THE STATE GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO FEDERAL INCOME TAX REFORM: INDICATIONS FROM THE STATES THAT COMPLETED THEIR WORK EARLY
Among the 22 states in the US that are finished with tax legislation for the year, 2 do not impose income taxes (South Dakota and Wyoming). Two others (Nebraska and North Dakota) did not have "a windfall" because they piggybacked on federal tax liability. Of the remaining states, 9 effecti...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | National tax journal 1987-09, Vol.40 (3), p.431-444 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 444 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 431 |
| container_title | National tax journal |
| container_volume | 40 |
| creator | GOLD, STEVEN D. |
| description | Among the 22 states in the US that are finished with tax legislation for the year, 2 do not impose income taxes (South Dakota and Wyoming). Two others (Nebraska and North Dakota) did not have "a windfall" because they piggybacked on federal tax liability. Of the remaining states, 9 effectively kept their entire windfall. What is occurring is a pattern of convergence, with states having highly progressive taxes reducing their maximum tax rates and states having little or no progression not changing their tax rates and therefore becoming considerably more progressive. Changes in progressivity have significant implications for the future growth of state tax revenue because of the close relationship between an income tax's progressivity and its elasticity. Another surprising result of the analysis of the 22 states is that most states are not returning the entire "windfall" to the taxpayers. Not all of the tax reform action centers around the income tax; many states are acting on themes similar to those embedded in federal reform. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1086/NTJ41788680 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1304513218</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41788680</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41788680</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-34a0568759e4ae3dbebac9db2608e1e58d7c81193a741d5edf810c1173e206f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c9LwzAUB_AgCs7pybMQ9CRSTZq0Sb2VLd2qXTva-OtUujbTDbWz2RD_ezMqUw8iISS898k3hwfAIUbnGHH3IpZXFDPOXY62QAd7lFqMMrYNOgjZ3DKb7II9recIIWxkB7zLoYCZ9KWAg-RWpPFIxBKmIhsncSagTGAg-iL1IxjGvWRkKv69aQdJOro0pX7Y82VoKAzSZAQ3YZm5-hKaF-NISNFfd8IU3iXpNRR-Gj3sg51p8azVwdfZBTeBkL2hFSUDkxlZpe2hpUVogRyXM8dTtFCkmqhJUXrVxHYRV1g5vGIlx9gjBaO4clQ15RiVGDOibOROXdIFx23uoqnfVkov83m9al7Nl7mNGHU9m_-DiO2ZRQ06-QthgqiDiY25UWetKpta60ZN80UzeymajxyjfD2j_MeMjD5t9ap8mpXFY71olNbfwb_tUWvnelk3m9hN_xOyGY9C</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1304513218</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>THE STATE GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO FEDERAL INCOME TAX REFORM: INDICATIONS FROM THE STATES THAT COMPLETED THEIR WORK EARLY</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>GOLD, STEVEN D.</creator><creatorcontrib>GOLD, STEVEN D.</creatorcontrib><description>Among the 22 states in the US that are finished with tax legislation for the year, 2 do not impose income taxes (South Dakota and Wyoming). Two others (Nebraska and North Dakota) did not have "a windfall" because they piggybacked on federal tax liability. Of the remaining states, 9 effectively kept their entire windfall. What is occurring is a pattern of convergence, with states having highly progressive taxes reducing their maximum tax rates and states having little or no progression not changing their tax rates and therefore becoming considerably more progressive. Changes in progressivity have significant implications for the future growth of state tax revenue because of the close relationship between an income tax's progressivity and its elasticity. Another surprising result of the analysis of the 22 states is that most states are not returning the entire "windfall" to the taxpayers. Not all of the tax reform action centers around the income tax; many states are acting on themes similar to those embedded in federal reform.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-0283</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7477</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/NTJ41788680</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NTXJAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago, Ill: National Tax Association</publisher><subject>Conformity ; Federal taxes ; Fiscal policy ; Income taxes ; Itemized deductions ; Personal income taxes ; State income tax ; State taxes ; States ; Statistical data ; Tax deductions ; Tax increases ; Tax rates ; Tax reform ; Tax revenues ; Taxation ; Taxpaying</subject><ispartof>National tax journal, 1987-09, Vol.40 (3), p.431-444</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1987 National Tax Association—Tax Institute of America</rights><rights>1987 National Tax Association. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright National Tax Association Sep 1987</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41788680$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41788680$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27868,27923,27924,58016,58249</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>GOLD, STEVEN D.</creatorcontrib><title>THE STATE GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO FEDERAL INCOME TAX REFORM: INDICATIONS FROM THE STATES THAT COMPLETED THEIR WORK EARLY</title><title>National tax journal</title><description>Among the 22 states in the US that are finished with tax legislation for the year, 2 do not impose income taxes (South Dakota and Wyoming). Two others (Nebraska and North Dakota) did not have "a windfall" because they piggybacked on federal tax liability. Of the remaining states, 9 effectively kept their entire windfall. What is occurring is a pattern of convergence, with states having highly progressive taxes reducing their maximum tax rates and states having little or no progression not changing their tax rates and therefore becoming considerably more progressive. Changes in progressivity have significant implications for the future growth of state tax revenue because of the close relationship between an income tax's progressivity and its elasticity. Another surprising result of the analysis of the 22 states is that most states are not returning the entire "windfall" to the taxpayers. Not all of the tax reform action centers around the income tax; many states are acting on themes similar to those embedded in federal reform.</description><subject>Conformity</subject><subject>Federal taxes</subject><subject>Fiscal policy</subject><subject>Income taxes</subject><subject>Itemized deductions</subject><subject>Personal income taxes</subject><subject>State income tax</subject><subject>State taxes</subject><subject>States</subject><subject>Statistical data</subject><subject>Tax deductions</subject><subject>Tax increases</subject><subject>Tax rates</subject><subject>Tax reform</subject><subject>Tax revenues</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Taxpaying</subject><issn>0028-0283</issn><issn>1944-7477</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HYQOX</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0c9LwzAUB_AgCs7pybMQ9CRSTZq0Sb2VLd2qXTva-OtUujbTDbWz2RD_ezMqUw8iISS898k3hwfAIUbnGHH3IpZXFDPOXY62QAd7lFqMMrYNOgjZ3DKb7II9recIIWxkB7zLoYCZ9KWAg-RWpPFIxBKmIhsncSagTGAg-iL1IxjGvWRkKv69aQdJOro0pX7Y82VoKAzSZAQ3YZm5-hKaF-NISNFfd8IU3iXpNRR-Gj3sg51p8azVwdfZBTeBkL2hFSUDkxlZpe2hpUVogRyXM8dTtFCkmqhJUXrVxHYRV1g5vGIlx9gjBaO4clQ15RiVGDOibOROXdIFx23uoqnfVkov83m9al7Nl7mNGHU9m_-DiO2ZRQ06-QthgqiDiY25UWetKpta60ZN80UzeymajxyjfD2j_MeMjD5t9ap8mpXFY71olNbfwb_tUWvnelk3m9hN_xOyGY9C</recordid><startdate>19870901</startdate><enddate>19870901</enddate><creator>GOLD, STEVEN D.</creator><general>National Tax Association</general><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABKTN</scope><scope>ACNBF</scope><scope>GHXMH</scope><scope>GPCCI</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>JVXPA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>~P6</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8A9</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0A</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19870901</creationdate><title>THE STATE GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO FEDERAL INCOME TAX REFORM: INDICATIONS FROM THE STATES THAT COMPLETED THEIR WORK EARLY</title><author>GOLD, STEVEN D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-34a0568759e4ae3dbebac9db2608e1e58d7c81193a741d5edf810c1173e206f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Conformity</topic><topic>Federal taxes</topic><topic>Fiscal policy</topic><topic>Income taxes</topic><topic>Itemized deductions</topic><topic>Personal income taxes</topic><topic>State income tax</topic><topic>State taxes</topic><topic>States</topic><topic>Statistical data</topic><topic>Tax deductions</topic><topic>Tax increases</topic><topic>Tax rates</topic><topic>Tax reform</topic><topic>Tax revenues</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Taxpaying</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GOLD, STEVEN D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online JSTOR Titles</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 6 (2022)</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 09</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 10</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 38</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 6</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Archive</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>National tax journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GOLD, STEVEN D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>THE STATE GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO FEDERAL INCOME TAX REFORM: INDICATIONS FROM THE STATES THAT COMPLETED THEIR WORK EARLY</atitle><jtitle>National tax journal</jtitle><date>1987-09-01</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>431</spage><epage>444</epage><pages>431-444</pages><issn>0028-0283</issn><eissn>1944-7477</eissn><coden>NTXJAC</coden><abstract>Among the 22 states in the US that are finished with tax legislation for the year, 2 do not impose income taxes (South Dakota and Wyoming). Two others (Nebraska and North Dakota) did not have "a windfall" because they piggybacked on federal tax liability. Of the remaining states, 9 effectively kept their entire windfall. What is occurring is a pattern of convergence, with states having highly progressive taxes reducing their maximum tax rates and states having little or no progression not changing their tax rates and therefore becoming considerably more progressive. Changes in progressivity have significant implications for the future growth of state tax revenue because of the close relationship between an income tax's progressivity and its elasticity. Another surprising result of the analysis of the 22 states is that most states are not returning the entire "windfall" to the taxpayers. Not all of the tax reform action centers around the income tax; many states are acting on themes similar to those embedded in federal reform.</abstract><cop>Chicago, Ill</cop><pub>National Tax Association</pub><doi>10.1086/NTJ41788680</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0028-0283 |
| ispartof | National tax journal, 1987-09, Vol.40 (3), p.431-444 |
| issn | 0028-0283 1944-7477 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1304513218 |
| source | Business Source Complete; Periodicals Index Online; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Education Source; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Conformity Federal taxes Fiscal policy Income taxes Itemized deductions Personal income taxes State income tax State taxes States Statistical data Tax deductions Tax increases Tax rates Tax reform Tax revenues Taxation Taxpaying |
| title | THE STATE GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO FEDERAL INCOME TAX REFORM: INDICATIONS FROM THE STATES THAT COMPLETED THEIR WORK EARLY |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T04%3A34%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THE%20STATE%20GOVERNMENT%20RESPONSE%20TO%20FEDERAL%20INCOME%20TAX%20REFORM:%20INDICATIONS%20FROM%20THE%20STATES%20THAT%20COMPLETED%20THEIR%20WORK%20EARLY&rft.jtitle=National%20tax%20journal&rft.au=GOLD,%20STEVEN%20D.&rft.date=1987-09-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=431&rft.epage=444&rft.pages=431-444&rft.issn=0028-0283&rft.eissn=1944-7477&rft.coden=NTXJAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/NTJ41788680&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41788680%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1304513218&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=41788680&rfr_iscdi=true |