A comparison of two teaching methods in Mathematical Statistics
Although tape-slide teaching has been available for twenty years, there have been few well-controlled studies of its effectiveness in higher education. In a three-year research project at the University of Exeter, a series of tape-slides was produced for a pilot comparison with the lecture method in...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames) 1981-01, Vol.6 (2), p.139-146 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 146 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 139 |
| container_title | Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames) |
| container_volume | 6 |
| creator | Harding, C.M. Riley, I.S. Bligh, D.A. |
| description | Although tape-slide teaching has been available for twenty years, there have been few well-controlled studies of its effectiveness in higher education. In a three-year research project at the University of Exeter, a series of tape-slides was produced for a pilot comparison with the lecture method in the first year; in the second year, an updated version of the tape-slide sequences was used in a main trial comparison. The teaching trials carried out were of a balanced design, involving variables such as course of study, age, sex, previous knowledge of statistics and tape-slides and tutor, and existing methods of assessment were mainly used. Results indicate no observable academic differences between the groups taught by each method. The economics of the two methods are found to be comparable. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/03075078112331379392 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1297958062</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1297958062</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-3b02c3801ec03858f118f5560c0c424a61326bc3ce7d8d96498f5aa21a4d64613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKv_wEXA9ejNY5LMqpTiCyouVHAX0kzGmTIzqUlK6b83pS7F1T1wvnMuHISuCdwSUHAHDGQJUhFCGSNMVqyiJ2hCuISCSP55iiYHpMhMdY4uYlwDgJCKT9Bsjq0fNiZ00Y_YNzjtPE7O2LYbv_DgUuvriLsRv5jUusGkzpoev6UsYtbxEp01po_u6vdO0cfD_fviqVi-Pj4v5svC0hJSwVZALVNAnAWmStUQopqyFGDBcsqNIIyKlWXWyVrVleBVto2hxPBa8OxO0c2xdxP899bFpNd-G8b8UhNayapUIGim-JGywccYXKM3oRtM2GsC-jCV_muqHJsdY93Y-DCYnQ99rZPZ9z40wYy2i5r92_ADBB1tgg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1297958062</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of two teaching methods in Mathematical Statistics</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>Taylor & Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Harding, C.M. ; Riley, I.S. ; Bligh, D.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Harding, C.M. ; Riley, I.S. ; Bligh, D.A.</creatorcontrib><description>Although tape-slide teaching has been available for twenty years, there have been few well-controlled studies of its effectiveness in higher education. In a three-year research project at the University of Exeter, a series of tape-slides was produced for a pilot comparison with the lecture method in the first year; in the second year, an updated version of the tape-slide sequences was used in a main trial comparison. The teaching trials carried out were of a balanced design, involving variables such as course of study, age, sex, previous knowledge of statistics and tape-slides and tutor, and existing methods of assessment were mainly used. Results indicate no observable academic differences between the groups taught by each method. The economics of the two methods are found to be comparable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0307-5079</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-174X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/03075078112331379392</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><ispartof>Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames), 1981-01, Vol.6 (2), p.139-146</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 1981</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-3b02c3801ec03858f118f5560c0c424a61326bc3ce7d8d96498f5aa21a4d64613</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/03075078112331379392$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03075078112331379392$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27869,27924,27925,59647,60436</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harding, C.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riley, I.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bligh, D.A.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of two teaching methods in Mathematical Statistics</title><title>Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames)</title><description>Although tape-slide teaching has been available for twenty years, there have been few well-controlled studies of its effectiveness in higher education. In a three-year research project at the University of Exeter, a series of tape-slides was produced for a pilot comparison with the lecture method in the first year; in the second year, an updated version of the tape-slide sequences was used in a main trial comparison. The teaching trials carried out were of a balanced design, involving variables such as course of study, age, sex, previous knowledge of statistics and tape-slides and tutor, and existing methods of assessment were mainly used. Results indicate no observable academic differences between the groups taught by each method. The economics of the two methods are found to be comparable.</description><issn>0307-5079</issn><issn>1470-174X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1981</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKv_wEXA9ejNY5LMqpTiCyouVHAX0kzGmTIzqUlK6b83pS7F1T1wvnMuHISuCdwSUHAHDGQJUhFCGSNMVqyiJ2hCuISCSP55iiYHpMhMdY4uYlwDgJCKT9Bsjq0fNiZ00Y_YNzjtPE7O2LYbv_DgUuvriLsRv5jUusGkzpoev6UsYtbxEp01po_u6vdO0cfD_fviqVi-Pj4v5svC0hJSwVZALVNAnAWmStUQopqyFGDBcsqNIIyKlWXWyVrVleBVto2hxPBa8OxO0c2xdxP899bFpNd-G8b8UhNayapUIGim-JGywccYXKM3oRtM2GsC-jCV_muqHJsdY93Y-DCYnQ99rZPZ9z40wYy2i5r92_ADBB1tgg</recordid><startdate>19810101</startdate><enddate>19810101</enddate><creator>Harding, C.M.</creator><creator>Riley, I.S.</creator><creator>Bligh, D.A.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Carfax Pub</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HAGHG</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19810101</creationdate><title>A comparison of two teaching methods in Mathematical Statistics</title><author>Harding, C.M. ; Riley, I.S. ; Bligh, D.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-3b02c3801ec03858f118f5560c0c424a61326bc3ce7d8d96498f5aa21a4d64613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1981</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harding, C.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riley, I.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bligh, D.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 12</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harding, C.M.</au><au>Riley, I.S.</au><au>Bligh, D.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of two teaching methods in Mathematical Statistics</atitle><jtitle>Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames)</jtitle><date>1981-01-01</date><risdate>1981</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>139</spage><epage>146</epage><pages>139-146</pages><issn>0307-5079</issn><eissn>1470-174X</eissn><abstract>Although tape-slide teaching has been available for twenty years, there have been few well-controlled studies of its effectiveness in higher education. In a three-year research project at the University of Exeter, a series of tape-slides was produced for a pilot comparison with the lecture method in the first year; in the second year, an updated version of the tape-slide sequences was used in a main trial comparison. The teaching trials carried out were of a balanced design, involving variables such as course of study, age, sex, previous knowledge of statistics and tape-slides and tutor, and existing methods of assessment were mainly used. Results indicate no observable academic differences between the groups taught by each method. The economics of the two methods are found to be comparable.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/03075078112331379392</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0307-5079 |
| ispartof | Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames), 1981-01, Vol.6 (2), p.139-146 |
| issn | 0307-5079 1470-174X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1297958062 |
| source | Periodicals Index Online; EBSCOhost Education Source; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete |
| title | A comparison of two teaching methods in Mathematical Statistics |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T01%3A28%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20two%20teaching%20methods%20in%20Mathematical%20Statistics&rft.jtitle=Studies%20in%20higher%20education%20(Dorchester-on-Thames)&rft.au=Harding,%20C.M.&rft.date=1981-01-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=139&rft.epage=146&rft.pages=139-146&rft.issn=0307-5079&rft.eissn=1470-174X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/03075078112331379392&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E1297958062%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1297958062&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |