Before the Mereological Fallacy: A Rejoinder to Rom Harré
The brain, he claims, is a part of a person's body, 'and a person's body is not part of that person in the relevant sense'.1 Organs of human beings, according to Harré, are tools that a person uses to perform tasks. [...]we presuppose that the normative implications of human psyc...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Philosophy (London) 2013-01, Vol.88 (1), p.141-148 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 148 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 141 |
| container_title | Philosophy (London) |
| container_volume | 88 |
| creator | Hacker, P. M. S. |
| description | The brain, he claims, is a part of a person's body, 'and a person's body is not part of that person in the relevant sense'.1 Organs of human beings, according to Harré, are tools that a person uses to perform tasks. [...]we presuppose that the normative implications of human psychological predicates can be taken through to the descriptions of lives of animals'. [...]we have the notion of tools and instruments that we make and use to fulfil certain functions. [...]we use instruments, such as spectacles or hearing aids, to improve our perceptual abilities in the case of defects in our sense organs, or to extend our perceptual acuity and range (in the case of microscope or telescope). |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S003181911200054X |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1266326361</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S003181911200054X</cupid><sourcerecordid>2856751071</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-9a88b1bc8c3ee9c924cdcdbc939a9a0de24f439b8e25e5b609c1fda2072b11433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFKw0AURQdRMFY_wN2A6-i8mWSS6a4Wa4WKUBW6CzOTl5qQdOokXfST_A5_zIR2IYirt7jn3AeXkGtgt8AguXtlTEAKCoAzxuJodUICiKQKU0hWpyQY4nDIz8lF21Y9IyFJAjK-x8J5pN0H0mf06Gq3Lq2u6UzXtbb7MZ3QJVau3OToaefo0jV0rr3__rokZ4WuW7w63hF5nz28Tefh4uXxaTpZhFZA0oVKp6kBY1MrEJVVPLK5zY1VQmmlWY48KiKhTIo8xthIpiwUueYs4QYgEmJEbg69W-8-d9h2WeV2ftO_zIBLKbgUEnoKDpT1rm09FtnWl432-wxYNkyU_Zmod8TR0Y3xZb7GX9X_Wj8S1meN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1266326361</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Before the Mereological Fallacy: A Rejoinder to Rom Harré</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Hacker, P. M. S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hacker, P. M. S.</creatorcontrib><description>The brain, he claims, is a part of a person's body, 'and a person's body is not part of that person in the relevant sense'.1 Organs of human beings, according to Harré, are tools that a person uses to perform tasks. [...]we presuppose that the normative implications of human psychological predicates can be taken through to the descriptions of lives of animals'. [...]we have the notion of tools and instruments that we make and use to fulfil certain functions. [...]we use instruments, such as spectacles or hearing aids, to improve our perceptual abilities in the case of defects in our sense organs, or to extend our perceptual acuity and range (in the case of microscope or telescope).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-8191</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-817X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S003181911200054X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Alliances ; Animals ; Brain ; Consciousness ; Divestiture ; Hearing aids ; Neurosciences ; Perception ; Philosophy ; Sensory systems</subject><ispartof>Philosophy (London), 2013-01, Vol.88 (1), p.141-148</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-9a88b1bc8c3ee9c924cdcdbc939a9a0de24f439b8e25e5b609c1fda2072b11433</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S003181911200054X/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hacker, P. M. S.</creatorcontrib><title>Before the Mereological Fallacy: A Rejoinder to Rom Harré</title><title>Philosophy (London)</title><addtitle>Philosophy</addtitle><description>The brain, he claims, is a part of a person's body, 'and a person's body is not part of that person in the relevant sense'.1 Organs of human beings, according to Harré, are tools that a person uses to perform tasks. [...]we presuppose that the normative implications of human psychological predicates can be taken through to the descriptions of lives of animals'. [...]we have the notion of tools and instruments that we make and use to fulfil certain functions. [...]we use instruments, such as spectacles or hearing aids, to improve our perceptual abilities in the case of defects in our sense organs, or to extend our perceptual acuity and range (in the case of microscope or telescope).</description><subject>Alliances</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Consciousness</subject><subject>Divestiture</subject><subject>Hearing aids</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Sensory systems</subject><issn>0031-8191</issn><issn>1469-817X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>88H</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2N</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMFKw0AURQdRMFY_wN2A6-i8mWSS6a4Wa4WKUBW6CzOTl5qQdOokXfST_A5_zIR2IYirt7jn3AeXkGtgt8AguXtlTEAKCoAzxuJodUICiKQKU0hWpyQY4nDIz8lF21Y9IyFJAjK-x8J5pN0H0mf06Gq3Lq2u6UzXtbb7MZ3QJVau3OToaefo0jV0rr3__rokZ4WuW7w63hF5nz28Tefh4uXxaTpZhFZA0oVKp6kBY1MrEJVVPLK5zY1VQmmlWY48KiKhTIo8xthIpiwUueYs4QYgEmJEbg69W-8-d9h2WeV2ftO_zIBLKbgUEnoKDpT1rm09FtnWl432-wxYNkyU_Zmod8TR0Y3xZb7GX9X_Wj8S1meN</recordid><startdate>201301</startdate><enddate>201301</enddate><creator>Hacker, P. M. S.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88H</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M2N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201301</creationdate><title>Before the Mereological Fallacy: A Rejoinder to Rom Harré</title><author>Hacker, P. M. S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-9a88b1bc8c3ee9c924cdcdbc939a9a0de24f439b8e25e5b609c1fda2072b11433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Alliances</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Consciousness</topic><topic>Divestiture</topic><topic>Hearing aids</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Sensory systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hacker, P. M. S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Religion Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences & Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Religion Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Philosophy (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hacker, P. M. S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Before the Mereological Fallacy: A Rejoinder to Rom Harré</atitle><jtitle>Philosophy (London)</jtitle><addtitle>Philosophy</addtitle><date>2013-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>141</spage><epage>148</epage><pages>141-148</pages><issn>0031-8191</issn><eissn>1469-817X</eissn><abstract>The brain, he claims, is a part of a person's body, 'and a person's body is not part of that person in the relevant sense'.1 Organs of human beings, according to Harré, are tools that a person uses to perform tasks. [...]we presuppose that the normative implications of human psychological predicates can be taken through to the descriptions of lives of animals'. [...]we have the notion of tools and instruments that we make and use to fulfil certain functions. [...]we use instruments, such as spectacles or hearing aids, to improve our perceptual abilities in the case of defects in our sense organs, or to extend our perceptual acuity and range (in the case of microscope or telescope).</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S003181911200054X</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0031-8191 |
| ispartof | Philosophy (London), 2013-01, Vol.88 (1), p.141-148 |
| issn | 0031-8191 1469-817X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1266326361 |
| source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
| subjects | Alliances Animals Brain Consciousness Divestiture Hearing aids Neurosciences Perception Philosophy Sensory systems |
| title | Before the Mereological Fallacy: A Rejoinder to Rom Harré |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T05%3A25%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Before%20the%20Mereological%20Fallacy:%20A%20Rejoinder%20to%20Rom%20Harr%C3%A9&rft.jtitle=Philosophy%20(London)&rft.au=Hacker,%20P.%20M.%20S.&rft.date=2013-01&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=148&rft.pages=141-148&rft.issn=0031-8191&rft.eissn=1469-817X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S003181911200054X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2856751071%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1266326361&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S003181911200054X&rfr_iscdi=true |