Some interpersonal effects of assertion, nonassertion, and aggression

Some interpersonal effects of assertion, nonassertion, and aggression

Females and males responded to a female confederate who behaved either nonassertively, assertively, or aggressively in role-played situations involving refusals and requests for behavior change. Responses to nonassertion were pleasant but did not allow the nonasserter to achieve immediate goals. Res...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Behavior therapy 1979, Vol.10 (1), p.20-28
Hauptverfasser: Hull, Debra B., Schroeder, Harold E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 28
container_issue 1
container_start_page 20
container_title Behavior therapy
container_volume 10
creator Hull, Debra B.
Schroeder, Harold E.
description Females and males responded to a female confederate who behaved either nonassertively, assertively, or aggressively in role-played situations involving refusals and requests for behavior change. Responses to nonassertion were pleasant but did not allow the nonasserter to achieve immediate goals. Responses to aggression did allow the aggressor to achieve goals, but were unpleasant. Responses to assertion allowed for the achievement of immediate goals and were generally pleasant. However, responses to assertion did have more negative effects than expected. Refusals were easier to resist than behavior change requests. There were no consistent differences in the way females and males responded.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0005-7894(79)80005-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1300421817</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0005789479800052</els_id><sourcerecordid>1300421817</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-88fc2b37f45fcbb72f62eb17196504f84ad4c62935b3bccd7cf7969f9541d8bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_QRhwo-BonpNkJVLqAwouquuQZG7KlHZSk1Hw35u2oktXl8M953Dvh9A5wTcEk-Z2jjEWtVSaX0p9pXaKHqARUVLVRCl1iEa_lmN0kvMSY4YZESM0ncc1VF0_QNpAyrG3qwpCAD_kKobK5gxp6GJ_XfVl96ds31Z2sUiQc9Gn6CjYVYaznzlGbw_T18lTPXt5fJ7cz2pPBR5qpYKnjsnARfDOSRoaCo5IohuBeVDcttw3VDPhmPO-lT5I3eigBSetcoGN0cW-d5Pi-wfkwSzjRyo3Z0MYxpwSRWRxib3Lp5hzgmA2qVvb9GUINltiZkfMbHEYqc2OmKEld7fPQXnhs4Nksu-g99B2qQAxbez-afgGq-VzJw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1300421817</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Some interpersonal effects of assertion, nonassertion, and aggression</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Hull, Debra B. ; Schroeder, Harold E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hull, Debra B. ; Schroeder, Harold E.</creatorcontrib><description>Females and males responded to a female confederate who behaved either nonassertively, assertively, or aggressively in role-played situations involving refusals and requests for behavior change. Responses to nonassertion were pleasant but did not allow the nonasserter to achieve immediate goals. Responses to aggression did allow the aggressor to achieve goals, but were unpleasant. Responses to assertion allowed for the achievement of immediate goals and were generally pleasant. However, responses to assertion did have more negative effects than expected. Refusals were easier to resist than behavior change requests. There were no consistent differences in the way females and males responded.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0005-7894</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-1888</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0005-7894(79)80005-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Behavior therapy, 1979, Vol.10 (1), p.20-28</ispartof><rights>1979 Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-88fc2b37f45fcbb72f62eb17196504f84ad4c62935b3bccd7cf7969f9541d8bf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-88fc2b37f45fcbb72f62eb17196504f84ad4c62935b3bccd7cf7969f9541d8bf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(79)80005-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27869,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hull, Debra B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, Harold E.</creatorcontrib><title>Some interpersonal effects of assertion, nonassertion, and aggression</title><title>Behavior therapy</title><description>Females and males responded to a female confederate who behaved either nonassertively, assertively, or aggressively in role-played situations involving refusals and requests for behavior change. Responses to nonassertion were pleasant but did not allow the nonasserter to achieve immediate goals. Responses to aggression did allow the aggressor to achieve goals, but were unpleasant. Responses to assertion allowed for the achievement of immediate goals and were generally pleasant. However, responses to assertion did have more negative effects than expected. Refusals were easier to resist than behavior change requests. There were no consistent differences in the way females and males responded.</description><issn>0005-7894</issn><issn>1878-1888</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1979</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_QRhwo-BonpNkJVLqAwouquuQZG7KlHZSk1Hw35u2oktXl8M953Dvh9A5wTcEk-Z2jjEWtVSaX0p9pXaKHqARUVLVRCl1iEa_lmN0kvMSY4YZESM0ncc1VF0_QNpAyrG3qwpCAD_kKobK5gxp6GJ_XfVl96ds31Z2sUiQc9Gn6CjYVYaznzlGbw_T18lTPXt5fJ7cz2pPBR5qpYKnjsnARfDOSRoaCo5IohuBeVDcttw3VDPhmPO-lT5I3eigBSetcoGN0cW-d5Pi-wfkwSzjRyo3Z0MYxpwSRWRxib3Lp5hzgmA2qVvb9GUINltiZkfMbHEYqc2OmKEld7fPQXnhs4Nksu-g99B2qQAxbez-afgGq-VzJw</recordid><startdate>1979</startdate><enddate>1979</enddate><creator>Hull, Debra B.</creator><creator>Schroeder, Harold E.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Academic Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HFXKP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1979</creationdate><title>Some interpersonal effects of assertion, nonassertion, and aggression</title><author>Hull, Debra B. ; Schroeder, Harold E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-88fc2b37f45fcbb72f62eb17196504f84ad4c62935b3bccd7cf7969f9541d8bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1979</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hull, Debra B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, Harold E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 17</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Behavior therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hull, Debra B.</au><au>Schroeder, Harold E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Some interpersonal effects of assertion, nonassertion, and aggression</atitle><jtitle>Behavior therapy</jtitle><date>1979</date><risdate>1979</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>20</spage><epage>28</epage><pages>20-28</pages><issn>0005-7894</issn><eissn>1878-1888</eissn><abstract>Females and males responded to a female confederate who behaved either nonassertively, assertively, or aggressively in role-played situations involving refusals and requests for behavior change. Responses to nonassertion were pleasant but did not allow the nonasserter to achieve immediate goals. Responses to aggression did allow the aggressor to achieve goals, but were unpleasant. Responses to assertion allowed for the achievement of immediate goals and were generally pleasant. However, responses to assertion did have more negative effects than expected. Refusals were easier to resist than behavior change requests. There were no consistent differences in the way females and males responded.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0005-7894(79)80005-2</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0005-7894
ispartof Behavior therapy, 1979, Vol.10 (1), p.20-28
issn 0005-7894
1878-1888
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1300421817
source Periodicals Index Online; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
title Some interpersonal effects of assertion, nonassertion, and aggression
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T15%3A50%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Some%20interpersonal%20effects%20of%20assertion,%20nonassertion,%20and%20aggression&rft.jtitle=Behavior%20therapy&rft.au=Hull,%20Debra%20B.&rft.date=1979&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=20&rft.epage=28&rft.pages=20-28&rft.issn=0005-7894&rft.eissn=1878-1888&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0005-7894(79)80005-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1300421817%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1300421817&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0005789479800052&rfr_iscdi=true