Parliamentarianism and sobornost': two models of representative institutions in Russian political culture

The paper seeks to inquire into the differences between the pluralist and the populist visions of democracy and the two models of representative assemblies associated with them, namely parliamentarianism and sobornost'. The first section attempts to trace the latter to its historic roots, both...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Discourse & society 1993-01, Vol.4 (1), p.57-74
Hauptverfasser: Biryukov, Nikolai, Sergeyev, Victor
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The paper seeks to inquire into the differences between the pluralist and the populist visions of democracy and the two models of representative assemblies associated with them, namely parliamentarianism and sobornost'. The first section attempts to trace the latter to its historic roots, both traditional and Marxist, while the second section deals with the impact it still bears on present-day political discourse. The argument is supported by the analysis of the proceedings of the First Congress of the People's Deputies of the USSR in 1989. Treated as indicative of this type of political culture are the 'anti-procedural' philippics pivoted on insistent contraposition of 'real work' to 'idle talk' and certain patterns of deputies' social and political identification as expressed in the variety of meanings attached to pronouns we and/or our.
ISSN:0957-9265
1460-3624
DOI:10.1177/0957926593004001004