Why and When Did NEP Die?: An Economist's Reflections

For about sixty years all Soviet economists and historians have celebrated the demise of NEP as socialism's greatest victory. You could count advocates of the opposite point of view on your fingers. The situation has changed in the last two or three years. The press today is for the most part f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Problems of economics 1990-08, Vol.33 (4), p.6-26
1. Verfasser: Khanin, G. I.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 26
container_issue 4
container_start_page 6
container_title Problems of economics
container_volume 33
creator Khanin, G. I.
description For about sixty years all Soviet economists and historians have celebrated the demise of NEP as socialism's greatest victory. You could count advocates of the opposite point of view on your fingers. The situation has changed in the last two or three years. The press today is for the most part filled with hymns of praise for NEP as the most successful period in the development of Soviet society. There is admiration for the miraculous recovery of Russia's economy after the civil war, for the economy's high effectiveness during that period, and for the establishment of a hard currency. We look to NEP for lessons that will help us to resolve our current economic problems. The termination of NEP in the late 1920s is bewailed as the turning point in Soviet history that marked the victory of the Administrative System with all its known tragic consequences for the life of Soviet society. Those responsible for the death of NEP are named: Stalin and those around him, members of the party machine [apparatchUd] infected with the ideology of War Communism, and individual social strata (poor peasants, part of the working class, and youth).
doi_str_mv 10.2753/PET1061-199133046
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1301613374</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1301613374</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c239t-3c58cdfc2c79a4c6c27b3616da90b2c4f12f3c2f4000bb331759649fd057aef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9LwzAYhnNQcE7_AG8FD56qX_K16SKCjFl_wNAhgx1Dmiaso0tm0iH9761sePP0Xt7n_fgeQq4o3LIix7tFuaTAaUqFoIiQ8RMyAkCWigz5GTmPcQNAJwJwRPLVuk-Uq5PV2rjkqamT93IxpHm8T6YuKbV3ftvE7iYmn8a2RneNd_GCnFrVRnN5zDFZPpfL2Ws6_3h5m03nqWYouhR1PtG11UwXQmWaa1ZUyCmvlYCK6cxSZlEzmwFAVSHSIhc8E7aGvFDG4phcH2Z3wX_tTezkxu-DGy5KikD58F2RDS16aOngYwzGyl1otir0koL8FSKPQuSfkIF5ODCNsz5s1bcPbS071bc-2KCcbqLE__EfT95l2g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1301613374</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why and When Did NEP Die?: An Economist's Reflections</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Khanin, G. I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Khanin, G. I.</creatorcontrib><description>For about sixty years all Soviet economists and historians have celebrated the demise of NEP as socialism's greatest victory. You could count advocates of the opposite point of view on your fingers. The situation has changed in the last two or three years. The press today is for the most part filled with hymns of praise for NEP as the most successful period in the development of Soviet society. There is admiration for the miraculous recovery of Russia's economy after the civil war, for the economy's high effectiveness during that period, and for the establishment of a hard currency. We look to NEP for lessons that will help us to resolve our current economic problems. The termination of NEP in the late 1920s is bewailed as the turning point in Soviet history that marked the victory of the Administrative System with all its known tragic consequences for the life of Soviet society. Those responsible for the death of NEP are named: Stalin and those around him, members of the party machine [apparatchUd] infected with the ideology of War Communism, and individual social strata (poor peasants, part of the working class, and youth).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-9436</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2753/PET1061-199133046</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Routledge</publisher><ispartof>Problems of economics, 1990-08, Vol.33 (4), p.6-26</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 1990</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27852,27907,27908</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khanin, G. I.</creatorcontrib><title>Why and When Did NEP Die?: An Economist's Reflections</title><title>Problems of economics</title><description>For about sixty years all Soviet economists and historians have celebrated the demise of NEP as socialism's greatest victory. You could count advocates of the opposite point of view on your fingers. The situation has changed in the last two or three years. The press today is for the most part filled with hymns of praise for NEP as the most successful period in the development of Soviet society. There is admiration for the miraculous recovery of Russia's economy after the civil war, for the economy's high effectiveness during that period, and for the establishment of a hard currency. We look to NEP for lessons that will help us to resolve our current economic problems. The termination of NEP in the late 1920s is bewailed as the turning point in Soviet history that marked the victory of the Administrative System with all its known tragic consequences for the life of Soviet society. Those responsible for the death of NEP are named: Stalin and those around him, members of the party machine [apparatchUd] infected with the ideology of War Communism, and individual social strata (poor peasants, part of the working class, and youth).</description><issn>0032-9436</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM9LwzAYhnNQcE7_AG8FD56qX_K16SKCjFl_wNAhgx1Dmiaso0tm0iH9761sePP0Xt7n_fgeQq4o3LIix7tFuaTAaUqFoIiQ8RMyAkCWigz5GTmPcQNAJwJwRPLVuk-Uq5PV2rjkqamT93IxpHm8T6YuKbV3ftvE7iYmn8a2RneNd_GCnFrVRnN5zDFZPpfL2Ws6_3h5m03nqWYouhR1PtG11UwXQmWaa1ZUyCmvlYCK6cxSZlEzmwFAVSHSIhc8E7aGvFDG4phcH2Z3wX_tTezkxu-DGy5KikD58F2RDS16aOngYwzGyl1otir0koL8FSKPQuSfkIF5ODCNsz5s1bcPbS071bc-2KCcbqLE__EfT95l2g</recordid><startdate>19900801</startdate><enddate>19900801</enddate><creator>Khanin, G. I.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>International Arts and Sciences Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FYSDU</scope><scope>GHEHK</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19900801</creationdate><title>Why and When Did NEP Die?: An Economist's Reflections</title><author>Khanin, G. I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c239t-3c58cdfc2c79a4c6c27b3616da90b2c4f12f3c2f4000bb331759649fd057aef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khanin, G. I.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 07</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 08</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Problems of economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khanin, G. I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why and When Did NEP Die?: An Economist's Reflections</atitle><jtitle>Problems of economics</jtitle><date>1990-08-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>6</spage><epage>26</epage><pages>6-26</pages><issn>0032-9436</issn><abstract>For about sixty years all Soviet economists and historians have celebrated the demise of NEP as socialism's greatest victory. You could count advocates of the opposite point of view on your fingers. The situation has changed in the last two or three years. The press today is for the most part filled with hymns of praise for NEP as the most successful period in the development of Soviet society. There is admiration for the miraculous recovery of Russia's economy after the civil war, for the economy's high effectiveness during that period, and for the establishment of a hard currency. We look to NEP for lessons that will help us to resolve our current economic problems. The termination of NEP in the late 1920s is bewailed as the turning point in Soviet history that marked the victory of the Administrative System with all its known tragic consequences for the life of Soviet society. Those responsible for the death of NEP are named: Stalin and those around him, members of the party machine [apparatchUd] infected with the ideology of War Communism, and individual social strata (poor peasants, part of the working class, and youth).</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.2753/PET1061-199133046</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-9436
ispartof Problems of economics, 1990-08, Vol.33 (4), p.6-26
issn 0032-9436
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1301613374
source Periodicals Index Online; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
title Why and When Did NEP Die?: An Economist's Reflections
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T09%3A53%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20and%20When%20Did%20NEP%20Die?:%20An%20Economist's%20Reflections&rft.jtitle=Problems%20of%20economics&rft.au=Khanin,%20G.%20I.&rft.date=1990-08-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=6&rft.epage=26&rft.pages=6-26&rft.issn=0032-9436&rft_id=info:doi/10.2753/PET1061-199133046&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1301613374%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1301613374&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true