Moralism and Anti-Moralism: Aspects of Bonhoeffer’s Christian Ethic

Dietrich Bonhoeffer's thinking about ethics and Christianity is a fascinating attempt to combine different, and often conflicting, strands in the Christian intellectual tradition. In this article, I outline his thinking, analyse the advantages and disadvantages in his approach, and relate it to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sophia 2012-12, Vol.51 (4), p.449-464
1. Verfasser: Coady, C. A. J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 464
container_issue 4
container_start_page 449
container_title Sophia
container_volume 51
creator Coady, C. A. J.
description Dietrich Bonhoeffer's thinking about ethics and Christianity is a fascinating attempt to combine different, and often conflicting, strands in the Christian intellectual tradition. In this article, I outline his thinking, analyse the advantages and disadvantages in his approach, and relate it to developments in contemporary philosophy. His critique of an excessive stress upon principles and abstraction in opposition to a concern for concrete circumstances is, I argue, best seen as a necessary critique of what I call moralism rather than morality. It is also related to recent philosophical theories of particularism and the debates about ‘emergency ethics’ in current philosophy. On the negative side, Bonhoeffer has a tendency to treat non-Christian ethics as necessarily relativist and at times is excessively influenced by the elements in Christian theological tradition that are hostile to the natural and to non-Christian philosophy. In addition, his invocation of ‘the Divine mandates’ seems to have undesirable implications for some genuine values in liberal democratic theory and practice.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11841-012-0340-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1270349497</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2867774871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-b24aa496c9d5184256a235f08af3ba3b5907825ff4ccf4195c34f394d45517103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUhoMoWKsP4C7gOnpOLs3EXS31AhU3Cu5CmiZ2SjtTk3Hhztfw9XwSU0bBjasDh_87l4-QU4RzBNAXGbGSyAA5AyGB8T0ywEoLZgQ875MBgKgYKq4PyVHOKwA0OMIBmd63ya3rvKGuWdBx09Xst3NJx3kbfJdpG-lV2yzbEGNIXx-fmU6Wqc5d7Ro67Za1PyYH0a1zOPmpQ_J0PX2c3LLZw83dZDxjXkjTsTmXzkkz8mahyrlcjRwXKkLlopg7MVcGdMVVjNL7KNGogkVh5EIqhRpBDMlZP3eb2te3kDu7at9SU1Za5Lo8bqTRJYV9yqc25xSi3aZ649K7RbA7W7a3ZYstu7NleWF4z-SSbV5C-jP5X-gbDnVrtw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1270349497</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Moralism and Anti-Moralism: Aspects of Bonhoeffer’s Christian Ethic</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Coady, C. A. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Coady, C. A. J.</creatorcontrib><description>Dietrich Bonhoeffer's thinking about ethics and Christianity is a fascinating attempt to combine different, and often conflicting, strands in the Christian intellectual tradition. In this article, I outline his thinking, analyse the advantages and disadvantages in his approach, and relate it to developments in contemporary philosophy. His critique of an excessive stress upon principles and abstraction in opposition to a concern for concrete circumstances is, I argue, best seen as a necessary critique of what I call moralism rather than morality. It is also related to recent philosophical theories of particularism and the debates about ‘emergency ethics’ in current philosophy. On the negative side, Bonhoeffer has a tendency to treat non-Christian ethics as necessarily relativist and at times is excessively influenced by the elements in Christian theological tradition that are hostile to the natural and to non-Christian philosophy. In addition, his invocation of ‘the Divine mandates’ seems to have undesirable implications for some genuine values in liberal democratic theory and practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-1527</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-930X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11841-012-0340-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Bonhoeffer, Dietrich ; Christianity ; Education ; Ethics ; Morality ; Non-Western Philosophy ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Religion ; Religion ; Religious Studies ; Stress</subject><ispartof>Sophia, 2012-12, Vol.51 (4), p.449-464</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-b24aa496c9d5184256a235f08af3ba3b5907825ff4ccf4195c34f394d45517103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-b24aa496c9d5184256a235f08af3ba3b5907825ff4ccf4195c34f394d45517103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11841-012-0340-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11841-012-0340-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Coady, C. A. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Moralism and Anti-Moralism: Aspects of Bonhoeffer’s Christian Ethic</title><title>Sophia</title><addtitle>SOPHIA</addtitle><description>Dietrich Bonhoeffer's thinking about ethics and Christianity is a fascinating attempt to combine different, and often conflicting, strands in the Christian intellectual tradition. In this article, I outline his thinking, analyse the advantages and disadvantages in his approach, and relate it to developments in contemporary philosophy. His critique of an excessive stress upon principles and abstraction in opposition to a concern for concrete circumstances is, I argue, best seen as a necessary critique of what I call moralism rather than morality. It is also related to recent philosophical theories of particularism and the debates about ‘emergency ethics’ in current philosophy. On the negative side, Bonhoeffer has a tendency to treat non-Christian ethics as necessarily relativist and at times is excessively influenced by the elements in Christian theological tradition that are hostile to the natural and to non-Christian philosophy. In addition, his invocation of ‘the Divine mandates’ seems to have undesirable implications for some genuine values in liberal democratic theory and practice.</description><subject>Bonhoeffer, Dietrich</subject><subject>Christianity</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Non-Western Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Religion</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Religious Studies</subject><subject>Stress</subject><issn>0038-1527</issn><issn>1873-930X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>88H</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2N</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUhoMoWKsP4C7gOnpOLs3EXS31AhU3Cu5CmiZ2SjtTk3Hhztfw9XwSU0bBjasDh_87l4-QU4RzBNAXGbGSyAA5AyGB8T0ywEoLZgQ875MBgKgYKq4PyVHOKwA0OMIBmd63ya3rvKGuWdBx09Xst3NJx3kbfJdpG-lV2yzbEGNIXx-fmU6Wqc5d7Ro67Za1PyYH0a1zOPmpQ_J0PX2c3LLZw83dZDxjXkjTsTmXzkkz8mahyrlcjRwXKkLlopg7MVcGdMVVjNL7KNGogkVh5EIqhRpBDMlZP3eb2te3kDu7at9SU1Za5Lo8bqTRJYV9yqc25xSi3aZ649K7RbA7W7a3ZYstu7NleWF4z-SSbV5C-jP5X-gbDnVrtw</recordid><startdate>20121201</startdate><enddate>20121201</enddate><creator>Coady, C. A. J.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88H</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2N</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121201</creationdate><title>Moralism and Anti-Moralism: Aspects of Bonhoeffer’s Christian Ethic</title><author>Coady, C. A. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-b24aa496c9d5184256a235f08af3ba3b5907825ff4ccf4195c34f394d45517103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Bonhoeffer, Dietrich</topic><topic>Christianity</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Non-Western Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Religion</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Religious Studies</topic><topic>Stress</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Coady, C. A. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Religion Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences &amp; Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Access via Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Religion Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Sophia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Coady, C. A. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Moralism and Anti-Moralism: Aspects of Bonhoeffer’s Christian Ethic</atitle><jtitle>Sophia</jtitle><stitle>SOPHIA</stitle><date>2012-12-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>449</spage><epage>464</epage><pages>449-464</pages><issn>0038-1527</issn><eissn>1873-930X</eissn><abstract>Dietrich Bonhoeffer's thinking about ethics and Christianity is a fascinating attempt to combine different, and often conflicting, strands in the Christian intellectual tradition. In this article, I outline his thinking, analyse the advantages and disadvantages in his approach, and relate it to developments in contemporary philosophy. His critique of an excessive stress upon principles and abstraction in opposition to a concern for concrete circumstances is, I argue, best seen as a necessary critique of what I call moralism rather than morality. It is also related to recent philosophical theories of particularism and the debates about ‘emergency ethics’ in current philosophy. On the negative side, Bonhoeffer has a tendency to treat non-Christian ethics as necessarily relativist and at times is excessively influenced by the elements in Christian theological tradition that are hostile to the natural and to non-Christian philosophy. In addition, his invocation of ‘the Divine mandates’ seems to have undesirable implications for some genuine values in liberal democratic theory and practice.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11841-012-0340-2</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0038-1527
ispartof Sophia, 2012-12, Vol.51 (4), p.449-464
issn 0038-1527
1873-930X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1270349497
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Bonhoeffer, Dietrich
Christianity
Education
Ethics
Morality
Non-Western Philosophy
Philosophy
Philosophy of Religion
Religion
Religious Studies
Stress
title Moralism and Anti-Moralism: Aspects of Bonhoeffer’s Christian Ethic
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T00%3A07%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Moralism%20and%20Anti-Moralism:%20Aspects%20of%20Bonhoeffer%E2%80%99s%20Christian%20Ethic&rft.jtitle=Sophia&rft.au=Coady,%20C.%20A.%20J.&rft.date=2012-12-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=449&rft.epage=464&rft.pages=449-464&rft.issn=0038-1527&rft.eissn=1873-930X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11841-012-0340-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2867774871%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1270349497&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true