eLSE Methodology: a Systematic Approach to the e-Learning Systems Evaluation

Quality of e-learning systems is one of the important topics that the researchers are investigating in the last years. This paper refines the concept of quality of e-learning systems and proposes a new framework, called TICS (Technology, Interaction, Content, Services), which focuses on the most imp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Educational technology & society 2006-01, Vol.9 (4), p.42-53
Hauptverfasser: Lanzilotti, Rosa, Ardito, Carmelo, Costabile, Maria F, De Angeli, Antonella
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 53
container_issue 4
container_start_page 42
container_title Educational technology & society
container_volume 9
creator Lanzilotti, Rosa
Ardito, Carmelo
Costabile, Maria F
De Angeli, Antonella
description Quality of e-learning systems is one of the important topics that the researchers are investigating in the last years. This paper refines the concept of quality of e-learning systems and proposes a new framework, called TICS (Technology, Interaction, Content, Services), which focuses on the most important aspects to be considered when designing or evaluating an e-learning system. Our proposal emphasizes user-system interaction as one of such important aspects. Guidelines that address the TICS aspects and an evaluation methodology, called eLSE (e-LearningSystematicEvaluation) have been derived. eLSE methodology combines a specific inspection technique with user-testing. This inspection, called AT inspection, uses evaluation patterns, called Abstract Tasks (ATs), that precisely describe the activities to be performed during inspection. The results of an empirical validation of the AT inspection technique, carried out to validate this technique, have shown an advantage of the AT inspection over the other two usability evaluation methods, demonstrating that Abstract Tasks are effective and efficient tools to drive evaluators and improve their performance.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1287050400</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ836862</ericid><jstor_id>jeductechsoci.9.4.42</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>jeductechsoci.9.4.42</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e238t-9fd6126c53041e85df9194c1ade9d550be302ce58fa07724c5e13201bcde4e2f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9jktLxDAUhYsoOI7-AxcBVy4Kebd1Nwz1RcXF6DpkkttpS6epSSrMv7fQwdU98H2ccy-SFeFMplxQejlnksmUSZ5dJzchdBhTzCVeJRVUuxJ9QGycdb07nJ6QRrtTiHDUsTVoM47eadOg6FBsAEFagfZDOxzOVkDlr-6nWXbDbXJV6z7A3fmuk-_n8mv7mlafL2_bTZUCZXlMi9pKQqURDHMCubB1QQpuiLZQWCHwHhimBkRea5xllBsBhFFM9sYCB1qzdfKw9M6__UwQourc5Id5UhGaZ1hgjvFs3S8W-Nao0bdH7U-qfM-ZzCWd8eOCuxCd_-cd2MlEME1wplWF4opT9geHKWJ7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1287050400</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>eLSE Methodology: a Systematic Approach to the e-Learning Systems Evaluation</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Lanzilotti, Rosa ; Ardito, Carmelo ; Costabile, Maria F ; De Angeli, Antonella</creator><creatorcontrib>Lanzilotti, Rosa ; Ardito, Carmelo ; Costabile, Maria F ; De Angeli, Antonella</creatorcontrib><description>Quality of e-learning systems is one of the important topics that the researchers are investigating in the last years. This paper refines the concept of quality of e-learning systems and proposes a new framework, called TICS (Technology, Interaction, Content, Services), which focuses on the most important aspects to be considered when designing or evaluating an e-learning system. Our proposal emphasizes user-system interaction as one of such important aspects. Guidelines that address the TICS aspects and an evaluation methodology, called eLSE (e-LearningSystematicEvaluation) have been derived. eLSE methodology combines a specific inspection technique with user-testing. This inspection, called AT inspection, uses evaluation patterns, called Abstract Tasks (ATs), that precisely describe the activities to be performed during inspection. The results of an empirical validation of the AT inspection technique, carried out to validate this technique, have shown an advantage of the AT inspection over the other two usability evaluation methods, demonstrating that Abstract Tasks are effective and efficient tools to drive evaluators and improve their performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1176-3647</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1436-4522</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1436-4522</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Palmerston North: International Forum of Educational Technology &amp; Society</publisher><subject>Collaborative learning ; College Seniors ; Computer Interfaces ; Computer software ; Design evaluation ; Distance learning ; Educational activities ; Educational evaluation ; Educational Quality ; Educational Technology ; Electronic Learning ; Evaluation Methods ; Evaluators ; Foreign Countries ; Heuristics ; Inspection ; Inspection reports ; Instructional materials ; Italy ; Learning ; Man Machine Systems ; Methodology ; Online instruction ; Product quality ; Special Issue Articles ; Systems Analysis ; Usability ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Educational technology &amp; society, 2006-01, Vol.9 (4), p.42-53</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 by International Forum of Educational Technology &amp; Society (IFETS)</rights><rights>2006. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at https://www.j-ets.net/ETS/guide.html</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/jeductechsoci.9.4.42$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.9.4.42$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ836862$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lanzilotti, Rosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ardito, Carmelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costabile, Maria F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Angeli, Antonella</creatorcontrib><title>eLSE Methodology: a Systematic Approach to the e-Learning Systems Evaluation</title><title>Educational technology &amp; society</title><description>Quality of e-learning systems is one of the important topics that the researchers are investigating in the last years. This paper refines the concept of quality of e-learning systems and proposes a new framework, called TICS (Technology, Interaction, Content, Services), which focuses on the most important aspects to be considered when designing or evaluating an e-learning system. Our proposal emphasizes user-system interaction as one of such important aspects. Guidelines that address the TICS aspects and an evaluation methodology, called eLSE (e-LearningSystematicEvaluation) have been derived. eLSE methodology combines a specific inspection technique with user-testing. This inspection, called AT inspection, uses evaluation patterns, called Abstract Tasks (ATs), that precisely describe the activities to be performed during inspection. The results of an empirical validation of the AT inspection technique, carried out to validate this technique, have shown an advantage of the AT inspection over the other two usability evaluation methods, demonstrating that Abstract Tasks are effective and efficient tools to drive evaluators and improve their performance.</description><subject>Collaborative learning</subject><subject>College Seniors</subject><subject>Computer Interfaces</subject><subject>Computer software</subject><subject>Design evaluation</subject><subject>Distance learning</subject><subject>Educational activities</subject><subject>Educational evaluation</subject><subject>Educational Quality</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Electronic Learning</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Evaluators</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Heuristics</subject><subject>Inspection</subject><subject>Inspection reports</subject><subject>Instructional materials</subject><subject>Italy</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Man Machine Systems</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Online instruction</subject><subject>Product quality</subject><subject>Special Issue Articles</subject><subject>Systems Analysis</subject><subject>Usability</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1176-3647</issn><issn>1436-4522</issn><issn>1436-4522</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNo9jktLxDAUhYsoOI7-AxcBVy4Kebd1Nwz1RcXF6DpkkttpS6epSSrMv7fQwdU98H2ccy-SFeFMplxQejlnksmUSZ5dJzchdBhTzCVeJRVUuxJ9QGycdb07nJ6QRrtTiHDUsTVoM47eadOg6FBsAEFagfZDOxzOVkDlr-6nWXbDbXJV6z7A3fmuk-_n8mv7mlafL2_bTZUCZXlMi9pKQqURDHMCubB1QQpuiLZQWCHwHhimBkRea5xllBsBhFFM9sYCB1qzdfKw9M6__UwQourc5Id5UhGaZ1hgjvFs3S8W-Nao0bdH7U-qfM-ZzCWd8eOCuxCd_-cd2MlEME1wplWF4opT9geHKWJ7</recordid><startdate>20060101</startdate><enddate>20060101</enddate><creator>Lanzilotti, Rosa</creator><creator>Ardito, Carmelo</creator><creator>Costabile, Maria F</creator><creator>De Angeli, Antonella</creator><general>International Forum of Educational Technology &amp; Society</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060101</creationdate><title>eLSE Methodology: a Systematic Approach to the e-Learning Systems Evaluation</title><author>Lanzilotti, Rosa ; Ardito, Carmelo ; Costabile, Maria F ; De Angeli, Antonella</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e238t-9fd6126c53041e85df9194c1ade9d550be302ce58fa07724c5e13201bcde4e2f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Collaborative learning</topic><topic>College Seniors</topic><topic>Computer Interfaces</topic><topic>Computer software</topic><topic>Design evaluation</topic><topic>Distance learning</topic><topic>Educational activities</topic><topic>Educational evaluation</topic><topic>Educational Quality</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Electronic Learning</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Evaluators</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Heuristics</topic><topic>Inspection</topic><topic>Inspection reports</topic><topic>Instructional materials</topic><topic>Italy</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Man Machine Systems</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Online instruction</topic><topic>Product quality</topic><topic>Special Issue Articles</topic><topic>Systems Analysis</topic><topic>Usability</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lanzilotti, Rosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ardito, Carmelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costabile, Maria F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Angeli, Antonella</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Educational technology &amp; society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lanzilotti, Rosa</au><au>Ardito, Carmelo</au><au>Costabile, Maria F</au><au>De Angeli, Antonella</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ836862</ericid><atitle>eLSE Methodology: a Systematic Approach to the e-Learning Systems Evaluation</atitle><jtitle>Educational technology &amp; society</jtitle><date>2006-01-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>42</spage><epage>53</epage><pages>42-53</pages><issn>1176-3647</issn><issn>1436-4522</issn><eissn>1436-4522</eissn><abstract>Quality of e-learning systems is one of the important topics that the researchers are investigating in the last years. This paper refines the concept of quality of e-learning systems and proposes a new framework, called TICS (Technology, Interaction, Content, Services), which focuses on the most important aspects to be considered when designing or evaluating an e-learning system. Our proposal emphasizes user-system interaction as one of such important aspects. Guidelines that address the TICS aspects and an evaluation methodology, called eLSE (e-LearningSystematicEvaluation) have been derived. eLSE methodology combines a specific inspection technique with user-testing. This inspection, called AT inspection, uses evaluation patterns, called Abstract Tasks (ATs), that precisely describe the activities to be performed during inspection. The results of an empirical validation of the AT inspection technique, carried out to validate this technique, have shown an advantage of the AT inspection over the other two usability evaluation methods, demonstrating that Abstract Tasks are effective and efficient tools to drive evaluators and improve their performance.</abstract><cop>Palmerston North</cop><pub>International Forum of Educational Technology &amp; Society</pub><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1176-3647
ispartof Educational technology & society, 2006-01, Vol.9 (4), p.42-53
issn 1176-3647
1436-4522
1436-4522
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1287050400
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects Collaborative learning
College Seniors
Computer Interfaces
Computer software
Design evaluation
Distance learning
Educational activities
Educational evaluation
Educational Quality
Educational Technology
Electronic Learning
Evaluation Methods
Evaluators
Foreign Countries
Heuristics
Inspection
Inspection reports
Instructional materials
Italy
Learning
Man Machine Systems
Methodology
Online instruction
Product quality
Special Issue Articles
Systems Analysis
Usability
Validity
title eLSE Methodology: a Systematic Approach to the e-Learning Systems Evaluation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T08%3A07%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=eLSE%20Methodology:%20a%20Systematic%20Approach%20to%20the%20e-Learning%20Systems%20Evaluation&rft.jtitle=Educational%20technology%20&%20society&rft.au=Lanzilotti,%20Rosa&rft.date=2006-01-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=42&rft.epage=53&rft.pages=42-53&rft.issn=1176-3647&rft.eissn=1436-4522&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3Ejeductechsoci.9.4.42%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1287050400&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ836862&rft_jstor_id=jeductechsoci.9.4.42&rfr_iscdi=true