INEQUALITY I N LATIN AMERICA AND THE QUANDARY OF CLIENTELISM
[...]liberals presented a middle alternative, challenging both tyranny (the rule of one) and anarchy (the rule of many), but emphasizing that "nothing was as dangerous for personal freedom as the coercive powers of the state and its coercive apparatus" (157). [...]they established a system...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Latin American research review 2012-09, Vol.47 (3), p.191 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 191 |
| container_title | Latin American research review |
| container_volume | 47 |
| creator | Korzeniewicz, Roberto Patricio |
| description | [...]liberals presented a middle alternative, challenging both tyranny (the rule of one) and anarchy (the rule of many), but emphasizing that "nothing was as dangerous for personal freedom as the coercive powers of the state and its coercive apparatus" (157). [...]they established a system of "mutual controls" or "checks and balances," aimed at preventing the invasion of one branch of power into the affairs of others. [...]mainstream literature's hope that social policies will promote better citizenship and eliminate clientelism has a parallel in the assumption of more alternative writings that the same results might be pursued and achieved by progressive social movements and organizations. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1270317886</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2867697631</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_12703178863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNyrsOgjAYQOHGaCJe3uFPnEl6AVoTlwZKaFJKxDowEQcciBGl8v4y-ABOZzjfAgUkjmgYUS6WKMCYslDwI1mjjfc9xjgWLAnQSVt1vkqjXQMaLBjptAVZqlqnEqTNwBUKZmEzWTdQ5ZAaraxTRl_KHVrdbw_f7X_dokOuXFqEr3F4T53_tP0wjc95tYRyzAgXImH_qS8UZjJp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1270317886</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>INEQUALITY I N LATIN AMERICA AND THE QUANDARY OF CLIENTELISM</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Korzeniewicz, Roberto Patricio</creator><creatorcontrib>Korzeniewicz, Roberto Patricio</creatorcontrib><description>[...]liberals presented a middle alternative, challenging both tyranny (the rule of one) and anarchy (the rule of many), but emphasizing that "nothing was as dangerous for personal freedom as the coercive powers of the state and its coercive apparatus" (157). [...]they established a system of "mutual controls" or "checks and balances," aimed at preventing the invasion of one branch of power into the affairs of others. [...]mainstream literature's hope that social policies will promote better citizenship and eliminate clientelism has a parallel in the assumption of more alternative writings that the same results might be pursued and achieved by progressive social movements and organizations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-8791</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1542-4278</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LARRBM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Pittsburgh: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>19th century ; 20th century ; Checks and balances ; Citizenship ; Conservatism ; Despotism ; Egalitarianism ; Inequality ; Latin American history ; Patronage ; Politics ; Populism ; Property rights ; Rural areas ; Social activism ; Social movements ; Social policy ; Sovereignty ; Standard of living</subject><ispartof>Latin American research review, 2012-09, Vol.47 (3), p.191</ispartof><rights>Copyright Latin American Studies Association 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12824,27321,33751</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Korzeniewicz, Roberto Patricio</creatorcontrib><title>INEQUALITY I N LATIN AMERICA AND THE QUANDARY OF CLIENTELISM</title><title>Latin American research review</title><description>[...]liberals presented a middle alternative, challenging both tyranny (the rule of one) and anarchy (the rule of many), but emphasizing that "nothing was as dangerous for personal freedom as the coercive powers of the state and its coercive apparatus" (157). [...]they established a system of "mutual controls" or "checks and balances," aimed at preventing the invasion of one branch of power into the affairs of others. [...]mainstream literature's hope that social policies will promote better citizenship and eliminate clientelism has a parallel in the assumption of more alternative writings that the same results might be pursued and achieved by progressive social movements and organizations.</description><subject>19th century</subject><subject>20th century</subject><subject>Checks and balances</subject><subject>Citizenship</subject><subject>Conservatism</subject><subject>Despotism</subject><subject>Egalitarianism</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Latin American history</subject><subject>Patronage</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Populism</subject><subject>Property rights</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Social activism</subject><subject>Social movements</subject><subject>Social policy</subject><subject>Sovereignty</subject><subject>Standard of living</subject><issn>0023-8791</issn><issn>1542-4278</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>LD-</sourceid><sourceid>LD.</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>QXPDG</sourceid><recordid>eNqNyrsOgjAYQOHGaCJe3uFPnEl6AVoTlwZKaFJKxDowEQcciBGl8v4y-ABOZzjfAgUkjmgYUS6WKMCYslDwI1mjjfc9xjgWLAnQSVt1vkqjXQMaLBjptAVZqlqnEqTNwBUKZmEzWTdQ5ZAaraxTRl_KHVrdbw_f7X_dokOuXFqEr3F4T53_tP0wjc95tYRyzAgXImH_qS8UZjJp</recordid><startdate>20120901</startdate><enddate>20120901</enddate><creator>Korzeniewicz, Roberto Patricio</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>89V</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8BY</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BSCPQ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>LD-</scope><scope>LD.</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>UXAQP</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120901</creationdate><title>INEQUALITY I N LATIN AMERICA AND THE QUANDARY OF CLIENTELISM</title><author>Korzeniewicz, Roberto Patricio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_12703178863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>19th century</topic><topic>20th century</topic><topic>Checks and balances</topic><topic>Citizenship</topic><topic>Conservatism</topic><topic>Despotism</topic><topic>Egalitarianism</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Latin American history</topic><topic>Patronage</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Populism</topic><topic>Property rights</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Social activism</topic><topic>Social movements</topic><topic>Social policy</topic><topic>Sovereignty</topic><topic>Standard of living</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Korzeniewicz, Roberto Patricio</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PRISMA Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PRISMA Database with HAPI Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Black Studies Center</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Ethnic NewsWatch</collection><collection>Ethnic NewsWatch (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>ProQuest Black Studies</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Latin American research review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Korzeniewicz, Roberto Patricio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>INEQUALITY I N LATIN AMERICA AND THE QUANDARY OF CLIENTELISM</atitle><jtitle>Latin American research review</jtitle><date>2012-09-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>191</spage><pages>191-</pages><issn>0023-8791</issn><eissn>1542-4278</eissn><coden>LARRBM</coden><abstract>[...]liberals presented a middle alternative, challenging both tyranny (the rule of one) and anarchy (the rule of many), but emphasizing that "nothing was as dangerous for personal freedom as the coercive powers of the state and its coercive apparatus" (157). [...]they established a system of "mutual controls" or "checks and balances," aimed at preventing the invasion of one branch of power into the affairs of others. [...]mainstream literature's hope that social policies will promote better citizenship and eliminate clientelism has a parallel in the assumption of more alternative writings that the same results might be pursued and achieved by progressive social movements and organizations.</abstract><cop>Pittsburgh</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0023-8791 |
| ispartof | Latin American research review, 2012-09, Vol.47 (3), p.191 |
| issn | 0023-8791 1542-4278 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1270317886 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
| subjects | 19th century 20th century Checks and balances Citizenship Conservatism Despotism Egalitarianism Inequality Latin American history Patronage Politics Populism Property rights Rural areas Social activism Social movements Social policy Sovereignty Standard of living |
| title | INEQUALITY I N LATIN AMERICA AND THE QUANDARY OF CLIENTELISM |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T22%3A38%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=INEQUALITY%20I%20N%20LATIN%20AMERICA%20AND%20THE%20QUANDARY%20OF%20CLIENTELISM&rft.jtitle=Latin%20American%20research%20review&rft.au=Korzeniewicz,%20Roberto%20Patricio&rft.date=2012-09-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=191&rft.pages=191-&rft.issn=0023-8791&rft.eissn=1542-4278&rft.coden=LARRBM&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2867697631%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1270317886&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |