Present Dissents: Causes of the Justices' Disagreements
This concludes Mr. Palmer's discussions of dissents and reversals of the Supreme Court. Beginning in the July, 1948, issue of the Journal, Mr. Palmer stated the number and extent of current dissents as compared with earlier records. Subsequently he examined the causes and effects of those disse...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | American Bar Association Journal 1949-03, Vol.35 (3), p.189-191 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 191 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 189 |
| container_title | American Bar Association Journal |
| container_volume | 35 |
| creator | Palmer, Ben W. |
| description | This concludes Mr. Palmer's discussions of dissents and reversals of the Supreme Court. Beginning in the July, 1948, issue of the Journal, Mr. Palmer stated the number and extent of current dissents as compared with earlier records. Subsequently he examined the causes and effects of those dissents. This month at the request of the editors, he summarizes his findings and conclusions. He states twenty-six basic causes for the "present fragmentation of the Court", and suggests how those causes may be removed. It is not to be expected that everyone will agree with all the opinions of Mr. Palmer, but readers generally will be greateful for his extensive presentation. His work should create an improved attitude toward the problem, and produce a clearer perception of the place and purpose of the judicial process in our Government. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1289542045</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25716783</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25716783</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j505-9cad36f2edc8d6d8917d114de83ad0dbcb250a232136c01cd4242add44eb88ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzUtLw0AUBeBBFIytP0EIuHAVmLnzjDuJbwp20X2YzNxogm3q3GThvzehrs5ZfJxzxjIQBgpbWn3OMs753HVpLtkVUc-5UCB1xuw2IeFhzB87WpLu88pPhJQPbT5-Yf4-0dgFpLtF-M-EuF_Yml20_pvw-j9XbPf8tKtei83Hy1v1sCl6zXVRBh-laQFjcNFEVwobhVARnfSRxyY0oLkHCUKawEWIChT4GJXCxjlEuWK3p9ljGn4mpLHuhykd5sdagCu1Aq70rG5OqqdxSPUxdXuffmvQVhjrpPwDqf1Mag</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1289542045</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Present Dissents: Causes of the Justices' Disagreements</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Palmer, Ben W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Ben W.</creatorcontrib><description>This concludes Mr. Palmer's discussions of dissents and reversals of the Supreme Court. Beginning in the July, 1948, issue of the Journal, Mr. Palmer stated the number and extent of current dissents as compared with earlier records. Subsequently he examined the causes and effects of those dissents. This month at the request of the editors, he summarizes his findings and conclusions. He states twenty-six basic causes for the "present fragmentation of the Court", and suggests how those causes may be removed. It is not to be expected that everyone will agree with all the opinions of Mr. Palmer, but readers generally will be greateful for his extensive presentation. His work should create an improved attitude toward the problem, and produce a clearer perception of the place and purpose of the judicial process in our Government.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-7596</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0747-0088</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2162-7975</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2162-7983</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago, Ill: American Bar Association</publisher><subject>Desire ; Justice ; Law objectivity ; Legislative bodies ; Natural law ; Philosophy of law ; Religious freedom ; Social justice ; Supreme Court justices ; Truth</subject><ispartof>American Bar Association Journal, 1949-03, Vol.35 (3), p.189-191</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25716783$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25716783$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,804,27874,58022,58255</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Ben W.</creatorcontrib><title>Present Dissents: Causes of the Justices' Disagreements</title><title>American Bar Association Journal</title><description>This concludes Mr. Palmer's discussions of dissents and reversals of the Supreme Court. Beginning in the July, 1948, issue of the Journal, Mr. Palmer stated the number and extent of current dissents as compared with earlier records. Subsequently he examined the causes and effects of those dissents. This month at the request of the editors, he summarizes his findings and conclusions. He states twenty-six basic causes for the "present fragmentation of the Court", and suggests how those causes may be removed. It is not to be expected that everyone will agree with all the opinions of Mr. Palmer, but readers generally will be greateful for his extensive presentation. His work should create an improved attitude toward the problem, and produce a clearer perception of the place and purpose of the judicial process in our Government.</description><subject>Desire</subject><subject>Justice</subject><subject>Law objectivity</subject><subject>Legislative bodies</subject><subject>Natural law</subject><subject>Philosophy of law</subject><subject>Religious freedom</subject><subject>Social justice</subject><subject>Supreme Court justices</subject><subject>Truth</subject><issn>0002-7596</issn><issn>0747-0088</issn><issn>2162-7975</issn><issn>2162-7983</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1949</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNotzUtLw0AUBeBBFIytP0EIuHAVmLnzjDuJbwp20X2YzNxogm3q3GThvzehrs5ZfJxzxjIQBgpbWn3OMs753HVpLtkVUc-5UCB1xuw2IeFhzB87WpLu88pPhJQPbT5-Yf4-0dgFpLtF-M-EuF_Yml20_pvw-j9XbPf8tKtei83Hy1v1sCl6zXVRBh-laQFjcNFEVwobhVARnfSRxyY0oLkHCUKawEWIChT4GJXCxjlEuWK3p9ljGn4mpLHuhykd5sdagCu1Aq70rG5OqqdxSPUxdXuffmvQVhjrpPwDqf1Mag</recordid><startdate>19490301</startdate><enddate>19490301</enddate><creator>Palmer, Ben W.</creator><general>American Bar Association</general><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FUVTR</scope><scope>HZAIM</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19490301</creationdate><title>Present Dissents: Causes of the Justices' Disagreements</title><author>Palmer, Ben W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j505-9cad36f2edc8d6d8917d114de83ad0dbcb250a232136c01cd4242add44eb88ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1949</creationdate><topic>Desire</topic><topic>Justice</topic><topic>Law objectivity</topic><topic>Legislative bodies</topic><topic>Natural law</topic><topic>Philosophy of law</topic><topic>Religious freedom</topic><topic>Social justice</topic><topic>Supreme Court justices</topic><topic>Truth</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Ben W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 06</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 26</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>American Bar Association Journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Palmer, Ben W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Present Dissents: Causes of the Justices' Disagreements</atitle><jtitle>American Bar Association Journal</jtitle><date>1949-03-01</date><risdate>1949</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>189</spage><epage>191</epage><pages>189-191</pages><issn>0002-7596</issn><issn>0747-0088</issn><eissn>2162-7975</eissn><eissn>2162-7983</eissn><abstract>This concludes Mr. Palmer's discussions of dissents and reversals of the Supreme Court. Beginning in the July, 1948, issue of the Journal, Mr. Palmer stated the number and extent of current dissents as compared with earlier records. Subsequently he examined the causes and effects of those dissents. This month at the request of the editors, he summarizes his findings and conclusions. He states twenty-six basic causes for the "present fragmentation of the Court", and suggests how those causes may be removed. It is not to be expected that everyone will agree with all the opinions of Mr. Palmer, but readers generally will be greateful for his extensive presentation. His work should create an improved attitude toward the problem, and produce a clearer perception of the place and purpose of the judicial process in our Government.</abstract><cop>Chicago, Ill</cop><pub>American Bar Association</pub><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0002-7596 |
| ispartof | American Bar Association Journal, 1949-03, Vol.35 (3), p.189-191 |
| issn | 0002-7596 0747-0088 2162-7975 2162-7983 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1289542045 |
| source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Periodicals Index Online; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
| subjects | Desire Justice Law objectivity Legislative bodies Natural law Philosophy of law Religious freedom Social justice Supreme Court justices Truth |
| title | Present Dissents: Causes of the Justices' Disagreements |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T03%3A15%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Present%20Dissents:%20Causes%20of%20the%20Justices'%20Disagreements&rft.jtitle=American%20Bar%20Association%20Journal&rft.au=Palmer,%20Ben%20W.&rft.date=1949-03-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=189&rft.epage=191&rft.pages=189-191&rft.issn=0002-7596&rft.eissn=2162-7975&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E25716783%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1289542045&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=25716783&rfr_iscdi=true |