Comparing alternative tests of causality in temporal systems: Analytic results and experimental evidence
This paper discusses eight alternative tests of the absence of casual ordering, all of which are asymptotically valid under the null hypothesis in the sense that their limiting size is known. Their behavior under alternatives is compared analytically using the concept of approximate slope, and these...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of econometrics 1983-01, Vol.21 (2), p.161-194 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 194 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 161 |
| container_title | Journal of econometrics |
| container_volume | 21 |
| creator | Geweke, John Meese, Richard Dent, Warren |
| description | This paper discusses eight alternative tests of the absence of casual ordering, all of which are asymptotically valid under the null hypothesis in the sense that their limiting size is known. Their behavior under alternatives is compared analytically using the concept of approximate slope, and these results are supported by the outcomes of Monte Carlo experiments. The implications of these comparisons for applied work are unambiguous: Wald variants of a test attributed to Granger, and a lagged dependent variable version of Sim's test introduced in this paper, are equivalent in all relevant respects and are preferred to the other tests discussed. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0304-4076(83)90012-X |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_repec</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1297318330</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>030440768390012X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1297318330</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e336t-c004677aa5b3d89853a498fb56ff6b2094c56ab20797110a338c5527f8fee7893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UctKJDEUDYMD0z7-wEVgNrooTSpVecxCkEZHRZiNgruQTt0aI_UySTfW38-tafHCfXA4OeRwCDnl7IIzLi-ZYFVRMSXPtDg3jPGyePlGVlyrspDa1Adk9UX5QQ5TemOM1ZUWK_K6HvvJxTD8pa7LEAeXww5ohpQTHVvq3Ta5LuSZhgHRfhqj62iaE97pF70eXDfn4GmEtO3wiRsaCh8TxNDDkJEKu9DA4OGYfG9dl-Dkcx-R59ubp_Vd8fjn9_36-rEAIWQuPGOVVMq5eiMabXQtXGV0u6ll28pNyUzla-nwUEZxzpwQ2td1qVrdAihtxBH5uded4vi-RRv2bdyirS5ZXholuBaCIethz4owgbcTftfF2QKWH4extzsrXMlxzNjcaIErLBj2tECSW24q-5p7FLvaiwH62gWINvmweG5CBJ9tMwbLmV2isksOdsnBouT_qOyL-Acb54gn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1297318330</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing alternative tests of causality in temporal systems: Analytic results and experimental evidence</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Geweke, John ; Meese, Richard ; Dent, Warren</creator><creatorcontrib>Geweke, John ; Meese, Richard ; Dent, Warren</creatorcontrib><description>This paper discusses eight alternative tests of the absence of casual ordering, all of which are asymptotically valid under the null hypothesis in the sense that their limiting size is known. Their behavior under alternatives is compared analytically using the concept of approximate slope, and these results are supported by the outcomes of Monte Carlo experiments. The implications of these comparisons for applied work are unambiguous: Wald variants of a test attributed to Granger, and a lagged dependent variable version of Sim's test introduced in this paper, are equivalent in all relevant respects and are preferred to the other tests discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0304-4076</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6895</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0304-4076(83)90012-X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><ispartof>Journal of econometrics, 1983-01, Vol.21 (2), p.161-194</ispartof><rights>1983</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(83)90012-X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4008,27869,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeeconom/v_3a21_3ay_3a1983_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a161-194.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Geweke, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meese, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dent, Warren</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing alternative tests of causality in temporal systems: Analytic results and experimental evidence</title><title>Journal of econometrics</title><description>This paper discusses eight alternative tests of the absence of casual ordering, all of which are asymptotically valid under the null hypothesis in the sense that their limiting size is known. Their behavior under alternatives is compared analytically using the concept of approximate slope, and these results are supported by the outcomes of Monte Carlo experiments. The implications of these comparisons for applied work are unambiguous: Wald variants of a test attributed to Granger, and a lagged dependent variable version of Sim's test introduced in this paper, are equivalent in all relevant respects and are preferred to the other tests discussed.</description><issn>0304-4076</issn><issn>1872-6895</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1983</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNo9UctKJDEUDYMD0z7-wEVgNrooTSpVecxCkEZHRZiNgruQTt0aI_UySTfW38-tafHCfXA4OeRwCDnl7IIzLi-ZYFVRMSXPtDg3jPGyePlGVlyrspDa1Adk9UX5QQ5TemOM1ZUWK_K6HvvJxTD8pa7LEAeXww5ohpQTHVvq3Ta5LuSZhgHRfhqj62iaE97pF70eXDfn4GmEtO3wiRsaCh8TxNDDkJEKu9DA4OGYfG9dl-Dkcx-R59ubp_Vd8fjn9_36-rEAIWQuPGOVVMq5eiMabXQtXGV0u6ll28pNyUzla-nwUEZxzpwQ2td1qVrdAihtxBH5uded4vi-RRv2bdyirS5ZXholuBaCIethz4owgbcTftfF2QKWH4extzsrXMlxzNjcaIErLBj2tECSW24q-5p7FLvaiwH62gWINvmweG5CBJ9tMwbLmV2isksOdsnBouT_qOyL-Acb54gn</recordid><startdate>19830101</startdate><enddate>19830101</enddate><creator>Geweke, John</creator><creator>Meese, Richard</creator><creator>Dent, Warren</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>North-Holland Pub. Co</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>FUVTR</scope><scope>IZSXY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19830101</creationdate><title>Comparing alternative tests of causality in temporal systems: Analytic results and experimental evidence</title><author>Geweke, John ; Meese, Richard ; Dent, Warren</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e336t-c004677aa5b3d89853a498fb56ff6b2094c56ab20797110a338c5527f8fee7893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1983</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Geweke, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meese, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dent, Warren</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 06</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 30</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Journal of econometrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Geweke, John</au><au>Meese, Richard</au><au>Dent, Warren</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing alternative tests of causality in temporal systems: Analytic results and experimental evidence</atitle><jtitle>Journal of econometrics</jtitle><date>1983-01-01</date><risdate>1983</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>161</spage><epage>194</epage><pages>161-194</pages><issn>0304-4076</issn><eissn>1872-6895</eissn><abstract>This paper discusses eight alternative tests of the absence of casual ordering, all of which are asymptotically valid under the null hypothesis in the sense that their limiting size is known. Their behavior under alternatives is compared analytically using the concept of approximate slope, and these results are supported by the outcomes of Monte Carlo experiments. The implications of these comparisons for applied work are unambiguous: Wald variants of a test attributed to Granger, and a lagged dependent variable version of Sim's test introduced in this paper, are equivalent in all relevant respects and are preferred to the other tests discussed.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/0304-4076(83)90012-X</doi><tpages>34</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0304-4076 |
| ispartof | Journal of econometrics, 1983-01, Vol.21 (2), p.161-194 |
| issn | 0304-4076 1872-6895 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1297318330 |
| source | RePEc; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; Periodicals Index Online |
| title | Comparing alternative tests of causality in temporal systems: Analytic results and experimental evidence |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T20%3A12%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_repec&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20alternative%20tests%20of%20causality%20in%20temporal%20systems:%20Analytic%20results%20and%20experimental%20evidence&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20econometrics&rft.au=Geweke,%20John&rft.date=1983-01-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=161&rft.epage=194&rft.pages=161-194&rft.issn=0304-4076&rft.eissn=1872-6895&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0304-4076(83)90012-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_repec%3E1297318330%3C/proquest_repec%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1297318330&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=030440768390012X&rfr_iscdi=true |