Dithiocarbamate spray residues on lettuces, tomatoes, berryfruits, and apples
After experimental or commercial spray programmes, thiocarbamate fungicide residues were determined on lettuces, boysenberries, tomatoes, blueberries, and apples. Highest residues were recorded on lettuce, less on boysenberries, and least on blueberries, tomatoes, and apples. Rates of decay and esti...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | New Zealand Journal of Experimental Agriculture 1982-07, Vol.10 (3), p.301-304 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 304 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 301 |
| container_title | New Zealand Journal of Experimental Agriculture |
| container_volume | 10 |
| creator | Hughes, J. T. Tate, K. G. |
| description | After experimental or commercial spray programmes, thiocarbamate fungicide residues were determined on lettuces, boysenberries, tomatoes, blueberries, and apples. Highest residues were recorded on lettuce, less on boysenberries, and least on blueberries, tomatoes, and apples. Rates of decay and estimated half lives (6-9 days) were similar for maneb, mancozeb, zineb, and thiram. In most instances residues following mancozeb spraying were higher than for maneb, the difference being greatest for lettuce and least for tomatoes. Results are discussed in relation to current New Zealand tolerance levels and waiting periods. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/03015521.1982.10427887 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1293349592</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1293349592</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-a4b0cb8cb3fc25e22b628782912f9dba6450b66b5fb23690cf6451671add756a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouOj-BSl4tWs-mrQ5LusnrHjRc0jSBLt0mzpJkf33pqx7di7zwTPvDC9CNwSvCG7wPWaYcE7JisiG5lFF66apz9CCkJqXTd2wc7SYoXKmLtEyxh3OwaRgol6gt4cufXXBajB6r5Mr4gj6UICLXTu5WISh6F1Kk3XxrkghI2GujAM4eJi6lBs9tIUex97Fa3ThdR_d8i9foc-nx4_NS7l9f37drLelZUymUlcGW9NYw7yl3FFqBM2vUkmol63RouLYCGG4N5QJia3PEyJqotu25kKzK3R71B0hfOc3k9qFCYZ8UhEqGasklzRT4khZCDGC82qEbq_hoAhWs3vq5J6a3VMn9_Li-rjYDT7AXv8E6FuV9KEP4EEPtouK_aPxCwwadkg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1293349592</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dithiocarbamate spray residues on lettuces, tomatoes, berryfruits, and apples</title><source>Royal Society of New Zealand Open Access Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Hughes, J. T. ; Tate, K. G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hughes, J. T. ; Tate, K. G.</creatorcontrib><description>After experimental or commercial spray programmes, thiocarbamate fungicide residues were determined on lettuces, boysenberries, tomatoes, blueberries, and apples. Highest residues were recorded on lettuce, less on boysenberries, and least on blueberries, tomatoes, and apples. Rates of decay and estimated half lives (6-9 days) were similar for maneb, mancozeb, zineb, and thiram. In most instances residues following mancozeb spraying were higher than for maneb, the difference being greatest for lettuce and least for tomatoes. Results are discussed in relation to current New Zealand tolerance levels and waiting periods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-5521</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0114-0671</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1175-8783</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/03015521.1982.10427887</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Wellington, N.Z: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>apples ; blueberries ; boysenberries ; control resistance ; ethylene bisdithiocarbamates (EBDC) ; ethylenethiourea (ETU) ; ferbam ; Fungicides ; lettuces ; mancozeb ; maneb ; mycoses ; plant diseases ; residues ; thiram ; tolerance ; tomatoes ; zineb</subject><ispartof>New Zealand Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 1982-07, Vol.10 (3), p.301-304</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 1982</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-a4b0cb8cb3fc25e22b628782912f9dba6450b66b5fb23690cf6451671add756a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-a4b0cb8cb3fc25e22b628782912f9dba6450b66b5fb23690cf6451671add756a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27848,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hughes, J. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tate, K. G.</creatorcontrib><title>Dithiocarbamate spray residues on lettuces, tomatoes, berryfruits, and apples</title><title>New Zealand Journal of Experimental Agriculture</title><description>After experimental or commercial spray programmes, thiocarbamate fungicide residues were determined on lettuces, boysenberries, tomatoes, blueberries, and apples. Highest residues were recorded on lettuce, less on boysenberries, and least on blueberries, tomatoes, and apples. Rates of decay and estimated half lives (6-9 days) were similar for maneb, mancozeb, zineb, and thiram. In most instances residues following mancozeb spraying were higher than for maneb, the difference being greatest for lettuce and least for tomatoes. Results are discussed in relation to current New Zealand tolerance levels and waiting periods.</description><subject>apples</subject><subject>blueberries</subject><subject>boysenberries</subject><subject>control resistance</subject><subject>ethylene bisdithiocarbamates (EBDC)</subject><subject>ethylenethiourea (ETU)</subject><subject>ferbam</subject><subject>Fungicides</subject><subject>lettuces</subject><subject>mancozeb</subject><subject>maneb</subject><subject>mycoses</subject><subject>plant diseases</subject><subject>residues</subject><subject>thiram</subject><subject>tolerance</subject><subject>tomatoes</subject><subject>zineb</subject><issn>0301-5521</issn><issn>0114-0671</issn><issn>1175-8783</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1982</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouOj-BSl4tWs-mrQ5LusnrHjRc0jSBLt0mzpJkf33pqx7di7zwTPvDC9CNwSvCG7wPWaYcE7JisiG5lFF66apz9CCkJqXTd2wc7SYoXKmLtEyxh3OwaRgol6gt4cufXXBajB6r5Mr4gj6UICLXTu5WISh6F1Kk3XxrkghI2GujAM4eJi6lBs9tIUex97Fa3ThdR_d8i9foc-nx4_NS7l9f37drLelZUymUlcGW9NYw7yl3FFqBM2vUkmol63RouLYCGG4N5QJia3PEyJqotu25kKzK3R71B0hfOc3k9qFCYZ8UhEqGasklzRT4khZCDGC82qEbq_hoAhWs3vq5J6a3VMn9_Li-rjYDT7AXv8E6FuV9KEP4EEPtouK_aPxCwwadkg</recordid><startdate>19820701</startdate><enddate>19820701</enddate><creator>Hughes, J. T.</creator><creator>Tate, K. G.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>DSIR Pub</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SDSKB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19820701</creationdate><title>Dithiocarbamate spray residues on lettuces, tomatoes, berryfruits, and apples</title><author>Hughes, J. T. ; Tate, K. G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-a4b0cb8cb3fc25e22b628782912f9dba6450b66b5fb23690cf6451671add756a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1982</creationdate><topic>apples</topic><topic>blueberries</topic><topic>boysenberries</topic><topic>control resistance</topic><topic>ethylene bisdithiocarbamates (EBDC)</topic><topic>ethylenethiourea (ETU)</topic><topic>ferbam</topic><topic>Fungicides</topic><topic>lettuces</topic><topic>mancozeb</topic><topic>maneb</topic><topic>mycoses</topic><topic>plant diseases</topic><topic>residues</topic><topic>thiram</topic><topic>tolerance</topic><topic>tomatoes</topic><topic>zineb</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hughes, J. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tate, K. G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 43</collection><jtitle>New Zealand Journal of Experimental Agriculture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hughes, J. T.</au><au>Tate, K. G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dithiocarbamate spray residues on lettuces, tomatoes, berryfruits, and apples</atitle><jtitle>New Zealand Journal of Experimental Agriculture</jtitle><date>1982-07-01</date><risdate>1982</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>301</spage><epage>304</epage><pages>301-304</pages><issn>0301-5521</issn><issn>0114-0671</issn><eissn>1175-8783</eissn><abstract>After experimental or commercial spray programmes, thiocarbamate fungicide residues were determined on lettuces, boysenberries, tomatoes, blueberries, and apples. Highest residues were recorded on lettuce, less on boysenberries, and least on blueberries, tomatoes, and apples. Rates of decay and estimated half lives (6-9 days) were similar for maneb, mancozeb, zineb, and thiram. In most instances residues following mancozeb spraying were higher than for maneb, the difference being greatest for lettuce and least for tomatoes. Results are discussed in relation to current New Zealand tolerance levels and waiting periods.</abstract><cop>Wellington, N.Z</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/03015521.1982.10427887</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0301-5521 |
| ispartof | New Zealand Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 1982-07, Vol.10 (3), p.301-304 |
| issn | 0301-5521 0114-0671 1175-8783 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1293349592 |
| source | Royal Society of New Zealand Open Access Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | apples blueberries boysenberries control resistance ethylene bisdithiocarbamates (EBDC) ethylenethiourea (ETU) ferbam Fungicides lettuces mancozeb maneb mycoses plant diseases residues thiram tolerance tomatoes zineb |
| title | Dithiocarbamate spray residues on lettuces, tomatoes, berryfruits, and apples |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T07%3A39%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dithiocarbamate%20spray%20residues%20on%20lettuces,%20tomatoes,%20berryfruits,%20and%20apples&rft.jtitle=New%20Zealand%20Journal%20of%20Experimental%20Agriculture&rft.au=Hughes,%20J.%20T.&rft.date=1982-07-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=301&rft.epage=304&rft.pages=301-304&rft.issn=0301-5521&rft.eissn=1175-8783&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/03015521.1982.10427887&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1293349592%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1293349592&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |