Movie Censorship: A Swiss Comparison
Obscenity and censorship are perhaps the most unsettled areas of constitutional law in this country today. To many, the deep divisions and divergent attitudes of the Justices of the Supreme Court constitute an intolerable state of affairs for a functioning system of jurisprudence. This article will...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Duke law journal 1966-01, Vol.1966 (3), p.633-668 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 668 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 633 |
| container_title | Duke law journal |
| container_volume | 1966 |
| creator | O'Brien, Francis William |
| description | Obscenity and censorship are perhaps the most unsettled areas of constitutional law in this country today. To many, the deep divisions and divergent attitudes of the Justices of the Supreme Court constitute an intolerable state of affairs for a functioning system of jurisprudence. This article will not present a panacea for these problems. But in an area where disagreement abounds, examination of the approach of another legal system can lead to clearer thinking, reorientation of analysis, and a better over-view of the entire area. Since many of the problems which have plagued the courts in this country have likewise been raised in Swiss censorship litigation, the reader should find Swiss solutions enlightening. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2307/1371500 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1300864577</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1371500</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1371500</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c207t-17f4f5c6a2f0ef0f004581e7ea4662edd83e6a424077119b44df5cebbf626823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1z0tLxDAUBeAsFBxH8S8UHHBVvXk0qe6G4gtGXDj7kLY32OI0Nbej-O-NdLauzubj3HsYu-BwLSSYGy4NLwCO2AKAi9xAqU_YKVEPAFpKvmCrl_DVYVbhQCHSezfeZevs7bsjyqqwG13sKAxn7Ni7D8LzQy7Z9uF-Wz3lm9fH52q9yRsBZsq58coXjXbCA3rwAKooORp0SmuBbVtK1E4JBcZwflsr1SaOde210KWQS3Y5144xfO6RJtuHfRzSRcslpN9VYUxSV7NqYiCK6O0Yu52LP5aD_VttD6uTXM2ypynEf9kvqu1T1w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1300864577</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Movie Censorship: A Swiss Comparison</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>O'Brien, Francis William</creator><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, Francis William</creatorcontrib><description>Obscenity and censorship are perhaps the most unsettled areas of constitutional law in this country today. To many, the deep divisions and divergent attitudes of the Justices of the Supreme Court constitute an intolerable state of affairs for a functioning system of jurisprudence. This article will not present a panacea for these problems. But in an area where disagreement abounds, examination of the approach of another legal system can lead to clearer thinking, reorientation of analysis, and a better over-view of the entire area. Since many of the problems which have plagued the courts in this country have likewise been raised in Swiss censorship litigation, the reader should find Swiss solutions enlightening.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-7086</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1371500</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Durham, N.C: Duke University School of Law</publisher><subject>Cantons ; Censorship ; Emergency protective orders ; Federal law ; Film criticism ; Motion picture industry ; Movies ; Nudism ; Obscenity ; Tribunals</subject><ispartof>Duke law journal, 1966-01, Vol.1966 (3), p.633-668</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1966 The Duke Law Journal</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1371500$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1371500$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27869,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, Francis William</creatorcontrib><title>Movie Censorship: A Swiss Comparison</title><title>Duke law journal</title><description>Obscenity and censorship are perhaps the most unsettled areas of constitutional law in this country today. To many, the deep divisions and divergent attitudes of the Justices of the Supreme Court constitute an intolerable state of affairs for a functioning system of jurisprudence. This article will not present a panacea for these problems. But in an area where disagreement abounds, examination of the approach of another legal system can lead to clearer thinking, reorientation of analysis, and a better over-view of the entire area. Since many of the problems which have plagued the courts in this country have likewise been raised in Swiss censorship litigation, the reader should find Swiss solutions enlightening.</description><subject>Cantons</subject><subject>Censorship</subject><subject>Emergency protective orders</subject><subject>Federal law</subject><subject>Film criticism</subject><subject>Motion picture industry</subject><subject>Movies</subject><subject>Nudism</subject><subject>Obscenity</subject><subject>Tribunals</subject><issn>0012-7086</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1966</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1z0tLxDAUBeAsFBxH8S8UHHBVvXk0qe6G4gtGXDj7kLY32OI0Nbej-O-NdLauzubj3HsYu-BwLSSYGy4NLwCO2AKAi9xAqU_YKVEPAFpKvmCrl_DVYVbhQCHSezfeZevs7bsjyqqwG13sKAxn7Ni7D8LzQy7Z9uF-Wz3lm9fH52q9yRsBZsq58coXjXbCA3rwAKooORp0SmuBbVtK1E4JBcZwflsr1SaOde210KWQS3Y5144xfO6RJtuHfRzSRcslpN9VYUxSV7NqYiCK6O0Yu52LP5aD_VttD6uTXM2ypynEf9kvqu1T1w</recordid><startdate>19660101</startdate><enddate>19660101</enddate><creator>O'Brien, Francis William</creator><general>Duke University School of Law</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IZSXY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19660101</creationdate><title>Movie Censorship: A Swiss Comparison</title><author>O'Brien, Francis William</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c207t-17f4f5c6a2f0ef0f004581e7ea4662edd83e6a424077119b44df5cebbf626823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1966</creationdate><topic>Cantons</topic><topic>Censorship</topic><topic>Emergency protective orders</topic><topic>Federal law</topic><topic>Film criticism</topic><topic>Motion picture industry</topic><topic>Movies</topic><topic>Nudism</topic><topic>Obscenity</topic><topic>Tribunals</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, Francis William</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 30</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Duke law journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O'Brien, Francis William</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Movie Censorship: A Swiss Comparison</atitle><jtitle>Duke law journal</jtitle><date>1966-01-01</date><risdate>1966</risdate><volume>1966</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>633</spage><epage>668</epage><pages>633-668</pages><issn>0012-7086</issn><abstract>Obscenity and censorship are perhaps the most unsettled areas of constitutional law in this country today. To many, the deep divisions and divergent attitudes of the Justices of the Supreme Court constitute an intolerable state of affairs for a functioning system of jurisprudence. This article will not present a panacea for these problems. But in an area where disagreement abounds, examination of the approach of another legal system can lead to clearer thinking, reorientation of analysis, and a better over-view of the entire area. Since many of the problems which have plagued the courts in this country have likewise been raised in Swiss censorship litigation, the reader should find Swiss solutions enlightening.</abstract><cop>Durham, N.C</cop><pub>Duke University School of Law</pub><doi>10.2307/1371500</doi><tpages>36</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0012-7086 |
| ispartof | Duke law journal, 1966-01, Vol.1966 (3), p.633-668 |
| issn | 0012-7086 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1300864577 |
| source | Periodicals Index Online; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Cantons Censorship Emergency protective orders Federal law Film criticism Motion picture industry Movies Nudism Obscenity Tribunals |
| title | Movie Censorship: A Swiss Comparison |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T15%3A57%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Movie%20Censorship:%20A%20Swiss%20Comparison&rft.jtitle=Duke%20law%20journal&rft.au=O'Brien,%20Francis%20William&rft.date=1966-01-01&rft.volume=1966&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=633&rft.epage=668&rft.pages=633-668&rft.issn=0012-7086&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1371500&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1371500%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1300864577&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1371500&rfr_iscdi=true |