Reactions to assertive versus unassertive behavior: Differential effects for males and females and implications for assertiveness training
Although a great deal of clinical research attention has been directed toward assertiveness training, few studies have examined the social impact or interpersonal evaluation of assertive versus unassertive behavior, including the differential evaluation of assertiveness exhibited by males and female...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Behavior therapy 1980-11, Vol.11 (5), p.670-682 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 682 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 670 |
| container_title | Behavior therapy |
| container_volume | 11 |
| creator | Kelly, Jeffrey A. Kern, Jeffrey M. Kirkley, Betty G. Patterson, Jana N. Keane, Terence M. |
| description | Although a great deal of clinical research attention has been directed toward assertiveness training, few studies have examined the social impact or interpersonal evaluation of assertive versus unassertive behavior, including the differential evaluation of assertiveness exhibited by males and females. In the present study, subjects observed a videotape showing a male or female stimulus model behaving either assertively or unassertively during four interactions similar to those used in assertiveness training research. Subjects then completed an interpersonal attraction inventory to evaluate the model they observed. Results indicated that while assertive models were viewed as skilled and able, they were given lower ratings on measures of likeability than unassertive models. Further, interaction effects indicated that assertive behavior exhibited by females resulted in more negative evaluations than the identical behavior in males. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0005-7894(80)80006-2 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1300412592</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0005789480800062</els_id><sourcerecordid>1300412592</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-234b916b1201b3dfde9211ffec3a2d9aa11f0769a2e3554119572ef192be05353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkN1KAzEQhYMoWKuPIAS80YvVmWSzzXojUn-hIPhzHbK7s5rSZmuyLfgKPrW7VtpLr2YmnDkn8zF2jHCOgNnFCwCoZKTz9FTDme6mLBE7bIB6pBPUWu-ywUayzw5inAJIkKgG7PuZbNm6xkfeNtzGSKF1K-IrCnEZ-dJvnwr6sCvXhEt-4-qaAvnW2Rmnri_byOsm8LmdUeTWV7ymbe_mi5kr7Tqll208PcUuN1jnnX8_ZHu1nUU6-qtD9nZ3-zp-SCZP94_j60lSCgVtImRa5JgVKAALWdUV5QKx_4S0osqt7QYYZbkVJJVKEXM1ElRjLgoCJZUcspO17yI0n0uKrZk2y-C7SIMSIEWhctGp1FpVhibGQLVZBDe34csgmB67-cVueqZGg_nFbvq9q_UedSesHAUTS0e-pMqFjpOpGvePww-3_YzH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1300412592</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reactions to assertive versus unassertive behavior: Differential effects for males and females and implications for assertiveness training</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Kelly, Jeffrey A. ; Kern, Jeffrey M. ; Kirkley, Betty G. ; Patterson, Jana N. ; Keane, Terence M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Jeffrey A. ; Kern, Jeffrey M. ; Kirkley, Betty G. ; Patterson, Jana N. ; Keane, Terence M.</creatorcontrib><description>Although a great deal of clinical research attention has been directed toward assertiveness training, few studies have examined the social impact or interpersonal evaluation of assertive versus unassertive behavior, including the differential evaluation of assertiveness exhibited by males and females. In the present study, subjects observed a videotape showing a male or female stimulus model behaving either assertively or unassertively during four interactions similar to those used in assertiveness training research. Subjects then completed an interpersonal attraction inventory to evaluate the model they observed. Results indicated that while assertive models were viewed as skilled and able, they were given lower ratings on measures of likeability than unassertive models. Further, interaction effects indicated that assertive behavior exhibited by females resulted in more negative evaluations than the identical behavior in males.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0005-7894</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-1888</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0005-7894(80)80006-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Behavior therapy, 1980-11, Vol.11 (5), p.670-682</ispartof><rights>1980 Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy. All rights reserved</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-234b916b1201b3dfde9211ffec3a2d9aa11f0769a2e3554119572ef192be05353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-234b916b1201b3dfde9211ffec3a2d9aa11f0769a2e3554119572ef192be05353</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(80)80006-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27870,27925,27926,45996</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Jeffrey A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kern, Jeffrey M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirkley, Betty G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patterson, Jana N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keane, Terence M.</creatorcontrib><title>Reactions to assertive versus unassertive behavior: Differential effects for males and females and implications for assertiveness training</title><title>Behavior therapy</title><description>Although a great deal of clinical research attention has been directed toward assertiveness training, few studies have examined the social impact or interpersonal evaluation of assertive versus unassertive behavior, including the differential evaluation of assertiveness exhibited by males and females. In the present study, subjects observed a videotape showing a male or female stimulus model behaving either assertively or unassertively during four interactions similar to those used in assertiveness training research. Subjects then completed an interpersonal attraction inventory to evaluate the model they observed. Results indicated that while assertive models were viewed as skilled and able, they were given lower ratings on measures of likeability than unassertive models. Further, interaction effects indicated that assertive behavior exhibited by females resulted in more negative evaluations than the identical behavior in males.</description><issn>0005-7894</issn><issn>1878-1888</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1980</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkN1KAzEQhYMoWKuPIAS80YvVmWSzzXojUn-hIPhzHbK7s5rSZmuyLfgKPrW7VtpLr2YmnDkn8zF2jHCOgNnFCwCoZKTz9FTDme6mLBE7bIB6pBPUWu-ywUayzw5inAJIkKgG7PuZbNm6xkfeNtzGSKF1K-IrCnEZ-dJvnwr6sCvXhEt-4-qaAvnW2Rmnri_byOsm8LmdUeTWV7ymbe_mi5kr7Tqll208PcUuN1jnnX8_ZHu1nUU6-qtD9nZ3-zp-SCZP94_j60lSCgVtImRa5JgVKAALWdUV5QKx_4S0osqt7QYYZbkVJJVKEXM1ElRjLgoCJZUcspO17yI0n0uKrZk2y-C7SIMSIEWhctGp1FpVhibGQLVZBDe34csgmB67-cVueqZGg_nFbvq9q_UedSesHAUTS0e-pMqFjpOpGvePww-3_YzH</recordid><startdate>19801101</startdate><enddate>19801101</enddate><creator>Kelly, Jeffrey A.</creator><creator>Kern, Jeffrey M.</creator><creator>Kirkley, Betty G.</creator><creator>Patterson, Jana N.</creator><creator>Keane, Terence M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Academic Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HFXKP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19801101</creationdate><title>Reactions to assertive versus unassertive behavior: Differential effects for males and females and implications for assertiveness training</title><author>Kelly, Jeffrey A. ; Kern, Jeffrey M. ; Kirkley, Betty G. ; Patterson, Jana N. ; Keane, Terence M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-234b916b1201b3dfde9211ffec3a2d9aa11f0769a2e3554119572ef192be05353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1980</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Jeffrey A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kern, Jeffrey M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirkley, Betty G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patterson, Jana N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keane, Terence M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 17</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Behavior therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kelly, Jeffrey A.</au><au>Kern, Jeffrey M.</au><au>Kirkley, Betty G.</au><au>Patterson, Jana N.</au><au>Keane, Terence M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reactions to assertive versus unassertive behavior: Differential effects for males and females and implications for assertiveness training</atitle><jtitle>Behavior therapy</jtitle><date>1980-11-01</date><risdate>1980</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>670</spage><epage>682</epage><pages>670-682</pages><issn>0005-7894</issn><eissn>1878-1888</eissn><abstract>Although a great deal of clinical research attention has been directed toward assertiveness training, few studies have examined the social impact or interpersonal evaluation of assertive versus unassertive behavior, including the differential evaluation of assertiveness exhibited by males and females. In the present study, subjects observed a videotape showing a male or female stimulus model behaving either assertively or unassertively during four interactions similar to those used in assertiveness training research. Subjects then completed an interpersonal attraction inventory to evaluate the model they observed. Results indicated that while assertive models were viewed as skilled and able, they were given lower ratings on measures of likeability than unassertive models. Further, interaction effects indicated that assertive behavior exhibited by females resulted in more negative evaluations than the identical behavior in males.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0005-7894(80)80006-2</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0005-7894 |
| ispartof | Behavior therapy, 1980-11, Vol.11 (5), p.670-682 |
| issn | 0005-7894 1878-1888 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1300412592 |
| source | Periodicals Index Online; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
| title | Reactions to assertive versus unassertive behavior: Differential effects for males and females and implications for assertiveness training |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T15%3A08%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reactions%20to%20assertive%20versus%20unassertive%20behavior:%20Differential%20effects%20for%20males%20and%20females%20and%20implications%20for%20assertiveness%20training&rft.jtitle=Behavior%20therapy&rft.au=Kelly,%20Jeffrey%20A.&rft.date=1980-11-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=670&rft.epage=682&rft.pages=670-682&rft.issn=0005-7894&rft.eissn=1878-1888&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0005-7894(80)80006-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1300412592%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1300412592&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0005789480800062&rfr_iscdi=true |