MR with surface coils in the follow-up after endoscopic laser resection for glottic squamous cell carcinoma

This study focuses on the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of MR of the larynx performed with surface coils after endoscopic laser resection (ELR) for glottic cancer. Thirty-one MR examinations of the larynx performed with surface coils on average 12 months after ELR were retrospectively reviewed...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuroradiology 2013-02, Vol.55 (2), p.225
Hauptverfasser: Ravanelli, Marco, Farina, Davide, Rizzardi, Paola, Botturi, Elisa, Prandolini, Paola, Mangili, Stefano, Peretti, Giorgio, Nicolai, Piero, Maroldi, Roberto
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 225
container_title Neuroradiology
container_volume 55
creator Ravanelli, Marco
Farina, Davide
Rizzardi, Paola
Botturi, Elisa
Prandolini, Paola
Mangili, Stefano
Peretti, Giorgio
Nicolai, Piero
Maroldi, Roberto
description This study focuses on the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of MR of the larynx performed with surface coils after endoscopic laser resection (ELR) for glottic cancer. Thirty-one MR examinations of the larynx performed with surface coils on average 12 months after ELR were retrospectively reviewed. Image quality was assessed for each acquired sequence (score 1-3). All the postoperative focal lesions detected at the excision site were analysed by assessing the following: contrast/noise ratio (CNR) normalized on lateral cricoarytenoid muscle; lesion morphology (nodular/elongated) and enhancement after contrast agent administration; apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on diffusion-weighted sequences (DWI). The image quality was highest for axial and coronal T2 sequences (2.39 and 2.58, respectively), and lower for the other sequences (1.66-1.72). However, in most sequences (86-100 %) the quality was considered acceptable. Among 35 focal lesions, nine were histologically proven recurrences, 26 were classified as benign focal lesions (BFL) on the basis of the subsequent follow-up. All recurrences had an intermediate T2 signal (0 < cnr0), mostly (4/5) nodular shape, intense enhancement and high ADC. The combination of T2-weighted and DWI provided the highest accuracy in the differential diagnosis between recurrences and BFL. MR with surface coils is feasible and can be considered an effective tool in the follow-up after ELR for glottic cancer.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00234-012-1128-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1284082819</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2882822721</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c161t-c73c4b8cf59a71359efa7ff0a70700b149545de6a66eddadf1d7b61a9894cbfd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotUEtLAzEYDKJgrf4AbwHP0e_bZDeboxRfUBFEzyWbh92abtoki3_fgJ6GeTADQ8g1wi0CyLsM0HDBABuG2PSMn5AFCl6ZauCULKpdRSXgnFzkvAMALrlckO_Xd_ozli3Nc_LaOGriGDIdJ1q2jvoYQvxh84FqX1yibrIxm3gYDQ06VyG57EwZ41SjiX6FWEr18nHW-zhnalwI1Ohkxinu9SU58zpkd_WPS_L5-PCxembrt6eX1f2aGeywMCO5EUNvfKu0RN4q57X0HrQECTCgUK1oret01zlrtfVo5dChVr0SZvCWL8nNX-8hxePsctns4pymOrmp1wjomx4V_wWjBFx7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1284082819</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MR with surface coils in the follow-up after endoscopic laser resection for glottic squamous cell carcinoma</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Ravanelli, Marco ; Farina, Davide ; Rizzardi, Paola ; Botturi, Elisa ; Prandolini, Paola ; Mangili, Stefano ; Peretti, Giorgio ; Nicolai, Piero ; Maroldi, Roberto</creator><creatorcontrib>Ravanelli, Marco ; Farina, Davide ; Rizzardi, Paola ; Botturi, Elisa ; Prandolini, Paola ; Mangili, Stefano ; Peretti, Giorgio ; Nicolai, Piero ; Maroldi, Roberto</creatorcontrib><description>This study focuses on the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of MR of the larynx performed with surface coils after endoscopic laser resection (ELR) for glottic cancer. Thirty-one MR examinations of the larynx performed with surface coils on average 12 months after ELR were retrospectively reviewed. Image quality was assessed for each acquired sequence (score 1-3). All the postoperative focal lesions detected at the excision site were analysed by assessing the following: contrast/noise ratio (CNR) normalized on lateral cricoarytenoid muscle; lesion morphology (nodular/elongated) and enhancement after contrast agent administration; apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on diffusion-weighted sequences (DWI). The image quality was highest for axial and coronal T2 sequences (2.39 and 2.58, respectively), and lower for the other sequences (1.66-1.72). However, in most sequences (86-100 %) the quality was considered acceptable. Among 35 focal lesions, nine were histologically proven recurrences, 26 were classified as benign focal lesions (BFL) on the basis of the subsequent follow-up. All recurrences had an intermediate T2 signal (0 &lt; cnr0), mostly (4/5) nodular shape, intense enhancement and high ADC. The combination of T2-weighted and DWI provided the highest accuracy in the differential diagnosis between recurrences and BFL. MR with surface coils is feasible and can be considered an effective tool in the follow-up after ELR for glottic cancer.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-3940</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1920</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00234-012-1128-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Cancer ; Lasers ; Neurosurgery ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Radiology</subject><ispartof>Neuroradiology, 2013-02, Vol.55 (2), p.225</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c161t-c73c4b8cf59a71359efa7ff0a70700b149545de6a66eddadf1d7b61a9894cbfd3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ravanelli, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farina, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rizzardi, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Botturi, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prandolini, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mangili, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peretti, Giorgio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicolai, Piero</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maroldi, Roberto</creatorcontrib><title>MR with surface coils in the follow-up after endoscopic laser resection for glottic squamous cell carcinoma</title><title>Neuroradiology</title><description>This study focuses on the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of MR of the larynx performed with surface coils after endoscopic laser resection (ELR) for glottic cancer. Thirty-one MR examinations of the larynx performed with surface coils on average 12 months after ELR were retrospectively reviewed. Image quality was assessed for each acquired sequence (score 1-3). All the postoperative focal lesions detected at the excision site were analysed by assessing the following: contrast/noise ratio (CNR) normalized on lateral cricoarytenoid muscle; lesion morphology (nodular/elongated) and enhancement after contrast agent administration; apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on diffusion-weighted sequences (DWI). The image quality was highest for axial and coronal T2 sequences (2.39 and 2.58, respectively), and lower for the other sequences (1.66-1.72). However, in most sequences (86-100 %) the quality was considered acceptable. Among 35 focal lesions, nine were histologically proven recurrences, 26 were classified as benign focal lesions (BFL) on the basis of the subsequent follow-up. All recurrences had an intermediate T2 signal (0 &lt; cnr0), mostly (4/5) nodular shape, intense enhancement and high ADC. The combination of T2-weighted and DWI provided the highest accuracy in the differential diagnosis between recurrences and BFL. MR with surface coils is feasible and can be considered an effective tool in the follow-up after ELR for glottic cancer.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><issn>0028-3940</issn><issn>1432-1920</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotUEtLAzEYDKJgrf4AbwHP0e_bZDeboxRfUBFEzyWbh92abtoki3_fgJ6GeTADQ8g1wi0CyLsM0HDBABuG2PSMn5AFCl6ZauCULKpdRSXgnFzkvAMALrlckO_Xd_ozli3Nc_LaOGriGDIdJ1q2jvoYQvxh84FqX1yibrIxm3gYDQ06VyG57EwZ41SjiX6FWEr18nHW-zhnalwI1Ohkxinu9SU58zpkd_WPS_L5-PCxembrt6eX1f2aGeywMCO5EUNvfKu0RN4q57X0HrQECTCgUK1oret01zlrtfVo5dChVr0SZvCWL8nNX-8hxePsctns4pymOrmp1wjomx4V_wWjBFx7</recordid><startdate>20130201</startdate><enddate>20130201</enddate><creator>Ravanelli, Marco</creator><creator>Farina, Davide</creator><creator>Rizzardi, Paola</creator><creator>Botturi, Elisa</creator><creator>Prandolini, Paola</creator><creator>Mangili, Stefano</creator><creator>Peretti, Giorgio</creator><creator>Nicolai, Piero</creator><creator>Maroldi, Roberto</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130201</creationdate><title>MR with surface coils in the follow-up after endoscopic laser resection for glottic squamous cell carcinoma</title><author>Ravanelli, Marco ; Farina, Davide ; Rizzardi, Paola ; Botturi, Elisa ; Prandolini, Paola ; Mangili, Stefano ; Peretti, Giorgio ; Nicolai, Piero ; Maroldi, Roberto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c161t-c73c4b8cf59a71359efa7ff0a70700b149545de6a66eddadf1d7b61a9894cbfd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ravanelli, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farina, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rizzardi, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Botturi, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prandolini, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mangili, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peretti, Giorgio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicolai, Piero</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maroldi, Roberto</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Neuroradiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ravanelli, Marco</au><au>Farina, Davide</au><au>Rizzardi, Paola</au><au>Botturi, Elisa</au><au>Prandolini, Paola</au><au>Mangili, Stefano</au><au>Peretti, Giorgio</au><au>Nicolai, Piero</au><au>Maroldi, Roberto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MR with surface coils in the follow-up after endoscopic laser resection for glottic squamous cell carcinoma</atitle><jtitle>Neuroradiology</jtitle><date>2013-02-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>225</spage><pages>225-</pages><issn>0028-3940</issn><eissn>1432-1920</eissn><abstract>This study focuses on the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of MR of the larynx performed with surface coils after endoscopic laser resection (ELR) for glottic cancer. Thirty-one MR examinations of the larynx performed with surface coils on average 12 months after ELR were retrospectively reviewed. Image quality was assessed for each acquired sequence (score 1-3). All the postoperative focal lesions detected at the excision site were analysed by assessing the following: contrast/noise ratio (CNR) normalized on lateral cricoarytenoid muscle; lesion morphology (nodular/elongated) and enhancement after contrast agent administration; apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on diffusion-weighted sequences (DWI). The image quality was highest for axial and coronal T2 sequences (2.39 and 2.58, respectively), and lower for the other sequences (1.66-1.72). However, in most sequences (86-100 %) the quality was considered acceptable. Among 35 focal lesions, nine were histologically proven recurrences, 26 were classified as benign focal lesions (BFL) on the basis of the subsequent follow-up. All recurrences had an intermediate T2 signal (0 &lt; cnr0), mostly (4/5) nodular shape, intense enhancement and high ADC. The combination of T2-weighted and DWI provided the highest accuracy in the differential diagnosis between recurrences and BFL. MR with surface coils is feasible and can be considered an effective tool in the follow-up after ELR for glottic cancer.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/s00234-012-1128-3</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-3940
ispartof Neuroradiology, 2013-02, Vol.55 (2), p.225
issn 0028-3940
1432-1920
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1284082819
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Cancer
Lasers
Neurosurgery
NMR
Nuclear magnetic resonance
Radiology
title MR with surface coils in the follow-up after endoscopic laser resection for glottic squamous cell carcinoma
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T13%3A29%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MR%20with%20surface%20coils%20in%20the%20follow-up%20after%20endoscopic%20laser%20resection%20for%20glottic%20squamous%20cell%20carcinoma&rft.jtitle=Neuroradiology&rft.au=Ravanelli,%20Marco&rft.date=2013-02-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=225&rft.pages=225-&rft.issn=0028-3940&rft.eissn=1432-1920&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00234-012-1128-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2882822721%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1284082819&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true