What's the point?
We present a theory of conversation comprehension in which a line of the conversation is “understood” by relating it to one of seven possible “points”. We define these points, and present examples where it seems plausible that the failure to “get the point” would indeed constitute a failure to under...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Cognitive science 1982-01, Vol.6 (3), p.255-275 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 275 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 255 |
| container_title | Cognitive science |
| container_volume | 6 |
| creator | Schank, Roger C. Collins, Gregg C. Davis, Ernest Johnson, Peter N. Lytinen, Steve Reiser, Brian J. |
| description | We present a theory of conversation comprehension in which a line of the conversation is “understood” by relating it to one of seven possible “points”. We define these points, and present examples where it seems plausible that the failure to “get the point” would indeed constitute a failure to understand the conversation. We argue that the recognition of such points must proceed in both a top down and bottom up fashion, and thus is likely to be quite complicated. Finally, we see the processing of information in the conversation to be dependent upon which point classification the user decides upon. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0364-0213(82)80002-5 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1297662541</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0364021382800025</els_id><sourcerecordid>1297662541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-9b0110837b6b353935d0018fc6b2f6ed13bbc0a6c5a2e74a5c3b67591b06ba1d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFj0tLxDAUhbNQcBxd-AOEARfqonpv0qTtapDBFwy4UHF5SdKUyaBtTTKC_97OVNy6OnA4Dz7GThGuEFBdP4NQeQYcxUXJL0sA4JncY5M_-4AdxrgefKVENWEnbyudzuMsrdys73yb5kdsv9Hv0R3_6pS93t2-LB6y5dP94-JmmVkhIGWVAUQoRWGUEVJUQtYAWDZWGd4oV6MwxoJWVmruilxLK4wqZIUGlNFYiyk7G3f70H1uXEy07jahHS4JeVUoxWWOQ0qOKRu6GINrqA_-Q4dvQqAtMe2IaYtGJacdMcmhNx97bkD48i5QtN611tU-OJuo7vw_Cz89dlvn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1297662541</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What's the point?</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Schank, Roger C. ; Collins, Gregg C. ; Davis, Ernest ; Johnson, Peter N. ; Lytinen, Steve ; Reiser, Brian J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schank, Roger C. ; Collins, Gregg C. ; Davis, Ernest ; Johnson, Peter N. ; Lytinen, Steve ; Reiser, Brian J.</creatorcontrib><description>We present a theory of conversation comprehension in which a line of the conversation is “understood” by relating it to one of seven possible “points”. We define these points, and present examples where it seems plausible that the failure to “get the point” would indeed constitute a failure to understand the conversation. We argue that the recognition of such points must proceed in both a top down and bottom up fashion, and thus is likely to be quite complicated. Finally, we see the processing of information in the conversation to be dependent upon which point classification the user decides upon.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-0213</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0364-0213(82)80002-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Norwood, NJ: Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>Cognitive science, 1982-01, Vol.6 (3), p.255-275</ispartof><rights>1982</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27848,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schank, Roger C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Gregg C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Ernest</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Peter N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lytinen, Steve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiser, Brian J.</creatorcontrib><title>What's the point?</title><title>Cognitive science</title><description>We present a theory of conversation comprehension in which a line of the conversation is “understood” by relating it to one of seven possible “points”. We define these points, and present examples where it seems plausible that the failure to “get the point” would indeed constitute a failure to understand the conversation. We argue that the recognition of such points must proceed in both a top down and bottom up fashion, and thus is likely to be quite complicated. Finally, we see the processing of information in the conversation to be dependent upon which point classification the user decides upon.</description><issn>0364-0213</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1982</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqFj0tLxDAUhbNQcBxd-AOEARfqonpv0qTtapDBFwy4UHF5SdKUyaBtTTKC_97OVNy6OnA4Dz7GThGuEFBdP4NQeQYcxUXJL0sA4JncY5M_-4AdxrgefKVENWEnbyudzuMsrdys73yb5kdsv9Hv0R3_6pS93t2-LB6y5dP94-JmmVkhIGWVAUQoRWGUEVJUQtYAWDZWGd4oV6MwxoJWVmruilxLK4wqZIUGlNFYiyk7G3f70H1uXEy07jahHS4JeVUoxWWOQ0qOKRu6GINrqA_-Q4dvQqAtMe2IaYtGJacdMcmhNx97bkD48i5QtN611tU-OJuo7vw_Cz89dlvn</recordid><startdate>19820101</startdate><enddate>19820101</enddate><creator>Schank, Roger C.</creator><creator>Collins, Gregg C.</creator><creator>Davis, Ernest</creator><creator>Johnson, Peter N.</creator><creator>Lytinen, Steve</creator><creator>Reiser, Brian J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Ablex Pub. Corp</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SAAPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19820101</creationdate><title>What's the point?</title><author>Schank, Roger C. ; Collins, Gregg C. ; Davis, Ernest ; Johnson, Peter N. ; Lytinen, Steve ; Reiser, Brian J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-9b0110837b6b353935d0018fc6b2f6ed13bbc0a6c5a2e74a5c3b67591b06ba1d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1982</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schank, Roger C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Gregg C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Ernest</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Peter N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lytinen, Steve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiser, Brian J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 42</collection><jtitle>Cognitive science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schank, Roger C.</au><au>Collins, Gregg C.</au><au>Davis, Ernest</au><au>Johnson, Peter N.</au><au>Lytinen, Steve</au><au>Reiser, Brian J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What's the point?</atitle><jtitle>Cognitive science</jtitle><date>1982-01-01</date><risdate>1982</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>255</spage><epage>275</epage><pages>255-275</pages><issn>0364-0213</issn><abstract>We present a theory of conversation comprehension in which a line of the conversation is “understood” by relating it to one of seven possible “points”. We define these points, and present examples where it seems plausible that the failure to “get the point” would indeed constitute a failure to understand the conversation. We argue that the recognition of such points must proceed in both a top down and bottom up fashion, and thus is likely to be quite complicated. Finally, we see the processing of information in the conversation to be dependent upon which point classification the user decides upon.</abstract><cop>Norwood, NJ</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/S0364-0213(82)80002-5</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0364-0213 |
| ispartof | Cognitive science, 1982-01, Vol.6 (3), p.255-275 |
| issn | 0364-0213 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1297662541 |
| source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Periodicals Index Online; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| title | What's the point? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T22%3A47%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What's%20the%20point?&rft.jtitle=Cognitive%20science&rft.au=Schank,%20Roger%20C.&rft.date=1982-01-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=255&rft.epage=275&rft.pages=255-275&rft.issn=0364-0213&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0364-0213(82)80002-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1297662541%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1297662541&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0364021382800025&rfr_iscdi=true |