Take heed: Voters defend the judiciary

Take heed: Voters defend the judiciary

In two other states (Florida and Iowa), voters used their ballots to retain politicallytargeted judges whose only sin to those opposing them was that in the performance of the judges' constitutional duties, a particular result was reached which ran counter to special interest group policy prefe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Judicature 2012-11, Vol.96 (3), p.96
1. Verfasser: Hayes, Dennis Courtland
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Associations
Elections
Judiciary
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 96
container_title Judicature
container_volume 96
creator Hayes, Dennis Courtland
description In two other states (Florida and Iowa), voters used their ballots to retain politicallytargeted judges whose only sin to those opposing them was that in the performance of the judges' constitutional duties, a particular result was reached which ran counter to special interest group policy preferences. [...]I wish to give a special thanks to the AJS Board for establishing the $40,000 Board Challenge Grant for the Annual Campaign.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1271933725</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2871516461</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-9f59b6ac3c4479910db1394e8771b7e83fb2dd1acf90bf0c9597e23434125b793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzU1LAzEQgOEcFFpr_0Og4G1hJpM0O96k-AUFL9VryceEdivdutk9-O8V9PTenvdKzQGMaVwLMFM3tXYAaIDXc3W3CyfRB5F8rz_6UYaqsxQ5Zz0eRHdTPqZjGL5v1XUJn1WW_12o96fH3eal2b49v24ets0FWxobLo7jOiRK1npmhByR2ErrPUYvLZVocsaQCkMskNixF0OWLBoXPdNCrf7cy9B_TVLHfddPw_l3uUfjkYm8cfQD4XE5xA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1271933725</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Take heed: Voters defend the judiciary</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Hayes, Dennis Courtland</creator><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Dennis Courtland</creatorcontrib><description>In two other states (Florida and Iowa), voters used their ballots to retain politicallytargeted judges whose only sin to those opposing them was that in the performance of the judges' constitutional duties, a particular result was reached which ran counter to special interest group policy preferences. [...]I wish to give a special thanks to the AJS Board for establishing the $40,000 Board Challenge Grant for the Annual Campaign.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5800</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JUDIEC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: Duke Law Center for Judicial Studies</publisher><subject>Associations ; Elections ; Judiciary</subject><ispartof>Judicature, 2012-11, Vol.96 (3), p.96</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Judicature Society Nov/Dec 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Dennis Courtland</creatorcontrib><title>Take heed: Voters defend the judiciary</title><title>Judicature</title><description>In two other states (Florida and Iowa), voters used their ballots to retain politicallytargeted judges whose only sin to those opposing them was that in the performance of the judges' constitutional duties, a particular result was reached which ran counter to special interest group policy preferences. [...]I wish to give a special thanks to the AJS Board for establishing the $40,000 Board Challenge Grant for the Annual Campaign.</description><subject>Associations</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Judiciary</subject><issn>0022-5800</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotzU1LAzEQgOEcFFpr_0Og4G1hJpM0O96k-AUFL9VryceEdivdutk9-O8V9PTenvdKzQGMaVwLMFM3tXYAaIDXc3W3CyfRB5F8rz_6UYaqsxQ5Zz0eRHdTPqZjGL5v1XUJn1WW_12o96fH3eal2b49v24ets0FWxobLo7jOiRK1npmhByR2ErrPUYvLZVocsaQCkMskNixF0OWLBoXPdNCrf7cy9B_TVLHfddPw_l3uUfjkYm8cfQD4XE5xA</recordid><startdate>20121101</startdate><enddate>20121101</enddate><creator>Hayes, Dennis Courtland</creator><general>Duke Law Center for Judicial Studies</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121101</creationdate><title>Take heed: Voters defend the judiciary</title><author>Hayes, Dennis Courtland</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-9f59b6ac3c4479910db1394e8771b7e83fb2dd1acf90bf0c9597e23434125b793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Associations</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Judiciary</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Dennis Courtland</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Judicature</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hayes, Dennis Courtland</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Take heed: Voters defend the judiciary</atitle><jtitle>Judicature</jtitle><date>2012-11-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>96</spage><pages>96-</pages><issn>0022-5800</issn><coden>JUDIEC</coden><abstract>In two other states (Florida and Iowa), voters used their ballots to retain politicallytargeted judges whose only sin to those opposing them was that in the performance of the judges' constitutional duties, a particular result was reached which ran counter to special interest group policy preferences. [...]I wish to give a special thanks to the AJS Board for establishing the $40,000 Board Challenge Grant for the Annual Campaign.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>Duke Law Center for Judicial Studies</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-5800
ispartof Judicature, 2012-11, Vol.96 (3), p.96
issn 0022-5800
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1271933725
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects Associations
Elections
Judiciary
title Take heed: Voters defend the judiciary
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T09%3A51%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Take%20heed:%20Voters%20defend%20the%20judiciary&rft.jtitle=Judicature&rft.au=Hayes,%20Dennis%20Courtland&rft.date=2012-11-01&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=96&rft.pages=96-&rft.issn=0022-5800&rft.coden=JUDIEC&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2871516461%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1271933725&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true