Vertically Related Markets: Export Rivalry Between DC and LDC Firms

We present a model of export rivalry in vertically related markets where a DC firm produces a high‐quality good as well as a key input utilized by an LDC firm to produce a low‐quality export good. the DC firm acts as a Stackelberg leader by setting the price of the input and the quantity of its expo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Review of international economics 1994-06, Vol.2 (2), p.131-142
Hauptverfasser: Chang, Winston W., Chen, Fang-Yueh
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 142
container_issue 2
container_start_page 131
container_title Review of international economics
container_volume 2
creator Chang, Winston W.
Chen, Fang-Yueh
description We present a model of export rivalry in vertically related markets where a DC firm produces a high‐quality good as well as a key input utilized by an LDC firm to produce a low‐quality export good. the DC firm acts as a Stackelberg leader by setting the price of the input and the quantity of its export good. We show that the DC firm's decision on vertical supply depends on the cost, demand, and quality parameters of both producers, and that the LDC government should tax either its final good exports or its key input imports.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1467-9396.1994.tb00035.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1292145436</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1292145436</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4941-a58e10e4742b4062c931c7c332d3256827e379b8216f0b11b9ac510107f124f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkV9v0zAUxS0E0srgO0TwnMz_He8FQdd1kwrTChu8XTnpjUhJ28zOuubb45Cq71i6utLxPb9rHRPygdGMxXOxzpjUJrXC6oxZK7OuoJQKlR1ekcnp6jWZUKtVapTRZ-RtCGtKmcotnZDpI_quLl3T9MkSG9fhKvnq_B_swmUyO7Q73yXLeu8a3ydfsHtB3CZX08RtV8ki9uvab8I78qZyTcD3x35OHq5nP6Y36eJufjv9vEhLaSVLncqRUZRG8kJSzUsrWGlKIfhKcKVzblAYW-Sc6YoWjBXWlYpRRk3FuKyEOCcfR27rd0_PGDpY7579Nq4Exi1nUkmh49TlOFX6XQgeK2h9vXG-B0ZhCA3WMCQDQzIwhAbH0OAQzTej2WOL5clZNM7jvo7KHoTjsfpY_7zC1UepHSTBQHL43W0i6tOIeqkb7P_jEbC8u51FUCSkI6EOHR5OhPg7oI0wCn5-m8P3-_tfc_3IIRd_AR5CmTY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1292145436</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vertically Related Markets: Export Rivalry Between DC and LDC Firms</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Chang, Winston W. ; Chen, Fang-Yueh</creator><creatorcontrib>Chang, Winston W. ; Chen, Fang-Yueh</creatorcontrib><description>We present a model of export rivalry in vertically related markets where a DC firm produces a high‐quality good as well as a key input utilized by an LDC firm to produce a low‐quality export good. the DC firm acts as a Stackelberg leader by setting the price of the input and the quantity of its export good. We show that the DC firm's decision on vertical supply depends on the cost, demand, and quality parameters of both producers, and that the LDC government should tax either its final good exports or its key input imports.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0965-7576</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9396</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9396.1994.tb00035.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Review of international economics, 1994-06, Vol.2 (2), p.131-142</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4941-a58e10e4742b4062c931c7c332d3256827e379b8216f0b11b9ac510107f124f33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4941-a58e10e4742b4062c931c7c332d3256827e379b8216f0b11b9ac510107f124f33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9396.1994.tb00035.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9396.1994.tb00035.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,4009,27874,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/blareviec/v_3a2_3ay_3a1994_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a131-42.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chang, Winston W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Fang-Yueh</creatorcontrib><title>Vertically Related Markets: Export Rivalry Between DC and LDC Firms</title><title>Review of international economics</title><description>We present a model of export rivalry in vertically related markets where a DC firm produces a high‐quality good as well as a key input utilized by an LDC firm to produce a low‐quality export good. the DC firm acts as a Stackelberg leader by setting the price of the input and the quantity of its export good. We show that the DC firm's decision on vertical supply depends on the cost, demand, and quality parameters of both producers, and that the LDC government should tax either its final good exports or its key input imports.</description><issn>0965-7576</issn><issn>1467-9396</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkV9v0zAUxS0E0srgO0TwnMz_He8FQdd1kwrTChu8XTnpjUhJ28zOuubb45Cq71i6utLxPb9rHRPygdGMxXOxzpjUJrXC6oxZK7OuoJQKlR1ekcnp6jWZUKtVapTRZ-RtCGtKmcotnZDpI_quLl3T9MkSG9fhKvnq_B_swmUyO7Q73yXLeu8a3ydfsHtB3CZX08RtV8ki9uvab8I78qZyTcD3x35OHq5nP6Y36eJufjv9vEhLaSVLncqRUZRG8kJSzUsrWGlKIfhKcKVzblAYW-Sc6YoWjBXWlYpRRk3FuKyEOCcfR27rd0_PGDpY7579Nq4Exi1nUkmh49TlOFX6XQgeK2h9vXG-B0ZhCA3WMCQDQzIwhAbH0OAQzTej2WOL5clZNM7jvo7KHoTjsfpY_7zC1UepHSTBQHL43W0i6tOIeqkb7P_jEbC8u51FUCSkI6EOHR5OhPg7oI0wCn5-m8P3-_tfc_3IIRd_AR5CmTY</recordid><startdate>199406</startdate><enddate>199406</enddate><creator>Chang, Winston W.</creator><creator>Chen, Fang-Yueh</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Blackwell</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQCIK</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199406</creationdate><title>Vertically Related Markets: Export Rivalry Between DC and LDC Firms</title><author>Chang, Winston W. ; Chen, Fang-Yueh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4941-a58e10e4742b4062c931c7c332d3256827e379b8216f0b11b9ac510107f124f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chang, Winston W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Fang-Yueh</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 33</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Review of international economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chang, Winston W.</au><au>Chen, Fang-Yueh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vertically Related Markets: Export Rivalry Between DC and LDC Firms</atitle><jtitle>Review of international economics</jtitle><date>1994-06</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>131</spage><epage>142</epage><pages>131-142</pages><issn>0965-7576</issn><eissn>1467-9396</eissn><abstract>We present a model of export rivalry in vertically related markets where a DC firm produces a high‐quality good as well as a key input utilized by an LDC firm to produce a low‐quality export good. the DC firm acts as a Stackelberg leader by setting the price of the input and the quantity of its export good. We show that the DC firm's decision on vertical supply depends on the cost, demand, and quality parameters of both producers, and that the LDC government should tax either its final good exports or its key input imports.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1467-9396.1994.tb00035.x</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0965-7576
ispartof Review of international economics, 1994-06, Vol.2 (2), p.131-142
issn 0965-7576
1467-9396
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1292145436
source RePEc; Periodicals Index Online; Wiley Online Library All Journals
title Vertically Related Markets: Export Rivalry Between DC and LDC Firms
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T08%3A42%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vertically%20Related%20Markets:%20Export%20Rivalry%20Between%20DC%20and%20LDC%20Firms&rft.jtitle=Review%20of%20international%20economics&rft.au=Chang,%20Winston%20W.&rft.date=1994-06&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=131&rft.epage=142&rft.pages=131-142&rft.issn=0965-7576&rft.eissn=1467-9396&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1467-9396.1994.tb00035.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1292145436%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1292145436&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true