Actor or victim of aggression: Divergent perspectives-divergent evaluations
The present study investigated the general assumption of perspective‐specific dissent between actor and victim in evaluating aggressive interactions. Four experimental designs were established to test the relation of evaluations between (a) actor versus victim when judging a single act, (b) initiato...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of social psychology 1984-07, Vol.14 (3), p.297-311 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 311 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 297 |
| container_title | European journal of social psychology |
| container_volume | 14 |
| creator | Mummendey, Amélie Linneweber, Volker Löschper, Gabi |
| description | The present study investigated the general assumption of perspective‐specific dissent between actor and victim in evaluating aggressive interactions. Four experimental designs were established to test the relation of evaluations between (a) actor versus victim when judging a single act, (b) initiator versus reactor when judging action and reaction, and (c) actor as well as recipient when judging own versus other's behaviour. Results of 2 × 2 ANOVAs supported the hypotheses showing a consistently more favourable evaluation of identical actions by actors versus recipients with respect to the dependent variable ‘appropriateness’. For the second dependent variable ‘aggressiveness’ differences were not significant.
Cette étude a examiné l'hypothèse générale d'une différence de perspective spécifique entre l'acteur et la victime pour évaluer des interactions agressives. Quatre plans expérimentaux ont été établis pour tester la relation existante entre les évaluations de: (1) un acteur ou une victime qui jugent un seǔl acte; (2) l'initiateur ou celui qui réagit lorsqu'ils jugent une action et une rtaction; (3) l'acteur et la victime lorsqu'ils jugent leur propre comportement ou celui de I'autre. Les rtsultats de 2 × 2 ANOVAS confortent les hypothtses. Ils montrent de façon consistante une évaluation plus favorable des měmes actes par les acteurs que par les victimes en ce qui concerne la variable dépendante: ‘caractère approprié’. Les différences ne sont pas significatives pour la seconde variable dépendante: ‘caractère agressif’. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ejsp.2420140305 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1292183852</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1292183852</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4295-2879f4ab728d602a034cf2ef0ca07eeab4a5b2c9df5a4fc48c3a4b6d7f787fdb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkElPwzAQhS0EEqVw5hoJrmknthMncKraUpaybxIXy3HsKqVNgp0W-u8xSlXECWlGI42-92b0EDoMoBMA4K6a2qqDKYaAAoFwC7UCSBLfNd5GLQAa-ZgxvIv2rJ0CQBJFpIWuerIujedqmcs6n3ul9sRkYpS1eVmceIN8qcxEFbVXKWMr5Zilsn62WaulmC1E7WC7j3a0mFl1sJ5t9Hw2fOqf--Pb0UW_N_YlxUno45glmoqU4TiLAAsgVGqsNEgBTCmRUhGmWCaZDgXVksaSCJpGGdMsZjpLSRsdNb6VKT8WytZ8Wi5M4U7yACc4iEkcYkd1G0qa0lqjNK9MPhdmxQPgP4nxn8T4b2JOcbz2FVaKmTaikLndyBL3KHXmbXTaYJ_5TK3-c-XDy8e7P0f8Rp3bWn1t1MK884gRFvLXmxEfvLC3h-t7wgfkGyUNjdU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1292183852</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Actor or victim of aggression: Divergent perspectives-divergent evaluations</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Mummendey, Amélie ; Linneweber, Volker ; Löschper, Gabi</creator><creatorcontrib>Mummendey, Amélie ; Linneweber, Volker ; Löschper, Gabi</creatorcontrib><description>The present study investigated the general assumption of perspective‐specific dissent between actor and victim in evaluating aggressive interactions. Four experimental designs were established to test the relation of evaluations between (a) actor versus victim when judging a single act, (b) initiator versus reactor when judging action and reaction, and (c) actor as well as recipient when judging own versus other's behaviour. Results of 2 × 2 ANOVAs supported the hypotheses showing a consistently more favourable evaluation of identical actions by actors versus recipients with respect to the dependent variable ‘appropriateness’. For the second dependent variable ‘aggressiveness’ differences were not significant.
Cette étude a examiné l'hypothèse générale d'une différence de perspective spécifique entre l'acteur et la victime pour évaluer des interactions agressives. Quatre plans expérimentaux ont été établis pour tester la relation existante entre les évaluations de: (1) un acteur ou une victime qui jugent un seǔl acte; (2) l'initiateur ou celui qui réagit lorsqu'ils jugent une action et une rtaction; (3) l'acteur et la victime lorsqu'ils jugent leur propre comportement ou celui de I'autre. Les rtsultats de 2 × 2 ANOVAS confortent les hypothtses. Ils montrent de façon consistante une évaluation plus favorable des měmes actes par les acteurs que par les victimes en ce qui concerne la variable dépendante: ‘caractère approprié’. Les différences ne sont pas significatives pour la seconde variable dépendante: ‘caractère agressif’.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0046-2772</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0992</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2420140305</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EJSPA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Social interactions. Communication. Group processes ; Social psychology</subject><ispartof>European journal of social psychology, 1984-07, Vol.14 (3), p.297-311</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1984 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</rights><rights>1985 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4295-2879f4ab728d602a034cf2ef0ca07eeab4a5b2c9df5a4fc48c3a4b6d7f787fdb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4295-2879f4ab728d602a034cf2ef0ca07eeab4a5b2c9df5a4fc48c3a4b6d7f787fdb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fejsp.2420140305$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fejsp.2420140305$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27852,27907,27908,45557,45558</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=9034418$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mummendey, Amélie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linneweber, Volker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Löschper, Gabi</creatorcontrib><title>Actor or victim of aggression: Divergent perspectives-divergent evaluations</title><title>European journal of social psychology</title><addtitle>Eur. J. Soc. Psychol</addtitle><description>The present study investigated the general assumption of perspective‐specific dissent between actor and victim in evaluating aggressive interactions. Four experimental designs were established to test the relation of evaluations between (a) actor versus victim when judging a single act, (b) initiator versus reactor when judging action and reaction, and (c) actor as well as recipient when judging own versus other's behaviour. Results of 2 × 2 ANOVAs supported the hypotheses showing a consistently more favourable evaluation of identical actions by actors versus recipients with respect to the dependent variable ‘appropriateness’. For the second dependent variable ‘aggressiveness’ differences were not significant.
Cette étude a examiné l'hypothèse générale d'une différence de perspective spécifique entre l'acteur et la victime pour évaluer des interactions agressives. Quatre plans expérimentaux ont été établis pour tester la relation existante entre les évaluations de: (1) un acteur ou une victime qui jugent un seǔl acte; (2) l'initiateur ou celui qui réagit lorsqu'ils jugent une action et une rtaction; (3) l'acteur et la victime lorsqu'ils jugent leur propre comportement ou celui de I'autre. Les rtsultats de 2 × 2 ANOVAS confortent les hypothtses. Ils montrent de façon consistante une évaluation plus favorable des měmes actes par les acteurs que par les victimes en ce qui concerne la variable dépendante: ‘caractère approprié’. Les différences ne sont pas significatives pour la seconde variable dépendante: ‘caractère agressif’.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Social interactions. Communication. Group processes</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><issn>0046-2772</issn><issn>1099-0992</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1984</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkElPwzAQhS0EEqVw5hoJrmknthMncKraUpaybxIXy3HsKqVNgp0W-u8xSlXECWlGI42-92b0EDoMoBMA4K6a2qqDKYaAAoFwC7UCSBLfNd5GLQAa-ZgxvIv2rJ0CQBJFpIWuerIujedqmcs6n3ul9sRkYpS1eVmceIN8qcxEFbVXKWMr5Zilsn62WaulmC1E7WC7j3a0mFl1sJ5t9Hw2fOqf--Pb0UW_N_YlxUno45glmoqU4TiLAAsgVGqsNEgBTCmRUhGmWCaZDgXVksaSCJpGGdMsZjpLSRsdNb6VKT8WytZ8Wi5M4U7yACc4iEkcYkd1G0qa0lqjNK9MPhdmxQPgP4nxn8T4b2JOcbz2FVaKmTaikLndyBL3KHXmbXTaYJ_5TK3-c-XDy8e7P0f8Rp3bWn1t1MK884gRFvLXmxEfvLC3h-t7wgfkGyUNjdU</recordid><startdate>198407</startdate><enddate>198407</enddate><creator>Mummendey, Amélie</creator><creator>Linneweber, Volker</creator><creator>Löschper, Gabi</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQCIK</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198407</creationdate><title>Actor or victim of aggression: Divergent perspectives-divergent evaluations</title><author>Mummendey, Amélie ; Linneweber, Volker ; Löschper, Gabi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4295-2879f4ab728d602a034cf2ef0ca07eeab4a5b2c9df5a4fc48c3a4b6d7f787fdb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1984</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Social interactions. Communication. Group processes</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mummendey, Amélie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linneweber, Volker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Löschper, Gabi</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 33</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>European journal of social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mummendey, Amélie</au><au>Linneweber, Volker</au><au>Löschper, Gabi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Actor or victim of aggression: Divergent perspectives-divergent evaluations</atitle><jtitle>European journal of social psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur. J. Soc. Psychol</addtitle><date>1984-07</date><risdate>1984</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>297</spage><epage>311</epage><pages>297-311</pages><issn>0046-2772</issn><eissn>1099-0992</eissn><coden>EJSPA6</coden><abstract>The present study investigated the general assumption of perspective‐specific dissent between actor and victim in evaluating aggressive interactions. Four experimental designs were established to test the relation of evaluations between (a) actor versus victim when judging a single act, (b) initiator versus reactor when judging action and reaction, and (c) actor as well as recipient when judging own versus other's behaviour. Results of 2 × 2 ANOVAs supported the hypotheses showing a consistently more favourable evaluation of identical actions by actors versus recipients with respect to the dependent variable ‘appropriateness’. For the second dependent variable ‘aggressiveness’ differences were not significant.
Cette étude a examiné l'hypothèse générale d'une différence de perspective spécifique entre l'acteur et la victime pour évaluer des interactions agressives. Quatre plans expérimentaux ont été établis pour tester la relation existante entre les évaluations de: (1) un acteur ou une victime qui jugent un seǔl acte; (2) l'initiateur ou celui qui réagit lorsqu'ils jugent une action et une rtaction; (3) l'acteur et la victime lorsqu'ils jugent leur propre comportement ou celui de I'autre. Les rtsultats de 2 × 2 ANOVAS confortent les hypothtses. Ils montrent de façon consistante une évaluation plus favorable des měmes actes par les acteurs que par les victimes en ce qui concerne la variable dépendante: ‘caractère approprié’. Les différences ne sont pas significatives pour la seconde variable dépendante: ‘caractère agressif’.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/ejsp.2420140305</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0046-2772 |
| ispartof | European journal of social psychology, 1984-07, Vol.14 (3), p.297-311 |
| issn | 0046-2772 1099-0992 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1292183852 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | Biological and medical sciences Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Social interactions. Communication. Group processes Social psychology |
| title | Actor or victim of aggression: Divergent perspectives-divergent evaluations |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T19%3A13%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Actor%20or%20victim%20of%20aggression:%20Divergent%20perspectives-divergent%20evaluations&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Mummendey,%20Am%C3%A9lie&rft.date=1984-07&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=297&rft.epage=311&rft.pages=297-311&rft.issn=0046-2772&rft.eissn=1099-0992&rft.coden=EJSPA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ejsp.2420140305&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1292183852%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1292183852&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |