The market valuation of cash dividends: A case to consider

Since early 1956 Citizens Utilities Company has had two classes of common stock which are virtually identical in all respects except dividend payout. One class pays only stock dividends, the other class pays only cash dividends, and the corporate charter requires that the dividends per share on the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of financial economics 1978-01, Vol.6 (2), p.235-264
1. Verfasser: Long, John B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 264
container_issue 2
container_start_page 235
container_title Journal of financial economics
container_volume 6
creator Long, John B.
description Since early 1956 Citizens Utilities Company has had two classes of common stock which are virtually identical in all respects except dividend payout. One class pays only stock dividends, the other class pays only cash dividends, and the corporate charter requires that the dividends per share on the two classes be of equivalent value. Under an I.R.S. ruling granted to Citizens Utilities in 1955 and a ‘grandfather clause’ in the 1969 Tax Reform Act, the stock dividends are not taxable as ordinary income. (No other publicly held firm has such a ruling and, in general, the 1969 Act made stock dividends of this type taxable.) Given these circumstances, the price-dividend history of the Citizens Utilities shares provides a view of the effects of alternative payout policies which, to an exceptional degree, is free of confounding factors. Close examination of this history implies that, if anything, claims to cash dividends have commanded a slight premium in the market over claims to equal amounts (before taxes) of capital gains.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0304-405X(78)90031-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_repec</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1295956614</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0304405X78900314</els_id><sourcerecordid>1295956614</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e335t-40417ea4ae269597d2386c788bcb92beb2094bd75a246a2f7da4e768653c9c8d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UE1Lw0AQXUTBWv0HHgJe9BDd7832IEjxCwteKnhbNrsTurVNYjYN9N-7seLAmxkejzfMQ-iS4FuCibzDDPOcY_F5rYobjTEjOT9CE1IonVOl-DGa_EtO0VmMa5xKCT1Bs-UKsq3tvqDPBrvZ2T40ddZUmbNxlfkwBA-1j7PsYWQg65vMNXVMbHeOTiq7iXDxN6fo4-lxOX_JF-_Pr_OHRQ6MiT4d5USB5Rao1EIrT1khnSqK0pWallBSrHnplbCUS0sr5S0HJQspmNOu8GyKrg6-bdd87yD2Zt3sujqdNIQmRyEl4Un1dlB10IIzbRfSV3sDAOsq1IkZDLMyYZ9AtCrSCAnUsNTbcWPCUMnNqt8mt_uDG6THhgCdiS5A7cCHDlxvfBMMwWZM34zRmjFak0x_0zec_QARX3Yz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1295956614</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The market valuation of cash dividends: A case to consider</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Long, John B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Long, John B.</creatorcontrib><description>Since early 1956 Citizens Utilities Company has had two classes of common stock which are virtually identical in all respects except dividend payout. One class pays only stock dividends, the other class pays only cash dividends, and the corporate charter requires that the dividends per share on the two classes be of equivalent value. Under an I.R.S. ruling granted to Citizens Utilities in 1955 and a ‘grandfather clause’ in the 1969 Tax Reform Act, the stock dividends are not taxable as ordinary income. (No other publicly held firm has such a ruling and, in general, the 1969 Act made stock dividends of this type taxable.) Given these circumstances, the price-dividend history of the Citizens Utilities shares provides a view of the effects of alternative payout policies which, to an exceptional degree, is free of confounding factors. Close examination of this history implies that, if anything, claims to cash dividends have commanded a slight premium in the market over claims to equal amounts (before taxes) of capital gains.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0304-405X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2774</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0304-405X(78)90031-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><ispartof>Journal of financial economics, 1978-01, Vol.6 (2), p.235-264</ispartof><rights>1978</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(78)90031-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4008,27869,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeejfinec/v_3a6_3ay_3a1978_3ai_3a2-3_3ap_3a235-264.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Long, John B.</creatorcontrib><title>The market valuation of cash dividends: A case to consider</title><title>Journal of financial economics</title><description>Since early 1956 Citizens Utilities Company has had two classes of common stock which are virtually identical in all respects except dividend payout. One class pays only stock dividends, the other class pays only cash dividends, and the corporate charter requires that the dividends per share on the two classes be of equivalent value. Under an I.R.S. ruling granted to Citizens Utilities in 1955 and a ‘grandfather clause’ in the 1969 Tax Reform Act, the stock dividends are not taxable as ordinary income. (No other publicly held firm has such a ruling and, in general, the 1969 Act made stock dividends of this type taxable.) Given these circumstances, the price-dividend history of the Citizens Utilities shares provides a view of the effects of alternative payout policies which, to an exceptional degree, is free of confounding factors. Close examination of this history implies that, if anything, claims to cash dividends have commanded a slight premium in the market over claims to equal amounts (before taxes) of capital gains.</description><issn>0304-405X</issn><issn>1879-2774</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1978</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNo9UE1Lw0AQXUTBWv0HHgJe9BDd7832IEjxCwteKnhbNrsTurVNYjYN9N-7seLAmxkejzfMQ-iS4FuCibzDDPOcY_F5rYobjTEjOT9CE1IonVOl-DGa_EtO0VmMa5xKCT1Bs-UKsq3tvqDPBrvZ2T40ddZUmbNxlfkwBA-1j7PsYWQg65vMNXVMbHeOTiq7iXDxN6fo4-lxOX_JF-_Pr_OHRQ6MiT4d5USB5Rao1EIrT1khnSqK0pWallBSrHnplbCUS0sr5S0HJQspmNOu8GyKrg6-bdd87yD2Zt3sujqdNIQmRyEl4Un1dlB10IIzbRfSV3sDAOsq1IkZDLMyYZ9AtCrSCAnUsNTbcWPCUMnNqt8mt_uDG6THhgCdiS5A7cCHDlxvfBMMwWZM34zRmjFak0x_0zec_QARX3Yz</recordid><startdate>19780101</startdate><enddate>19780101</enddate><creator>Long, John B.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>North-Holland in collaboration with the Graduate School of Management, University of Rochester</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>GHEHK</scope><scope>JQCIK</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19780101</creationdate><title>The market valuation of cash dividends: A case to consider</title><author>Long, John B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e335t-40417ea4ae269597d2386c788bcb92beb2094bd75a246a2f7da4e768653c9c8d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1978</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Long, John B.</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 08</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 33</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Journal of financial economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Long, John B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The market valuation of cash dividends: A case to consider</atitle><jtitle>Journal of financial economics</jtitle><date>1978-01-01</date><risdate>1978</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>235</spage><epage>264</epage><pages>235-264</pages><issn>0304-405X</issn><eissn>1879-2774</eissn><abstract>Since early 1956 Citizens Utilities Company has had two classes of common stock which are virtually identical in all respects except dividend payout. One class pays only stock dividends, the other class pays only cash dividends, and the corporate charter requires that the dividends per share on the two classes be of equivalent value. Under an I.R.S. ruling granted to Citizens Utilities in 1955 and a ‘grandfather clause’ in the 1969 Tax Reform Act, the stock dividends are not taxable as ordinary income. (No other publicly held firm has such a ruling and, in general, the 1969 Act made stock dividends of this type taxable.) Given these circumstances, the price-dividend history of the Citizens Utilities shares provides a view of the effects of alternative payout policies which, to an exceptional degree, is free of confounding factors. Close examination of this history implies that, if anything, claims to cash dividends have commanded a slight premium in the market over claims to equal amounts (before taxes) of capital gains.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/0304-405X(78)90031-4</doi><tpages>30</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0304-405X
ispartof Journal of financial economics, 1978-01, Vol.6 (2), p.235-264
issn 0304-405X
1879-2774
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1295956614
source RePEc; Periodicals Index Online; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
title The market valuation of cash dividends: A case to consider
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T05%3A42%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_repec&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20market%20valuation%20of%20cash%20dividends:%20A%20case%20to%20consider&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20financial%20economics&rft.au=Long,%20John%20B.&rft.date=1978-01-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=235&rft.epage=264&rft.pages=235-264&rft.issn=0304-405X&rft.eissn=1879-2774&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0304-405X(78)90031-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_repec%3E1295956614%3C/proquest_repec%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1295956614&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=0304405X78900314&rfr_iscdi=true