Long-term impact of family group conferences on re-offending: the Indianapolis restorative justice experiment
Objectives The purpose of the current study is to test the long-term effect of Family Group Conferences (FGCs) on recidivism prevalence and time to first re-offense for first-time youthful offenders. Methods The current study builds on an experiment with a reasonably large sample ( n = 782) conduct...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of experimental criminology 2012-12, Vol.8 (4), p.369-385 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 385 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 369 |
container_title | Journal of experimental criminology |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Jeong, Seokjin McGarrell, Edmund F. Hipple, Natalie Kroovand |
description | Objectives
The purpose of the current study is to test the long-term effect of Family Group Conferences (FGCs) on recidivism prevalence and time to first re-offense for first-time youthful offenders.
Methods
The current study builds on an experiment with a reasonably large sample (
n
= 782) conducted in Marion County (Indianapolis), Indiana, USA. The current study extends this work by following the cases for an additional 10 years. To examine the empirical relationships among the variables, this study employs a two-step approach. The initial analysis, employing logistic regression, measures prevalence of re-offending based on whether the youth ever was re-arrested during the follow-up period. The second step employs Cox Proportional-Hazards Regression to examine time until first re-offense.
Results
The findings revealed that when extended to a 12-year follow-up period, there were no significant differences between the FGC and control groups in re-offending prevalence or time to re-offense.
Conclusions
An earlier study suggests that treatment group youths experienced reduced risk in the short-term and there is no evidence in the present study to suggest that youths participating in FGCs were placed at greater risk for re-offending. Given these findings and the body of research suggesting improved outcomes for victims, continued experimentation with FGCs and related restorative processes seems warranted. Future studies would benefit from blocking procedures in the experimental design in order to examine whether treatment effects are moderated by gender, race, and initial type of offense. The lack of such blocking procedures represents a limitation of the current study. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11292-012-9158-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1266511736</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2857792591</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-d1655c6fabd6f9ca54cf468a25e375d6923699c3502925afda61e54d2bafd9593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMtOwzAQjBBIlMcHcLPE2eBH7CTcUMWjUiUucLZcZx1SNXawHUT_Hpdw4MJpR9qZ3ZkpiitKbigh1W2klDUME8pwQ0WN66NiQUXFcM2pOP7BHPNKkNPiLMYtISUrK74ohrV3HU4QBtQPozYJeYusHvrdHnXBTyMy3lkI4AxE5B0KgL214NredXcovQNaZaydHv2uj3kdkw869Z-AtlNMvQEEXyOEfgCXLooTq3cRLn_nefH2-PC6fMbrl6fV8n6NDacy4ZZKIYy0etNK2xgtSmNLWWsmIEdoZcO4bBrDBcmZhbatlhRE2bJNxo1o-HlxPd8dg_-YsiW19VNw-aWiTEpBacVlZtGZZYKPMYBVY7apw15Rog6tqrlVlVtVh1ZVnTVs1sTMdR2EP5f_FX0DmmF8Hw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1266511736</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Long-term impact of family group conferences on re-offending: the Indianapolis restorative justice experiment</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Jeong, Seokjin ; McGarrell, Edmund F. ; Hipple, Natalie Kroovand</creator><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Seokjin ; McGarrell, Edmund F. ; Hipple, Natalie Kroovand</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
The purpose of the current study is to test the long-term effect of Family Group Conferences (FGCs) on recidivism prevalence and time to first re-offense for first-time youthful offenders.
Methods
The current study builds on an experiment with a reasonably large sample (
n
= 782) conducted in Marion County (Indianapolis), Indiana, USA. The current study extends this work by following the cases for an additional 10 years. To examine the empirical relationships among the variables, this study employs a two-step approach. The initial analysis, employing logistic regression, measures prevalence of re-offending based on whether the youth ever was re-arrested during the follow-up period. The second step employs Cox Proportional-Hazards Regression to examine time until first re-offense.
Results
The findings revealed that when extended to a 12-year follow-up period, there were no significant differences between the FGC and control groups in re-offending prevalence or time to re-offense.
Conclusions
An earlier study suggests that treatment group youths experienced reduced risk in the short-term and there is no evidence in the present study to suggest that youths participating in FGCs were placed at greater risk for re-offending. Given these findings and the body of research suggesting improved outcomes for victims, continued experimentation with FGCs and related restorative processes seems warranted. Future studies would benefit from blocking procedures in the experimental design in order to examine whether treatment effects are moderated by gender, race, and initial type of offense. The lack of such blocking procedures represents a limitation of the current study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1573-3750</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11292-012-9158-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Criminology ; Criminology and Criminal Justice ; Families & family life ; Juvenile offenders ; Law and Criminology ; Political Science ; Recidivism ; Restorative justice ; Social Sciences</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental criminology, 2012-12, Vol.8 (4), p.369-385</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-d1655c6fabd6f9ca54cf468a25e375d6923699c3502925afda61e54d2bafd9593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-d1655c6fabd6f9ca54cf468a25e375d6923699c3502925afda61e54d2bafd9593</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11292-012-9158-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11292-012-9158-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Seokjin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGarrell, Edmund F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hipple, Natalie Kroovand</creatorcontrib><title>Long-term impact of family group conferences on re-offending: the Indianapolis restorative justice experiment</title><title>Journal of experimental criminology</title><addtitle>J Exp Criminol</addtitle><description>Objectives
The purpose of the current study is to test the long-term effect of Family Group Conferences (FGCs) on recidivism prevalence and time to first re-offense for first-time youthful offenders.
Methods
The current study builds on an experiment with a reasonably large sample (
n
= 782) conducted in Marion County (Indianapolis), Indiana, USA. The current study extends this work by following the cases for an additional 10 years. To examine the empirical relationships among the variables, this study employs a two-step approach. The initial analysis, employing logistic regression, measures prevalence of re-offending based on whether the youth ever was re-arrested during the follow-up period. The second step employs Cox Proportional-Hazards Regression to examine time until first re-offense.
Results
The findings revealed that when extended to a 12-year follow-up period, there were no significant differences between the FGC and control groups in re-offending prevalence or time to re-offense.
Conclusions
An earlier study suggests that treatment group youths experienced reduced risk in the short-term and there is no evidence in the present study to suggest that youths participating in FGCs were placed at greater risk for re-offending. Given these findings and the body of research suggesting improved outcomes for victims, continued experimentation with FGCs and related restorative processes seems warranted. Future studies would benefit from blocking procedures in the experimental design in order to examine whether treatment effects are moderated by gender, race, and initial type of offense. The lack of such blocking procedures represents a limitation of the current study.</description><subject>Criminology</subject><subject>Criminology and Criminal Justice</subject><subject>Families & family life</subject><subject>Juvenile offenders</subject><subject>Law and Criminology</subject><subject>Political Science</subject><subject>Recidivism</subject><subject>Restorative justice</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><issn>1573-3750</issn><issn>1572-8315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UMtOwzAQjBBIlMcHcLPE2eBH7CTcUMWjUiUucLZcZx1SNXawHUT_Hpdw4MJpR9qZ3ZkpiitKbigh1W2klDUME8pwQ0WN66NiQUXFcM2pOP7BHPNKkNPiLMYtISUrK74ohrV3HU4QBtQPozYJeYusHvrdHnXBTyMy3lkI4AxE5B0KgL214NredXcovQNaZaydHv2uj3kdkw869Z-AtlNMvQEEXyOEfgCXLooTq3cRLn_nefH2-PC6fMbrl6fV8n6NDacy4ZZKIYy0etNK2xgtSmNLWWsmIEdoZcO4bBrDBcmZhbatlhRE2bJNxo1o-HlxPd8dg_-YsiW19VNw-aWiTEpBacVlZtGZZYKPMYBVY7apw15Rog6tqrlVlVtVh1ZVnTVs1sTMdR2EP5f_FX0DmmF8Hw</recordid><startdate>20121201</startdate><enddate>20121201</enddate><creator>Jeong, Seokjin</creator><creator>McGarrell, Edmund F.</creator><creator>Hipple, Natalie Kroovand</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121201</creationdate><title>Long-term impact of family group conferences on re-offending: the Indianapolis restorative justice experiment</title><author>Jeong, Seokjin ; McGarrell, Edmund F. ; Hipple, Natalie Kroovand</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-d1655c6fabd6f9ca54cf468a25e375d6923699c3502925afda61e54d2bafd9593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Criminology</topic><topic>Criminology and Criminal Justice</topic><topic>Families & family life</topic><topic>Juvenile offenders</topic><topic>Law and Criminology</topic><topic>Political Science</topic><topic>Recidivism</topic><topic>Restorative justice</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Seokjin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGarrell, Edmund F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hipple, Natalie Kroovand</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental criminology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jeong, Seokjin</au><au>McGarrell, Edmund F.</au><au>Hipple, Natalie Kroovand</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Long-term impact of family group conferences on re-offending: the Indianapolis restorative justice experiment</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental criminology</jtitle><stitle>J Exp Criminol</stitle><date>2012-12-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>369</spage><epage>385</epage><pages>369-385</pages><issn>1573-3750</issn><eissn>1572-8315</eissn><abstract>Objectives
The purpose of the current study is to test the long-term effect of Family Group Conferences (FGCs) on recidivism prevalence and time to first re-offense for first-time youthful offenders.
Methods
The current study builds on an experiment with a reasonably large sample (
n
= 782) conducted in Marion County (Indianapolis), Indiana, USA. The current study extends this work by following the cases for an additional 10 years. To examine the empirical relationships among the variables, this study employs a two-step approach. The initial analysis, employing logistic regression, measures prevalence of re-offending based on whether the youth ever was re-arrested during the follow-up period. The second step employs Cox Proportional-Hazards Regression to examine time until first re-offense.
Results
The findings revealed that when extended to a 12-year follow-up period, there were no significant differences between the FGC and control groups in re-offending prevalence or time to re-offense.
Conclusions
An earlier study suggests that treatment group youths experienced reduced risk in the short-term and there is no evidence in the present study to suggest that youths participating in FGCs were placed at greater risk for re-offending. Given these findings and the body of research suggesting improved outcomes for victims, continued experimentation with FGCs and related restorative processes seems warranted. Future studies would benefit from blocking procedures in the experimental design in order to examine whether treatment effects are moderated by gender, race, and initial type of offense. The lack of such blocking procedures represents a limitation of the current study.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11292-012-9158-8</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1573-3750 |
ispartof | Journal of experimental criminology, 2012-12, Vol.8 (4), p.369-385 |
issn | 1573-3750 1572-8315 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1266511736 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Criminology Criminology and Criminal Justice Families & family life Juvenile offenders Law and Criminology Political Science Recidivism Restorative justice Social Sciences |
title | Long-term impact of family group conferences on re-offending: the Indianapolis restorative justice experiment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T06%3A49%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long-term%20impact%20of%20family%20group%20conferences%20on%20re-offending:%20the%20Indianapolis%20restorative%20justice%20experiment&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20criminology&rft.au=Jeong,%20Seokjin&rft.date=2012-12-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=369&rft.epage=385&rft.pages=369-385&rft.issn=1573-3750&rft.eissn=1572-8315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11292-012-9158-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2857792591%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1266511736&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |