The Ohio-Hubei Agreement: Clues to Chinese Negotiating Practices
The commercial, cultural and educational agreement between the State of Ohio and Hubei province has become a major element in Hubei's efforts to modernize its industrial and agricultural sectors. At the same time, the agreement also provides evidence of increasing provincial autonomy in China&#...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The China quarterly (London) 1982-09, Vol.91 (91), p.486-491 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 491 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 91 |
| container_start_page | 486 |
| container_title | The China quarterly (London) |
| container_volume | 91 |
| creator | Shroeder, Paul E. |
| description | The commercial, cultural and educational agreement between the State of Ohio and Hubei province has become a major element in Hubei's efforts to modernize its industrial and agricultural sectors. At the same time, the agreement also provides evidence of increasing provincial autonomy in China's economic development. This latter fact is seen in the negotiating practices adopted by provincial officials before and after the agreement was reached. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0305741000000680 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1292874795</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0305741000000680</cupid><jstor_id>653369</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>653369</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6843de22832d0144e1e096eed968b562a402b8eecbf0d3799c1fbcb05ef102543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_gHgJeI7uVza7nixRW6G0SuvFy5KPSbq1TXR3C_rvTU0pgjiXOTzvO_POIHRO8BXBJL6eYYajmBP8U0LiA9QjXMiQCi4PUW-Lwy0_RifOLTEmNCKih27nCwimC9OEo00GJhhUFmANtb8JktUGXOCbIFmYGhwEE6gab1Jv6ip4smnuTQ7uFB2V6crB2a730cvD_TwZhePp8DEZjMOcxZEPheSsAEolowUmnAMBrARAoYTMIkFTjmkmAfKsxAWLlcpJmeUZjqAkmEac9dFlN_fdNh9tMK-XzcbW7UpNqKIy5rGKWhXpVLltnLNQ6ndr1qn90gTr7aP0n0e1novOs3S-sXuDiBgTqqVhR43z8LmnqX3TIm5P02L4rMeKzu4miuvXVs92CdJ1Zk1Rwa-g_2b4Bm26gC0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1292874795</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Ohio-Hubei Agreement: Clues to Chinese Negotiating Practices</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Shroeder, Paul E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shroeder, Paul E.</creatorcontrib><description>The commercial, cultural and educational agreement between the State of Ohio and Hubei province has become a major element in Hubei's efforts to modernize its industrial and agricultural sectors. At the same time, the agreement also provides evidence of increasing provincial autonomy in China's economic development. This latter fact is seen in the negotiating practices adopted by provincial officials before and after the agreement was reached.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-7410</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2648</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0305741000000680</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Business structures ; Committees ; Imports ; International agreements ; International trade ; Joint ventures ; Provincial government ; Technology ; Trade</subject><ispartof>The China quarterly (London), 1982-09, Vol.91 (91), p.486-491</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The China Quarterly 1982</rights><rights>Copyright 1982 Contemporary China Institute, School of Oriental and African Studies</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6843de22832d0144e1e096eed968b562a402b8eecbf0d3799c1fbcb05ef102543</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/653369$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0305741000000680/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,803,27869,27924,27925,55628,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shroeder, Paul E.</creatorcontrib><title>The Ohio-Hubei Agreement: Clues to Chinese Negotiating Practices</title><title>The China quarterly (London)</title><addtitle>The China Quarterly</addtitle><description>The commercial, cultural and educational agreement between the State of Ohio and Hubei province has become a major element in Hubei's efforts to modernize its industrial and agricultural sectors. At the same time, the agreement also provides evidence of increasing provincial autonomy in China's economic development. This latter fact is seen in the negotiating practices adopted by provincial officials before and after the agreement was reached.</description><subject>Business structures</subject><subject>Committees</subject><subject>Imports</subject><subject>International agreements</subject><subject>International trade</subject><subject>Joint ventures</subject><subject>Provincial government</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Trade</subject><issn>0305-7410</issn><issn>1468-2648</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1982</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_gHgJeI7uVza7nixRW6G0SuvFy5KPSbq1TXR3C_rvTU0pgjiXOTzvO_POIHRO8BXBJL6eYYajmBP8U0LiA9QjXMiQCi4PUW-Lwy0_RifOLTEmNCKih27nCwimC9OEo00GJhhUFmANtb8JktUGXOCbIFmYGhwEE6gab1Jv6ip4smnuTQ7uFB2V6crB2a730cvD_TwZhePp8DEZjMOcxZEPheSsAEolowUmnAMBrARAoYTMIkFTjmkmAfKsxAWLlcpJmeUZjqAkmEac9dFlN_fdNh9tMK-XzcbW7UpNqKIy5rGKWhXpVLltnLNQ6ndr1qn90gTr7aP0n0e1novOs3S-sXuDiBgTqqVhR43z8LmnqX3TIm5P02L4rMeKzu4miuvXVs92CdJ1Zk1Rwa-g_2b4Bm26gC0</recordid><startdate>19820901</startdate><enddate>19820901</enddate><creator>Shroeder, Paul E.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Contemporary China Institute, School of Oriental and African Studies, London University</general><general>Congress for Cultural Freedom</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HBMBR</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19820901</creationdate><title>The Ohio-Hubei Agreement: Clues to Chinese Negotiating Practices</title><author>Shroeder, Paul E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6843de22832d0144e1e096eed968b562a402b8eecbf0d3799c1fbcb05ef102543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1982</creationdate><topic>Business structures</topic><topic>Committees</topic><topic>Imports</topic><topic>International agreements</topic><topic>International trade</topic><topic>Joint ventures</topic><topic>Provincial government</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Trade</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shroeder, Paul E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 14</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>The China quarterly (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shroeder, Paul E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Ohio-Hubei Agreement: Clues to Chinese Negotiating Practices</atitle><jtitle>The China quarterly (London)</jtitle><addtitle>The China Quarterly</addtitle><date>1982-09-01</date><risdate>1982</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>91</issue><spage>486</spage><epage>491</epage><pages>486-491</pages><issn>0305-7410</issn><eissn>1468-2648</eissn><abstract>The commercial, cultural and educational agreement between the State of Ohio and Hubei province has become a major element in Hubei's efforts to modernize its industrial and agricultural sectors. At the same time, the agreement also provides evidence of increasing provincial autonomy in China's economic development. This latter fact is seen in the negotiating practices adopted by provincial officials before and after the agreement was reached.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0305741000000680</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0305-7410 |
| ispartof | The China quarterly (London), 1982-09, Vol.91 (91), p.486-491 |
| issn | 0305-7410 1468-2648 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1292874795 |
| source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Periodicals Index Online; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
| subjects | Business structures Committees Imports International agreements International trade Joint ventures Provincial government Technology Trade |
| title | The Ohio-Hubei Agreement: Clues to Chinese Negotiating Practices |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T15%3A26%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Ohio-Hubei%20Agreement:%20Clues%20to%20Chinese%20Negotiating%20Practices&rft.jtitle=The%20China%20quarterly%20(London)&rft.au=Shroeder,%20Paul%20E.&rft.date=1982-09-01&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=91&rft.spage=486&rft.epage=491&rft.pages=486-491&rft.issn=0305-7410&rft.eissn=1468-2648&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0305741000000680&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E653369%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1292874795&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0305741000000680&rft_jstor_id=653369&rfr_iscdi=true |