Investigating the mechanisms of learning from a constrained preparation for future learning activity

Many studies have shown benefits associated with engaging students in problem-solving activities prior to administering lessons. These problem-solving activities are assumed to activate relevant knowledge and allow students to develop some initial knowledge structures, which support understanding of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Instructional science 2013-01, Vol.41 (1), p.191-216
Hauptverfasser: Siler, Stephanie A., Klahr, David, Price, Norman
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 216
container_issue 1
container_start_page 191
container_title Instructional science
container_volume 41
creator Siler, Stephanie A.
Klahr, David
Price, Norman
description Many studies have shown benefits associated with engaging students in problem-solving activities prior to administering lessons. These problem-solving activities are assumed to activate relevant knowledge and allow students to develop some initial knowledge structures, which support understanding of the lesson. In this paper we report the results of two studies in which we investigated the underlying benefits of engaging in a preparatory activity—setting up experiments without running them or receiving feedback—prior to an interactive computerized lesson on experimental design compared to only engaging in the interactive lesson. We predicted that the seventh-grade participants who demonstrated some initial knowledge of the topic—experimental design—would benefit more from spending the whole time engaged in instructional activities. However, we expected students who did not demonstrate initial knowledge would benefit more from engaging in the preparatory activity, which would allow them to activate or develop initial knowledge that would aid their understanding of the subsequent instruction. The predicted condition by initial knowledge interaction was found in both studies. In Study 1, the benefit of only engaging in the instruction was found only for the lowest-knowledge of students who demonstrated initial knowledge. For students who did not demonstrate some initial knowledge, the benefit of completing the preparatory activity appeared to be due to the development of an understanding of the general goal of the activity rather than of specific knowledge of experimental design. Based on this finding, in Study 2, we investigated an initial goal by condition interaction. In fact, students who did not express an understanding of the task goal on the pretest benefited from engaging in the preparatory activity and students who did benefited more from the instruction. Again, this benefit appeared to be due to students' development of an appropriate understanding of the task goal during the preparatory activity.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11251-012-9224-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1268632663</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ998498</ericid><jstor_id>23372566</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23372566</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-c9340cf3196455e9b45aa4e95821349f9f0a585db6a6eb258ae51f0bc052b0e53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_QFAIuB69ec1MllJ8VApudB0yadJOaZOapAX_vSkj6srVXZzznXvvQeiSwC0BaO4SIVSQCgitJKW8ao7QiIiGVUQKeoxGABQqTpvmFJ2ltAIAwlsYofnU723K_ULn3i9wXlq8sWapfZ82CQeH11ZHf5BcDBussQk-5ah7b-d4G-1Wx0IGj12I2O3yLtpfRJvc7_v8eY5OnF4ne_E9x-j98eFt8lzNXp-mk_tZZZiQuTKScTCOEVlzIazsuNCaWylaShiXTjrQohXzrta17ahotRXEQWdA0A6sYGN0M-RuY_jYlbfUKuyiLysVoXVbM1rXrLjI4DIxpBStU9vYb3T8VATUoUw1lKlKmepQpmoKczUwNvbmx__wImXLZVtkOsipSH5h45_F_2ReD9Aq5RB_QiljDRXl0C-CGos4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1268632663</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigating the mechanisms of learning from a constrained preparation for future learning activity</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Siler, Stephanie A. ; Klahr, David ; Price, Norman</creator><creatorcontrib>Siler, Stephanie A. ; Klahr, David ; Price, Norman</creatorcontrib><description>Many studies have shown benefits associated with engaging students in problem-solving activities prior to administering lessons. These problem-solving activities are assumed to activate relevant knowledge and allow students to develop some initial knowledge structures, which support understanding of the lesson. In this paper we report the results of two studies in which we investigated the underlying benefits of engaging in a preparatory activity—setting up experiments without running them or receiving feedback—prior to an interactive computerized lesson on experimental design compared to only engaging in the interactive lesson. We predicted that the seventh-grade participants who demonstrated some initial knowledge of the topic—experimental design—would benefit more from spending the whole time engaged in instructional activities. However, we expected students who did not demonstrate initial knowledge would benefit more from engaging in the preparatory activity, which would allow them to activate or develop initial knowledge that would aid their understanding of the subsequent instruction. The predicted condition by initial knowledge interaction was found in both studies. In Study 1, the benefit of only engaging in the instruction was found only for the lowest-knowledge of students who demonstrated initial knowledge. For students who did not demonstrate some initial knowledge, the benefit of completing the preparatory activity appeared to be due to the development of an understanding of the general goal of the activity rather than of specific knowledge of experimental design. Based on this finding, in Study 2, we investigated an initial goal by condition interaction. In fact, students who did not express an understanding of the task goal on the pretest benefited from engaging in the preparatory activity and students who did benefited more from the instruction. Again, this benefit appeared to be due to students' development of an appropriate understanding of the task goal during the preparatory activity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-4277</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1952</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11251-012-9224-7</identifier><identifier>CODEN: INLSBJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Achievement Gains ; Cognitive style ; Comparative Analysis ; Education ; Educational activities ; Educational Psychology ; Engineering ; Experiment design ; Experiments ; Feedback (Response) ; Grade 4 ; Grade 7 ; Hemic system ; Individualized Instruction ; Instructional design ; Learner Engagement ; Learning ; Learning Activities ; Learning and Instruction ; Mathematics ; Middle school students ; Pedagogic Psychology ; Posttests ; Pretests ; Pretests Posttests ; Prior Learning ; Problem Solving ; Research Design ; Resistance (Psychology) ; Science teachers ; Teachers ; Teaching Methods ; Tutoring</subject><ispartof>Instructional science, 2013-01, Vol.41 (1), p.191-216</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-c9340cf3196455e9b45aa4e95821349f9f0a585db6a6eb258ae51f0bc052b0e53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-c9340cf3196455e9b45aa4e95821349f9f0a585db6a6eb258ae51f0bc052b0e53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23372566$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23372566$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ998498$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Siler, Stephanie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klahr, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Norman</creatorcontrib><title>Investigating the mechanisms of learning from a constrained preparation for future learning activity</title><title>Instructional science</title><addtitle>Instr Sci</addtitle><description>Many studies have shown benefits associated with engaging students in problem-solving activities prior to administering lessons. These problem-solving activities are assumed to activate relevant knowledge and allow students to develop some initial knowledge structures, which support understanding of the lesson. In this paper we report the results of two studies in which we investigated the underlying benefits of engaging in a preparatory activity—setting up experiments without running them or receiving feedback—prior to an interactive computerized lesson on experimental design compared to only engaging in the interactive lesson. We predicted that the seventh-grade participants who demonstrated some initial knowledge of the topic—experimental design—would benefit more from spending the whole time engaged in instructional activities. However, we expected students who did not demonstrate initial knowledge would benefit more from engaging in the preparatory activity, which would allow them to activate or develop initial knowledge that would aid their understanding of the subsequent instruction. The predicted condition by initial knowledge interaction was found in both studies. In Study 1, the benefit of only engaging in the instruction was found only for the lowest-knowledge of students who demonstrated initial knowledge. For students who did not demonstrate some initial knowledge, the benefit of completing the preparatory activity appeared to be due to the development of an understanding of the general goal of the activity rather than of specific knowledge of experimental design. Based on this finding, in Study 2, we investigated an initial goal by condition interaction. In fact, students who did not express an understanding of the task goal on the pretest benefited from engaging in the preparatory activity and students who did benefited more from the instruction. Again, this benefit appeared to be due to students' development of an appropriate understanding of the task goal during the preparatory activity.</description><subject>Achievement Gains</subject><subject>Cognitive style</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational activities</subject><subject>Educational Psychology</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Experiment design</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Grade 4</subject><subject>Grade 7</subject><subject>Hemic system</subject><subject>Individualized Instruction</subject><subject>Instructional design</subject><subject>Learner Engagement</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Activities</subject><subject>Learning and Instruction</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Middle school students</subject><subject>Pedagogic Psychology</subject><subject>Posttests</subject><subject>Pretests</subject><subject>Pretests Posttests</subject><subject>Prior Learning</subject><subject>Problem Solving</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Resistance (Psychology)</subject><subject>Science teachers</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Tutoring</subject><issn>0020-4277</issn><issn>1573-1952</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_QFAIuB69ec1MllJ8VApudB0yadJOaZOapAX_vSkj6srVXZzznXvvQeiSwC0BaO4SIVSQCgitJKW8ao7QiIiGVUQKeoxGABQqTpvmFJ2ltAIAwlsYofnU723K_ULn3i9wXlq8sWapfZ82CQeH11ZHf5BcDBussQk-5ah7b-d4G-1Wx0IGj12I2O3yLtpfRJvc7_v8eY5OnF4ne_E9x-j98eFt8lzNXp-mk_tZZZiQuTKScTCOEVlzIazsuNCaWylaShiXTjrQohXzrta17ahotRXEQWdA0A6sYGN0M-RuY_jYlbfUKuyiLysVoXVbM1rXrLjI4DIxpBStU9vYb3T8VATUoUw1lKlKmepQpmoKczUwNvbmx__wImXLZVtkOsipSH5h45_F_2ReD9Aq5RB_QiljDRXl0C-CGos4</recordid><startdate>20130101</startdate><enddate>20130101</enddate><creator>Siler, Stephanie A.</creator><creator>Klahr, David</creator><creator>Price, Norman</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130101</creationdate><title>Investigating the mechanisms of learning from a constrained preparation for future learning activity</title><author>Siler, Stephanie A. ; Klahr, David ; Price, Norman</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-c9340cf3196455e9b45aa4e95821349f9f0a585db6a6eb258ae51f0bc052b0e53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Achievement Gains</topic><topic>Cognitive style</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational activities</topic><topic>Educational Psychology</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Experiment design</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Grade 4</topic><topic>Grade 7</topic><topic>Hemic system</topic><topic>Individualized Instruction</topic><topic>Instructional design</topic><topic>Learner Engagement</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Activities</topic><topic>Learning and Instruction</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Middle school students</topic><topic>Pedagogic Psychology</topic><topic>Posttests</topic><topic>Pretests</topic><topic>Pretests Posttests</topic><topic>Prior Learning</topic><topic>Problem Solving</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Resistance (Psychology)</topic><topic>Science teachers</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Tutoring</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Siler, Stephanie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klahr, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Norman</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Instructional science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Siler, Stephanie A.</au><au>Klahr, David</au><au>Price, Norman</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ998498</ericid><atitle>Investigating the mechanisms of learning from a constrained preparation for future learning activity</atitle><jtitle>Instructional science</jtitle><stitle>Instr Sci</stitle><date>2013-01-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>191</spage><epage>216</epage><pages>191-216</pages><issn>0020-4277</issn><eissn>1573-1952</eissn><coden>INLSBJ</coden><abstract>Many studies have shown benefits associated with engaging students in problem-solving activities prior to administering lessons. These problem-solving activities are assumed to activate relevant knowledge and allow students to develop some initial knowledge structures, which support understanding of the lesson. In this paper we report the results of two studies in which we investigated the underlying benefits of engaging in a preparatory activity—setting up experiments without running them or receiving feedback—prior to an interactive computerized lesson on experimental design compared to only engaging in the interactive lesson. We predicted that the seventh-grade participants who demonstrated some initial knowledge of the topic—experimental design—would benefit more from spending the whole time engaged in instructional activities. However, we expected students who did not demonstrate initial knowledge would benefit more from engaging in the preparatory activity, which would allow them to activate or develop initial knowledge that would aid their understanding of the subsequent instruction. The predicted condition by initial knowledge interaction was found in both studies. In Study 1, the benefit of only engaging in the instruction was found only for the lowest-knowledge of students who demonstrated initial knowledge. For students who did not demonstrate some initial knowledge, the benefit of completing the preparatory activity appeared to be due to the development of an understanding of the general goal of the activity rather than of specific knowledge of experimental design. Based on this finding, in Study 2, we investigated an initial goal by condition interaction. In fact, students who did not express an understanding of the task goal on the pretest benefited from engaging in the preparatory activity and students who did benefited more from the instruction. Again, this benefit appeared to be due to students' development of an appropriate understanding of the task goal during the preparatory activity.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s11251-012-9224-7</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-4277
ispartof Instructional science, 2013-01, Vol.41 (1), p.191-216
issn 0020-4277
1573-1952
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1268632663
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Education Source; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Achievement Gains
Cognitive style
Comparative Analysis
Education
Educational activities
Educational Psychology
Engineering
Experiment design
Experiments
Feedback (Response)
Grade 4
Grade 7
Hemic system
Individualized Instruction
Instructional design
Learner Engagement
Learning
Learning Activities
Learning and Instruction
Mathematics
Middle school students
Pedagogic Psychology
Posttests
Pretests
Pretests Posttests
Prior Learning
Problem Solving
Research Design
Resistance (Psychology)
Science teachers
Teachers
Teaching Methods
Tutoring
title Investigating the mechanisms of learning from a constrained preparation for future learning activity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T09%3A17%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigating%20the%20mechanisms%20of%20learning%20from%20a%20constrained%20preparation%20for%20future%20learning%20activity&rft.jtitle=Instructional%20science&rft.au=Siler,%20Stephanie%20A.&rft.date=2013-01-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=191&rft.epage=216&rft.pages=191-216&rft.issn=0020-4277&rft.eissn=1573-1952&rft.coden=INLSBJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11251-012-9224-7&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23372566%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1268632663&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ998498&rft_jstor_id=23372566&rfr_iscdi=true