Some characteristics of retrieval limitation in long-term memory

Some characteristics of retrieval limitation in long-term memory

Two variables were considered as potentially relevant to limitations on retrieval from long-term memory: category size and retrieval cues. The experiment involved a multitrial free recall design where each presentation was followed by three successive recall phases. The proportion recalled per recal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1972-01, Vol.11 (6), p.685-691
1. Verfasser: Patterson, Karalyn E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 691
container_issue 6
container_start_page 685
container_title Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
container_volume 11
creator Patterson, Karalyn E.
description Two variables were considered as potentially relevant to limitations on retrieval from long-term memory: category size and retrieval cues. The experiment involved a multitrial free recall design where each presentation was followed by three successive recall phases. The proportion recalled per recalled category and the consistency among the specific words recalled on the three phases of each trial (a) were higher for cued than for noncued subjects, and (b) varied as an inverse function of category size. Given a small category and an experimentally defined retrieval strategy, recall was essentially perfect after several trials.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80002-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1297336717</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022537172800021</els_id><sourcerecordid>1297336717</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-b1471dd86f1c6a45dec2a4bac9c7bab62ee3f1add780c6d31de951ae28d4de53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1OwzAQhH0AiVJ4BCRLXOAQ8NpJnJ4AVfxJlTi0d8uxN-AqiYvtVurbkzaIK6fVrmZmNR8hV8DugEF5v2SM86wQEm4kv63YsGZwQiZ_5zNyHuOaMQFQFRPyuPQdUvOlgzYJg4vJmUh9QwOm4HCnW9q6ziWdnO-p62nr-89sUHa0w86H_QU5bXQb8fJ3Tsnq5Xk1f8sWH6_v86dFZoSQKashl2BtVTZgSp0XFg3Xea3NzMha1yVHFA1oa2XFTGkFWJwVoJFXNrdYiCm5HmM3wX9vMSa19tvQDx8V8JkUopQgB1UxqkzwMQZs1Ca4Toe9AqYOfNSRjzqAUJKrIx8Fg-9h9OHQYOcwqGgc9gatC2iSst79k_ADPNxv6g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1297336717</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Some characteristics of retrieval limitation in long-term memory</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Patterson, Karalyn E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Patterson, Karalyn E.</creatorcontrib><description>Two variables were considered as potentially relevant to limitations on retrieval from long-term memory: category size and retrieval cues. The experiment involved a multitrial free recall design where each presentation was followed by three successive recall phases. The proportion recalled per recalled category and the consistency among the specific words recalled on the three phases of each trial (a) were higher for cued than for noncued subjects, and (b) varied as an inverse function of category size. Given a small category and an experimentally defined retrieval strategy, recall was essentially perfect after several trials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5371</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0749-596X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80002-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier B.V</publisher><ispartof>Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972-01, Vol.11 (6), p.685-691</ispartof><rights>1972 Academic Press, Inc. All rights reserved</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-b1471dd86f1c6a45dec2a4bac9c7bab62ee3f1add780c6d31de951ae28d4de53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-b1471dd86f1c6a45dec2a4bac9c7bab62ee3f1add780c6d31de951ae28d4de53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27869,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Patterson, Karalyn E.</creatorcontrib><title>Some characteristics of retrieval limitation in long-term memory</title><title>Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior</title><description>Two variables were considered as potentially relevant to limitations on retrieval from long-term memory: category size and retrieval cues. The experiment involved a multitrial free recall design where each presentation was followed by three successive recall phases. The proportion recalled per recalled category and the consistency among the specific words recalled on the three phases of each trial (a) were higher for cued than for noncued subjects, and (b) varied as an inverse function of category size. Given a small category and an experimentally defined retrieval strategy, recall was essentially perfect after several trials.</description><issn>0022-5371</issn><issn>0749-596X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1972</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0R3</sourceid><sourceid>ACFII</sourceid><sourceid>HYQOX</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>~OC</sourceid><sourceid>~PJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1OwzAQhH0AiVJ4BCRLXOAQ8NpJnJ4AVfxJlTi0d8uxN-AqiYvtVurbkzaIK6fVrmZmNR8hV8DugEF5v2SM86wQEm4kv63YsGZwQiZ_5zNyHuOaMQFQFRPyuPQdUvOlgzYJg4vJmUh9QwOm4HCnW9q6ziWdnO-p62nr-89sUHa0w86H_QU5bXQb8fJ3Tsnq5Xk1f8sWH6_v86dFZoSQKashl2BtVTZgSp0XFg3Xea3NzMha1yVHFA1oa2XFTGkFWJwVoJFXNrdYiCm5HmM3wX9vMSa19tvQDx8V8JkUopQgB1UxqkzwMQZs1Ca4Toe9AqYOfNSRjzqAUJKrIx8Fg-9h9OHQYOcwqGgc9gatC2iSst79k_ADPNxv6g</recordid><startdate>19720101</startdate><enddate>19720101</enddate><creator>Patterson, Karalyn E.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Academic Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0R3</scope><scope>ACFII</scope><scope>ANHVI</scope><scope>FUVTR</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>JSICY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SFNNT</scope><scope>~OB</scope><scope>~OC</scope><scope>~OG</scope><scope>~PJ</scope><scope>~PM</scope><scope>~PN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19720101</creationdate><title>Some characteristics of retrieval limitation in long-term memory</title><author>Patterson, Karalyn E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-b1471dd86f1c6a45dec2a4bac9c7bab62ee3f1add780c6d31de951ae28d4de53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1972</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Patterson, Karalyn E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 1.2</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 1 (2022)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Liberal Arts Collection 1 (2022)</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 06</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 36</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 44</collection><collection>PAO Collection 1</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 1</collection><collection>PAO Collection 1 (purchase pre Feb/2008)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online JISC Collection</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Liberal Arts Collection 1</collection><jtitle>Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Patterson, Karalyn E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Some characteristics of retrieval limitation in long-term memory</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior</jtitle><date>1972-01-01</date><risdate>1972</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>685</spage><epage>691</epage><pages>685-691</pages><issn>0022-5371</issn><issn>0749-596X</issn><abstract>Two variables were considered as potentially relevant to limitations on retrieval from long-term memory: category size and retrieval cues. The experiment involved a multitrial free recall design where each presentation was followed by three successive recall phases. The proportion recalled per recalled category and the consistency among the specific words recalled on the three phases of each trial (a) were higher for cued than for noncued subjects, and (b) varied as an inverse function of category size. Given a small category and an experimentally defined retrieval strategy, recall was essentially perfect after several trials.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80002-1</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-5371
ispartof Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972-01, Vol.11 (6), p.685-691
issn 0022-5371
0749-596X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1297336717
source Periodicals Index Online; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Some characteristics of retrieval limitation in long-term memory
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T21%3A47%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Some%20characteristics%20of%20retrieval%20limitation%20in%20long-term%20memory&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Verbal%20Learning%20and%20Verbal%20Behavior&rft.au=Patterson,%20Karalyn%20E.&rft.date=1972-01-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=685&rft.epage=691&rft.pages=685-691&rft.issn=0022-5371&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80002-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1297336717%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1297336717&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0022537172800021&rfr_iscdi=true