Global macroecology of bird assemblages in urbanized and semi-natural ecosystems
Aim: Despite the increasing pace of urbanization, little is known about how this process affects biodiversity globally. We investigate macroecological patterns of bird assemblages in urbanized areas relative to semi-natural ecosystems. Location: World-wide. Methods: We use a database of quantitative...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Global ecology and biogeography 2011-05, Vol.20 (3), p.426-436 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 436 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 426 |
container_title | Global ecology and biogeography |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Pautasso, Marco Böhning-Gaese, Katrin Clergeau, Philippe Cueto, Victor R. Dinetti, Marco Fernández-Juricic, Esteban Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki, Marja-Liisa Jokimäki, Jukka McKinney, Michael L. Sodhi, Navjot S. Storch, David Tomialojc, Ludwik Weisberg, Peter J. Woinarski, John Fuller, Richard A. Cantarello, Elena |
description | Aim: Despite the increasing pace of urbanization, little is known about how this process affects biodiversity globally. We investigate macroecological patterns of bird assemblages in urbanized areas relative to semi-natural ecosystems. Location: World-wide. Methods: We use a database of quantitative bird surveys to compare key assemblage structure parameters for plots in urbanized and semi-natural ecosystems controlling for spatial autocorrelation and survey methodology. We use the term 'urbanized' instead of 'urban' ecosystems as many of the plots were not located in the centre of towns but in remnant habitat patches within conurbations. Results: Some macroecological relationships were conserved in urbanized landscapes. Species-area, species-abundance and species-biomass relationships did not differ significantly between urbanized and non-urbanized environments. However, there were differences in the relationships between productivity and assemblage structure. In forests, species richness increased with productivity; in both forests and open habitats, the evenness of species abundances declined as productivity increased. Among urbanized plots, instead, both species richness and the evenness of species abundances were independent of variation in productivity. Main conclusions: Remnant habitats within urbanized areas are subject to many ecological alterations, yet key macroecological patterns differ remarkably little in urbanized versus non-urbanized plots. Our results support the need for increased conservation activities in urbanized landscapes, particularly given the additional benefits of local experiences of biodiversity for the human population. With increasing urbanization world-wide, broad-scale efforts are needed to understand and manage the effects of this driver of change on biodiversity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00616.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1242433378</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41239261</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41239261</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4316-b1557b8c434eca1310ca8a05d44599e90988170d8ea07df6c01d6150daf5f0a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kF1LwzAUhosoOKc_QSiIl60nzUdT8EZlbuLQXSh6F07bdLT2YyYbbv56Uzeam5yc931yDq_n-QRC4s5NFRImRCAjKsMIXBdAEBFuj7zRIBwPdfR56p1ZWwEAZ1yMvMW07lKs_QYz0-msq7vlzu8KPy1N7qO1uklrXGrrl62_MSm25a92Qpv7TiqDFtcb43BH2p1d68aeeycF1lZfHO6x9_44eXuYBfPX6dPD3TzIGCUiSAnncSrdg-kMCSWQoUTgOWM8SXQCiZQkhlxqhDgvRAYkF4RDjgUvwAFj72r_78p03xtt16rqNqZ1IxWJWMQopbF0ruuDC22GdWGwzUqrVqZs0OxUxEC4Sdz5bve-n7LWu0EnoPqQVaX6_FSfpepDVv8hq62aTu5d4fDLPV7ZdWcGnJGIJpHolw32euky2g46mi8lYhpz9fEyVc9zPmN8IVVC_wAl6ont</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1242433378</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Global macroecology of bird assemblages in urbanized and semi-natural ecosystems</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Pautasso, Marco ; Böhning-Gaese, Katrin ; Clergeau, Philippe ; Cueto, Victor R. ; Dinetti, Marco ; Fernández-Juricic, Esteban ; Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki, Marja-Liisa ; Jokimäki, Jukka ; McKinney, Michael L. ; Sodhi, Navjot S. ; Storch, David ; Tomialojc, Ludwik ; Weisberg, Peter J. ; Woinarski, John ; Fuller, Richard A. ; Cantarello, Elena</creator><creatorcontrib>Pautasso, Marco ; Böhning-Gaese, Katrin ; Clergeau, Philippe ; Cueto, Victor R. ; Dinetti, Marco ; Fernández-Juricic, Esteban ; Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki, Marja-Liisa ; Jokimäki, Jukka ; McKinney, Michael L. ; Sodhi, Navjot S. ; Storch, David ; Tomialojc, Ludwik ; Weisberg, Peter J. ; Woinarski, John ; Fuller, Richard A. ; Cantarello, Elena</creatorcontrib><description>Aim: Despite the increasing pace of urbanization, little is known about how this process affects biodiversity globally. We investigate macroecological patterns of bird assemblages in urbanized areas relative to semi-natural ecosystems. Location: World-wide. Methods: We use a database of quantitative bird surveys to compare key assemblage structure parameters for plots in urbanized and semi-natural ecosystems controlling for spatial autocorrelation and survey methodology. We use the term 'urbanized' instead of 'urban' ecosystems as many of the plots were not located in the centre of towns but in remnant habitat patches within conurbations. Results: Some macroecological relationships were conserved in urbanized landscapes. Species-area, species-abundance and species-biomass relationships did not differ significantly between urbanized and non-urbanized environments. However, there were differences in the relationships between productivity and assemblage structure. In forests, species richness increased with productivity; in both forests and open habitats, the evenness of species abundances declined as productivity increased. Among urbanized plots, instead, both species richness and the evenness of species abundances were independent of variation in productivity. Main conclusions: Remnant habitats within urbanized areas are subject to many ecological alterations, yet key macroecological patterns differ remarkably little in urbanized versus non-urbanized plots. Our results support the need for increased conservation activities in urbanized landscapes, particularly given the additional benefits of local experiences of biodiversity for the human population. With increasing urbanization world-wide, broad-scale efforts are needed to understand and manage the effects of this driver of change on biodiversity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1466-822X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-8238</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00616.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GEBIFS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Aves ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birds ; conservation biogeography ; Conservation biology ; Ecosystems ; environmental impacts ; Forest habitats ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Habitat conservation ; habitat heterogeneity ; Habitats ; more-individuals hypothesis ; rarity ; scale ; Species ; species-energy relationship ; species-people coexistence ; Sustainable urbanism ; Synecology ; Urban ecology ; Urban habitats ; Urbanization ; Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><ispartof>Global ecology and biogeography, 2011-05, Vol.20 (3), p.426-436</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 Blackwell Publishing</rights><rights>2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4316-b1557b8c434eca1310ca8a05d44599e90988170d8ea07df6c01d6150daf5f0a13</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41239261$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41239261$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24060985$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pautasso, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Böhning-Gaese, Katrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clergeau, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cueto, Victor R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dinetti, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Juricic, Esteban</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki, Marja-Liisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jokimäki, Jukka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKinney, Michael L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sodhi, Navjot S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storch, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomialojc, Ludwik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weisberg, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woinarski, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuller, Richard A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cantarello, Elena</creatorcontrib><title>Global macroecology of bird assemblages in urbanized and semi-natural ecosystems</title><title>Global ecology and biogeography</title><description>Aim: Despite the increasing pace of urbanization, little is known about how this process affects biodiversity globally. We investigate macroecological patterns of bird assemblages in urbanized areas relative to semi-natural ecosystems. Location: World-wide. Methods: We use a database of quantitative bird surveys to compare key assemblage structure parameters for plots in urbanized and semi-natural ecosystems controlling for spatial autocorrelation and survey methodology. We use the term 'urbanized' instead of 'urban' ecosystems as many of the plots were not located in the centre of towns but in remnant habitat patches within conurbations. Results: Some macroecological relationships were conserved in urbanized landscapes. Species-area, species-abundance and species-biomass relationships did not differ significantly between urbanized and non-urbanized environments. However, there were differences in the relationships between productivity and assemblage structure. In forests, species richness increased with productivity; in both forests and open habitats, the evenness of species abundances declined as productivity increased. Among urbanized plots, instead, both species richness and the evenness of species abundances were independent of variation in productivity. Main conclusions: Remnant habitats within urbanized areas are subject to many ecological alterations, yet key macroecological patterns differ remarkably little in urbanized versus non-urbanized plots. Our results support the need for increased conservation activities in urbanized landscapes, particularly given the additional benefits of local experiences of biodiversity for the human population. With increasing urbanization world-wide, broad-scale efforts are needed to understand and manage the effects of this driver of change on biodiversity.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>conservation biogeography</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>environmental impacts</subject><subject>Forest habitats</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>habitat heterogeneity</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>more-individuals hypothesis</subject><subject>rarity</subject><subject>scale</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>species-energy relationship</subject><subject>species-people coexistence</subject><subject>Sustainable urbanism</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Urban ecology</subject><subject>Urban habitats</subject><subject>Urbanization</subject><subject>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><issn>1466-822X</issn><issn>1466-8238</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kF1LwzAUhosoOKc_QSiIl60nzUdT8EZlbuLQXSh6F07bdLT2YyYbbv56Uzeam5yc931yDq_n-QRC4s5NFRImRCAjKsMIXBdAEBFuj7zRIBwPdfR56p1ZWwEAZ1yMvMW07lKs_QYz0-msq7vlzu8KPy1N7qO1uklrXGrrl62_MSm25a92Qpv7TiqDFtcb43BH2p1d68aeeycF1lZfHO6x9_44eXuYBfPX6dPD3TzIGCUiSAnncSrdg-kMCSWQoUTgOWM8SXQCiZQkhlxqhDgvRAYkF4RDjgUvwAFj72r_78p03xtt16rqNqZ1IxWJWMQopbF0ruuDC22GdWGwzUqrVqZs0OxUxEC4Sdz5bve-n7LWu0EnoPqQVaX6_FSfpepDVv8hq62aTu5d4fDLPV7ZdWcGnJGIJpHolw32euky2g46mi8lYhpz9fEyVc9zPmN8IVVC_wAl6ont</recordid><startdate>201105</startdate><enddate>201105</enddate><creator>Pautasso, Marco</creator><creator>Böhning-Gaese, Katrin</creator><creator>Clergeau, Philippe</creator><creator>Cueto, Victor R.</creator><creator>Dinetti, Marco</creator><creator>Fernández-Juricic, Esteban</creator><creator>Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki, Marja-Liisa</creator><creator>Jokimäki, Jukka</creator><creator>McKinney, Michael L.</creator><creator>Sodhi, Navjot S.</creator><creator>Storch, David</creator><creator>Tomialojc, Ludwik</creator><creator>Weisberg, Peter J.</creator><creator>Woinarski, John</creator><creator>Fuller, Richard A.</creator><creator>Cantarello, Elena</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201105</creationdate><title>Global macroecology of bird assemblages in urbanized and semi-natural ecosystems</title><author>Pautasso, Marco ; Böhning-Gaese, Katrin ; Clergeau, Philippe ; Cueto, Victor R. ; Dinetti, Marco ; Fernández-Juricic, Esteban ; Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki, Marja-Liisa ; Jokimäki, Jukka ; McKinney, Michael L. ; Sodhi, Navjot S. ; Storch, David ; Tomialojc, Ludwik ; Weisberg, Peter J. ; Woinarski, John ; Fuller, Richard A. ; Cantarello, Elena</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4316-b1557b8c434eca1310ca8a05d44599e90988170d8ea07df6c01d6150daf5f0a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>conservation biogeography</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>environmental impacts</topic><topic>Forest habitats</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>habitat heterogeneity</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>more-individuals hypothesis</topic><topic>rarity</topic><topic>scale</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>species-energy relationship</topic><topic>species-people coexistence</topic><topic>Sustainable urbanism</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Urban ecology</topic><topic>Urban habitats</topic><topic>Urbanization</topic><topic>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pautasso, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Böhning-Gaese, Katrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clergeau, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cueto, Victor R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dinetti, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Juricic, Esteban</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki, Marja-Liisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jokimäki, Jukka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKinney, Michael L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sodhi, Navjot S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storch, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomialojc, Ludwik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weisberg, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woinarski, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuller, Richard A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cantarello, Elena</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Global ecology and biogeography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pautasso, Marco</au><au>Böhning-Gaese, Katrin</au><au>Clergeau, Philippe</au><au>Cueto, Victor R.</au><au>Dinetti, Marco</au><au>Fernández-Juricic, Esteban</au><au>Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki, Marja-Liisa</au><au>Jokimäki, Jukka</au><au>McKinney, Michael L.</au><au>Sodhi, Navjot S.</au><au>Storch, David</au><au>Tomialojc, Ludwik</au><au>Weisberg, Peter J.</au><au>Woinarski, John</au><au>Fuller, Richard A.</au><au>Cantarello, Elena</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Global macroecology of bird assemblages in urbanized and semi-natural ecosystems</atitle><jtitle>Global ecology and biogeography</jtitle><date>2011-05</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>426</spage><epage>436</epage><pages>426-436</pages><issn>1466-822X</issn><eissn>1466-8238</eissn><coden>GEBIFS</coden><abstract>Aim: Despite the increasing pace of urbanization, little is known about how this process affects biodiversity globally. We investigate macroecological patterns of bird assemblages in urbanized areas relative to semi-natural ecosystems. Location: World-wide. Methods: We use a database of quantitative bird surveys to compare key assemblage structure parameters for plots in urbanized and semi-natural ecosystems controlling for spatial autocorrelation and survey methodology. We use the term 'urbanized' instead of 'urban' ecosystems as many of the plots were not located in the centre of towns but in remnant habitat patches within conurbations. Results: Some macroecological relationships were conserved in urbanized landscapes. Species-area, species-abundance and species-biomass relationships did not differ significantly between urbanized and non-urbanized environments. However, there were differences in the relationships between productivity and assemblage structure. In forests, species richness increased with productivity; in both forests and open habitats, the evenness of species abundances declined as productivity increased. Among urbanized plots, instead, both species richness and the evenness of species abundances were independent of variation in productivity. Main conclusions: Remnant habitats within urbanized areas are subject to many ecological alterations, yet key macroecological patterns differ remarkably little in urbanized versus non-urbanized plots. Our results support the need for increased conservation activities in urbanized landscapes, particularly given the additional benefits of local experiences of biodiversity for the human population. With increasing urbanization world-wide, broad-scale efforts are needed to understand and manage the effects of this driver of change on biodiversity.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00616.x</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1466-822X |
ispartof | Global ecology and biogeography, 2011-05, Vol.20 (3), p.426-436 |
issn | 1466-822X 1466-8238 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1242433378 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Aves Biological and medical sciences Birds conservation biogeography Conservation biology Ecosystems environmental impacts Forest habitats Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects Habitat conservation habitat heterogeneity Habitats more-individuals hypothesis rarity scale Species species-energy relationship species-people coexistence Sustainable urbanism Synecology Urban ecology Urban habitats Urbanization Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution |
title | Global macroecology of bird assemblages in urbanized and semi-natural ecosystems |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T23%3A31%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Global%20macroecology%20of%20bird%20assemblages%20in%20urbanized%20and%20semi-natural%20ecosystems&rft.jtitle=Global%20ecology%20and%20biogeography&rft.au=Pautasso,%20Marco&rft.date=2011-05&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=426&rft.epage=436&rft.pages=426-436&rft.issn=1466-822X&rft.eissn=1466-8238&rft.coden=GEBIFS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00616.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41239261%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1242433378&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=41239261&rfr_iscdi=true |