Reliability and Concurrent Validity of the Recreation Experience Preference Scales
Two procedures for scoring the Recreation Experience Preference scales were investigated from using data obtained from respondents engaged in outdoor recreational activities in Pennsylvania (N = 463) and Michigan (N = 1531). Both scoring procedures were judged to yield acceptable levels of reliabili...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Educational and psychological measurement 1981-10, Vol.41 (3), p.897-907 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 907 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 897 |
| container_title | Educational and psychological measurement |
| container_volume | 41 |
| creator | Tinsley, Howard E.A. Kass, Richard A. Driver, B.L. |
| description | Two procedures for scoring the Recreation Experience Preference scales were investigated from using data obtained from respondents engaged in outdoor recreational activities in Pennsylvania (N = 463) and Michigan (N = 1531). Both scoring procedures were judged to yield acceptable levels of reliability and concurrent validity. In field situations where there is less time to question respondents, the briefer domain scoring strategy is preferred. When respondent time is not an issue, the scale score strategy is recommended. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/001316448104100333 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1290208897</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_001316448104100333</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1290208897</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-7633a6bf471b53314a7745d9010d255f233cddaca2607a12e9925e6dfefbd1473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kFtLxDAQhYMouK7-AZ8CPtfN5NK0j7KsF1hQ1strSZOJZqntmnTB_fe2rg-COC8zDN85MxxCzoFdAmg9YwwE5FIWwCQwJoQ4IBNQimeiKIpDMhmBbCSOyUlKazaUBJiQ1QqbYOrQhH5HTevovGvtNkZse_pimuDGfedp_4Z0hTai6UPX0sXnBmPA1iJ9iOgxfo-P1jSYTsmRN03Cs58-Jc_Xi6f5bba8v7mbXy0zK0D1mc6FMHntpYZaCQHSaC2VKxkwx5XyXAjrnLGG50wb4FiWXGHuPPragdRiSi72vpvYfWwx9dW628Z2OFkBLxlnRVGOFN9TNnYpDb9WmxjeTdxVwKoxu-pvdoNothcl84q_bP9XfAFkYm3D</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1290208897</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reliability and Concurrent Validity of the Recreation Experience Preference Scales</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Tinsley, Howard E.A. ; Kass, Richard A. ; Driver, B.L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tinsley, Howard E.A. ; Kass, Richard A. ; Driver, B.L.</creatorcontrib><description>Two procedures for scoring the Recreation Experience Preference scales were investigated from using data obtained from respondents engaged in outdoor recreational activities in Pennsylvania (N = 463) and Michigan (N = 1531). Both scoring procedures were judged to yield acceptable levels of reliability and concurrent validity. In field situations where there is less time to question respondents, the briefer domain scoring strategy is preferred. When respondent time is not an issue, the scale score strategy is recommended.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-1644</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3888</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/001316448104100333</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Educational and psychological measurement, 1981-10, Vol.41 (3), p.897-907</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-7633a6bf471b53314a7745d9010d255f233cddaca2607a12e9925e6dfefbd1473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-7633a6bf471b53314a7745d9010d255f233cddaca2607a12e9925e6dfefbd1473</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/001316448104100333$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/001316448104100333$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,21800,27850,27905,27906,43602,43603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tinsley, Howard E.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kass, Richard A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Driver, B.L.</creatorcontrib><title>Reliability and Concurrent Validity of the Recreation Experience Preference Scales</title><title>Educational and psychological measurement</title><description>Two procedures for scoring the Recreation Experience Preference scales were investigated from using data obtained from respondents engaged in outdoor recreational activities in Pennsylvania (N = 463) and Michigan (N = 1531). Both scoring procedures were judged to yield acceptable levels of reliability and concurrent validity. In field situations where there is less time to question respondents, the briefer domain scoring strategy is preferred. When respondent time is not an issue, the scale score strategy is recommended.</description><issn>0013-1644</issn><issn>1552-3888</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1981</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kFtLxDAQhYMouK7-AZ8CPtfN5NK0j7KsF1hQ1strSZOJZqntmnTB_fe2rg-COC8zDN85MxxCzoFdAmg9YwwE5FIWwCQwJoQ4IBNQimeiKIpDMhmBbCSOyUlKazaUBJiQ1QqbYOrQhH5HTevovGvtNkZse_pimuDGfedp_4Z0hTai6UPX0sXnBmPA1iJ9iOgxfo-P1jSYTsmRN03Cs58-Jc_Xi6f5bba8v7mbXy0zK0D1mc6FMHntpYZaCQHSaC2VKxkwx5XyXAjrnLGG50wb4FiWXGHuPPragdRiSi72vpvYfWwx9dW628Z2OFkBLxlnRVGOFN9TNnYpDb9WmxjeTdxVwKoxu-pvdoNothcl84q_bP9XfAFkYm3D</recordid><startdate>198110</startdate><enddate>198110</enddate><creator>Tinsley, Howard E.A.</creator><creator>Kass, Richard A.</creator><creator>Driver, B.L.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Educational and Psychological Measurement, etc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198110</creationdate><title>Reliability and Concurrent Validity of the Recreation Experience Preference Scales</title><author>Tinsley, Howard E.A. ; Kass, Richard A. ; Driver, B.L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-7633a6bf471b53314a7745d9010d255f233cddaca2607a12e9925e6dfefbd1473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1981</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tinsley, Howard E.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kass, Richard A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Driver, B.L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Educational and psychological measurement</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tinsley, Howard E.A.</au><au>Kass, Richard A.</au><au>Driver, B.L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reliability and Concurrent Validity of the Recreation Experience Preference Scales</atitle><jtitle>Educational and psychological measurement</jtitle><date>1981-10</date><risdate>1981</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>897</spage><epage>907</epage><pages>897-907</pages><issn>0013-1644</issn><eissn>1552-3888</eissn><abstract>Two procedures for scoring the Recreation Experience Preference scales were investigated from using data obtained from respondents engaged in outdoor recreational activities in Pennsylvania (N = 463) and Michigan (N = 1531). Both scoring procedures were judged to yield acceptable levels of reliability and concurrent validity. In field situations where there is less time to question respondents, the briefer domain scoring strategy is preferred. When respondent time is not an issue, the scale score strategy is recommended.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/001316448104100333</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0013-1644 |
| ispartof | Educational and psychological measurement, 1981-10, Vol.41 (3), p.897-907 |
| issn | 0013-1644 1552-3888 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1290208897 |
| source | Periodicals Index Online; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
| title | Reliability and Concurrent Validity of the Recreation Experience Preference Scales |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T06%3A51%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reliability%20and%20Concurrent%20Validity%20of%20the%20Recreation%20Experience%20Preference%20Scales&rft.jtitle=Educational%20and%20psychological%20measurement&rft.au=Tinsley,%20Howard%20E.A.&rft.date=1981-10&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=897&rft.epage=907&rft.pages=897-907&rft.issn=0013-1644&rft.eissn=1552-3888&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/001316448104100333&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1290208897%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1290208897&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_001316448104100333&rfr_iscdi=true |