Rethinking Budgeting as a Continuous Process

In their article "Budgeting and Rebudgeting in Local Governments: Siamese Twins?" Eugenio Anessi-Pessina, Mariafrancesca Sicilia, and Ileana Steccolini address a very important subject for the community of public sector financial practitioners that is severely underinvestigated in the inte...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Public administration review 2012-11, Vol.72 (6), p.885-886
1. Verfasser: Alesani, Daniele
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 886
container_issue 6
container_start_page 885
container_title Public administration review
container_volume 72
creator Alesani, Daniele
description In their article "Budgeting and Rebudgeting in Local Governments: Siamese Twins?" Eugenio Anessi-Pessina, Mariafrancesca Sicilia, and Ileana Steccolini address a very important subject for the community of public sector financial practitioners that is severely underinvestigated in the international literature. The article argues that approved budgets are a starting point for a continuous process of budget execution and revision, or rebudgeting. The authors adopt an explanatory perspective and test hypotheses on the determinants of the rebudgeting process. This research speaks powerfully to the professional community, which is already used to thinking about budgeting as a yearlong cycle, far from a one-stop-shop exercise that culminates with the issuance of an organization's budget whose allocations are to be simply monitored and reported. As the authors note, future research should further investigate the rebudgeting process in terms of the roles and interactions of its main players.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02644.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1242476262</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2848452421</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3804-a87d4ea8bb1a704fa84afaeccafe9507507ec437f65664e15dd2e50f69ef8e513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF9LwzAUxYMoOKffoeCrrfmf7kXYhk5h6BibewxZezPbzXY2LW7f3tTKng0Xcu_NOSfwQyggOCL-3OcRERyHkvoFxYRGmErOo8MZ6p0ezlEPY8ZCxgS9RFfO5dgrCY976G4O9UdWbLNiE4yadAN12xkXmGBcFn5oysYFs6pMwLlrdGHNzsHN391Hy6fHxfg5nL5NXsbDaZiwGPPQxCrlYOL1mhiFuTUxN9ZAkhgLA4GVL0g4U1YKKTkQkaYUBLZyADYGQVgf3Xa5-6r8asDVOi-bqvBfakI55UpSSb0q7lRJVTpXgdX7Kvs01VETrFs2OtctAt0i0C0b_ctGH7z1obN-Zzs4_tunZ8vhvG19QNgFZK6GwynAVFstFVNCr14nekHE-0qNlB6wHzV1eH8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1242476262</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rethinking Budgeting as a Continuous Process</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>Education Source (EBSCOhost)</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Alesani, Daniele</creator><creatorcontrib>Alesani, Daniele</creatorcontrib><description>In their article "Budgeting and Rebudgeting in Local Governments: Siamese Twins?" Eugenio Anessi-Pessina, Mariafrancesca Sicilia, and Ileana Steccolini address a very important subject for the community of public sector financial practitioners that is severely underinvestigated in the international literature. The article argues that approved budgets are a starting point for a continuous process of budget execution and revision, or rebudgeting. The authors adopt an explanatory perspective and test hypotheses on the determinants of the rebudgeting process. This research speaks powerfully to the professional community, which is already used to thinking about budgeting as a yearlong cycle, far from a one-stop-shop exercise that culminates with the issuance of an organization's budget whose allocations are to be simply monitored and reported. As the authors note, future research should further investigate the rebudgeting process in terms of the roles and interactions of its main players.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-3352</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-6210</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02644.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PBARBM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Budgeting ; Local government ; Public sector</subject><ispartof>Public administration review, 2012-11, Vol.72 (6), p.885-886</ispartof><rights>2012 by The American Society for Public Administration</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Nov/Dec 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3804-a87d4ea8bb1a704fa84afaeccafe9507507ec437f65664e15dd2e50f69ef8e513</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1540-6210.2012.02644.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1540-6210.2012.02644.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alesani, Daniele</creatorcontrib><title>Rethinking Budgeting as a Continuous Process</title><title>Public administration review</title><addtitle>Public Admin Rev</addtitle><description>In their article "Budgeting and Rebudgeting in Local Governments: Siamese Twins?" Eugenio Anessi-Pessina, Mariafrancesca Sicilia, and Ileana Steccolini address a very important subject for the community of public sector financial practitioners that is severely underinvestigated in the international literature. The article argues that approved budgets are a starting point for a continuous process of budget execution and revision, or rebudgeting. The authors adopt an explanatory perspective and test hypotheses on the determinants of the rebudgeting process. This research speaks powerfully to the professional community, which is already used to thinking about budgeting as a yearlong cycle, far from a one-stop-shop exercise that culminates with the issuance of an organization's budget whose allocations are to be simply monitored and reported. As the authors note, future research should further investigate the rebudgeting process in terms of the roles and interactions of its main players.</description><subject>Budgeting</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Public sector</subject><issn>0033-3352</issn><issn>1540-6210</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkF9LwzAUxYMoOKffoeCrrfmf7kXYhk5h6BibewxZezPbzXY2LW7f3tTKng0Xcu_NOSfwQyggOCL-3OcRERyHkvoFxYRGmErOo8MZ6p0ezlEPY8ZCxgS9RFfO5dgrCY976G4O9UdWbLNiE4yadAN12xkXmGBcFn5oysYFs6pMwLlrdGHNzsHN391Hy6fHxfg5nL5NXsbDaZiwGPPQxCrlYOL1mhiFuTUxN9ZAkhgLA4GVL0g4U1YKKTkQkaYUBLZyADYGQVgf3Xa5-6r8asDVOi-bqvBfakI55UpSSb0q7lRJVTpXgdX7Kvs01VETrFs2OtctAt0i0C0b_ctGH7z1obN-Zzs4_tunZ8vhvG19QNgFZK6GwynAVFstFVNCr14nekHE-0qNlB6wHzV1eH8</recordid><startdate>201211</startdate><enddate>201211</enddate><creator>Alesani, Daniele</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>American Society for Public Administration</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201211</creationdate><title>Rethinking Budgeting as a Continuous Process</title><author>Alesani, Daniele</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3804-a87d4ea8bb1a704fa84afaeccafe9507507ec437f65664e15dd2e50f69ef8e513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Budgeting</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Public sector</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alesani, Daniele</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Public administration review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alesani, Daniele</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rethinking Budgeting as a Continuous Process</atitle><jtitle>Public administration review</jtitle><addtitle>Public Admin Rev</addtitle><date>2012-11</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>885</spage><epage>886</epage><pages>885-886</pages><issn>0033-3352</issn><eissn>1540-6210</eissn><coden>PBARBM</coden><abstract>In their article "Budgeting and Rebudgeting in Local Governments: Siamese Twins?" Eugenio Anessi-Pessina, Mariafrancesca Sicilia, and Ileana Steccolini address a very important subject for the community of public sector financial practitioners that is severely underinvestigated in the international literature. The article argues that approved budgets are a starting point for a continuous process of budget execution and revision, or rebudgeting. The authors adopt an explanatory perspective and test hypotheses on the determinants of the rebudgeting process. This research speaks powerfully to the professional community, which is already used to thinking about budgeting as a yearlong cycle, far from a one-stop-shop exercise that culminates with the issuance of an organization's budget whose allocations are to be simply monitored and reported. As the authors note, future research should further investigate the rebudgeting process in terms of the roles and interactions of its main players.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02644.x</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-3352
ispartof Public administration review, 2012-11, Vol.72 (6), p.885-886
issn 0033-3352
1540-6210
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1242476262
source Jstor Complete Legacy; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; Education Source (EBSCOhost); Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Business Source Complete
subjects Budgeting
Local government
Public sector
title Rethinking Budgeting as a Continuous Process
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T13%3A27%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rethinking%20Budgeting%20as%20a%20Continuous%20Process&rft.jtitle=Public%20administration%20review&rft.au=Alesani,%20Daniele&rft.date=2012-11&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=885&rft.epage=886&rft.pages=885-886&rft.issn=0033-3352&rft.eissn=1540-6210&rft.coden=PBARBM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02644.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2848452421%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1242476262&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true