Prior Residence Effect in the Dart-Poison Frog, Dendrobates Pumilio

AbstractEach of 32 male, Dendrobates pumilio (red phase) were allowed to establish a territory in one half of a 40 liter aquarium. Each enclosure contained a substrate of Sphagnum, a potted plant, and a water dish. Males occupying the same aquarium were prevented from seeing one another by an opaque...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Behaviour 1994, Vol.131 (3-4), p.207-224
Hauptverfasser: Baugh, Julia R, Forester, Don C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 224
container_issue 3-4
container_start_page 207
container_title Behaviour
container_volume 131
creator Baugh, Julia R
Forester, Don C
description AbstractEach of 32 male, Dendrobates pumilio (red phase) were allowed to establish a territory in one half of a 40 liter aquarium. Each enclosure contained a substrate of Sphagnum, a potted plant, and a water dish. Males occupying the same aquarium were prevented from seeing one another by an opaque barrier. In the first experiment, residents were presented with a conspecific intruder matched for size and color. Based on a numerical index of aggression, residents were consistently dominant over intruders. When reciprocal trials were conducted, the results were reversed (i.e. residents were dominant over males to which they previously had been subordinate). The success of resident males was not influenced by the size of conspecific intruders. In addition, residents consistently dominated a sympatric confamilial intruder (Phyllobates lugubris). Removal experiments revealed that resident males recognize and defend their enclosures after 3, and to a lesser degree, 6 days of isolation. We also examined the effect of territorial markers on the prior residence effect by stepwise removal of the plant and Sphagnum. Residents aggressively defended enclosures in both experiments. When Sphagnum was removed from the resident's enclosures and placed in a previously unused aquaria, 7 of 10 males exhibited dominance over conspecific intruders.
doi_str_mv 10.1163/156853994X00442
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1303828373</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4535239</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4535239</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b459t-1db7e91a72db5ea2e421a06a733a87ad57491792c40417a12ac313e6ee97b7ac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1LAzEQDaJgrZ69eFjQo6v53DRH2dbPikUr9Bayu7Oaum5qsgX990YqVQRPw5v35s3MQ2if4BNCMnZKRDYQTCk-w5hzuoF6X500tmabqIcxFqlUQm2jnRDmEUrBRA_lE2-dT-4h2AraEpJRXUPZJbZNumdIhsZ36cTZ4Nrk3Lun42QIbeVdYToIyWT5ahvrdtFWbZoAe9-1jx7PR9P8Mh3fXVzlZ-O04EJ1KakKCYoYSatCgKHAKTE4M5IxM5CmEpIrIhUtOeZEGkJNyQiDDEDJQkbQR4cr34V3b0sInZ67pW_jSk0YZgM6YNGrj05XqtK7EDzUeuHtq_EfmmD9lZT-k1ScOPr2NaE0Te1NW9qwHmNMUha9--hgJZuHzvk1zWOOlKlIpyvahg7e17TxLzqTTAp9fTPVObnNH-T4Vuc_-sLbpvn1yj9XfgJ9lIvY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1303828373</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prior Residence Effect in the Dart-Poison Frog, Dendrobates Pumilio</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Baugh, Julia R ; Forester, Don C</creator><creatorcontrib>Baugh, Julia R ; Forester, Don C</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractEach of 32 male, Dendrobates pumilio (red phase) were allowed to establish a territory in one half of a 40 liter aquarium. Each enclosure contained a substrate of Sphagnum, a potted plant, and a water dish. Males occupying the same aquarium were prevented from seeing one another by an opaque barrier. In the first experiment, residents were presented with a conspecific intruder matched for size and color. Based on a numerical index of aggression, residents were consistently dominant over intruders. When reciprocal trials were conducted, the results were reversed (i.e. residents were dominant over males to which they previously had been subordinate). The success of resident males was not influenced by the size of conspecific intruders. In addition, residents consistently dominated a sympatric confamilial intruder (Phyllobates lugubris). Removal experiments revealed that resident males recognize and defend their enclosures after 3, and to a lesser degree, 6 days of isolation. We also examined the effect of territorial markers on the prior residence effect by stepwise removal of the plant and Sphagnum. Residents aggressively defended enclosures in both experiments. When Sphagnum was removed from the resident's enclosures and placed in a previously unused aquaria, 7 of 10 males exhibited dominance over conspecific intruders.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0005-7959</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1568-539X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1163/156853994X00442</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BEHAA8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Netherlands: Brill</publisher><subject>Amphibia and reptilia ; Amphibians ; Animal ethology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Experimentation ; Forestry ; Frogs ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Homes ; Male animals ; Mosses ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Public aquariums ; Social behavior ; Territoriality ; Vertebrata</subject><ispartof>Behaviour, 1994, Vol.131 (3-4), p.207-224</ispartof><rights>1994 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands</rights><rights>Copyright 1994 E. J. Brill</rights><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b459t-1db7e91a72db5ea2e421a06a733a87ad57491792c40417a12ac313e6ee97b7ac3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4535239$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4535239$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,4024,27869,27923,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3372328$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baugh, Julia R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forester, Don C</creatorcontrib><title>Prior Residence Effect in the Dart-Poison Frog, Dendrobates Pumilio</title><title>Behaviour</title><addtitle>BEH</addtitle><description>AbstractEach of 32 male, Dendrobates pumilio (red phase) were allowed to establish a territory in one half of a 40 liter aquarium. Each enclosure contained a substrate of Sphagnum, a potted plant, and a water dish. Males occupying the same aquarium were prevented from seeing one another by an opaque barrier. In the first experiment, residents were presented with a conspecific intruder matched for size and color. Based on a numerical index of aggression, residents were consistently dominant over intruders. When reciprocal trials were conducted, the results were reversed (i.e. residents were dominant over males to which they previously had been subordinate). The success of resident males was not influenced by the size of conspecific intruders. In addition, residents consistently dominated a sympatric confamilial intruder (Phyllobates lugubris). Removal experiments revealed that resident males recognize and defend their enclosures after 3, and to a lesser degree, 6 days of isolation. We also examined the effect of territorial markers on the prior residence effect by stepwise removal of the plant and Sphagnum. Residents aggressively defended enclosures in both experiments. When Sphagnum was removed from the resident's enclosures and placed in a previously unused aquaria, 7 of 10 males exhibited dominance over conspecific intruders.</description><subject>Amphibia and reptilia</subject><subject>Amphibians</subject><subject>Animal ethology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Frogs</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Homes</subject><subject>Male animals</subject><subject>Mosses</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Public aquariums</subject><subject>Social behavior</subject><subject>Territoriality</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><issn>0005-7959</issn><issn>1568-539X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UE1LAzEQDaJgrZ69eFjQo6v53DRH2dbPikUr9Bayu7Oaum5qsgX990YqVQRPw5v35s3MQ2if4BNCMnZKRDYQTCk-w5hzuoF6X500tmabqIcxFqlUQm2jnRDmEUrBRA_lE2-dT-4h2AraEpJRXUPZJbZNumdIhsZ36cTZ4Nrk3Lun42QIbeVdYToIyWT5ahvrdtFWbZoAe9-1jx7PR9P8Mh3fXVzlZ-O04EJ1KakKCYoYSatCgKHAKTE4M5IxM5CmEpIrIhUtOeZEGkJNyQiDDEDJQkbQR4cr34V3b0sInZ67pW_jSk0YZgM6YNGrj05XqtK7EDzUeuHtq_EfmmD9lZT-k1ScOPr2NaE0Te1NW9qwHmNMUha9--hgJZuHzvk1zWOOlKlIpyvahg7e17TxLzqTTAp9fTPVObnNH-T4Vuc_-sLbpvn1yj9XfgJ9lIvY</recordid><startdate>1994</startdate><enddate>1994</enddate><creator>Baugh, Julia R</creator><creator>Forester, Don C</creator><general>Brill</general><general>BRILL</general><general>E. J. Brill</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HQAFP</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1994</creationdate><title>Prior Residence Effect in the Dart-Poison Frog, Dendrobates Pumilio</title><author>Baugh, Julia R ; Forester, Don C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b459t-1db7e91a72db5ea2e421a06a733a87ad57491792c40417a12ac313e6ee97b7ac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Amphibia and reptilia</topic><topic>Amphibians</topic><topic>Animal ethology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Frogs</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Homes</topic><topic>Male animals</topic><topic>Mosses</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Public aquariums</topic><topic>Social behavior</topic><topic>Territoriality</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baugh, Julia R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forester, Don C</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 23</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Behaviour</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baugh, Julia R</au><au>Forester, Don C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prior Residence Effect in the Dart-Poison Frog, Dendrobates Pumilio</atitle><jtitle>Behaviour</jtitle><addtitle>BEH</addtitle><date>1994</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>131</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>207</spage><epage>224</epage><pages>207-224</pages><issn>0005-7959</issn><eissn>1568-539X</eissn><coden>BEHAA8</coden><abstract>AbstractEach of 32 male, Dendrobates pumilio (red phase) were allowed to establish a territory in one half of a 40 liter aquarium. Each enclosure contained a substrate of Sphagnum, a potted plant, and a water dish. Males occupying the same aquarium were prevented from seeing one another by an opaque barrier. In the first experiment, residents were presented with a conspecific intruder matched for size and color. Based on a numerical index of aggression, residents were consistently dominant over intruders. When reciprocal trials were conducted, the results were reversed (i.e. residents were dominant over males to which they previously had been subordinate). The success of resident males was not influenced by the size of conspecific intruders. In addition, residents consistently dominated a sympatric confamilial intruder (Phyllobates lugubris). Removal experiments revealed that resident males recognize and defend their enclosures after 3, and to a lesser degree, 6 days of isolation. We also examined the effect of territorial markers on the prior residence effect by stepwise removal of the plant and Sphagnum. Residents aggressively defended enclosures in both experiments. When Sphagnum was removed from the resident's enclosures and placed in a previously unused aquaria, 7 of 10 males exhibited dominance over conspecific intruders.</abstract><cop>The Netherlands</cop><pub>Brill</pub><doi>10.1163/156853994X00442</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0005-7959
ispartof Behaviour, 1994, Vol.131 (3-4), p.207-224
issn 0005-7959
1568-539X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1303828373
source Periodicals Index Online; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Amphibia and reptilia
Amphibians
Animal ethology
Biological and medical sciences
Experimentation
Forestry
Frogs
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Homes
Male animals
Mosses
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Public aquariums
Social behavior
Territoriality
Vertebrata
title Prior Residence Effect in the Dart-Poison Frog, Dendrobates Pumilio
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T22%3A10%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prior%20Residence%20Effect%20in%20the%20Dart-Poison%20Frog,%20Dendrobates%20Pumilio&rft.jtitle=Behaviour&rft.au=Baugh,%20Julia%20R&rft.date=1994&rft.volume=131&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=207&rft.epage=224&rft.pages=207-224&rft.issn=0005-7959&rft.eissn=1568-539X&rft.coden=BEHAA8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1163/156853994X00442&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4535239%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1303828373&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4535239&rfr_iscdi=true