Regulating Judicial Misconduct and Divining "Good Behavior" for Federal Judges
The author states that in recent years there has been an unprecedented number of instances in which federal judges have been accused of criminal behaviour and other forms of misconduct. This raises major concerns regarding the scope and enforcement of canons of conduct for members of the judicial br...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Michigan law review 1989-02, Vol.87 (4), p.765-796 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 796 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 765 |
| container_title | Michigan law review |
| container_volume | 87 |
| creator | Edwards, Harry T. |
| description | The author states that in recent years there has been an unprecedented number of instances in which federal judges have been accused of criminal behaviour and other forms of misconduct. This raises major concerns regarding the scope and enforcement of canons of conduct for members of the judicial branch. He maintains that avenues for judicial independence must also be considered in relation to monitoring judicial conduct. He examines the problems associated with judicial misconduct and suggests a system of judicial self-regulation unencumbered by any form of congressional interference. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2307/1289292 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1301581101</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/agispt.19891306</informt_id><jstor_id>1289292</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1289292</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-e5fc6e49d0ff4dcc25237813f8c1d55c72e2ce7c33c9aa08f647cf2298d64bcc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kFtLJDEQRsOyws6q-BeaUfSpNZX0JXlc74oXWNbnECtJm6GnMybdgv_eDOO-CD4VFOf7qjiE7AE9Zpy2J8CEZJL9IDOQXJairtufZEYpa0rGePWL_E5pQSmFmsOMPPy13dTr0Q9dcTsZj173xb1PGAYz4VjowRTn_s0Pa2B-FYIpTu2LfvMhzgsXYnFpjY05k8OdTTtky-k-2d3PuU2eLi_-nV2Xd49XN2d_7kpkEsbS1g4bW0lDnasMIqsZbwVwJxBMXWPLLEPbIucotabCNVWLjjEpTFM9I_JtcrjpXcXwOtk0qmX-2fa9HmyYkqplJVohRQbnX8BFmOKQf1OMQjYEjGdo_zsIeBYlAChk6mhDYQwpRevUKvqlju8KqFqrV5_qM3m6IePSj0p3Pq1GlayO-KL8kK2t1yF2ygS_DnMOzX8MpJD5aJNLDjYlizSG-O2tD7RFljA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1301581101</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Regulating Judicial Misconduct and Divining "Good Behavior" for Federal Judges</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Edwards, Harry T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Harry T.</creatorcontrib><description>The author states that in recent years there has been an unprecedented number of instances in which federal judges have been accused of criminal behaviour and other forms of misconduct. This raises major concerns regarding the scope and enforcement of canons of conduct for members of the judicial branch. He maintains that avenues for judicial independence must also be considered in relation to monitoring judicial conduct. He examines the problems associated with judicial misconduct and suggests a system of judicial self-regulation unencumbered by any form of congressional interference.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0026-2234</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-8557</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1289292</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ann Arbor, Mich: University of Michigan Law School</publisher><subject>Affirmative action ; Behavior ; Chief judge ; Civil Rights Act 1964-US ; Constitutional law ; Crime ; Criminals ; Disabilities ; Discipline ; Discrimination ; Evidence ; Impeachment ; Interpretation and construction ; Judges ; Judges & magistrates ; Judicial Conference of the United States ; Judicial system ; Legal proceedings ; Regulation ; Separation of powers ; Supreme Court decisions ; United States ; United States Senate</subject><ispartof>Michigan law review, 1989-02, Vol.87 (4), p.765-796</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1989 The Michigan Law Review Association</rights><rights>Copyright Michigan Law Review Association Feb 1989</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1289292$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1289292$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27865,27869,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Harry T.</creatorcontrib><title>Regulating Judicial Misconduct and Divining "Good Behavior" for Federal Judges</title><title>Michigan law review</title><description>The author states that in recent years there has been an unprecedented number of instances in which federal judges have been accused of criminal behaviour and other forms of misconduct. This raises major concerns regarding the scope and enforcement of canons of conduct for members of the judicial branch. He maintains that avenues for judicial independence must also be considered in relation to monitoring judicial conduct. He examines the problems associated with judicial misconduct and suggests a system of judicial self-regulation unencumbered by any form of congressional interference.</description><subject>Affirmative action</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Chief judge</subject><subject>Civil Rights Act 1964-US</subject><subject>Constitutional law</subject><subject>Crime</subject><subject>Criminals</subject><subject>Disabilities</subject><subject>Discipline</subject><subject>Discrimination</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Impeachment</subject><subject>Interpretation and construction</subject><subject>Judges</subject><subject>Judges & magistrates</subject><subject>Judicial Conference of the United States</subject><subject>Judicial system</subject><subject>Legal proceedings</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Separation of powers</subject><subject>Supreme Court decisions</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>United States Senate</subject><issn>0026-2234</issn><issn>1939-8557</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kFtLJDEQRsOyws6q-BeaUfSpNZX0JXlc74oXWNbnECtJm6GnMybdgv_eDOO-CD4VFOf7qjiE7AE9Zpy2J8CEZJL9IDOQXJairtufZEYpa0rGePWL_E5pQSmFmsOMPPy13dTr0Q9dcTsZj173xb1PGAYz4VjowRTn_s0Pa2B-FYIpTu2LfvMhzgsXYnFpjY05k8OdTTtky-k-2d3PuU2eLi_-nV2Xd49XN2d_7kpkEsbS1g4bW0lDnasMIqsZbwVwJxBMXWPLLEPbIucotabCNVWLjjEpTFM9I_JtcrjpXcXwOtk0qmX-2fa9HmyYkqplJVohRQbnX8BFmOKQf1OMQjYEjGdo_zsIeBYlAChk6mhDYQwpRevUKvqlju8KqFqrV5_qM3m6IePSj0p3Pq1GlayO-KL8kK2t1yF2ygS_DnMOzX8MpJD5aJNLDjYlizSG-O2tD7RFljA</recordid><startdate>19890201</startdate><enddate>19890201</enddate><creator>Edwards, Harry T.</creator><general>University of Michigan Law School</general><general>University of Michigan, Dept.of Law</general><general>Michigan Law Review Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FYSDU</scope><scope>GPCCI</scope><scope>ICWRT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19890201</creationdate><title>Regulating Judicial Misconduct and Divining "Good Behavior" for Federal Judges</title><author>Edwards, Harry T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-e5fc6e49d0ff4dcc25237813f8c1d55c72e2ce7c33c9aa08f647cf2298d64bcc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Affirmative action</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Chief judge</topic><topic>Civil Rights Act 1964-US</topic><topic>Constitutional law</topic><topic>Crime</topic><topic>Criminals</topic><topic>Disabilities</topic><topic>Discipline</topic><topic>Discrimination</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Impeachment</topic><topic>Interpretation and construction</topic><topic>Judges</topic><topic>Judges & magistrates</topic><topic>Judicial Conference of the United States</topic><topic>Judicial system</topic><topic>Legal proceedings</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Separation of powers</topic><topic>Supreme Court decisions</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>United States Senate</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Harry T.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 07</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 10</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 28</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Michigan law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Edwards, Harry T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Regulating Judicial Misconduct and Divining "Good Behavior" for Federal Judges</atitle><jtitle>Michigan law review</jtitle><date>1989-02-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>765</spage><epage>796</epage><pages>765-796</pages><issn>0026-2234</issn><eissn>1939-8557</eissn><abstract>The author states that in recent years there has been an unprecedented number of instances in which federal judges have been accused of criminal behaviour and other forms of misconduct. This raises major concerns regarding the scope and enforcement of canons of conduct for members of the judicial branch. He maintains that avenues for judicial independence must also be considered in relation to monitoring judicial conduct. He examines the problems associated with judicial misconduct and suggests a system of judicial self-regulation unencumbered by any form of congressional interference.</abstract><cop>Ann Arbor, Mich</cop><pub>University of Michigan Law School</pub><doi>10.2307/1289292</doi><tpages>32</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0026-2234 |
| ispartof | Michigan law review, 1989-02, Vol.87 (4), p.765-796 |
| issn | 0026-2234 1939-8557 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1301581101 |
| source | PAIS Index; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Periodicals Index Online; Jstor Complete Legacy |
| subjects | Affirmative action Behavior Chief judge Civil Rights Act 1964-US Constitutional law Crime Criminals Disabilities Discipline Discrimination Evidence Impeachment Interpretation and construction Judges Judges & magistrates Judicial Conference of the United States Judicial system Legal proceedings Regulation Separation of powers Supreme Court decisions United States United States Senate |
| title | Regulating Judicial Misconduct and Divining "Good Behavior" for Federal Judges |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T05%3A51%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Regulating%20Judicial%20Misconduct%20and%20Divining%20%22Good%20Behavior%22%20for%20Federal%20Judges&rft.jtitle=Michigan%20law%20review&rft.au=Edwards,%20Harry%20T.&rft.date=1989-02-01&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=765&rft.epage=796&rft.pages=765-796&rft.issn=0026-2234&rft.eissn=1939-8557&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1289292&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1289292%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1301581101&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/agispt.19891306&rft_jstor_id=1289292&rfr_iscdi=true |