Lawyers, Liberalism, and Procedure: The German Imperial Justice Laws of 1877–79
Although Franz Schnabel described the nineteenth century as the “century of the formal Rechtsstaat,” most political and social historians of the German Kaiserreich have paid surprisingly little attention to the legal aspect of the development of society and polity. Textbooks in German history contai...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Central European history 1993-06, Vol.26 (2), p.165-193 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 193 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 165 |
container_title | Central European history |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Ledford, Kenneth F. |
description | Although Franz Schnabel described the nineteenth century as the “century of the formal Rechtsstaat,” most political and social historians of the German Kaiserreich have paid surprisingly little attention to the legal aspect of the development of society and polity. Textbooks in German history contain only brief mention of the enactment of legal reforms, either naming them without comment or subsuming them under administrative initiatives of the National Liberal party. More importantly, even standard works on the history of liberalism give precious little space to the important legislative reforms that are the focus of this essay; James J. Sheehan devotes only a paragraph to the adoption of the Imperial Justice Laws of 1877–79, and Dieter Langewiesche stresses the importance of legal unity and these reforms to liberals, but also in only one paragraph. In general, historians of German liberalism have left efforts to examine the development and unification of the German legal system after 1848 to legal historians, who are housed in Germany in the separate legal faculties and focus their work primarily on the history of legal doctrine. By failing to examine law as a historical artifact, however, political and social historians have also overlooked the Weberian message that law is a crucial analytical entry point into any understanding of modem society. Contemporary legal scholars stress that legal and social systems are inextricably intertwined, and that neither can be understood without a grasp of the other. Understanding legal discourse helps historians understand broader social discourse. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0008938900020112 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1297837781</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0008938900020112</cupid><jstor_id>4546330</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4546330</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-bd9ee17bdcd026fe91ab2d05cb9048b8c6dd0e7e2da7ed2cdecc8e2332e29c703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UM1KAzEYDKJgrT6A4CHgtav56SYbb1JsrRRssSL0ErLJV93a7dZki_bmO_iGPom7tBRBPA0fM_PNMAidUnJBCZWXD4SQRPFEVcgIpWwPNWgsVEQFFfuoUdNRzR-ioxBm9RnHrIFGA_O-Bh9aeJCl4M08C3kLm4XDQ19YcCsPV3j8ArgHPjcL3M-X4DMzx3erUGYWcOUPuJhimkj5_fkl1TE6mJp5gJMtNtFj92bcuY0G971-53oQWS5FGaVOAVCZOusIE1NQ1KTMkdimirSTNLHCOQISmDMSHLMOrE2Acc6AKSsJb6Lzzd-lL95WEEo9K1Z-UUVqypRMuJQJrVR0o7K-CMHDVC99lhu_1pToejn9Z7nKc7bxzEJZ-J2hHbcF53VwtKGzUMLHjjb-VQvJZaxFb6Qnw87TZDia6G6l59sKJk995p7hV9N_S_wAx8KIVA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1297837781</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lawyers, Liberalism, and Procedure: The German Imperial Justice Laws of 1877–79</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Cambridge Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Ledford, Kenneth F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ledford, Kenneth F.</creatorcontrib><description>Although Franz Schnabel described the nineteenth century as the “century of the formal Rechtsstaat,” most political and social historians of the German Kaiserreich have paid surprisingly little attention to the legal aspect of the development of society and polity. Textbooks in German history contain only brief mention of the enactment of legal reforms, either naming them without comment or subsuming them under administrative initiatives of the National Liberal party. More importantly, even standard works on the history of liberalism give precious little space to the important legislative reforms that are the focus of this essay; James J. Sheehan devotes only a paragraph to the adoption of the Imperial Justice Laws of 1877–79, and Dieter Langewiesche stresses the importance of legal unity and these reforms to liberals, but also in only one paragraph. In general, historians of German liberalism have left efforts to examine the development and unification of the German legal system after 1848 to legal historians, who are housed in Germany in the separate legal faculties and focus their work primarily on the history of legal doctrine. By failing to examine law as a historical artifact, however, political and social historians have also overlooked the Weberian message that law is a crucial analytical entry point into any understanding of modem society. Contemporary legal scholars stress that legal and social systems are inextricably intertwined, and that neither can be understood without a grasp of the other. Understanding legal discourse helps historians understand broader social discourse.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-9389</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1569-1616</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0008938900020112</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Attorneys ; Confederation ; Judges ; Law reform ; Lawyer client communication ; Legal proceedings ; Liberalism ; Rule of law ; Statutory law ; Trials</subject><ispartof>Central European history, 1993-06, Vol.26 (2), p.165-193</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Conference Group for Central European History of the American Historical Association 1993</rights><rights>Copyright 1994 Humanities Press International, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-bd9ee17bdcd026fe91ab2d05cb9048b8c6dd0e7e2da7ed2cdecc8e2332e29c703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-bd9ee17bdcd026fe91ab2d05cb9048b8c6dd0e7e2da7ed2cdecc8e2332e29c703</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4546330$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0008938900020112/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,799,27846,27901,27902,55603,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ledford, Kenneth F.</creatorcontrib><title>Lawyers, Liberalism, and Procedure: The German Imperial Justice Laws of 1877–79</title><title>Central European history</title><addtitle>Cent Eur Hist</addtitle><description>Although Franz Schnabel described the nineteenth century as the “century of the formal Rechtsstaat,” most political and social historians of the German Kaiserreich have paid surprisingly little attention to the legal aspect of the development of society and polity. Textbooks in German history contain only brief mention of the enactment of legal reforms, either naming them without comment or subsuming them under administrative initiatives of the National Liberal party. More importantly, even standard works on the history of liberalism give precious little space to the important legislative reforms that are the focus of this essay; James J. Sheehan devotes only a paragraph to the adoption of the Imperial Justice Laws of 1877–79, and Dieter Langewiesche stresses the importance of legal unity and these reforms to liberals, but also in only one paragraph. In general, historians of German liberalism have left efforts to examine the development and unification of the German legal system after 1848 to legal historians, who are housed in Germany in the separate legal faculties and focus their work primarily on the history of legal doctrine. By failing to examine law as a historical artifact, however, political and social historians have also overlooked the Weberian message that law is a crucial analytical entry point into any understanding of modem society. Contemporary legal scholars stress that legal and social systems are inextricably intertwined, and that neither can be understood without a grasp of the other. Understanding legal discourse helps historians understand broader social discourse.</description><subject>Attorneys</subject><subject>Confederation</subject><subject>Judges</subject><subject>Law reform</subject><subject>Lawyer client communication</subject><subject>Legal proceedings</subject><subject>Liberalism</subject><subject>Rule of law</subject><subject>Statutory law</subject><subject>Trials</subject><issn>0008-9389</issn><issn>1569-1616</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HYQOX</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>~OU</sourceid><sourceid>~OW</sourceid><sourceid>~PO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UM1KAzEYDKJgrT6A4CHgtav56SYbb1JsrRRssSL0ErLJV93a7dZki_bmO_iGPom7tBRBPA0fM_PNMAidUnJBCZWXD4SQRPFEVcgIpWwPNWgsVEQFFfuoUdNRzR-ioxBm9RnHrIFGA_O-Bh9aeJCl4M08C3kLm4XDQ19YcCsPV3j8ArgHPjcL3M-X4DMzx3erUGYWcOUPuJhimkj5_fkl1TE6mJp5gJMtNtFj92bcuY0G971-53oQWS5FGaVOAVCZOusIE1NQ1KTMkdimirSTNLHCOQISmDMSHLMOrE2Acc6AKSsJb6Lzzd-lL95WEEo9K1Z-UUVqypRMuJQJrVR0o7K-CMHDVC99lhu_1pToejn9Z7nKc7bxzEJZ-J2hHbcF53VwtKGzUMLHjjb-VQvJZaxFb6Qnw87TZDia6G6l59sKJk995p7hV9N_S_wAx8KIVA</recordid><startdate>199306</startdate><enddate>199306</enddate><creator>Ledford, Kenneth F.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Humanities Press International, Inc</general><general>Emory University</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABKTN</scope><scope>GPCCI</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>HZAIM</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>~OT</scope><scope>~OU</scope><scope>~OV</scope><scope>~OW</scope><scope>~PK</scope><scope>~PO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199306</creationdate><title>Lawyers, Liberalism, and Procedure: The German Imperial Justice Laws of 1877–79</title><author>Ledford, Kenneth F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-bd9ee17bdcd026fe91ab2d05cb9048b8c6dd0e7e2da7ed2cdecc8e2332e29c703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Attorneys</topic><topic>Confederation</topic><topic>Judges</topic><topic>Law reform</topic><topic>Lawyer client communication</topic><topic>Legal proceedings</topic><topic>Liberalism</topic><topic>Rule of law</topic><topic>Statutory law</topic><topic>Trials</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ledford, Kenneth F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online JSTOR Titles</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 10</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 26</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PAO Collection 2 (purchase pre Oct/2008)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 2</collection><collection>PAO Collection 2</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 2.2</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Historical Studies Collection</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Liberal Arts Collection 2</collection><jtitle>Central European history</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ledford, Kenneth F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lawyers, Liberalism, and Procedure: The German Imperial Justice Laws of 1877–79</atitle><jtitle>Central European history</jtitle><addtitle>Cent Eur Hist</addtitle><date>1993-06</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>165</spage><epage>193</epage><pages>165-193</pages><issn>0008-9389</issn><eissn>1569-1616</eissn><abstract>Although Franz Schnabel described the nineteenth century as the “century of the formal Rechtsstaat,” most political and social historians of the German Kaiserreich have paid surprisingly little attention to the legal aspect of the development of society and polity. Textbooks in German history contain only brief mention of the enactment of legal reforms, either naming them without comment or subsuming them under administrative initiatives of the National Liberal party. More importantly, even standard works on the history of liberalism give precious little space to the important legislative reforms that are the focus of this essay; James J. Sheehan devotes only a paragraph to the adoption of the Imperial Justice Laws of 1877–79, and Dieter Langewiesche stresses the importance of legal unity and these reforms to liberals, but also in only one paragraph. In general, historians of German liberalism have left efforts to examine the development and unification of the German legal system after 1848 to legal historians, who are housed in Germany in the separate legal faculties and focus their work primarily on the history of legal doctrine. By failing to examine law as a historical artifact, however, political and social historians have also overlooked the Weberian message that law is a crucial analytical entry point into any understanding of modem society. Contemporary legal scholars stress that legal and social systems are inextricably intertwined, and that neither can be understood without a grasp of the other. Understanding legal discourse helps historians understand broader social discourse.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0008938900020112</doi><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0008-9389 |
ispartof | Central European history, 1993-06, Vol.26 (2), p.165-193 |
issn | 0008-9389 1569-1616 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1297837781 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Cambridge Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Periodicals Index Online |
subjects | Attorneys Confederation Judges Law reform Lawyer client communication Legal proceedings Liberalism Rule of law Statutory law Trials |
title | Lawyers, Liberalism, and Procedure: The German Imperial Justice Laws of 1877–79 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T01%3A39%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lawyers,%20Liberalism,%20and%20Procedure:%20The%20German%20Imperial%20Justice%20Laws%20of%201877%E2%80%9379&rft.jtitle=Central%20European%20history&rft.au=Ledford,%20Kenneth%20F.&rft.date=1993-06&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=165&rft.epage=193&rft.pages=165-193&rft.issn=0008-9389&rft.eissn=1569-1616&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0008938900020112&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4546330%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1297837781&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0008938900020112&rft_jstor_id=4546330&rfr_iscdi=true |