Moralism and Anti-Moralism: Aspects of Bonhoeffer’s Christian Ethic
Dietrich Bonhoeffer's thinking about ethics and Christianity is a fascinating attempt to combine different, and often conflicting, strands in the Christian intellectual tradition. In this article, I outline his thinking, analyse the advantages and disadvantages in his approach, and relate it to...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sophia 2012-12, Vol.51 (4), p.449-464 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 464 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 449 |
container_title | Sophia |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Coady, C. A. J. |
description | Dietrich Bonhoeffer's thinking about ethics and Christianity is a fascinating attempt to combine different, and often conflicting, strands in the Christian intellectual tradition. In this article, I outline his thinking, analyse the advantages and disadvantages in his approach, and relate it to developments in contemporary philosophy. His critique of an excessive stress upon principles and abstraction in opposition to a concern for concrete circumstances is, I argue, best seen as a necessary critique of what I call moralism rather than morality. It is also related to recent philosophical theories of particularism and the debates about ‘emergency ethics’ in current philosophy. On the negative side, Bonhoeffer has a tendency to treat non-Christian ethics as necessarily relativist and at times is excessively influenced by the elements in Christian theological tradition that are hostile to the natural and to non-Christian philosophy. In addition, his invocation of ‘the Divine mandates’ seems to have undesirable implications for some genuine values in liberal democratic theory and practice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11841-012-0340-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1270349497</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2867774871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-b24aa496c9d5184256a235f08af3ba3b5907825ff4ccf4195c34f394d45517103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUhoMoWKsP4C7gOnpOLs3EXS31AhU3Cu5CmiZ2SjtTk3Hhztfw9XwSU0bBjasDh_87l4-QU4RzBNAXGbGSyAA5AyGB8T0ywEoLZgQ875MBgKgYKq4PyVHOKwA0OMIBmd63ya3rvKGuWdBx09Xst3NJx3kbfJdpG-lV2yzbEGNIXx-fmU6Wqc5d7Ro67Za1PyYH0a1zOPmpQ_J0PX2c3LLZw83dZDxjXkjTsTmXzkkz8mahyrlcjRwXKkLlopg7MVcGdMVVjNL7KNGogkVh5EIqhRpBDMlZP3eb2te3kDu7at9SU1Za5Lo8bqTRJYV9yqc25xSi3aZ649K7RbA7W7a3ZYstu7NleWF4z-SSbV5C-jP5X-gbDnVrtw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1270349497</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Moralism and Anti-Moralism: Aspects of Bonhoeffer’s Christian Ethic</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Coady, C. A. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Coady, C. A. J.</creatorcontrib><description>Dietrich Bonhoeffer's thinking about ethics and Christianity is a fascinating attempt to combine different, and often conflicting, strands in the Christian intellectual tradition. In this article, I outline his thinking, analyse the advantages and disadvantages in his approach, and relate it to developments in contemporary philosophy. His critique of an excessive stress upon principles and abstraction in opposition to a concern for concrete circumstances is, I argue, best seen as a necessary critique of what I call moralism rather than morality. It is also related to recent philosophical theories of particularism and the debates about ‘emergency ethics’ in current philosophy. On the negative side, Bonhoeffer has a tendency to treat non-Christian ethics as necessarily relativist and at times is excessively influenced by the elements in Christian theological tradition that are hostile to the natural and to non-Christian philosophy. In addition, his invocation of ‘the Divine mandates’ seems to have undesirable implications for some genuine values in liberal democratic theory and practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-1527</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-930X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11841-012-0340-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Bonhoeffer, Dietrich ; Christianity ; Education ; Ethics ; Morality ; Non-Western Philosophy ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Religion ; Religion ; Religious Studies ; Stress</subject><ispartof>Sophia, 2012-12, Vol.51 (4), p.449-464</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-b24aa496c9d5184256a235f08af3ba3b5907825ff4ccf4195c34f394d45517103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-b24aa496c9d5184256a235f08af3ba3b5907825ff4ccf4195c34f394d45517103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11841-012-0340-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11841-012-0340-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Coady, C. A. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Moralism and Anti-Moralism: Aspects of Bonhoeffer’s Christian Ethic</title><title>Sophia</title><addtitle>SOPHIA</addtitle><description>Dietrich Bonhoeffer's thinking about ethics and Christianity is a fascinating attempt to combine different, and often conflicting, strands in the Christian intellectual tradition. In this article, I outline his thinking, analyse the advantages and disadvantages in his approach, and relate it to developments in contemporary philosophy. His critique of an excessive stress upon principles and abstraction in opposition to a concern for concrete circumstances is, I argue, best seen as a necessary critique of what I call moralism rather than morality. It is also related to recent philosophical theories of particularism and the debates about ‘emergency ethics’ in current philosophy. On the negative side, Bonhoeffer has a tendency to treat non-Christian ethics as necessarily relativist and at times is excessively influenced by the elements in Christian theological tradition that are hostile to the natural and to non-Christian philosophy. In addition, his invocation of ‘the Divine mandates’ seems to have undesirable implications for some genuine values in liberal democratic theory and practice.</description><subject>Bonhoeffer, Dietrich</subject><subject>Christianity</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Non-Western Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Religion</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Religious Studies</subject><subject>Stress</subject><issn>0038-1527</issn><issn>1873-930X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>88H</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2N</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUhoMoWKsP4C7gOnpOLs3EXS31AhU3Cu5CmiZ2SjtTk3Hhztfw9XwSU0bBjasDh_87l4-QU4RzBNAXGbGSyAA5AyGB8T0ywEoLZgQ875MBgKgYKq4PyVHOKwA0OMIBmd63ya3rvKGuWdBx09Xst3NJx3kbfJdpG-lV2yzbEGNIXx-fmU6Wqc5d7Ro67Za1PyYH0a1zOPmpQ_J0PX2c3LLZw83dZDxjXkjTsTmXzkkz8mahyrlcjRwXKkLlopg7MVcGdMVVjNL7KNGogkVh5EIqhRpBDMlZP3eb2te3kDu7at9SU1Za5Lo8bqTRJYV9yqc25xSi3aZ649K7RbA7W7a3ZYstu7NleWF4z-SSbV5C-jP5X-gbDnVrtw</recordid><startdate>20121201</startdate><enddate>20121201</enddate><creator>Coady, C. A. J.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88H</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2N</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121201</creationdate><title>Moralism and Anti-Moralism: Aspects of Bonhoeffer’s Christian Ethic</title><author>Coady, C. A. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-b24aa496c9d5184256a235f08af3ba3b5907825ff4ccf4195c34f394d45517103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Bonhoeffer, Dietrich</topic><topic>Christianity</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Non-Western Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Religion</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Religious Studies</topic><topic>Stress</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Coady, C. A. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Religion Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences & Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Access via Art, Design & Architecture Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Religion Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Sophia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Coady, C. A. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Moralism and Anti-Moralism: Aspects of Bonhoeffer’s Christian Ethic</atitle><jtitle>Sophia</jtitle><stitle>SOPHIA</stitle><date>2012-12-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>449</spage><epage>464</epage><pages>449-464</pages><issn>0038-1527</issn><eissn>1873-930X</eissn><abstract>Dietrich Bonhoeffer's thinking about ethics and Christianity is a fascinating attempt to combine different, and often conflicting, strands in the Christian intellectual tradition. In this article, I outline his thinking, analyse the advantages and disadvantages in his approach, and relate it to developments in contemporary philosophy. His critique of an excessive stress upon principles and abstraction in opposition to a concern for concrete circumstances is, I argue, best seen as a necessary critique of what I call moralism rather than morality. It is also related to recent philosophical theories of particularism and the debates about ‘emergency ethics’ in current philosophy. On the negative side, Bonhoeffer has a tendency to treat non-Christian ethics as necessarily relativist and at times is excessively influenced by the elements in Christian theological tradition that are hostile to the natural and to non-Christian philosophy. In addition, his invocation of ‘the Divine mandates’ seems to have undesirable implications for some genuine values in liberal democratic theory and practice.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11841-012-0340-2</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0038-1527 |
ispartof | Sophia, 2012-12, Vol.51 (4), p.449-464 |
issn | 0038-1527 1873-930X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1270349497 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Bonhoeffer, Dietrich Christianity Education Ethics Morality Non-Western Philosophy Philosophy Philosophy of Religion Religion Religious Studies Stress |
title | Moralism and Anti-Moralism: Aspects of Bonhoeffer’s Christian Ethic |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T00%3A07%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Moralism%20and%20Anti-Moralism:%20Aspects%20of%20Bonhoeffer%E2%80%99s%20Christian%20Ethic&rft.jtitle=Sophia&rft.au=Coady,%20C.%20A.%20J.&rft.date=2012-12-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=449&rft.epage=464&rft.pages=449-464&rft.issn=0038-1527&rft.eissn=1873-930X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11841-012-0340-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2867774871%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1270349497&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |