Countering loss of vigilance in sonar watchstanding using signal injection and performance feedback

Sonar operators are confronted with a watchstanding task that demands high levels of vigilance for the appearance of weak or transitory signals. Maintaining vigilance is difficult because of very low target signal rates and an open loop system with (usually) no performance feedback. Four experiments...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ergonomics 1994-07, Vol.37 (7), p.1157-1184
Hauptverfasser: MACKIE, ROBERT R., DENNIS WYLIE, C., SMITH, MALCOLM J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1184
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1157
container_title Ergonomics
container_volume 37
creator MACKIE, ROBERT R.
DENNIS WYLIE, C.
SMITH, MALCOLM J.
description Sonar operators are confronted with a watchstanding task that demands high levels of vigilance for the appearance of weak or transitory signals. Maintaining vigilance is difficult because of very low target signal rates and an open loop system with (usually) no performance feedback. Four experiments were conducted to see whether operator vigilance, as reflected by target detection latency, could be enhanced through signal injection and performance feedback. In each of these experiments, target detection performance was markedly enhanced. The effects were operationally and statistically significant and generally increased with time on watch. The beneficial effects were shown not to be simply a function of increased signal rate due to signal injection. Analysis using a signal detection theory model showed that the target reporting threshold dropped under the experimental treatment and detection efficiency increased. In addition, it was shown that the subjects spent significantly more time observing the search display with signal injection and feedback. On the negative side, there was a modest increase in false alarms which was judged to be tolerable in view of the marked reduction in target detection times. Most false alarms were quickly recognized and reported as such. These beneficial effects were confirmed in a fifth experiment using trained sonar operators as subjects and prototype displays of an advanced sonar system.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00140139408964895
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1301248734</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>26328659</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-f7c1f4a2ee73680522d7b8d8df7c81f41fe39edc263fa5a95af0485144dda9f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtLJDEUhYM4YNszP8Bd4Yi70jyrEnAzNL5AcOO-iHm0aauTnqRK6X8_t2x1MeLmhsv5zg33XISOCD4jWOJzjAnHhCmOpWq4VGIPzQhrmlpI3u6j2aTXE3CADktZQcuIojNkFmmMg8shLqs-lVIlX72EZeh1NK4KsSop6ly96sE8lUFHO4FjmWoJy6h7YFbODCHFCtRq47JPef3m9s7ZR22ef6IfXvfF_Xp_5-jh6vJhcVPf3V_fLv7c1YYTMtS-NcRzTZ1rWSOxoNS2j9JKC4IEhXjHlLOGNsxroZXQHnMpCOfWauXZHJ3uxm5y-ju6MnTrUIzrYRWXxtKBj8pGKACP_wNXacywCzAQH1UNoHP0-zuIMEwoly3jQJEdZTKEl53vNjmsdd52BHfTYbovhwHPyftkXYzufYawQvk0ciowERKwix0W4luiryn3thv0tk_5w8O-_-UfYpygLw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1301248734</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Countering loss of vigilance in sonar watchstanding using signal injection and performance feedback</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>MACKIE, ROBERT R. ; DENNIS WYLIE, C. ; SMITH, MALCOLM J.</creator><creatorcontrib>MACKIE, ROBERT R. ; DENNIS WYLIE, C. ; SMITH, MALCOLM J.</creatorcontrib><description>Sonar operators are confronted with a watchstanding task that demands high levels of vigilance for the appearance of weak or transitory signals. Maintaining vigilance is difficult because of very low target signal rates and an open loop system with (usually) no performance feedback. Four experiments were conducted to see whether operator vigilance, as reflected by target detection latency, could be enhanced through signal injection and performance feedback. In each of these experiments, target detection performance was markedly enhanced. The effects were operationally and statistically significant and generally increased with time on watch. The beneficial effects were shown not to be simply a function of increased signal rate due to signal injection. Analysis using a signal detection theory model showed that the target reporting threshold dropped under the experimental treatment and detection efficiency increased. In addition, it was shown that the subjects spent significantly more time observing the search display with signal injection and feedback. On the negative side, there was a modest increase in false alarms which was judged to be tolerable in view of the marked reduction in target detection times. Most false alarms were quickly recognized and reported as such. These beneficial effects were confirmed in a fifth experiment using trained sonar operators as subjects and prototype displays of an advanced sonar system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-0139</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1366-5847</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00140139408964895</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ERGOAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Attention ; Behavior ; Biological and medical sciences ; Countermeasures ; Ergonomics ; Ergonomics. Human factors ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Occupational psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Sonar ; Target detection ; Vigilance ; Watchstanding</subject><ispartof>Ergonomics, 1994-07, Vol.37 (7), p.1157-1184</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 1994</rights><rights>1994 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group Jul 1994</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-f7c1f4a2ee73680522d7b8d8df7c81f41fe39edc263fa5a95af0485144dda9f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-f7c1f4a2ee73680522d7b8d8df7c81f41fe39edc263fa5a95af0485144dda9f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00140139408964895$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00140139408964895$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27867,27922,27923,59645,60434</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=4250158$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MACKIE, ROBERT R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DENNIS WYLIE, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SMITH, MALCOLM J.</creatorcontrib><title>Countering loss of vigilance in sonar watchstanding using signal injection and performance feedback</title><title>Ergonomics</title><description>Sonar operators are confronted with a watchstanding task that demands high levels of vigilance for the appearance of weak or transitory signals. Maintaining vigilance is difficult because of very low target signal rates and an open loop system with (usually) no performance feedback. Four experiments were conducted to see whether operator vigilance, as reflected by target detection latency, could be enhanced through signal injection and performance feedback. In each of these experiments, target detection performance was markedly enhanced. The effects were operationally and statistically significant and generally increased with time on watch. The beneficial effects were shown not to be simply a function of increased signal rate due to signal injection. Analysis using a signal detection theory model showed that the target reporting threshold dropped under the experimental treatment and detection efficiency increased. In addition, it was shown that the subjects spent significantly more time observing the search display with signal injection and feedback. On the negative side, there was a modest increase in false alarms which was judged to be tolerable in view of the marked reduction in target detection times. Most false alarms were quickly recognized and reported as such. These beneficial effects were confirmed in a fifth experiment using trained sonar operators as subjects and prototype displays of an advanced sonar system.</description><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Countermeasures</subject><subject>Ergonomics</subject><subject>Ergonomics. Human factors</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Occupational psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Sonar</subject><subject>Target detection</subject><subject>Vigilance</subject><subject>Watchstanding</subject><issn>0014-0139</issn><issn>1366-5847</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtLJDEUhYM4YNszP8Bd4Yi70jyrEnAzNL5AcOO-iHm0aauTnqRK6X8_t2x1MeLmhsv5zg33XISOCD4jWOJzjAnHhCmOpWq4VGIPzQhrmlpI3u6j2aTXE3CADktZQcuIojNkFmmMg8shLqs-lVIlX72EZeh1NK4KsSop6ly96sE8lUFHO4FjmWoJy6h7YFbODCHFCtRq47JPef3m9s7ZR22ef6IfXvfF_Xp_5-jh6vJhcVPf3V_fLv7c1YYTMtS-NcRzTZ1rWSOxoNS2j9JKC4IEhXjHlLOGNsxroZXQHnMpCOfWauXZHJ3uxm5y-ju6MnTrUIzrYRWXxtKBj8pGKACP_wNXacywCzAQH1UNoHP0-zuIMEwoly3jQJEdZTKEl53vNjmsdd52BHfTYbovhwHPyftkXYzufYawQvk0ciowERKwix0W4luiryn3thv0tk_5w8O-_-UfYpygLw</recordid><startdate>19940701</startdate><enddate>19940701</enddate><creator>MACKIE, ROBERT R.</creator><creator>DENNIS WYLIE, C.</creator><creator>SMITH, MALCOLM J.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor and Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis LLC</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ICWRT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19940701</creationdate><title>Countering loss of vigilance in sonar watchstanding using signal injection and performance feedback</title><author>MACKIE, ROBERT R. ; DENNIS WYLIE, C. ; SMITH, MALCOLM J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-f7c1f4a2ee73680522d7b8d8df7c81f41fe39edc263fa5a95af0485144dda9f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Countermeasures</topic><topic>Ergonomics</topic><topic>Ergonomics. Human factors</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Occupational psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Sonar</topic><topic>Target detection</topic><topic>Vigilance</topic><topic>Watchstanding</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MACKIE, ROBERT R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DENNIS WYLIE, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SMITH, MALCOLM J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 28</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Ergonomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MACKIE, ROBERT R.</au><au>DENNIS WYLIE, C.</au><au>SMITH, MALCOLM J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Countering loss of vigilance in sonar watchstanding using signal injection and performance feedback</atitle><jtitle>Ergonomics</jtitle><date>1994-07-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1157</spage><epage>1184</epage><pages>1157-1184</pages><issn>0014-0139</issn><eissn>1366-5847</eissn><coden>ERGOAX</coden><abstract>Sonar operators are confronted with a watchstanding task that demands high levels of vigilance for the appearance of weak or transitory signals. Maintaining vigilance is difficult because of very low target signal rates and an open loop system with (usually) no performance feedback. Four experiments were conducted to see whether operator vigilance, as reflected by target detection latency, could be enhanced through signal injection and performance feedback. In each of these experiments, target detection performance was markedly enhanced. The effects were operationally and statistically significant and generally increased with time on watch. The beneficial effects were shown not to be simply a function of increased signal rate due to signal injection. Analysis using a signal detection theory model showed that the target reporting threshold dropped under the experimental treatment and detection efficiency increased. In addition, it was shown that the subjects spent significantly more time observing the search display with signal injection and feedback. On the negative side, there was a modest increase in false alarms which was judged to be tolerable in view of the marked reduction in target detection times. Most false alarms were quickly recognized and reported as such. These beneficial effects were confirmed in a fifth experiment using trained sonar operators as subjects and prototype displays of an advanced sonar system.</abstract><cop>London</cop><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/00140139408964895</doi><tpages>28</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0014-0139
ispartof Ergonomics, 1994-07, Vol.37 (7), p.1157-1184
issn 0014-0139
1366-5847
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1301248734
source Periodicals Index Online; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete
subjects Attention
Behavior
Biological and medical sciences
Countermeasures
Ergonomics
Ergonomics. Human factors
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Occupational psychology
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Sonar
Target detection
Vigilance
Watchstanding
title Countering loss of vigilance in sonar watchstanding using signal injection and performance feedback
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T09%3A05%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Countering%20loss%20of%20vigilance%20in%20sonar%20watchstanding%20using%20signal%20injection%20and%20performance%20feedback&rft.jtitle=Ergonomics&rft.au=MACKIE,%20ROBERT%20R.&rft.date=1994-07-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1157&rft.epage=1184&rft.pages=1157-1184&rft.issn=0014-0139&rft.eissn=1366-5847&rft.coden=ERGOAX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00140139408964895&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E26328659%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1301248734&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true