Prior Residence Effect in the Dart-Poison Frog, Dendrobates Pumilio
AbstractEach of 32 male, Dendrobates pumilio (red phase) were allowed to establish a territory in one half of a 40 liter aquarium. Each enclosure contained a substrate of Sphagnum, a potted plant, and a water dish. Males occupying the same aquarium were prevented from seeing one another by an opaque...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Behaviour 1994, Vol.131 (3-4), p.207-224 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 224 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3-4 |
container_start_page | 207 |
container_title | Behaviour |
container_volume | 131 |
creator | Baugh, Julia R Forester, Don C |
description | AbstractEach of 32 male, Dendrobates pumilio (red phase) were allowed to establish a territory in one half of a 40 liter aquarium. Each enclosure contained a substrate of Sphagnum, a potted plant, and a water dish. Males occupying the same aquarium were prevented from seeing one another by an opaque barrier. In the first experiment, residents were presented with a conspecific intruder matched for size and color. Based on a numerical index of aggression, residents were consistently dominant over intruders. When reciprocal trials were conducted, the results were reversed (i.e. residents were dominant over males to which they previously had been subordinate). The success of resident males was not influenced by the size of conspecific intruders. In addition, residents consistently dominated a sympatric confamilial intruder (Phyllobates lugubris). Removal experiments revealed that resident males recognize and defend their enclosures after 3, and to a lesser degree, 6 days of isolation. We also examined the effect of territorial markers on the prior residence effect by stepwise removal of the plant and Sphagnum. Residents aggressively defended enclosures in both experiments. When Sphagnum was removed from the resident's enclosures and placed in a previously unused aquaria, 7 of 10 males exhibited dominance over conspecific intruders. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1163/156853994X00442 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1303828373</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4535239</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4535239</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b459t-1db7e91a72db5ea2e421a06a733a87ad57491792c40417a12ac313e6ee97b7ac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1LAzEQDaJgrZ69eFjQo6v53DRH2dbPikUr9Bayu7Oaum5qsgX990YqVQRPw5v35s3MQ2if4BNCMnZKRDYQTCk-w5hzuoF6X500tmabqIcxFqlUQm2jnRDmEUrBRA_lE2-dT-4h2AraEpJRXUPZJbZNumdIhsZ36cTZ4Nrk3Lun42QIbeVdYToIyWT5ahvrdtFWbZoAe9-1jx7PR9P8Mh3fXVzlZ-O04EJ1KakKCYoYSatCgKHAKTE4M5IxM5CmEpIrIhUtOeZEGkJNyQiDDEDJQkbQR4cr34V3b0sInZ67pW_jSk0YZgM6YNGrj05XqtK7EDzUeuHtq_EfmmD9lZT-k1ScOPr2NaE0Te1NW9qwHmNMUha9--hgJZuHzvk1zWOOlKlIpyvahg7e17TxLzqTTAp9fTPVObnNH-T4Vuc_-sLbpvn1yj9XfgJ9lIvY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1303828373</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prior Residence Effect in the Dart-Poison Frog, Dendrobates Pumilio</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Baugh, Julia R ; Forester, Don C</creator><creatorcontrib>Baugh, Julia R ; Forester, Don C</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractEach of 32 male, Dendrobates pumilio (red phase) were allowed to establish a territory in one half of a 40 liter aquarium. Each enclosure contained a substrate of Sphagnum, a potted plant, and a water dish. Males occupying the same aquarium were prevented from seeing one another by an opaque barrier. In the first experiment, residents were presented with a conspecific intruder matched for size and color. Based on a numerical index of aggression, residents were consistently dominant over intruders. When reciprocal trials were conducted, the results were reversed (i.e. residents were dominant over males to which they previously had been subordinate). The success of resident males was not influenced by the size of conspecific intruders. In addition, residents consistently dominated a sympatric confamilial intruder (Phyllobates lugubris). Removal experiments revealed that resident males recognize and defend their enclosures after 3, and to a lesser degree, 6 days of isolation. We also examined the effect of territorial markers on the prior residence effect by stepwise removal of the plant and Sphagnum. Residents aggressively defended enclosures in both experiments. When Sphagnum was removed from the resident's enclosures and placed in a previously unused aquaria, 7 of 10 males exhibited dominance over conspecific intruders.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0005-7959</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1568-539X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1163/156853994X00442</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BEHAA8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Netherlands: Brill</publisher><subject>Amphibia and reptilia ; Amphibians ; Animal ethology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Experimentation ; Forestry ; Frogs ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Homes ; Male animals ; Mosses ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Public aquariums ; Social behavior ; Territoriality ; Vertebrata</subject><ispartof>Behaviour, 1994, Vol.131 (3-4), p.207-224</ispartof><rights>1994 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands</rights><rights>Copyright 1994 E. J. Brill</rights><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b459t-1db7e91a72db5ea2e421a06a733a87ad57491792c40417a12ac313e6ee97b7ac3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4535239$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4535239$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,4024,27869,27923,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3372328$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baugh, Julia R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forester, Don C</creatorcontrib><title>Prior Residence Effect in the Dart-Poison Frog, Dendrobates Pumilio</title><title>Behaviour</title><addtitle>BEH</addtitle><description>AbstractEach of 32 male, Dendrobates pumilio (red phase) were allowed to establish a territory in one half of a 40 liter aquarium. Each enclosure contained a substrate of Sphagnum, a potted plant, and a water dish. Males occupying the same aquarium were prevented from seeing one another by an opaque barrier. In the first experiment, residents were presented with a conspecific intruder matched for size and color. Based on a numerical index of aggression, residents were consistently dominant over intruders. When reciprocal trials were conducted, the results were reversed (i.e. residents were dominant over males to which they previously had been subordinate). The success of resident males was not influenced by the size of conspecific intruders. In addition, residents consistently dominated a sympatric confamilial intruder (Phyllobates lugubris). Removal experiments revealed that resident males recognize and defend their enclosures after 3, and to a lesser degree, 6 days of isolation. We also examined the effect of territorial markers on the prior residence effect by stepwise removal of the plant and Sphagnum. Residents aggressively defended enclosures in both experiments. When Sphagnum was removed from the resident's enclosures and placed in a previously unused aquaria, 7 of 10 males exhibited dominance over conspecific intruders.</description><subject>Amphibia and reptilia</subject><subject>Amphibians</subject><subject>Animal ethology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Frogs</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Homes</subject><subject>Male animals</subject><subject>Mosses</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Public aquariums</subject><subject>Social behavior</subject><subject>Territoriality</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><issn>0005-7959</issn><issn>1568-539X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UE1LAzEQDaJgrZ69eFjQo6v53DRH2dbPikUr9Bayu7Oaum5qsgX990YqVQRPw5v35s3MQ2if4BNCMnZKRDYQTCk-w5hzuoF6X500tmabqIcxFqlUQm2jnRDmEUrBRA_lE2-dT-4h2AraEpJRXUPZJbZNumdIhsZ36cTZ4Nrk3Lun42QIbeVdYToIyWT5ahvrdtFWbZoAe9-1jx7PR9P8Mh3fXVzlZ-O04EJ1KakKCYoYSatCgKHAKTE4M5IxM5CmEpIrIhUtOeZEGkJNyQiDDEDJQkbQR4cr34V3b0sInZ67pW_jSk0YZgM6YNGrj05XqtK7EDzUeuHtq_EfmmD9lZT-k1ScOPr2NaE0Te1NW9qwHmNMUha9--hgJZuHzvk1zWOOlKlIpyvahg7e17TxLzqTTAp9fTPVObnNH-T4Vuc_-sLbpvn1yj9XfgJ9lIvY</recordid><startdate>1994</startdate><enddate>1994</enddate><creator>Baugh, Julia R</creator><creator>Forester, Don C</creator><general>Brill</general><general>BRILL</general><general>E. J. Brill</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HQAFP</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1994</creationdate><title>Prior Residence Effect in the Dart-Poison Frog, Dendrobates Pumilio</title><author>Baugh, Julia R ; Forester, Don C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b459t-1db7e91a72db5ea2e421a06a733a87ad57491792c40417a12ac313e6ee97b7ac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Amphibia and reptilia</topic><topic>Amphibians</topic><topic>Animal ethology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Frogs</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Homes</topic><topic>Male animals</topic><topic>Mosses</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Public aquariums</topic><topic>Social behavior</topic><topic>Territoriality</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baugh, Julia R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forester, Don C</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 23</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Behaviour</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baugh, Julia R</au><au>Forester, Don C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prior Residence Effect in the Dart-Poison Frog, Dendrobates Pumilio</atitle><jtitle>Behaviour</jtitle><addtitle>BEH</addtitle><date>1994</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>131</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>207</spage><epage>224</epage><pages>207-224</pages><issn>0005-7959</issn><eissn>1568-539X</eissn><coden>BEHAA8</coden><abstract>AbstractEach of 32 male, Dendrobates pumilio (red phase) were allowed to establish a territory in one half of a 40 liter aquarium. Each enclosure contained a substrate of Sphagnum, a potted plant, and a water dish. Males occupying the same aquarium were prevented from seeing one another by an opaque barrier. In the first experiment, residents were presented with a conspecific intruder matched for size and color. Based on a numerical index of aggression, residents were consistently dominant over intruders. When reciprocal trials were conducted, the results were reversed (i.e. residents were dominant over males to which they previously had been subordinate). The success of resident males was not influenced by the size of conspecific intruders. In addition, residents consistently dominated a sympatric confamilial intruder (Phyllobates lugubris). Removal experiments revealed that resident males recognize and defend their enclosures after 3, and to a lesser degree, 6 days of isolation. We also examined the effect of territorial markers on the prior residence effect by stepwise removal of the plant and Sphagnum. Residents aggressively defended enclosures in both experiments. When Sphagnum was removed from the resident's enclosures and placed in a previously unused aquaria, 7 of 10 males exhibited dominance over conspecific intruders.</abstract><cop>The Netherlands</cop><pub>Brill</pub><doi>10.1163/156853994X00442</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0005-7959 |
ispartof | Behaviour, 1994, Vol.131 (3-4), p.207-224 |
issn | 0005-7959 1568-539X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1303828373 |
source | Periodicals Index Online; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Amphibia and reptilia Amphibians Animal ethology Biological and medical sciences Experimentation Forestry Frogs Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Homes Male animals Mosses Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Public aquariums Social behavior Territoriality Vertebrata |
title | Prior Residence Effect in the Dart-Poison Frog, Dendrobates Pumilio |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T22%3A10%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prior%20Residence%20Effect%20in%20the%20Dart-Poison%20Frog,%20Dendrobates%20Pumilio&rft.jtitle=Behaviour&rft.au=Baugh,%20Julia%20R&rft.date=1994&rft.volume=131&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=207&rft.epage=224&rft.pages=207-224&rft.issn=0005-7959&rft.eissn=1568-539X&rft.coden=BEHAA8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1163/156853994X00442&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4535239%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1303828373&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4535239&rfr_iscdi=true |