Behaviour therapy versus psychotherapy and applied science
Recent discussions about the relation of behaviour therapy to psychotherapy and what common ground exists between them are theoretical discussions. They are disembodied from the practical problem of determining optimal treatments for every type of patient. There is a lamentable lack of familiarity w...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian Psychologist 1967-04, Vol.8a (2), p.105-113 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 113 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 105 |
container_title | Canadian Psychologist |
container_volume | 8a |
creator | Arthur, Artur Z |
description | Recent discussions about the relation of behaviour therapy to psychotherapy and what common ground exists between them are theoretical discussions. They are disembodied from the practical problem of determining optimal treatments for every type of patient. There is a lamentable lack of familiarity with such principles of applied psychology as that the criterion of excellence of a treatment Is in the product not in the theory, that the aim of selecting a treatment is optimality not just success, and that some measures of value must enter into every decision about the selection of treatment. It appears that psychologists have fallen into the error of expecting discussions of theoretical issues to improve treatment procedures. Only discussions of the relation of explicit, operationally defined and measurable procedures to explicit, measurable behaviour improvement can have a beneficial effect on the development of methods of treatment. The exiguousness of explicit measures of treatment and of improvement, or of some other benefits, is the major shortcoming of psychotherapy. Decision theory seems to be the most appropriate model for comparing the value of different treatments. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/h0083136 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1297765580</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1297765580</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a277t-38bd751f38db23992158500aac3818320cfca019edb6e168e7e8c2aabc3c99e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10EtLxDAQB_AgCq4P8CMU9SBIddK0TeJNF1-w4EXPYZpOaZe1jUl3Yb-9WdY9CHoaGH7z4M_YGYcbDkLetgBKcFHusQlXUqVSQL7PJhDbaa5EdsiOQpgDCNAin7C7B2px1Q1Ln4wteXTrZEU-LEPiwtq2w66JfZ2gc4uO6iTYjnpLJ-ygwUWg0596zD6eHt-nL-ns7fl1ej9LMZNyTIWqalnwRqi6yoTWGS9UAYBoheLxIbCNReCa6qokXiqSpGyGWFlhtSYtjtn5dq_zw9eSwmjm8d0-njQlz_NScS4juvgP8UxLWRaFgqiutsr6IQRPjXG--0S_NhzMJj6ziy_S6y1Fh2aTBfqxswsKduk99aOx6IxCk8W5IurLv_Vv9g0YV30K</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1297765580</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Behaviour therapy versus psychotherapy and applied science</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Arthur, Artur Z</creator><contributor>Gibson, David</contributor><creatorcontrib>Arthur, Artur Z ; Gibson, David</creatorcontrib><description>Recent discussions about the relation of behaviour therapy to psychotherapy and what common ground exists between them are theoretical discussions. They are disembodied from the practical problem of determining optimal treatments for every type of patient. There is a lamentable lack of familiarity with such principles of applied psychology as that the criterion of excellence of a treatment Is in the product not in the theory, that the aim of selecting a treatment is optimality not just success, and that some measures of value must enter into every decision about the selection of treatment. It appears that psychologists have fallen into the error of expecting discussions of theoretical issues to improve treatment procedures. Only discussions of the relation of explicit, operationally defined and measurable procedures to explicit, measurable behaviour improvement can have a beneficial effect on the development of methods of treatment. The exiguousness of explicit measures of treatment and of improvement, or of some other benefits, is the major shortcoming of psychotherapy. Decision theory seems to be the most appropriate model for comparing the value of different treatments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-4832</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0708-5591</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-7304</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/h0083136</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ottawa: Canadian Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Applied Psychology ; Behavior Therapy ; Human ; Psychotherapy</subject><ispartof>Canadian Psychologist, 1967-04, Vol.8a (2), p.105-113</ispartof><rights>1967 Canadian Psychological Association</rights><rights>1967, Canadian Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a277t-38bd751f38db23992158500aac3818320cfca019edb6e168e7e8c2aabc3c99e93</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27846,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Gibson, David</contributor><creatorcontrib>Arthur, Artur Z</creatorcontrib><title>Behaviour therapy versus psychotherapy and applied science</title><title>Canadian Psychologist</title><description>Recent discussions about the relation of behaviour therapy to psychotherapy and what common ground exists between them are theoretical discussions. They are disembodied from the practical problem of determining optimal treatments for every type of patient. There is a lamentable lack of familiarity with such principles of applied psychology as that the criterion of excellence of a treatment Is in the product not in the theory, that the aim of selecting a treatment is optimality not just success, and that some measures of value must enter into every decision about the selection of treatment. It appears that psychologists have fallen into the error of expecting discussions of theoretical issues to improve treatment procedures. Only discussions of the relation of explicit, operationally defined and measurable procedures to explicit, measurable behaviour improvement can have a beneficial effect on the development of methods of treatment. The exiguousness of explicit measures of treatment and of improvement, or of some other benefits, is the major shortcoming of psychotherapy. Decision theory seems to be the most appropriate model for comparing the value of different treatments.</description><subject>Applied Psychology</subject><subject>Behavior Therapy</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Psychotherapy</subject><issn>0008-4832</issn><issn>0708-5591</issn><issn>1878-7304</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1967</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HYQOX</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp10EtLxDAQB_AgCq4P8CMU9SBIddK0TeJNF1-w4EXPYZpOaZe1jUl3Yb-9WdY9CHoaGH7z4M_YGYcbDkLetgBKcFHusQlXUqVSQL7PJhDbaa5EdsiOQpgDCNAin7C7B2px1Q1Ln4wteXTrZEU-LEPiwtq2w66JfZ2gc4uO6iTYjnpLJ-ygwUWg0596zD6eHt-nL-ns7fl1ej9LMZNyTIWqalnwRqi6yoTWGS9UAYBoheLxIbCNReCa6qokXiqSpGyGWFlhtSYtjtn5dq_zw9eSwmjm8d0-njQlz_NScS4juvgP8UxLWRaFgqiutsr6IQRPjXG--0S_NhzMJj6ziy_S6y1Fh2aTBfqxswsKduk99aOx6IxCk8W5IurLv_Vv9g0YV30K</recordid><startdate>19670401</startdate><enddate>19670401</enddate><creator>Arthur, Artur Z</creator><general>Canadian Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ADABO</scope><scope>BEAJS</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDPSG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PEXHY</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SAAPM</scope><scope>~P9</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19670401</creationdate><title>Behaviour therapy versus psychotherapy and applied science</title><author>Arthur, Artur Z</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a277t-38bd751f38db23992158500aac3818320cfca019edb6e168e7e8c2aabc3c99e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1967</creationdate><topic>Applied Psychology</topic><topic>Behavior Therapy</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Psychotherapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arthur, Artur Z</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 3 (2022)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 3</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 9.2</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 3.2</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 42</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 9</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Canadian Psychologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arthur, Artur Z</au><au>Gibson, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Behaviour therapy versus psychotherapy and applied science</atitle><jtitle>Canadian Psychologist</jtitle><date>1967-04-01</date><risdate>1967</risdate><volume>8a</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>105</spage><epage>113</epage><pages>105-113</pages><issn>0008-4832</issn><issn>0708-5591</issn><eissn>1878-7304</eissn><abstract>Recent discussions about the relation of behaviour therapy to psychotherapy and what common ground exists between them are theoretical discussions. They are disembodied from the practical problem of determining optimal treatments for every type of patient. There is a lamentable lack of familiarity with such principles of applied psychology as that the criterion of excellence of a treatment Is in the product not in the theory, that the aim of selecting a treatment is optimality not just success, and that some measures of value must enter into every decision about the selection of treatment. It appears that psychologists have fallen into the error of expecting discussions of theoretical issues to improve treatment procedures. Only discussions of the relation of explicit, operationally defined and measurable procedures to explicit, measurable behaviour improvement can have a beneficial effect on the development of methods of treatment. The exiguousness of explicit measures of treatment and of improvement, or of some other benefits, is the major shortcoming of psychotherapy. Decision theory seems to be the most appropriate model for comparing the value of different treatments.</abstract><cop>Ottawa</cop><pub>Canadian Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/h0083136</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0008-4832 |
ispartof | Canadian Psychologist, 1967-04, Vol.8a (2), p.105-113 |
issn | 0008-4832 0708-5591 1878-7304 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1297765580 |
source | APA PsycARTICLES; Periodicals Index Online |
subjects | Applied Psychology Behavior Therapy Human Psychotherapy |
title | Behaviour therapy versus psychotherapy and applied science |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T13%3A07%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Behaviour%20therapy%20versus%20psychotherapy%20and%20applied%20science&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20Psychologist&rft.au=Arthur,%20Artur%20Z&rft.date=1967-04-01&rft.volume=8a&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=105&rft.epage=113&rft.pages=105-113&rft.issn=0008-4832&rft.eissn=1878-7304&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/h0083136&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1297765580%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1297765580&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |