SIGNAL-DETECTION PERFORMANCE BY SUBJECTS DIFFERING IN PREDISPOSITION TO DAYDREAMING

SS REPRESENTING EXTREMES ON QUESTIONNAIRES OF PRIOR DISPOSITION TO DAYDREAMING FREQUENCY AND THOUGHTFULNESS ALSO DIFFERED IN REPORTS OF TASK-IRRELEVANT IMAGERY DURING RAPID-RATE AUDITORY SIGNAL-DETECTION SESSIONS. WHILE HIGH DAYDREAMERS SHOWED A SIGNIFICANT PERFORMANCE DECREMENT OVER TIME IN GENERAL...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Consulting Psychology 1967-10, Vol.31 (5), p.487-491
Hauptverfasser: ANTROBUS, JOHN S, COLEMAN, RONALD, SINGER, JEROME L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 491
container_issue 5
container_start_page 487
container_title Journal of Consulting Psychology
container_volume 31
creator ANTROBUS, JOHN S
COLEMAN, RONALD
SINGER, JEROME L
description SS REPRESENTING EXTREMES ON QUESTIONNAIRES OF PRIOR DISPOSITION TO DAYDREAMING FREQUENCY AND THOUGHTFULNESS ALSO DIFFERED IN REPORTS OF TASK-IRRELEVANT IMAGERY DURING RAPID-RATE AUDITORY SIGNAL-DETECTION SESSIONS. WHILE HIGH DAYDREAMERS SHOWED A SIGNIFICANT PERFORMANCE DECREMENT OVER TIME IN GENERAL, THEY DID NOT SHOW SIGNIFICANTLY MORE DETECTION ERRORS THAN DID LOW DAYDREAMERS. RESULTS SUGGEST THAT DATA OBTAINED FROM QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONSES ARE RELEVANT TO PERFORMANCE IN AN EXPERIMENTAL SITUATION AND ALSO SUPPORT A MODEL RELATING DAYDREAMING TRENDS TO CERTAIN PATTERNS OF PREFERENCE FOR INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL STIMULATION EVEN UNDER RELATIVELY DEMANDING AND ALERTING CONDITIONS OF RAPID SIGNAL PRESENTATION.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/h0024969
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1290468383</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1290468383</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a398t-b694bcec29867347e025ff0be8f6f7892c543dddc90586d36d7fee1a829d31b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10V1P2zAUBmBrGmKlTNofmBSNCSFNYcex44_L0qQlCBqUlAuurMRxtKJ-ZHZzwb_HpWXSpnHli_c551jnIPQFwyUGwn_-AoioZPIDGmBJWYiF4B_RAEDGoRASf0Inzj0BEBAUjtExAx5LzgeoLLPpbHQbJuk8Hc-zfBbcp8UkL-5Gs3EaXD0G5cPVjU_KIMkmk7TIZtMg86hIk6y8z8vstWaeB8noMSnS0Z0Hp-iorZbOfD68Q_QwSefj6_A2n2ZjP6wiUmzDmklaa6MjKRgnlBuI4raF2oiWtVzISMeUNE2jJcSCNYQ1vDUGVyKSDcE1I0N0vu_b2c3v3ritWi2cNstltTab3ilBWcQFBw-__QOfNr1d-78phimhBFPp0dl7CEcSKBNEEK8u9krbjXPWtKqzi1VlnxUGtTuFejuFp18PDft6ZZo_8LB7n__Y51VXqc4968puF3ppnO6tNeut0rpTBKtYUbHT3_-v_2YvfPGWBA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614343149</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>SIGNAL-DETECTION PERFORMANCE BY SUBJECTS DIFFERING IN PREDISPOSITION TO DAYDREAMING</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>ANTROBUS, JOHN S ; COLEMAN, RONALD ; SINGER, JEROME L</creator><contributor>Holzberg, Jules D</contributor><creatorcontrib>ANTROBUS, JOHN S ; COLEMAN, RONALD ; SINGER, JEROME L ; Holzberg, Jules D</creatorcontrib><description>SS REPRESENTING EXTREMES ON QUESTIONNAIRES OF PRIOR DISPOSITION TO DAYDREAMING FREQUENCY AND THOUGHTFULNESS ALSO DIFFERED IN REPORTS OF TASK-IRRELEVANT IMAGERY DURING RAPID-RATE AUDITORY SIGNAL-DETECTION SESSIONS. WHILE HIGH DAYDREAMERS SHOWED A SIGNIFICANT PERFORMANCE DECREMENT OVER TIME IN GENERAL, THEY DID NOT SHOW SIGNIFICANTLY MORE DETECTION ERRORS THAN DID LOW DAYDREAMERS. RESULTS SUGGEST THAT DATA OBTAINED FROM QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONSES ARE RELEVANT TO PERFORMANCE IN AN EXPERIMENTAL SITUATION AND ALSO SUPPORT A MODEL RELATING DAYDREAMING TRENDS TO CERTAIN PATTERNS OF PREFERENCE FOR INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL STIMULATION EVEN UNDER RELATIVELY DEMANDING AND ALERTING CONDITIONS OF RAPID SIGNAL PRESENTATION.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-8891</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0022-006X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1946-1887</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2117</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/h0024969</identifier><identifier>PMID: 6075977</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Attention ; Auditory Perception ; Fantasies (Thought Disturbances) ; Fantasy ; Fantasy (Defense Mechanism) ; Female ; Human ; Humans ; Imagery ; Imagination ; Male ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Thinking</subject><ispartof>Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1967-10, Vol.31 (5), p.487-491</ispartof><rights>1967 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1967, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a398t-b694bcec29867347e025ff0be8f6f7892c543dddc90586d36d7fee1a829d31b63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27846,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6075977$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Holzberg, Jules D</contributor><creatorcontrib>ANTROBUS, JOHN S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COLEMAN, RONALD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SINGER, JEROME L</creatorcontrib><title>SIGNAL-DETECTION PERFORMANCE BY SUBJECTS DIFFERING IN PREDISPOSITION TO DAYDREAMING</title><title>Journal of Consulting Psychology</title><addtitle>J Consult Psychol</addtitle><description>SS REPRESENTING EXTREMES ON QUESTIONNAIRES OF PRIOR DISPOSITION TO DAYDREAMING FREQUENCY AND THOUGHTFULNESS ALSO DIFFERED IN REPORTS OF TASK-IRRELEVANT IMAGERY DURING RAPID-RATE AUDITORY SIGNAL-DETECTION SESSIONS. WHILE HIGH DAYDREAMERS SHOWED A SIGNIFICANT PERFORMANCE DECREMENT OVER TIME IN GENERAL, THEY DID NOT SHOW SIGNIFICANTLY MORE DETECTION ERRORS THAN DID LOW DAYDREAMERS. RESULTS SUGGEST THAT DATA OBTAINED FROM QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONSES ARE RELEVANT TO PERFORMANCE IN AN EXPERIMENTAL SITUATION AND ALSO SUPPORT A MODEL RELATING DAYDREAMING TRENDS TO CERTAIN PATTERNS OF PREFERENCE FOR INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL STIMULATION EVEN UNDER RELATIVELY DEMANDING AND ALERTING CONDITIONS OF RAPID SIGNAL PRESENTATION.</description><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Auditory Perception</subject><subject>Fantasies (Thought Disturbances)</subject><subject>Fantasy</subject><subject>Fantasy (Defense Mechanism)</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imagery</subject><subject>Imagination</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Thinking</subject><issn>0095-8891</issn><issn>0022-006X</issn><issn>1946-1887</issn><issn>1939-2117</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1967</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp10V1P2zAUBmBrGmKlTNofmBSNCSFNYcex44_L0qQlCBqUlAuurMRxtKJ-ZHZzwb_HpWXSpnHli_c551jnIPQFwyUGwn_-AoioZPIDGmBJWYiF4B_RAEDGoRASf0Inzj0BEBAUjtExAx5LzgeoLLPpbHQbJuk8Hc-zfBbcp8UkL-5Gs3EaXD0G5cPVjU_KIMkmk7TIZtMg86hIk6y8z8vstWaeB8noMSnS0Z0Hp-iorZbOfD68Q_QwSefj6_A2n2ZjP6wiUmzDmklaa6MjKRgnlBuI4raF2oiWtVzISMeUNE2jJcSCNYQ1vDUGVyKSDcE1I0N0vu_b2c3v3ritWi2cNstltTab3ilBWcQFBw-__QOfNr1d-78phimhBFPp0dl7CEcSKBNEEK8u9krbjXPWtKqzi1VlnxUGtTuFejuFp18PDft6ZZo_8LB7n__Y51VXqc4968puF3ppnO6tNeut0rpTBKtYUbHT3_-v_2YvfPGWBA</recordid><startdate>196710</startdate><enddate>196710</enddate><creator>ANTROBUS, JOHN S</creator><creator>COLEMAN, RONALD</creator><creator>SINGER, JEROME L</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>196710</creationdate><title>SIGNAL-DETECTION PERFORMANCE BY SUBJECTS DIFFERING IN PREDISPOSITION TO DAYDREAMING</title><author>ANTROBUS, JOHN S ; COLEMAN, RONALD ; SINGER, JEROME L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a398t-b694bcec29867347e025ff0be8f6f7892c543dddc90586d36d7fee1a829d31b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1967</creationdate><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Auditory Perception</topic><topic>Fantasies (Thought Disturbances)</topic><topic>Fantasy</topic><topic>Fantasy (Defense Mechanism)</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imagery</topic><topic>Imagination</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Thinking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ANTROBUS, JOHN S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COLEMAN, RONALD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SINGER, JEROME L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of Consulting Psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ANTROBUS, JOHN S</au><au>COLEMAN, RONALD</au><au>SINGER, JEROME L</au><au>Holzberg, Jules D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SIGNAL-DETECTION PERFORMANCE BY SUBJECTS DIFFERING IN PREDISPOSITION TO DAYDREAMING</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Consulting Psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Consult Psychol</addtitle><date>1967-10</date><risdate>1967</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>487</spage><epage>491</epage><pages>487-491</pages><issn>0095-8891</issn><issn>0022-006X</issn><eissn>1946-1887</eissn><eissn>1939-2117</eissn><abstract>SS REPRESENTING EXTREMES ON QUESTIONNAIRES OF PRIOR DISPOSITION TO DAYDREAMING FREQUENCY AND THOUGHTFULNESS ALSO DIFFERED IN REPORTS OF TASK-IRRELEVANT IMAGERY DURING RAPID-RATE AUDITORY SIGNAL-DETECTION SESSIONS. WHILE HIGH DAYDREAMERS SHOWED A SIGNIFICANT PERFORMANCE DECREMENT OVER TIME IN GENERAL, THEY DID NOT SHOW SIGNIFICANTLY MORE DETECTION ERRORS THAN DID LOW DAYDREAMERS. RESULTS SUGGEST THAT DATA OBTAINED FROM QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONSES ARE RELEVANT TO PERFORMANCE IN AN EXPERIMENTAL SITUATION AND ALSO SUPPORT A MODEL RELATING DAYDREAMING TRENDS TO CERTAIN PATTERNS OF PREFERENCE FOR INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL STIMULATION EVEN UNDER RELATIVELY DEMANDING AND ALERTING CONDITIONS OF RAPID SIGNAL PRESENTATION.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>6075977</pmid><doi>10.1037/h0024969</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0095-8891
ispartof Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1967-10, Vol.31 (5), p.487-491
issn 0095-8891
0022-006X
1946-1887
1939-2117
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1290468383
source APA PsycARTICLES; MEDLINE; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Attention
Auditory Perception
Fantasies (Thought Disturbances)
Fantasy
Fantasy (Defense Mechanism)
Female
Human
Humans
Imagery
Imagination
Male
Surveys and Questionnaires
Thinking
title SIGNAL-DETECTION PERFORMANCE BY SUBJECTS DIFFERING IN PREDISPOSITION TO DAYDREAMING
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T00%3A55%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SIGNAL-DETECTION%20PERFORMANCE%20BY%20SUBJECTS%20DIFFERING%20IN%20PREDISPOSITION%20TO%20DAYDREAMING&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Consulting%20Psychology&rft.au=ANTROBUS,%20JOHN%20S&rft.date=1967-10&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=487&rft.epage=491&rft.pages=487-491&rft.issn=0095-8891&rft.eissn=1946-1887&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/h0024969&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1290468383%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614343149&rft_id=info:pmid/6075977&rfr_iscdi=true