"Preferential Admissions Revisited: Some Reflections on" DeFunis "and" Bakke
"The passage of a decade since the" Bakke "(preferential admissions) case offers a time for reflection and analysis. It also recalls the earlier" DeFunis "litigation, testing the constitutionality of the University of Washington's minority admissions program. The contra...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of college and university law 1987-12, Vol.14 (3), p.423 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 423 |
container_title | Journal of college and university law |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | O' Neil, Robert M |
description | "The passage of a decade since the" Bakke "(preferential admissions) case offers a time for reflection and analysis. It also recalls the earlier" DeFunis "litigation, testing the constitutionality of the University of Washington's minority admissions program. The contrast between the two cases, both in their inception and their outcome, should still be of interest to legal scholars. While the focus in the minority-preference and race-conscious remedy area has shifted largely from college admissions to employment, the" Bakke "and" DeFunis "cases still offer substantial guidance." |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1292994194</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1292994194</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_12929941943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNiskKwjAUAHNQsC7_EOK5kC60iTe34sGDqPcS7CukS6J5qd9vET_A0zDMTEjAuUxCkQkxI3PEhnOe55kIyJldHNTgwHitOrqteo2orUF6hbdG7aHa0JvtYfS6g4f_NmsYPUAxGI2UKVMxulNtC0syrVWHsPpxQdbF8b4_hU9nXwOgLxs7ODOmMoplLGUayTT57_oAawM7zQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1292994194</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>"Preferential Admissions Revisited: Some Reflections on" DeFunis "and" Bakke</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>O' Neil, Robert M</creator><creatorcontrib>O' Neil, Robert M</creatorcontrib><description>"The passage of a decade since the" Bakke "(preferential admissions) case offers a time for reflection and analysis. It also recalls the earlier" DeFunis "litigation, testing the constitutionality of the University of Washington's minority admissions program. The contrast between the two cases, both in their inception and their outcome, should still be of interest to legal scholars. While the focus in the minority-preference and race-conscious remedy area has shifted largely from college admissions to employment, the" Bakke "and" DeFunis "cases still offer substantial guidance."</description><identifier>ISSN: 0093-8688</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, D.C: National Association of College and University Attorneys</publisher><ispartof>Journal of college and university law, 1987-12, Vol.14 (3), p.423</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27868</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>O' Neil, Robert M</creatorcontrib><title>"Preferential Admissions Revisited: Some Reflections on" DeFunis "and" Bakke</title><title>Journal of college and university law</title><description>"The passage of a decade since the" Bakke "(preferential admissions) case offers a time for reflection and analysis. It also recalls the earlier" DeFunis "litigation, testing the constitutionality of the University of Washington's minority admissions program. The contrast between the two cases, both in their inception and their outcome, should still be of interest to legal scholars. While the focus in the minority-preference and race-conscious remedy area has shifted largely from college admissions to employment, the" Bakke "and" DeFunis "cases still offer substantial guidance."</description><issn>0093-8688</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqNiskKwjAUAHNQsC7_EOK5kC60iTe34sGDqPcS7CukS6J5qd9vET_A0zDMTEjAuUxCkQkxI3PEhnOe55kIyJldHNTgwHitOrqteo2orUF6hbdG7aHa0JvtYfS6g4f_NmsYPUAxGI2UKVMxulNtC0syrVWHsPpxQdbF8b4_hU9nXwOgLxs7ODOmMoplLGUayTT57_oAawM7zQ</recordid><startdate>19871201</startdate><enddate>19871201</enddate><creator>O' Neil, Robert M</creator><general>National Association of College and University Attorneys</general><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SDSKB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19871201</creationdate><title>"Preferential Admissions Revisited: Some Reflections on" DeFunis "and" Bakke</title><author>O' Neil, Robert M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_12929941943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O' Neil, Robert M</creatorcontrib><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 43</collection><jtitle>Journal of college and university law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O' Neil, Robert M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>"Preferential Admissions Revisited: Some Reflections on" DeFunis "and" Bakke</atitle><jtitle>Journal of college and university law</jtitle><date>1987-12-01</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>423</spage><pages>423-</pages><issn>0093-8688</issn><abstract>"The passage of a decade since the" Bakke "(preferential admissions) case offers a time for reflection and analysis. It also recalls the earlier" DeFunis "litigation, testing the constitutionality of the University of Washington's minority admissions program. The contrast between the two cases, both in their inception and their outcome, should still be of interest to legal scholars. While the focus in the minority-preference and race-conscious remedy area has shifted largely from college admissions to employment, the" Bakke "and" DeFunis "cases still offer substantial guidance."</abstract><cop>Washington, D.C</cop><pub>National Association of College and University Attorneys</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0093-8688 |
ispartof | Journal of college and university law, 1987-12, Vol.14 (3), p.423 |
issn | 0093-8688 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1292994194 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Periodicals Index Online |
title | "Preferential Admissions Revisited: Some Reflections on" DeFunis "and" Bakke |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T11%3A18%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%22Preferential%20Admissions%20Revisited:%20Some%20Reflections%20on%22%20DeFunis%20%22and%22%20Bakke&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20college%20and%20university%20law&rft.au=O'%20Neil,%20Robert%20M&rft.date=1987-12-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=423&rft.pages=423-&rft.issn=0093-8688&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1292994194%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1292994194&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |