Public Environmental Amenity Benefits of Private Land: The Case of Prime Agricultural Land
Failure of land markets to account for environmental amenity benefits may lend support to public policies to protect agricultural land. The contingent valuation method is employed to estimate willingness to pay for such amenities in Greenville County, South Carolina. Marginal household amenity benef...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of agricultural and applied economics 1985-07, Vol.17 (1), p.139-149 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 149 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 139 |
| container_title | Journal of agricultural and applied economics |
| container_volume | 17 |
| creator | Bergstrom, John C. Dillman, B. L. Stoll, John R. |
| description | Failure of land markets to account for environmental amenity benefits may lend support to public policies to protect agricultural land. The contingent valuation method is employed to estimate willingness to pay for such amenities in Greenville County, South Carolina. Marginal household amenity benefits were estimated at $.06 per thousand acres using a payment card in a mail survey with 53 percent response. Bid payment vehicle was found not to significantly influence bids received. The informational structure of the contingent market was found to influence valuation responses, reinforcing the hypothesis that respondents react to alternative contingent market structures. The relationship between contingent market structure and directional effects upon responses is an important area for future research. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0081305200017155 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1297790491</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0081305200017155</cupid><sourcerecordid>1297790491</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-ad3d45a773d0f1a2206272a47501bfc9ef7fe6f91ea31b9fab9aea62f91c92f23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kFFLwzAUhYMoOKc_QJ8CPldv0qZZfJtjm8LA6VTEl3DbJlrdWk3a4f69GRsiiE-X5H7n3MMh5JjBGQMmz2cAPRaD4ADhyYTYIR0OIo1kAmKXdBjIJAIJvX1y4P0bQMK56HXI87TN5mVOh9WydHW1MFWDc9oPs2xW9NJUxpaNp7WlU1cusTF0glVxQe9fDR2gN9vNwtD-iyvzdt60LhisoUOyZ3HuzdF2dsnDaHg_uIomN-PrQX8S5VzFIsIiLhKBUsYFWIacQ8olx0QKYJnNlbHSmtQqZjBmmbKYKTSY8vCTK2553CWnG98PV3-2xjf6rW5dFU5qxpWUChLFAsU2VO5q752x-iPERrfSDPS6Qv2nwqCJNprSN-brR4DuXacylkKn41t9N3p8mk3VQE8Cf7LhLdYaQx9eP8x6KQvn12bxNgAuMlcWL-ZXzn8jfAOgaIlq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1297790491</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Public Environmental Amenity Benefits of Private Land: The Case of Prime Agricultural Land</title><source>AgEcon</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Bergstrom, John C. ; Dillman, B. L. ; Stoll, John R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bergstrom, John C. ; Dillman, B. L. ; Stoll, John R.</creatorcontrib><description>Failure of land markets to account for environmental amenity benefits may lend support to public policies to protect agricultural land. The contingent valuation method is employed to estimate willingness to pay for such amenities in Greenville County, South Carolina. Marginal household amenity benefits were estimated at $.06 per thousand acres using a payment card in a mail survey with 53 percent response. Bid payment vehicle was found not to significantly influence bids received. The informational structure of the contingent market was found to influence valuation responses, reinforcing the hypothesis that respondents react to alternative contingent market structures. The relationship between contingent market structure and directional effects upon responses is an important area for future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1074-0708</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0081-3052</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2056-7405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0081-3052</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0081305200017155</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>CAROLINA DEL SUR ; CAROLINE DU SUD ; contingent valuation ; environmental amenities ; ENVIRONNEMENT ; ESTIMACION ; MEDIO AMBIENTE ; MODELE ; MODELOS ; prime land ; public policy ; Submitted Articles ; SURFACE AGRICOLE UTILE ; TIERRAS AGRICOLAS ; VALEUR D'ESTIMATION</subject><ispartof>Journal of agricultural and applied economics, 1985-07, Vol.17 (1), p.139-149</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1985</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-ad3d45a773d0f1a2206272a47501bfc9ef7fe6f91ea31b9fab9aea62f91c92f23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-ad3d45a773d0f1a2206272a47501bfc9ef7fe6f91ea31b9fab9aea62f91c92f23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27874,27929,27930</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bergstrom, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dillman, B. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoll, John R.</creatorcontrib><title>Public Environmental Amenity Benefits of Private Land: The Case of Prime Agricultural Land</title><title>Journal of agricultural and applied economics</title><addtitle>J. Agric. Appl. Econ</addtitle><description>Failure of land markets to account for environmental amenity benefits may lend support to public policies to protect agricultural land. The contingent valuation method is employed to estimate willingness to pay for such amenities in Greenville County, South Carolina. Marginal household amenity benefits were estimated at $.06 per thousand acres using a payment card in a mail survey with 53 percent response. Bid payment vehicle was found not to significantly influence bids received. The informational structure of the contingent market was found to influence valuation responses, reinforcing the hypothesis that respondents react to alternative contingent market structures. The relationship between contingent market structure and directional effects upon responses is an important area for future research.</description><subject>CAROLINA DEL SUR</subject><subject>CAROLINE DU SUD</subject><subject>contingent valuation</subject><subject>environmental amenities</subject><subject>ENVIRONNEMENT</subject><subject>ESTIMACION</subject><subject>MEDIO AMBIENTE</subject><subject>MODELE</subject><subject>MODELOS</subject><subject>prime land</subject><subject>public policy</subject><subject>Submitted Articles</subject><subject>SURFACE AGRICOLE UTILE</subject><subject>TIERRAS AGRICOLAS</subject><subject>VALEUR D'ESTIMATION</subject><issn>1074-0708</issn><issn>0081-3052</issn><issn>2056-7405</issn><issn>0081-3052</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HYQOX</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kFFLwzAUhYMoOKc_QJ8CPldv0qZZfJtjm8LA6VTEl3DbJlrdWk3a4f69GRsiiE-X5H7n3MMh5JjBGQMmz2cAPRaD4ADhyYTYIR0OIo1kAmKXdBjIJAIJvX1y4P0bQMK56HXI87TN5mVOh9WydHW1MFWDc9oPs2xW9NJUxpaNp7WlU1cusTF0glVxQe9fDR2gN9vNwtD-iyvzdt60LhisoUOyZ3HuzdF2dsnDaHg_uIomN-PrQX8S5VzFIsIiLhKBUsYFWIacQ8olx0QKYJnNlbHSmtQqZjBmmbKYKTSY8vCTK2553CWnG98PV3-2xjf6rW5dFU5qxpWUChLFAsU2VO5q752x-iPERrfSDPS6Qv2nwqCJNprSN-brR4DuXacylkKn41t9N3p8mk3VQE8Cf7LhLdYaQx9eP8x6KQvn12bxNgAuMlcWL-ZXzn8jfAOgaIlq</recordid><startdate>198507</startdate><enddate>198507</enddate><creator>Bergstrom, John C.</creator><creator>Dillman, B. L.</creator><creator>Stoll, John R.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Southern Agricultural Economics Association</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ADABO</scope><scope>BEAJS</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDPSG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PEXHY</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SAAPM</scope><scope>~P9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198507</creationdate><title>Public Environmental Amenity Benefits of Private Land: The Case of Prime Agricultural Land</title><author>Bergstrom, John C. ; Dillman, B. L. ; Stoll, John R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-ad3d45a773d0f1a2206272a47501bfc9ef7fe6f91ea31b9fab9aea62f91c92f23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>CAROLINA DEL SUR</topic><topic>CAROLINE DU SUD</topic><topic>contingent valuation</topic><topic>environmental amenities</topic><topic>ENVIRONNEMENT</topic><topic>ESTIMACION</topic><topic>MEDIO AMBIENTE</topic><topic>MODELE</topic><topic>MODELOS</topic><topic>prime land</topic><topic>public policy</topic><topic>Submitted Articles</topic><topic>SURFACE AGRICOLE UTILE</topic><topic>TIERRAS AGRICOLAS</topic><topic>VALEUR D'ESTIMATION</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bergstrom, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dillman, B. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoll, John R.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 3 (2022)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 3</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 9.2</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 3.2</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 42</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 9</collection><jtitle>Journal of agricultural and applied economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bergstrom, John C.</au><au>Dillman, B. L.</au><au>Stoll, John R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Public Environmental Amenity Benefits of Private Land: The Case of Prime Agricultural Land</atitle><jtitle>Journal of agricultural and applied economics</jtitle><addtitle>J. Agric. Appl. Econ</addtitle><date>1985-07</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>139</spage><epage>149</epage><pages>139-149</pages><issn>1074-0708</issn><issn>0081-3052</issn><eissn>2056-7405</eissn><eissn>0081-3052</eissn><abstract>Failure of land markets to account for environmental amenity benefits may lend support to public policies to protect agricultural land. The contingent valuation method is employed to estimate willingness to pay for such amenities in Greenville County, South Carolina. Marginal household amenity benefits were estimated at $.06 per thousand acres using a payment card in a mail survey with 53 percent response. Bid payment vehicle was found not to significantly influence bids received. The informational structure of the contingent market was found to influence valuation responses, reinforcing the hypothesis that respondents react to alternative contingent market structures. The relationship between contingent market structure and directional effects upon responses is an important area for future research.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0081305200017155</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1074-0708 |
| ispartof | Journal of agricultural and applied economics, 1985-07, Vol.17 (1), p.139-149 |
| issn | 1074-0708 0081-3052 2056-7405 0081-3052 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1297790491 |
| source | AgEcon; Periodicals Index Online; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | CAROLINA DEL SUR CAROLINE DU SUD contingent valuation environmental amenities ENVIRONNEMENT ESTIMACION MEDIO AMBIENTE MODELE MODELOS prime land public policy Submitted Articles SURFACE AGRICOLE UTILE TIERRAS AGRICOLAS VALEUR D'ESTIMATION |
| title | Public Environmental Amenity Benefits of Private Land: The Case of Prime Agricultural Land |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T14%3A44%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Public%20Environmental%20Amenity%20Benefits%20of%20Private%20Land:%20The%20Case%20of%20Prime%20Agricultural%20Land&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20agricultural%20and%20applied%20economics&rft.au=Bergstrom,%20John%20C.&rft.date=1985-07&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=139&rft.epage=149&rft.pages=139-149&rft.issn=1074-0708&rft.eissn=2056-7405&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0081305200017155&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1297790491%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1297790491&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0081305200017155&rfr_iscdi=true |