Five dimensions of organizational citizenship behavior: Comparing antecedents and levels of engagement in China and the US
The purpose of this article is to investigate differences between the US and China in (1) employees’ level of engagement in the five dimensions of organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) identified by Organ ( 1988 ), and (2) the effects of perceived distributive justice and perceived supervisor su...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Asia Pacific journal of management 2013-03, Vol.30 (1), p.115-147 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 147 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 115 |
container_title | Asia Pacific journal of management |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Wang, Lei Hinrichs, Kim T. Prieto, Leonel Howell, Jon P. |
description | The purpose of this article is to investigate differences between the US and China in (1) employees’ level of engagement in the five dimensions of organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) identified by Organ (
1988
), and (2) the effects of perceived distributive justice and perceived supervisor support on OCB. Results suggest that Chinese respondents have a higher level of sportsmanship and courtesy, but a lower level of civic virtue than the US respondents. In addition, perceived supervisor support is significantly related to all five OCB dimensions for the Chinese sample, whereas for the US sample, perceived distributive justice is significantly related to conscientiousness and sportsmanship and marginally related to altruism. A follow-up study was conducted in the US to examine the direct effects of such cultural factors as individualistic/collectivistic orientation and power distance orientation on each of the five OCB dimensions, and their moderating effects on the relationships of the five OCB dimensions with perceived supervisor support and perceived distributive justice. Results suggest an effect of individualistic/collectivistic orientation on the five OCB dimensions. No relationship was found between power distance orientation and OCB. Moreover, the results did not support our predictions regarding the moderating effects of individualistic/collectivistic orientation and power distance orientation on the relationships between OCB dimensions and perceived supervisor support or perceived distributive justice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10490-010-9237-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1285325827</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2887685561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-bc911e7fe45a789872bed767387b333f4cc89a5a7c80609e63fc6510201575503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwANwscQ74J44TbqiigFSJA_RsOc4mcZU6wU4r0afHbThw4bSr3ZmR5kPolpJ7Soh8CJSkBUkIJUnBuEzoGZpRIVlSFCI_RzPCqExSkdFLdBXChkRPlpEZOiztHnBlt-CC7V3AfY1732hnD3qMB91hY0d7iO_WDriEVu9t7x_xot8O2lvXYO1GMFCBG0PcK9zBHrpTELhGNxCjR2wdXrTW6ZNibAGvP67RRa27ADe_c47Wy-fPxWuyen95WzytEsNTOSalKSgFWUMqtMyLXLISKplJnsuSc16nxuSFjj-Tk4wUkPHaZIISRmJ_IQifo7spd_D91w7CqDb9zsdmQVGWC85EzmRU0UllfB-Ch1oN3m61_1aUqCNiNSFWEbE6IlY0etjkCcORBPg_yf-afgDlPn7_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1285325827</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Five dimensions of organizational citizenship behavior: Comparing antecedents and levels of engagement in China and the US</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Wang, Lei ; Hinrichs, Kim T. ; Prieto, Leonel ; Howell, Jon P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Lei ; Hinrichs, Kim T. ; Prieto, Leonel ; Howell, Jon P.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this article is to investigate differences between the US and China in (1) employees’ level of engagement in the five dimensions of organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) identified by Organ (
1988
), and (2) the effects of perceived distributive justice and perceived supervisor support on OCB. Results suggest that Chinese respondents have a higher level of sportsmanship and courtesy, but a lower level of civic virtue than the US respondents. In addition, perceived supervisor support is significantly related to all five OCB dimensions for the Chinese sample, whereas for the US sample, perceived distributive justice is significantly related to conscientiousness and sportsmanship and marginally related to altruism. A follow-up study was conducted in the US to examine the direct effects of such cultural factors as individualistic/collectivistic orientation and power distance orientation on each of the five OCB dimensions, and their moderating effects on the relationships of the five OCB dimensions with perceived supervisor support and perceived distributive justice. Results suggest an effect of individualistic/collectivistic orientation on the five OCB dimensions. No relationship was found between power distance orientation and OCB. Moreover, the results did not support our predictions regarding the moderating effects of individualistic/collectivistic orientation and power distance orientation on the relationships between OCB dimensions and perceived supervisor support or perceived distributive justice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0217-4561</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9958</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10490-010-9237-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Altruism ; Behavior ; Business and Management ; Collectivism ; Corporate culture ; Cross cultural studies ; Culture ; Distributive justice ; Egalitarianism ; Employee attitude ; Employees ; Individualism ; International ; Management ; Motivation ; Organizational justice ; Supervisors</subject><ispartof>Asia Pacific journal of management, 2013-03, Vol.30 (1), p.115-147</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-bc911e7fe45a789872bed767387b333f4cc89a5a7c80609e63fc6510201575503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-bc911e7fe45a789872bed767387b333f4cc89a5a7c80609e63fc6510201575503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10490-010-9237-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10490-010-9237-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinrichs, Kim T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prieto, Leonel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howell, Jon P.</creatorcontrib><title>Five dimensions of organizational citizenship behavior: Comparing antecedents and levels of engagement in China and the US</title><title>Asia Pacific journal of management</title><addtitle>Asia Pac J Manag</addtitle><description>The purpose of this article is to investigate differences between the US and China in (1) employees’ level of engagement in the five dimensions of organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) identified by Organ (
1988
), and (2) the effects of perceived distributive justice and perceived supervisor support on OCB. Results suggest that Chinese respondents have a higher level of sportsmanship and courtesy, but a lower level of civic virtue than the US respondents. In addition, perceived supervisor support is significantly related to all five OCB dimensions for the Chinese sample, whereas for the US sample, perceived distributive justice is significantly related to conscientiousness and sportsmanship and marginally related to altruism. A follow-up study was conducted in the US to examine the direct effects of such cultural factors as individualistic/collectivistic orientation and power distance orientation on each of the five OCB dimensions, and their moderating effects on the relationships of the five OCB dimensions with perceived supervisor support and perceived distributive justice. Results suggest an effect of individualistic/collectivistic orientation on the five OCB dimensions. No relationship was found between power distance orientation and OCB. Moreover, the results did not support our predictions regarding the moderating effects of individualistic/collectivistic orientation and power distance orientation on the relationships between OCB dimensions and perceived supervisor support or perceived distributive justice.</description><subject>Altruism</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Collectivism</subject><subject>Corporate culture</subject><subject>Cross cultural studies</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Distributive justice</subject><subject>Egalitarianism</subject><subject>Employee attitude</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Individualism</subject><subject>International</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Organizational justice</subject><subject>Supervisors</subject><issn>0217-4561</issn><issn>1572-9958</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwANwscQ74J44TbqiigFSJA_RsOc4mcZU6wU4r0afHbThw4bSr3ZmR5kPolpJ7Soh8CJSkBUkIJUnBuEzoGZpRIVlSFCI_RzPCqExSkdFLdBXChkRPlpEZOiztHnBlt-CC7V3AfY1732hnD3qMB91hY0d7iO_WDriEVu9t7x_xot8O2lvXYO1GMFCBG0PcK9zBHrpTELhGNxCjR2wdXrTW6ZNibAGvP67RRa27ADe_c47Wy-fPxWuyen95WzytEsNTOSalKSgFWUMqtMyLXLISKplJnsuSc16nxuSFjj-Tk4wUkPHaZIISRmJ_IQifo7spd_D91w7CqDb9zsdmQVGWC85EzmRU0UllfB-Ch1oN3m61_1aUqCNiNSFWEbE6IlY0etjkCcORBPg_yf-afgDlPn7_</recordid><startdate>20130301</startdate><enddate>20130301</enddate><creator>Wang, Lei</creator><creator>Hinrichs, Kim T.</creator><creator>Prieto, Leonel</creator><creator>Howell, Jon P.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RO</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AI</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130301</creationdate><title>Five dimensions of organizational citizenship behavior: Comparing antecedents and levels of engagement in China and the US</title><author>Wang, Lei ; Hinrichs, Kim T. ; Prieto, Leonel ; Howell, Jon P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-bc911e7fe45a789872bed767387b333f4cc89a5a7c80609e63fc6510201575503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Altruism</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Collectivism</topic><topic>Corporate culture</topic><topic>Cross cultural studies</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Distributive justice</topic><topic>Egalitarianism</topic><topic>Employee attitude</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Individualism</topic><topic>International</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Organizational justice</topic><topic>Supervisors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinrichs, Kim T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prieto, Leonel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howell, Jon P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Asia Pacific journal of management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Lei</au><au>Hinrichs, Kim T.</au><au>Prieto, Leonel</au><au>Howell, Jon P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Five dimensions of organizational citizenship behavior: Comparing antecedents and levels of engagement in China and the US</atitle><jtitle>Asia Pacific journal of management</jtitle><stitle>Asia Pac J Manag</stitle><date>2013-03-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>115</spage><epage>147</epage><pages>115-147</pages><issn>0217-4561</issn><eissn>1572-9958</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this article is to investigate differences between the US and China in (1) employees’ level of engagement in the five dimensions of organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) identified by Organ (
1988
), and (2) the effects of perceived distributive justice and perceived supervisor support on OCB. Results suggest that Chinese respondents have a higher level of sportsmanship and courtesy, but a lower level of civic virtue than the US respondents. In addition, perceived supervisor support is significantly related to all five OCB dimensions for the Chinese sample, whereas for the US sample, perceived distributive justice is significantly related to conscientiousness and sportsmanship and marginally related to altruism. A follow-up study was conducted in the US to examine the direct effects of such cultural factors as individualistic/collectivistic orientation and power distance orientation on each of the five OCB dimensions, and their moderating effects on the relationships of the five OCB dimensions with perceived supervisor support and perceived distributive justice. Results suggest an effect of individualistic/collectivistic orientation on the five OCB dimensions. No relationship was found between power distance orientation and OCB. Moreover, the results did not support our predictions regarding the moderating effects of individualistic/collectivistic orientation and power distance orientation on the relationships between OCB dimensions and perceived supervisor support or perceived distributive justice.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10490-010-9237-1</doi><tpages>33</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0217-4561 |
ispartof | Asia Pacific journal of management, 2013-03, Vol.30 (1), p.115-147 |
issn | 0217-4561 1572-9958 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1285325827 |
source | SpringerLink Journals; Business Source Complete |
subjects | Altruism Behavior Business and Management Collectivism Corporate culture Cross cultural studies Culture Distributive justice Egalitarianism Employee attitude Employees Individualism International Management Motivation Organizational justice Supervisors |
title | Five dimensions of organizational citizenship behavior: Comparing antecedents and levels of engagement in China and the US |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T03%3A27%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Five%20dimensions%20of%20organizational%20citizenship%20behavior:%20Comparing%20antecedents%20and%20levels%20of%20engagement%20in%20China%20and%20the%20US&rft.jtitle=Asia%20Pacific%20journal%20of%20management&rft.au=Wang,%20Lei&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=115&rft.epage=147&rft.pages=115-147&rft.issn=0217-4561&rft.eissn=1572-9958&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10490-010-9237-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2887685561%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1285325827&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |