Comparison of Two Approaches—Jan and Prof—for Capturing Rater Strategies

Comparison of Two Approaches—Jan and Prof—for Capturing Rater Strategies

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Educational and psychological measurement 1966, Vol.26 (2), p.267-286
Hauptverfasser: Wherry, Robert J., Naylor, James C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 286
container_issue 2
container_start_page 267
container_title Educational and psychological measurement
container_volume 26
creator Wherry, Robert J.
Naylor, James C.
description
doi_str_mv 10.1177/001316446602600202
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1290210280</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_001316446602600202</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1290188378</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-25127c40e7df9ac79865f3570a0d8dae3d62887cfb5ec4027378d2ccf8171fd13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1KAzEUhYMoWKsv4Crgeuy9mckkXZbBXwqK1vUQ81On2MmYzCDufAif0CcxpS4EEe_mcOE7514OIccIp4hCTAAwx7IoyhJYCcCA7ZARcs6yXEq5S0YbINsQ--QgxhWkKRBHZF75dadCE31LvaOLV09nXRe80k82fr5_XKuWqtbQ2-BdWp0PtFJdP4SmXdI71dtA7_uQdNnYeEj2nHqO9uhbx-Th_GxRXWbzm4urajbPNOOyzxhHJnQBVhg3VVpMZcldzgUoMNIom5uSSSm0e-Q2YUzkQhqmtZMo0BnMx-Rkm5sefRls7OuVH0KbTtbIpsAQmIT_KJQy5SaKbSkdfIzBuroLzVqFtxqh3nRb_-42mSZbU1RL-yP2b8cX44l5Bw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1290188378</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Two Approaches—Jan and Prof—for Capturing Rater Strategies</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Wherry, Robert J. ; Naylor, James C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wherry, Robert J. ; Naylor, James C.</creatorcontrib><identifier>ISSN: 0013-1644</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3888</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/001316446602600202</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Educational and psychological measurement, 1966, Vol.26 (2), p.267-286</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-25127c40e7df9ac79865f3570a0d8dae3d62887cfb5ec4027378d2ccf8171fd13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-25127c40e7df9ac79865f3570a0d8dae3d62887cfb5ec4027378d2ccf8171fd13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/001316446602600202$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/001316446602600202$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,21819,27869,27923,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wherry, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naylor, James C.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Two Approaches—Jan and Prof—for Capturing Rater Strategies</title><title>Educational and psychological measurement</title><issn>0013-1644</issn><issn>1552-3888</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1966</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1KAzEUhYMoWKsv4Crgeuy9mckkXZbBXwqK1vUQ81On2MmYzCDufAif0CcxpS4EEe_mcOE7514OIccIp4hCTAAwx7IoyhJYCcCA7ZARcs6yXEq5S0YbINsQ--QgxhWkKRBHZF75dadCE31LvaOLV09nXRe80k82fr5_XKuWqtbQ2-BdWp0PtFJdP4SmXdI71dtA7_uQdNnYeEj2nHqO9uhbx-Th_GxRXWbzm4urajbPNOOyzxhHJnQBVhg3VVpMZcldzgUoMNIom5uSSSm0e-Q2YUzkQhqmtZMo0BnMx-Rkm5sefRls7OuVH0KbTtbIpsAQmIT_KJQy5SaKbSkdfIzBuroLzVqFtxqh3nRb_-42mSZbU1RL-yP2b8cX44l5Bw</recordid><startdate>1966</startdate><enddate>1966</enddate><creator>Wherry, Robert J.</creator><creator>Naylor, James C.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Educational and Psychological Measurement, etc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1966</creationdate><title>Comparison of Two Approaches—Jan and Prof—for Capturing Rater Strategies</title><author>Wherry, Robert J. ; Naylor, James C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-25127c40e7df9ac79865f3570a0d8dae3d62887cfb5ec4027378d2ccf8171fd13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1966</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wherry, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naylor, James C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Educational and psychological measurement</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wherry, Robert J.</au><au>Naylor, James C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Two Approaches—Jan and Prof—for Capturing Rater Strategies</atitle><jtitle>Educational and psychological measurement</jtitle><date>1966</date><risdate>1966</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>267</spage><epage>286</epage><pages>267-286</pages><issn>0013-1644</issn><eissn>1552-3888</eissn><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/001316446602600202</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-1644
ispartof Educational and psychological measurement, 1966, Vol.26 (2), p.267-286
issn 0013-1644
1552-3888
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1290210280
source Access via SAGE; Periodicals Index Online
title Comparison of Two Approaches—Jan and Prof—for Capturing Rater Strategies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T17%3A52%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Two%20Approaches%E2%80%94Jan%20and%20Prof%E2%80%94for%20Capturing%20Rater%20Strategies&rft.jtitle=Educational%20and%20psychological%20measurement&rft.au=Wherry,%20Robert%20J.&rft.date=1966&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=267&rft.epage=286&rft.pages=267-286&rft.issn=0013-1644&rft.eissn=1552-3888&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/001316446602600202&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1290188378%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1290188378&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_001316446602600202&rfr_iscdi=true