The effect of instructional explanations and self-explanation prompts in worked examples on student learning and transfer

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of different types of worked examples on student learning and transfer of a problem-solving task. Four types of worked examples were examined: standard worked examples, worked examples with self-explanation prompts, worked examples with instruc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of instructional media 2012-09, Vol.39 (4), p.331
Hauptverfasser: Huang, Xiaoxia, Reiser, Robert A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page 331
container_title International journal of instructional media
container_volume 39
creator Huang, Xiaoxia
Reiser, Robert A
description The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of different types of worked examples on student learning and transfer of a problem-solving task. Four types of worked examples were examined: standard worked examples, worked examples with self-explanation prompts, worked examples with instructional explanations, and worked examples with a combination of instructional explanations and self-explanation prompts. Two hundred and five middle school students were randomly assigned to the treatment conditions and a control condition. All students studied a serf-paced instructional program on using two comma rules. Students in each worked example condition received condition-specific example-problem pairs during practice, while students in the control group received problems without any worked examples. Learning, transfer, and time on task were measured. Analysis of the data indicated that using instructional explanations and self-explanation prompts with worked examples had a positive effect on learning.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1273686120</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A311499609</galeid><sourcerecordid>A311499609</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1670-2a07869f76e86bd16f3657501bf11838211287d9f50e3ecb64df5bd0389da0b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE1PwzAMhnsAiTH4D5E4cShKmjVNj9MEA2kSl3Gu0sYpHWla4lSMf0_4kNikyQfL9vO-sn2WzCgts5RJll8kl4g7SllGczZLPrevQMAYaAIZDOkcBj81oRucsgT2o1VOfVdIlNMEwZr0oEtGP_RjwKgjH4N_Ax01qh8tIIlTDJMGF4gF5V3n2h-P4JVDA_4qOTfKIlz_5Xny8nC_XT2mm-f102q5SVsmCppmihZSlKYQIEWtmTBc5EVOWW0Yk1xmjGWy0KXJKXBoarHQJq815bLUitYFnyc3v75x1_cJMFS7YfLxPKxYVnAhRXzFP9UqC1XnzBD3bPoOm2rJGVuUpaBlpNITVAsOvLKDA9PF9hF_d4KPoaHvmpOC2yNBZALsQ6smxEquN4fsFwktkkc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1273686120</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of instructional explanations and self-explanation prompts in worked examples on student learning and transfer</title><source>Education Source (EBSCOhost)</source><creator>Huang, Xiaoxia ; Reiser, Robert A</creator><creatorcontrib>Huang, Xiaoxia ; Reiser, Robert A</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of different types of worked examples on student learning and transfer of a problem-solving task. Four types of worked examples were examined: standard worked examples, worked examples with self-explanation prompts, worked examples with instructional explanations, and worked examples with a combination of instructional explanations and self-explanation prompts. Two hundred and five middle school students were randomly assigned to the treatment conditions and a control condition. All students studied a serf-paced instructional program on using two comma rules. Students in each worked example condition received condition-specific example-problem pairs during practice, while students in the control group received problems without any worked examples. Learning, transfer, and time on task were measured. Analysis of the data indicated that using instructional explanations and self-explanation prompts with worked examples had a positive effect on learning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0092-1815</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Westwood Press, Inc</publisher><subject>Education ; Educational aspects ; Equipment and supplies ; Evaluation ; Learning ; Methods ; Middle school students ; Problem solving ; Self-explanation ; Teaching ; Teaching methods</subject><ispartof>International journal of instructional media, 2012-09, Vol.39 (4), p.331</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Westwood Press, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Dr. Phillip J. Sleeman 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huang, Xiaoxia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiser, Robert A</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of instructional explanations and self-explanation prompts in worked examples on student learning and transfer</title><title>International journal of instructional media</title><description>The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of different types of worked examples on student learning and transfer of a problem-solving task. Four types of worked examples were examined: standard worked examples, worked examples with self-explanation prompts, worked examples with instructional explanations, and worked examples with a combination of instructional explanations and self-explanation prompts. Two hundred and five middle school students were randomly assigned to the treatment conditions and a control condition. All students studied a serf-paced instructional program on using two comma rules. Students in each worked example condition received condition-specific example-problem pairs during practice, while students in the control group received problems without any worked examples. Learning, transfer, and time on task were measured. Analysis of the data indicated that using instructional explanations and self-explanation prompts with worked examples had a positive effect on learning.</description><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational aspects</subject><subject>Equipment and supplies</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle school students</subject><subject>Problem solving</subject><subject>Self-explanation</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><issn>0092-1815</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkE1PwzAMhnsAiTH4D5E4cShKmjVNj9MEA2kSl3Gu0sYpHWla4lSMf0_4kNikyQfL9vO-sn2WzCgts5RJll8kl4g7SllGczZLPrevQMAYaAIZDOkcBj81oRucsgT2o1VOfVdIlNMEwZr0oEtGP_RjwKgjH4N_Ax01qh8tIIlTDJMGF4gF5V3n2h-P4JVDA_4qOTfKIlz_5Xny8nC_XT2mm-f102q5SVsmCppmihZSlKYQIEWtmTBc5EVOWW0Yk1xmjGWy0KXJKXBoarHQJq815bLUitYFnyc3v75x1_cJMFS7YfLxPKxYVnAhRXzFP9UqC1XnzBD3bPoOm2rJGVuUpaBlpNITVAsOvLKDA9PF9hF_d4KPoaHvmpOC2yNBZALsQ6smxEquN4fsFwktkkc</recordid><startdate>20120922</startdate><enddate>20120922</enddate><creator>Huang, Xiaoxia</creator><creator>Reiser, Robert A</creator><general>Westwood Press, Inc</general><general>Dr. Phillip J. Sleeman</general><scope>8GL</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120922</creationdate><title>The effect of instructional explanations and self-explanation prompts in worked examples on student learning and transfer</title><author>Huang, Xiaoxia ; Reiser, Robert A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1670-2a07869f76e86bd16f3657501bf11838211287d9f50e3ecb64df5bd0389da0b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational aspects</topic><topic>Equipment and supplies</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle school students</topic><topic>Problem solving</topic><topic>Self-explanation</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huang, Xiaoxia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiser, Robert A</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>International journal of instructional media</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huang, Xiaoxia</au><au>Reiser, Robert A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of instructional explanations and self-explanation prompts in worked examples on student learning and transfer</atitle><jtitle>International journal of instructional media</jtitle><date>2012-09-22</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>331</spage><pages>331-</pages><issn>0092-1815</issn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of different types of worked examples on student learning and transfer of a problem-solving task. Four types of worked examples were examined: standard worked examples, worked examples with self-explanation prompts, worked examples with instructional explanations, and worked examples with a combination of instructional explanations and self-explanation prompts. Two hundred and five middle school students were randomly assigned to the treatment conditions and a control condition. All students studied a serf-paced instructional program on using two comma rules. Students in each worked example condition received condition-specific example-problem pairs during practice, while students in the control group received problems without any worked examples. Learning, transfer, and time on task were measured. Analysis of the data indicated that using instructional explanations and self-explanation prompts with worked examples had a positive effect on learning.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Westwood Press, Inc</pub><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0092-1815
ispartof International journal of instructional media, 2012-09, Vol.39 (4), p.331
issn 0092-1815
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1273686120
source Education Source (EBSCOhost)
subjects Education
Educational aspects
Equipment and supplies
Evaluation
Learning
Methods
Middle school students
Problem solving
Self-explanation
Teaching
Teaching methods
title The effect of instructional explanations and self-explanation prompts in worked examples on student learning and transfer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T23%3A13%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20instructional%20explanations%20and%20self-explanation%20prompts%20in%20worked%20examples%20on%20student%20learning%20and%20transfer&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20instructional%20media&rft.au=Huang,%20Xiaoxia&rft.date=2012-09-22&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=331&rft.pages=331-&rft.issn=0092-1815&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA311499609%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1273686120&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A311499609&rfr_iscdi=true