The relative reactivity of external observations and self-monitoring

The relative reactivity of external observations and self-monitoring

To compare the relative reactivity of self-monitoring and external-monitoring, trained observers (from behind a one-way mirror) recorded the face-touching frequency of 14 college students in a classroom situation through five experimental conditions: baseline, observer-present, observer-absent, self...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Behavior therapy 1976-01, Vol.7 (3), p.314-321
Hauptverfasser: Nelson, Rosemery O., Lipinski, David P., Black, John L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 321
container_issue 3
container_start_page 314
container_title Behavior therapy
container_volume 7
creator Nelson, Rosemery O.
Lipinski, David P.
Black, John L.
description To compare the relative reactivity of self-monitoring and external-monitoring, trained observers (from behind a one-way mirror) recorded the face-touching frequency of 14 college students in a classroom situation through five experimental conditions: baseline, observer-present, observer-absent, self-recording, and return-to-baseline. Although external-monitoring reduced face-touching frequency, self-monitoring was more reactive and produced more consistent reactivity across subjects. These results were discussed in terms of possible mechanisms explaining the reactivity of self-monitoring and possible variables affecting the reactivity of external observations.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0005-7894(76)80057-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1300420965</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0005789476800573</els_id><sourcerecordid>1300420965</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-682681680bfe655f097d9eff421db5ec6993b14b79251d652ceeadcdbd794c403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwE5AicYFDwI7j1wmh8pQqcaCcrcReg6s0LnYa0X9P0iKunHZWmhntfgidE3xNMOE3bxhjlgupykvBr-SwiJweoAmRQuZESnmIJn-WY3SS0hJjiilhE3S_-IQsQlN1vh9FZQbhu20WXAbfHcS2arJQJ4j9YAltyqrWZgkal69C67sQfftxio5c1SQ4-51T9P74sJg95_PXp5fZ3Tw3lLIu57LgknCJawecMYeVsAqcKwtiawaGK0VrUtZCFYxYzgoDUFljaytUaUpMp-hi37uO4WsDqdPLsBkvTJpQjMsCK84GF9u7TAwpRXB6Hf2qiltNsB6B6R0wPdLQgusdME2H3O0-B8MLvYeok_HQGrA-gum0Df6fhh80mXLm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1300420965</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The relative reactivity of external observations and self-monitoring</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Nelson, Rosemery O. ; Lipinski, David P. ; Black, John L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Rosemery O. ; Lipinski, David P. ; Black, John L.</creatorcontrib><description>To compare the relative reactivity of self-monitoring and external-monitoring, trained observers (from behind a one-way mirror) recorded the face-touching frequency of 14 college students in a classroom situation through five experimental conditions: baseline, observer-present, observer-absent, self-recording, and return-to-baseline. Although external-monitoring reduced face-touching frequency, self-monitoring was more reactive and produced more consistent reactivity across subjects. These results were discussed in terms of possible mechanisms explaining the reactivity of self-monitoring and possible variables affecting the reactivity of external observations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0005-7894</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-1888</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0005-7894(76)80057-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Behavior therapy, 1976-01, Vol.7 (3), p.314-321</ispartof><rights>1976 Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-682681680bfe655f097d9eff421db5ec6993b14b79251d652ceeadcdbd794c403</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-682681680bfe655f097d9eff421db5ec6993b14b79251d652ceeadcdbd794c403</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005789476800573$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27848,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Rosemery O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipinski, David P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Black, John L.</creatorcontrib><title>The relative reactivity of external observations and self-monitoring</title><title>Behavior therapy</title><description>To compare the relative reactivity of self-monitoring and external-monitoring, trained observers (from behind a one-way mirror) recorded the face-touching frequency of 14 college students in a classroom situation through five experimental conditions: baseline, observer-present, observer-absent, self-recording, and return-to-baseline. Although external-monitoring reduced face-touching frequency, self-monitoring was more reactive and produced more consistent reactivity across subjects. These results were discussed in terms of possible mechanisms explaining the reactivity of self-monitoring and possible variables affecting the reactivity of external observations.</description><issn>0005-7894</issn><issn>1878-1888</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1976</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwE5AicYFDwI7j1wmh8pQqcaCcrcReg6s0LnYa0X9P0iKunHZWmhntfgidE3xNMOE3bxhjlgupykvBr-SwiJweoAmRQuZESnmIJn-WY3SS0hJjiilhE3S_-IQsQlN1vh9FZQbhu20WXAbfHcS2arJQJ4j9YAltyqrWZgkal69C67sQfftxio5c1SQ4-51T9P74sJg95_PXp5fZ3Tw3lLIu57LgknCJawecMYeVsAqcKwtiawaGK0VrUtZCFYxYzgoDUFljaytUaUpMp-hi37uO4WsDqdPLsBkvTJpQjMsCK84GF9u7TAwpRXB6Hf2qiltNsB6B6R0wPdLQgusdME2H3O0-B8MLvYeok_HQGrA-gum0Df6fhh80mXLm</recordid><startdate>19760101</startdate><enddate>19760101</enddate><creator>Nelson, Rosemery O.</creator><creator>Lipinski, David P.</creator><creator>Black, John L.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Academic Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HFXKP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19760101</creationdate><title>The relative reactivity of external observations and self-monitoring</title><author>Nelson, Rosemery O. ; Lipinski, David P. ; Black, John L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-682681680bfe655f097d9eff421db5ec6993b14b79251d652ceeadcdbd794c403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1976</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Rosemery O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipinski, David P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Black, John L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 17</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Behavior therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nelson, Rosemery O.</au><au>Lipinski, David P.</au><au>Black, John L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The relative reactivity of external observations and self-monitoring</atitle><jtitle>Behavior therapy</jtitle><date>1976-01-01</date><risdate>1976</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>314</spage><epage>321</epage><pages>314-321</pages><issn>0005-7894</issn><eissn>1878-1888</eissn><abstract>To compare the relative reactivity of self-monitoring and external-monitoring, trained observers (from behind a one-way mirror) recorded the face-touching frequency of 14 college students in a classroom situation through five experimental conditions: baseline, observer-present, observer-absent, self-recording, and return-to-baseline. Although external-monitoring reduced face-touching frequency, self-monitoring was more reactive and produced more consistent reactivity across subjects. These results were discussed in terms of possible mechanisms explaining the reactivity of self-monitoring and possible variables affecting the reactivity of external observations.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0005-7894(76)80057-3</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0005-7894
ispartof Behavior therapy, 1976-01, Vol.7 (3), p.314-321
issn 0005-7894
1878-1888
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1300420965
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Periodicals Index Online
title The relative reactivity of external observations and self-monitoring
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T00%3A08%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20relative%20reactivity%20of%20external%20observations%20and%20self-monitoring&rft.jtitle=Behavior%20therapy&rft.au=Nelson,%20Rosemery%20O.&rft.date=1976-01-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=314&rft.epage=321&rft.pages=314-321&rft.issn=0005-7894&rft.eissn=1878-1888&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0005-7894(76)80057-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1300420965%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1300420965&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0005789476800573&rfr_iscdi=true