KEYNES, KEYNESIANS AND THE EVIDENCE ON U.K. TRADE CYCLES
Many scholars have noted that, since at least 1790, U.K. economic fluctuations have seemed to reach major peaks every 7-10 years. Keynes (1936, ch.18) used the elements of his theory to explain non-periodic economic fluctuations. His explanation of periodic fluctuations, i.e. cycles, appears in Chap...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of economic studies (Bradford) 1977-02, Vol.4 (2), p.103-119 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 119 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 103 |
container_title | Journal of economic studies (Bradford) |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | KLOTZ, BENJAMIN P. |
description | Many scholars have noted that, since at least 1790, U.K. economic fluctuations have seemed to reach major peaks every 7-10 years. Keynes (1936, ch.18) used the elements of his theory to explain non-periodic economic fluctuations. His explanation of periodic fluctuations, i.e. cycles, appears in Chapter 22 of the General Theory. As is well known, he believed that fluctuations in "animal spirits" (that were often only loosely connected with the cost and the real rate of return on capital) led to oscillations in investment which, combined with the durability of capital goods, caused the duration of modern major cycles; fluctuations in liquidity preference and the propensity to consume played lesser roles. Bowing to Jevons (1964), Keynes also noted that unstable agricultural inventories could have been a source of waves in the early 19th Century when agriculture was relatively more important in the U.K. But Keynes did not demonstrate just how his investment theory implied a definite cycle period, because he did not merge his multiplier with the accelerator principle to provide an endogenous explanation of periodic turning points in output. Consequently, as Hicks (1950, p. l) notes, Keynes did not demonstrate how investment and income could peak every 7-10 years; his was really a theory of nonperiodic waves. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/eb002473 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1292136928</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1292136928</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c229t-3a06ad64c5c97cd9d44880f0dc92e736c5b5b5693322e42f7bb7c0ada0cde2b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM9PwjAcxRujiYgm_glNPOjBYX9t7Y5kq4KQYRxIODVd2yUgCHaQ6H_vzAQPmu_hXT7vvW8eAJcYdTBG4s4VCBHG6RFoYR6KgFPBj0ELYcYCGorwFJxV1QIhFFJEWkAM5CyT-S1stN_NctjNUjjuSShf-qnMEglHGZx0Bh04fu6mEiazZCjzc3BS6mXlLn60DSb3cpz0guHooZ90h4EhJN4GVKNI24iZ0MTc2NgyJgQqkTUxcZxGJizqi2JKCXGMlLwouEHaamSsIwWlbXDV5G78-n3nqq1arHf-ra5UmMQE0ygmoqZuGsr4dVV5V6qNn6-0_1QYqe9d1H6XGg0adF5t3ceB0_5VRZzyULEpUY9kOn1Kk4HKfx9wK-f10h4c-0S1sWVNXf9P_en_AsZ5daE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1292136928</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>KEYNES, KEYNESIANS AND THE EVIDENCE ON U.K. TRADE CYCLES</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Emerald Journals</source><creator>KLOTZ, BENJAMIN P.</creator><creatorcontrib>KLOTZ, BENJAMIN P.</creatorcontrib><description>Many scholars have noted that, since at least 1790, U.K. economic fluctuations have seemed to reach major peaks every 7-10 years. Keynes (1936, ch.18) used the elements of his theory to explain non-periodic economic fluctuations. His explanation of periodic fluctuations, i.e. cycles, appears in Chapter 22 of the General Theory. As is well known, he believed that fluctuations in "animal spirits" (that were often only loosely connected with the cost and the real rate of return on capital) led to oscillations in investment which, combined with the durability of capital goods, caused the duration of modern major cycles; fluctuations in liquidity preference and the propensity to consume played lesser roles. Bowing to Jevons (1964), Keynes also noted that unstable agricultural inventories could have been a source of waves in the early 19th Century when agriculture was relatively more important in the U.K. But Keynes did not demonstrate just how his investment theory implied a definite cycle period, because he did not merge his multiplier with the accelerator principle to provide an endogenous explanation of periodic turning points in output. Consequently, as Hicks (1950, p. l) notes, Keynes did not demonstrate how investment and income could peak every 7-10 years; his was really a theory of nonperiodic waves.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-3585</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7387</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/eb002473</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Glasgow: MCB UP Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Journal of economic studies (Bradford), 1977-02, Vol.4 (2), p.103-119</ispartof><rights>MCB UP Limited</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c229t-3a06ad64c5c97cd9d44880f0dc92e736c5b5b5693322e42f7bb7c0ada0cde2b33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/eb002473/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/eb002473/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,967,11635,27869,27924,27925,52686,52689</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>KLOTZ, BENJAMIN P.</creatorcontrib><title>KEYNES, KEYNESIANS AND THE EVIDENCE ON U.K. TRADE CYCLES</title><title>Journal of economic studies (Bradford)</title><description>Many scholars have noted that, since at least 1790, U.K. economic fluctuations have seemed to reach major peaks every 7-10 years. Keynes (1936, ch.18) used the elements of his theory to explain non-periodic economic fluctuations. His explanation of periodic fluctuations, i.e. cycles, appears in Chapter 22 of the General Theory. As is well known, he believed that fluctuations in "animal spirits" (that were often only loosely connected with the cost and the real rate of return on capital) led to oscillations in investment which, combined with the durability of capital goods, caused the duration of modern major cycles; fluctuations in liquidity preference and the propensity to consume played lesser roles. Bowing to Jevons (1964), Keynes also noted that unstable agricultural inventories could have been a source of waves in the early 19th Century when agriculture was relatively more important in the U.K. But Keynes did not demonstrate just how his investment theory implied a definite cycle period, because he did not merge his multiplier with the accelerator principle to provide an endogenous explanation of periodic turning points in output. Consequently, as Hicks (1950, p. l) notes, Keynes did not demonstrate how investment and income could peak every 7-10 years; his was really a theory of nonperiodic waves.</description><issn>0144-3585</issn><issn>1758-7387</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1977</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNptkM9PwjAcxRujiYgm_glNPOjBYX9t7Y5kq4KQYRxIODVd2yUgCHaQ6H_vzAQPmu_hXT7vvW8eAJcYdTBG4s4VCBHG6RFoYR6KgFPBj0ELYcYCGorwFJxV1QIhFFJEWkAM5CyT-S1stN_NctjNUjjuSShf-qnMEglHGZx0Bh04fu6mEiazZCjzc3BS6mXlLn60DSb3cpz0guHooZ90h4EhJN4GVKNI24iZ0MTc2NgyJgQqkTUxcZxGJizqi2JKCXGMlLwouEHaamSsIwWlbXDV5G78-n3nqq1arHf-ra5UmMQE0ygmoqZuGsr4dVV5V6qNn6-0_1QYqe9d1H6XGg0adF5t3ceB0_5VRZzyULEpUY9kOn1Kk4HKfx9wK-f10h4c-0S1sWVNXf9P_en_AsZ5daE</recordid><startdate>19770201</startdate><enddate>19770201</enddate><creator>KLOTZ, BENJAMIN P.</creator><general>MCB UP Ltd</general><general>Dept. of Economics, University of Strathclyde</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQCIK</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19770201</creationdate><title>KEYNES, KEYNESIANS AND THE EVIDENCE ON U.K. TRADE CYCLES</title><author>KLOTZ, BENJAMIN P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c229t-3a06ad64c5c97cd9d44880f0dc92e736c5b5b5693322e42f7bb7c0ada0cde2b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1977</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KLOTZ, BENJAMIN P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 33</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Journal of economic studies (Bradford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KLOTZ, BENJAMIN P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>KEYNES, KEYNESIANS AND THE EVIDENCE ON U.K. TRADE CYCLES</atitle><jtitle>Journal of economic studies (Bradford)</jtitle><date>1977-02-01</date><risdate>1977</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>103</spage><epage>119</epage><pages>103-119</pages><issn>0144-3585</issn><eissn>1758-7387</eissn><abstract>Many scholars have noted that, since at least 1790, U.K. economic fluctuations have seemed to reach major peaks every 7-10 years. Keynes (1936, ch.18) used the elements of his theory to explain non-periodic economic fluctuations. His explanation of periodic fluctuations, i.e. cycles, appears in Chapter 22 of the General Theory. As is well known, he believed that fluctuations in "animal spirits" (that were often only loosely connected with the cost and the real rate of return on capital) led to oscillations in investment which, combined with the durability of capital goods, caused the duration of modern major cycles; fluctuations in liquidity preference and the propensity to consume played lesser roles. Bowing to Jevons (1964), Keynes also noted that unstable agricultural inventories could have been a source of waves in the early 19th Century when agriculture was relatively more important in the U.K. But Keynes did not demonstrate just how his investment theory implied a definite cycle period, because he did not merge his multiplier with the accelerator principle to provide an endogenous explanation of periodic turning points in output. Consequently, as Hicks (1950, p. l) notes, Keynes did not demonstrate how investment and income could peak every 7-10 years; his was really a theory of nonperiodic waves.</abstract><cop>Glasgow</cop><pub>MCB UP Ltd</pub><doi>10.1108/eb002473</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0144-3585 |
ispartof | Journal of economic studies (Bradford), 1977-02, Vol.4 (2), p.103-119 |
issn | 0144-3585 1758-7387 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1292136928 |
source | Periodicals Index Online; Emerald Journals |
title | KEYNES, KEYNESIANS AND THE EVIDENCE ON U.K. TRADE CYCLES |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T04%3A49%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=KEYNES,%20KEYNESIANS%20AND%20THE%20EVIDENCE%20ON%20U.K.%20TRADE%20CYCLES&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20economic%20studies%20(Bradford)&rft.au=KLOTZ,%20BENJAMIN%20P.&rft.date=1977-02-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=103&rft.epage=119&rft.pages=103-119&rft.issn=0144-3585&rft.eissn=1758-7387&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/eb002473&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1292136928%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1292136928&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |