Response to Miksicek, Elsesser, Wuebber, Bruhns, and Hammond

Response to Miksicek, Elsesser, Wuebber, Bruhns, and Hammond

A recent statement by the five authors purports to demonstrate that the fruit we previously identified as ramón was really achiote. This response points out several weaknesses in the five authors' ethnohistorical methodology that makes their identification far less secure. The original aim of o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American antiquity 1983-01, Vol.48 (1), p.128-131
Hauptverfasser: Reina, Ruben E., Hill, II, Robert M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Comments
Corn
Ethnohistory
Famine
Fruits
Leaves
Lowlands
Milpas
Plants
Shrubs
Tortillas
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 131
container_issue 1
container_start_page 128
container_title American antiquity
container_volume 48
creator Reina, Ruben E.
Hill, II, Robert M.
description A recent statement by the five authors purports to demonstrate that the fruit we previously identified as ramón was really achiote. This response points out several weaknesses in the five authors' ethnohistorical methodology that makes their identification far less secure. The original aim of our paper is restated to turn discussion away from the minor point of ramón versus achiote.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/279825
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1296035440</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_2307_279825</cupid><jstor_id>279825</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>279825</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c190t-9b19859af4619ccd7f730108da2cf3a57daaa4e84ab16c05f2a39e6dee7a5ffc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AURQdRsFb9DQFBXDT6ZiaTyYAbW6oVKoIoLsPLfGhak6kzycJ_b0sL6sLVvYvDuXAJOaVwyTjIKyZVwcQeGTDORCogz_bJAABYKjnND8lRjAsAyoEXA3L9ZOPKt9EmnU8e6mWstV2OkulHtDHaMEpee1tVmzIO_XsbRwm2Jplh0_jWHJMDh2vyZJdD8nI7fZ7M0vnj3f3kZp5qqqBLVUVVIRS6LKdKayOd5EChMMi04yikQcTMFhlWNNcgHEOubG6slSic03xIzrbeVfCfvY1dufB9aNeTJWUqBy6yDNbU-ZbSwccYrCtXoW4wfJUUys0z5faZH90idj78T13sdNhUoTZv9tfqX_QbnVRrwg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1296035440</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Response to Miksicek, Elsesser, Wuebber, Bruhns, and Hammond</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Reina, Ruben E. ; Hill, II, Robert M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Reina, Ruben E. ; Hill, II, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><description>A recent statement by the five authors purports to demonstrate that the fruit we previously identified as ramón was really achiote. This response points out several weaknesses in the five authors' ethnohistorical methodology that makes their identification far less secure. The original aim of our paper is restated to turn discussion away from the minor point of ramón versus achiote.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-7316</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2325-5064</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/279825</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, US: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Comments ; Corn ; Ethnohistory ; Famine ; Fruits ; Leaves ; Lowlands ; Milpas ; Plants ; Shrubs ; Tortillas</subject><ispartof>American antiquity, 1983-01, Vol.48 (1), p.128-131</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1983</rights><rights>Copyright 1983 The Society for American Archaeology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c190t-9b19859af4619ccd7f730108da2cf3a57daaa4e84ab16c05f2a39e6dee7a5ffc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/279825$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/279825$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,804,27874,27929,27930,58022,58255</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reina, Ruben E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, II, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><title>Response to Miksicek, Elsesser, Wuebber, Bruhns, and Hammond</title><title>American antiquity</title><addtitle>Am. antiq</addtitle><description>A recent statement by the five authors purports to demonstrate that the fruit we previously identified as ramón was really achiote. This response points out several weaknesses in the five authors' ethnohistorical methodology that makes their identification far less secure. The original aim of our paper is restated to turn discussion away from the minor point of ramón versus achiote.</description><subject>Comments</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Ethnohistory</subject><subject>Famine</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Lowlands</subject><subject>Milpas</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Shrubs</subject><subject>Tortillas</subject><issn>0002-7316</issn><issn>2325-5064</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1983</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AURQdRsFb9DQFBXDT6ZiaTyYAbW6oVKoIoLsPLfGhak6kzycJ_b0sL6sLVvYvDuXAJOaVwyTjIKyZVwcQeGTDORCogz_bJAABYKjnND8lRjAsAyoEXA3L9ZOPKt9EmnU8e6mWstV2OkulHtDHaMEpee1tVmzIO_XsbRwm2Jplh0_jWHJMDh2vyZJdD8nI7fZ7M0vnj3f3kZp5qqqBLVUVVIRS6LKdKayOd5EChMMi04yikQcTMFhlWNNcgHEOubG6slSic03xIzrbeVfCfvY1dufB9aNeTJWUqBy6yDNbU-ZbSwccYrCtXoW4wfJUUys0z5faZH90idj78T13sdNhUoTZv9tfqX_QbnVRrwg</recordid><startdate>198301</startdate><enddate>198301</enddate><creator>Reina, Ruben E.</creator><creator>Hill, II, Robert M.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Society for American Archaeology</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FIXVA</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>HZAIM</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198301</creationdate><title>Response to Miksicek, Elsesser, Wuebber, Bruhns, and Hammond</title><author>Reina, Ruben E. ; Hill, II, Robert M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c190t-9b19859af4619ccd7f730108da2cf3a57daaa4e84ab16c05f2a39e6dee7a5ffc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1983</creationdate><topic>Comments</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Ethnohistory</topic><topic>Famine</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Lowlands</topic><topic>Milpas</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Shrubs</topic><topic>Tortillas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reina, Ruben E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, II, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 03</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 26</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>American antiquity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reina, Ruben E.</au><au>Hill, II, Robert M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Response to Miksicek, Elsesser, Wuebber, Bruhns, and Hammond</atitle><jtitle>American antiquity</jtitle><addtitle>Am. antiq</addtitle><date>1983-01</date><risdate>1983</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>128</spage><epage>131</epage><pages>128-131</pages><issn>0002-7316</issn><eissn>2325-5064</eissn><abstract>A recent statement by the five authors purports to demonstrate that the fruit we previously identified as ramón was really achiote. This response points out several weaknesses in the five authors' ethnohistorical methodology that makes their identification far less secure. The original aim of our paper is restated to turn discussion away from the minor point of ramón versus achiote.</abstract><cop>New York, US</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.2307/279825</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-7316
ispartof American antiquity, 1983-01, Vol.48 (1), p.128-131
issn 0002-7316
2325-5064
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1296035440
source Periodicals Index Online; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Comments
Corn
Ethnohistory
Famine
Fruits
Leaves
Lowlands
Milpas
Plants
Shrubs
Tortillas
title Response to Miksicek, Elsesser, Wuebber, Bruhns, and Hammond
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T16%3A14%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Response%20to%20Miksicek,%20Elsesser,%20Wuebber,%20Bruhns,%20and%20Hammond&rft.jtitle=American%20antiquity&rft.au=Reina,%20Ruben%20E.&rft.date=1983-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=128&rft.epage=131&rft.pages=128-131&rft.issn=0002-7316&rft.eissn=2325-5064&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/279825&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E279825%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1296035440&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_2307_279825&rft_jstor_id=279825&rfr_iscdi=true