interesting and eventful one. Within it have been crowded changes in political thought that have excited the apprehensions of those who fear, and inspired hope in those who wish f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings of the American Political Science Association 1908-12, Vol.4, p.141-151
1. Verfasser: Smith, J. Allen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 151
container_issue
container_start_page 141
container_title Proceedings of the American Political Science Association
container_volume 4
creator Smith, J. Allen
description The brief period covered by our history as an independent nation has been, for the student of political institutions, an interesting and eventful one. Within it have been crowded changes in political thought that have excited the apprehensions of those who fear, and inspired hope in those who wish for the ultimate triumph of truly popular government. Rightly viewed our entire history as a nation has been a record of active and unceasing conflict between opposing views of government. The real struggle, the one which is fundamental, the one which in importance has overshadowed all others, the one which in this as in other countries has had a determining influence upon the course of political evolution, has been and still is over the question in whose hands shall the power of ultimate control over the State be lodged. This question, though often kept in the background of political discussion and for that reason not sufficiently appreciated by many who have given their attention mainly to the outward and visible phenomena of our political life, is nevertheless the one which, consciously or unconsciously, has been the cause of all important changes made in our governmental institutions. Notwithstanding the more or less prevalent belief that the one distinguishing feature of the American constitutional system is its recognition of and adaptation to the idea of government by the people, it is nevertheless true that the fear of too much democracy, rather than too little, largely determined the form in which our general government was cast in the beginning. The subsequent development of our political institutions has been due in large measure to the effort to make the constitutional arrangements inherited from our Federalist fathers a more effective means of popular rule. The whole course of later political development in this country may be viewed as the outcome of a movement to evade or break down the checks intended to guard against what the founders regarded as an undue and dangerous extension of the power of the people.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/3038461
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1304779246</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_2307_3038461</cupid><jstor_id>3038461</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3038461</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-3bcd08b0cf128cdba609cff72cd308f800dfe8a08ede360d6e4fc9dda0a903743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9z01Lw0AQBuBFFKxV_AsBBfEQnewm-3GU0tZiQVoUj8tmP0pi29TdDei_NyVFxIOnYeDhnXcQuszgDhNg9wQIz2l2hAaYYJpSEHCMBlmBIeUUilN0FkINAKJgYoCSpdV2G5PZNsQqtrFqtmqdzO2qCmu1387RiVPrYC8Oc4heJ-OX0WM6f57ORg_zVGMqYkpKbYCXoF2GuTal6u5q5xjWhgB3HMA4yxVwayyhYKjNnRbGKFACCMvJEF31uTvffLQ2RFk3re_KBJkRyBkTOKeduumV9k0I3jq589VG-S-Zgdy_Lw_vd_K6l3WIjf-HpT2rQrSfP0z5d0kZYYWk04V8W4wKvnyictL520MBtSl9ZVb2V88_2d98CXKu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1304779246</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Recent Institutional Legislation</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Smith, J. Allen</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, J. Allen</creatorcontrib><description>The brief period covered by our history as an independent nation has been, for the student of political institutions, an interesting and eventful one. Within it have been crowded changes in political thought that have excited the apprehensions of those who fear, and inspired hope in those who wish for the ultimate triumph of truly popular government. Rightly viewed our entire history as a nation has been a record of active and unceasing conflict between opposing views of government. The real struggle, the one which is fundamental, the one which in importance has overshadowed all others, the one which in this as in other countries has had a determining influence upon the course of political evolution, has been and still is over the question in whose hands shall the power of ultimate control over the State be lodged. This question, though often kept in the background of political discussion and for that reason not sufficiently appreciated by many who have given their attention mainly to the outward and visible phenomena of our political life, is nevertheless the one which, consciously or unconsciously, has been the cause of all important changes made in our governmental institutions. Notwithstanding the more or less prevalent belief that the one distinguishing feature of the American constitutional system is its recognition of and adaptation to the idea of government by the people, it is nevertheless true that the fear of too much democracy, rather than too little, largely determined the form in which our general government was cast in the beginning. The subsequent development of our political institutions has been due in large measure to the effort to make the constitutional arrangements inherited from our Federalist fathers a more effective means of popular rule. The whole course of later political development in this country may be viewed as the outcome of a movement to evade or break down the checks intended to guard against what the founders regarded as an undue and dangerous extension of the power of the people.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1520-8605</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2326-6090</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3038461</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Democracy ; Democratic authority ; Government officials ; Municipal governments ; Papers and Discussions ; Political institutions ; Political power ; Popular sovereignty ; Public opinion ; State government ; The Newer Institutional Forms of Democracy ; Voting rights</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the American Political Science Association, 1908-12, Vol.4, p.141-151</ispartof><rights>Copyright © American Political Science Association 1908</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-3bcd08b0cf128cdba609cff72cd308f800dfe8a08ede360d6e4fc9dda0a903743</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3038461$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3038461$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27869,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, J. Allen</creatorcontrib><title>Recent Institutional Legislation</title><title>Proceedings of the American Political Science Association</title><addtitle>Proc. Am. Polit. Sci. Assoc</addtitle><description>The brief period covered by our history as an independent nation has been, for the student of political institutions, an interesting and eventful one. Within it have been crowded changes in political thought that have excited the apprehensions of those who fear, and inspired hope in those who wish for the ultimate triumph of truly popular government. Rightly viewed our entire history as a nation has been a record of active and unceasing conflict between opposing views of government. The real struggle, the one which is fundamental, the one which in importance has overshadowed all others, the one which in this as in other countries has had a determining influence upon the course of political evolution, has been and still is over the question in whose hands shall the power of ultimate control over the State be lodged. This question, though often kept in the background of political discussion and for that reason not sufficiently appreciated by many who have given their attention mainly to the outward and visible phenomena of our political life, is nevertheless the one which, consciously or unconsciously, has been the cause of all important changes made in our governmental institutions. Notwithstanding the more or less prevalent belief that the one distinguishing feature of the American constitutional system is its recognition of and adaptation to the idea of government by the people, it is nevertheless true that the fear of too much democracy, rather than too little, largely determined the form in which our general government was cast in the beginning. The subsequent development of our political institutions has been due in large measure to the effort to make the constitutional arrangements inherited from our Federalist fathers a more effective means of popular rule. The whole course of later political development in this country may be viewed as the outcome of a movement to evade or break down the checks intended to guard against what the founders regarded as an undue and dangerous extension of the power of the people.</description><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Democratic authority</subject><subject>Government officials</subject><subject>Municipal governments</subject><subject>Papers and Discussions</subject><subject>Political institutions</subject><subject>Political power</subject><subject>Popular sovereignty</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>State government</subject><subject>The Newer Institutional Forms of Democracy</subject><subject>Voting rights</subject><issn>1520-8605</issn><issn>2326-6090</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1908</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>JFNAL</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp9z01Lw0AQBuBFFKxV_AsBBfEQnewm-3GU0tZiQVoUj8tmP0pi29TdDei_NyVFxIOnYeDhnXcQuszgDhNg9wQIz2l2hAaYYJpSEHCMBlmBIeUUilN0FkINAKJgYoCSpdV2G5PZNsQqtrFqtmqdzO2qCmu1387RiVPrYC8Oc4heJ-OX0WM6f57ORg_zVGMqYkpKbYCXoF2GuTal6u5q5xjWhgB3HMA4yxVwayyhYKjNnRbGKFACCMvJEF31uTvffLQ2RFk3re_KBJkRyBkTOKeduumV9k0I3jq589VG-S-Zgdy_Lw_vd_K6l3WIjf-HpT2rQrSfP0z5d0kZYYWk04V8W4wKvnyictL520MBtSl9ZVb2V88_2d98CXKu</recordid><startdate>190812</startdate><enddate>190812</enddate><creator>Smith, J. Allen</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>The American Political Science Association</general><general>American Political Science Association</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>JFNAL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>GHXMH</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>190812</creationdate><title>Recent Institutional Legislation</title><author>Smith, J. Allen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-3bcd08b0cf128cdba609cff72cd308f800dfe8a08ede360d6e4fc9dda0a903743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1908</creationdate><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Democratic authority</topic><topic>Government officials</topic><topic>Municipal governments</topic><topic>Papers and Discussions</topic><topic>Political institutions</topic><topic>Political power</topic><topic>Popular sovereignty</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>State government</topic><topic>The Newer Institutional Forms of Democracy</topic><topic>Voting rights</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, J. Allen</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Jstor Journals Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 09</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the American Political Science Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, J. Allen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Recent Institutional Legislation</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the American Political Science Association</jtitle><addtitle>Proc. Am. Polit. Sci. Assoc</addtitle><date>1908-12</date><risdate>1908</risdate><volume>4</volume><spage>141</spage><epage>151</epage><pages>141-151</pages><issn>1520-8605</issn><eissn>2326-6090</eissn><abstract>The brief period covered by our history as an independent nation has been, for the student of political institutions, an interesting and eventful one. Within it have been crowded changes in political thought that have excited the apprehensions of those who fear, and inspired hope in those who wish for the ultimate triumph of truly popular government. Rightly viewed our entire history as a nation has been a record of active and unceasing conflict between opposing views of government. The real struggle, the one which is fundamental, the one which in importance has overshadowed all others, the one which in this as in other countries has had a determining influence upon the course of political evolution, has been and still is over the question in whose hands shall the power of ultimate control over the State be lodged. This question, though often kept in the background of political discussion and for that reason not sufficiently appreciated by many who have given their attention mainly to the outward and visible phenomena of our political life, is nevertheless the one which, consciously or unconsciously, has been the cause of all important changes made in our governmental institutions. Notwithstanding the more or less prevalent belief that the one distinguishing feature of the American constitutional system is its recognition of and adaptation to the idea of government by the people, it is nevertheless true that the fear of too much democracy, rather than too little, largely determined the form in which our general government was cast in the beginning. The subsequent development of our political institutions has been due in large measure to the effort to make the constitutional arrangements inherited from our Federalist fathers a more effective means of popular rule. The whole course of later political development in this country may be viewed as the outcome of a movement to evade or break down the checks intended to guard against what the founders regarded as an undue and dangerous extension of the power of the people.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.2307/3038461</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1520-8605
ispartof Proceedings of the American Political Science Association, 1908-12, Vol.4, p.141-151
issn 1520-8605
2326-6090
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1304779246
source Jstor Complete Legacy; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Democracy
Democratic authority
Government officials
Municipal governments
Papers and Discussions
Political institutions
Political power
Popular sovereignty
Public opinion
State government
The Newer Institutional Forms of Democracy
Voting rights
title Recent Institutional Legislation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T01%3A58%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Recent%20Institutional%20Legislation&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20American%20Political%20Science%20Association&rft.au=Smith,%20J.%20Allen&rft.date=1908-12&rft.volume=4&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=151&rft.pages=141-151&rft.issn=1520-8605&rft.eissn=2326-6090&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3038461&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3038461%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1304779246&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_2307_3038461&rft_jstor_id=3038461&rfr_iscdi=true