Interference effects of intralist word relationships in verbal learning

Six paired-associate lists, four constructed on the basis of associative strength and two on the basis of semantic distance of pairs of response members, were studied with regard to amount of intralist interference. A control list with response members remotely related with respect to these two vari...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1963-01, Vol.2 (2), p.170-175
1. Verfasser: Higa, Masanori
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 175
container_issue 2
container_start_page 170
container_title Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
container_volume 2
creator Higa, Masanori
description Six paired-associate lists, four constructed on the basis of associative strength and two on the basis of semantic distance of pairs of response members, were studied with regard to amount of intralist interference. A control list with response members remotely related with respect to these two variables was used for comparison. The types of relationships between six experimental response words were: (1) antonyms, (2) coordinate words, (3) strong direct associates in free association which are neither antonyms nor coordinates, (4) words which are not strong associates but which have high proportions of common responses in a free-association test, (5) connotatively, as well as denotatively, similar words, and (6) only connotatively similar words. The results showed that among the four association lists, only the lists of strong associates and antonyms were more difficult than the control list. Of the two semanticdistnace lists, only the synonym list was more difficult than the control list. Learning the control list first facilitated the learning of an experimental list significantly more than vice versa. The value of associative strength and semantic distance as predictors of interferences in paired-associate learning was discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0022-5371(63)80082-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1297335583</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022537163800821</els_id><sourcerecordid>1297335583</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-337d5a508cef73658c1912e411e1f08a4021bf9cf17c594db7009d97dccfcedd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9LAzEQxXNQsFY_grDgRQ-rM5vN_jmJFFsLBQ_qOaTJRFPW3TrZVvz2blvx6mlg5r03vJ8QFwg3CFjcPgNkWapkiVeFvK4AqizFIzH6W5-I0xhXABKxUiMxm7c9sSem1lJC3pPtY9L5JLQ9mybEPvnq2CVMjelD18b3sI7DMdkSL02TNGS4De3bmTj2pol0_jvH4nX68DJ5TBdPs_nkfpHaHLBPpSydMgoqS76Uhaos1phRjkjooTI5ZLj0tfVYWlXnblkC1K4unbXeknNyLC4PuWvuPjcUe73qNtwOLzVmdSmlUpUcVOqgstzFyOT1msOH4W-NoHec9J6T3gHRhdR7ThoH393BR0OFbSDW0YYdGRd4AKNdF_5J-AGUiHHh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1297335583</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interference effects of intralist word relationships in verbal learning</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Higa, Masanori</creator><creatorcontrib>Higa, Masanori</creatorcontrib><description>Six paired-associate lists, four constructed on the basis of associative strength and two on the basis of semantic distance of pairs of response members, were studied with regard to amount of intralist interference. A control list with response members remotely related with respect to these two variables was used for comparison. The types of relationships between six experimental response words were: (1) antonyms, (2) coordinate words, (3) strong direct associates in free association which are neither antonyms nor coordinates, (4) words which are not strong associates but which have high proportions of common responses in a free-association test, (5) connotatively, as well as denotatively, similar words, and (6) only connotatively similar words. The results showed that among the four association lists, only the lists of strong associates and antonyms were more difficult than the control list. Of the two semanticdistnace lists, only the synonym list was more difficult than the control list. Learning the control list first facilitated the learning of an experimental list significantly more than vice versa. The value of associative strength and semantic distance as predictors of interferences in paired-associate learning was discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5371</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0749-596X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5371(63)80082-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier B.V</publisher><ispartof>Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1963-01, Vol.2 (2), p.170-175</ispartof><rights>1963 Academic Press Inc. All rights reserved</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-337d5a508cef73658c1912e411e1f08a4021bf9cf17c594db7009d97dccfcedd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-337d5a508cef73658c1912e411e1f08a4021bf9cf17c594db7009d97dccfcedd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27848,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Higa, Masanori</creatorcontrib><title>Interference effects of intralist word relationships in verbal learning</title><title>Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior</title><description>Six paired-associate lists, four constructed on the basis of associative strength and two on the basis of semantic distance of pairs of response members, were studied with regard to amount of intralist interference. A control list with response members remotely related with respect to these two variables was used for comparison. The types of relationships between six experimental response words were: (1) antonyms, (2) coordinate words, (3) strong direct associates in free association which are neither antonyms nor coordinates, (4) words which are not strong associates but which have high proportions of common responses in a free-association test, (5) connotatively, as well as denotatively, similar words, and (6) only connotatively similar words. The results showed that among the four association lists, only the lists of strong associates and antonyms were more difficult than the control list. Of the two semanticdistnace lists, only the synonym list was more difficult than the control list. Learning the control list first facilitated the learning of an experimental list significantly more than vice versa. The value of associative strength and semantic distance as predictors of interferences in paired-associate learning was discussed.</description><issn>0022-5371</issn><issn>0749-596X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1963</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0R3</sourceid><sourceid>ACFII</sourceid><sourceid>HYQOX</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>~OC</sourceid><sourceid>~PJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE9LAzEQxXNQsFY_grDgRQ-rM5vN_jmJFFsLBQ_qOaTJRFPW3TrZVvz2blvx6mlg5r03vJ8QFwg3CFjcPgNkWapkiVeFvK4AqizFIzH6W5-I0xhXABKxUiMxm7c9sSem1lJC3pPtY9L5JLQ9mybEPvnq2CVMjelD18b3sI7DMdkSL02TNGS4De3bmTj2pol0_jvH4nX68DJ5TBdPs_nkfpHaHLBPpSydMgoqS76Uhaos1phRjkjooTI5ZLj0tfVYWlXnblkC1K4unbXeknNyLC4PuWvuPjcUe73qNtwOLzVmdSmlUpUcVOqgstzFyOT1msOH4W-NoHec9J6T3gHRhdR7ThoH393BR0OFbSDW0YYdGRd4AKNdF_5J-AGUiHHh</recordid><startdate>19630101</startdate><enddate>19630101</enddate><creator>Higa, Masanori</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Academic Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0R3</scope><scope>ACFII</scope><scope>ANHVI</scope><scope>FUVTR</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>JSICY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SFNNT</scope><scope>~OB</scope><scope>~OC</scope><scope>~OG</scope><scope>~PJ</scope><scope>~PM</scope><scope>~PN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19630101</creationdate><title>Interference effects of intralist word relationships in verbal learning</title><author>Higa, Masanori</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-337d5a508cef73658c1912e411e1f08a4021bf9cf17c594db7009d97dccfcedd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1963</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Higa, Masanori</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 1.2</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 1 (2022)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Liberal Arts Collection 1 (2022)</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 06</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 36</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 44</collection><collection>PAO Collection 1</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 1</collection><collection>PAO Collection 1 (purchase pre Feb/2008)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online JISC Collection</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Liberal Arts Collection 1</collection><jtitle>Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Higa, Masanori</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interference effects of intralist word relationships in verbal learning</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior</jtitle><date>1963-01-01</date><risdate>1963</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>170</spage><epage>175</epage><pages>170-175</pages><issn>0022-5371</issn><issn>0749-596X</issn><abstract>Six paired-associate lists, four constructed on the basis of associative strength and two on the basis of semantic distance of pairs of response members, were studied with regard to amount of intralist interference. A control list with response members remotely related with respect to these two variables was used for comparison. The types of relationships between six experimental response words were: (1) antonyms, (2) coordinate words, (3) strong direct associates in free association which are neither antonyms nor coordinates, (4) words which are not strong associates but which have high proportions of common responses in a free-association test, (5) connotatively, as well as denotatively, similar words, and (6) only connotatively similar words. The results showed that among the four association lists, only the lists of strong associates and antonyms were more difficult than the control list. Of the two semanticdistnace lists, only the synonym list was more difficult than the control list. Learning the control list first facilitated the learning of an experimental list significantly more than vice versa. The value of associative strength and semantic distance as predictors of interferences in paired-associate learning was discussed.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/S0022-5371(63)80082-1</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-5371
ispartof Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1963-01, Vol.2 (2), p.170-175
issn 0022-5371
0749-596X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1297335583
source Alma/SFX Local Collection; Periodicals Index Online
title Interference effects of intralist word relationships in verbal learning
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T08%3A59%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interference%20effects%20of%20intralist%20word%20relationships%20in%20verbal%20learning&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Verbal%20Learning%20and%20Verbal%20Behavior&rft.au=Higa,%20Masanori&rft.date=1963-01-01&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=170&rft.epage=175&rft.pages=170-175&rft.issn=0022-5371&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0022-5371(63)80082-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1297335583%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1297335583&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0022537163800821&rfr_iscdi=true